Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Probus

International Journal of Romance Linguistics

Editor-in-Chief: Wetzels, W. Leo


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.435
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.830

CiteScore 2018: 0.85

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.255
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.668

Online
ISSN
1613-4079
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 31, Issue 1

Issues

Not a fact: A synchronic analysis of el hecho de and o facto de

Patrícia Amaral / Manuel Delicado Cantero
  • Corresponding author
  • School of Literature, Languages and Linguistics, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2019-05-10 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/probus-2018-1007

Abstract

This paper provides empirical evidence showing that the clause-taking nominals el hecho de (Spanish) and o facto de (Portuguese) are not reliable tests of factivity of predicates, as commonly assumed in the literature. Naturally occurring data from both languages show that these nominals are compatible with a wide range of predicates and that they occur in sentences with both factive and non-factive interpretations. Our findings contribute to the debate on the syntactic and semantic properties of clause-taking nominal constructions, clausal nominalization in Ibero-Romance, and to current research on the nature of factivity.

Keywords: factivity; clause-taking nominals; nominalization; Spanish; Portuguese

References

  • Alonso Ramos, Margarita. 2004. Las construcciones con verbo de apoyo. Madrid: Visor.Google Scholar

  • Âmbar, Manuela & Ángel Luis Jiménez-Fernández. 2017. Inflected infinitives in Romance. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to syntax, 1–42. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Augusto, Marina R. A. 2003. Padrões de extração em estruturas factivas [Patterns of extraction in factive structures]. Ph.D. dissertation. Universidade Estadual de Campinas.Google Scholar

  • Barbosa, Pilar. 2013. Implicação e pressuposição na subordinação argumental finita [Implication and presupposition in fintie argumental subordination]. In B. P. Eduardo, Maria Raposo, Fernanda Bacelar, Maria Antónia Mota, Luísa Segura & Amália Mendes (eds.), Gramática do português [Portuguese grammar], 1821–1897. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.Google Scholar

  • Beaver, David. 2010. Have you noticed that your belly button lint colour is related to the colour of your clothing? In Rainer Bäuerle, Uwe Reyle & Thomas E. Zimmermann (eds.), Presuppositions and discourse: Essays offered to Hans Kamp, 65–99. Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar

  • Becker, Martin G. 2014. Informational status and the semantics of mood in Spanish preposed complement clauses. In Andreas Dufter & Álvaro S. Octavio de Toledo (eds.), Left sentence peripheries in Spanish: Diachronic, variationist and comparative perspectives, 283–308. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Bosque, Ignacio. 2001. On the weight of light predicates. In Julia Herschenson, Enrique Mallén & Karen Zagona (eds.), Features and interfaces in Romance, 23–38. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Brito, Ana Maria. 2013. Tensed and non-tensed nominalization of the infinitive in Portuguese. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 12(1). 7–40.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chierchia, Gennaro & Sally McConnell-Ginet. 1990. Meaning and grammar. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Cunha, Celso & Lindley Cintra. 1984. Nova gramática do português contemporâneo [New grammar of present-day Portuguese]. Lisboa: Edições Sá da Costa.Google Scholar

  • Dam-Jensen, Helle. 2008. Determination, nominalisation and conceptual processing. In Henrik Høeg Müller & Alex Klinge (eds.), Essays on nominal determination: From morphology to discourse management, 287–308. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • de Cuba, Carlos. 2017. Noun complement clauses as referential modifiers. Glossa 2(1). 1–46.Google Scholar

  • de Cuba, Carlos & Ürögdi. Barbara. 2010. Clearing up the facts on complementation. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics. Volume 16.1, Article 6. Available at: http://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol16/iss1/6.

  • de Cuba, Carlos & Barbara Ürögdi. 2009. Eliminating factivity from syntax: Sentential complements in Hungarian. In Marcel Den Dikken & Robert Vago (eds.), Approaches to Hungarian. Volume 11: Papers from the 2007 New York conference, 29–64. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • De Marneffe, Marie Catherine, Chris Manning & Christopher Potts. 2011. Veridicality and utterance understanding. In 2011 Fifth IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing, 430–443. Palo Alto, CA. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=6061472&isnumber=6061289

  • de Miguel, Elena. 2008. Construcciones con verbos de apoyo en español. De cómo entran los nombres en la órbita de los verbos. In Inés Olza Moreno, Manuel Casado Velarde & Ramón González Ruiz (eds.), Actas del XXXVII Simposio Internacional de la SEL, 567–578. Pamplona: Universidad de Navarra.Google Scholar

  • Delicado Cantero, Manuel. 2013a. Prepositional clauses in Spanish. A diachronic and comparative syntactic study. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Delicado Cantero, Manuel. 2013b. Clausal substantivization in Spanish: Syntax and constraints. Australian Journal of Linguistics 33(2). 106–120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Demonte, Violeta. 1977. La subordinación sustantiva. Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar

  • Dias, Epifânio Silva. 1970. Syntaxe histórica portuguesa [Historical Portuguese syntax]. Lisboa: Liv. Clássica Editora.Google Scholar

  • Dudley, Rachel, Meredith Rowe, Valentine Hacquard & Jeffrey Lidz. 2017. Discovering the factivity of know from its distribution. Poster presented at SALT, University of Maryland, 2017.Google Scholar

  • Figueira, Rosa A. 1974. Verbos introdutores de pressupostos [Presupposition-introducing verbs]. Master thesis. Campinas: Unicamp.Google Scholar

  • Giannakidou, Anastasia & Alda Mari. 2015. Mixed (non)veridicality and mood choice in complement clauses: Starting with emotive verbs. http://home.uchicago.edu/~giannaki/pubs/GM.subjunctive.typology.pdf.

  • Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument structure. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Han, Hye J. 2005. A nominal-shell for CPs: Beyond subject CPs. In Rodney L. Edwards, Patrick J. Midtlyng, Colin L. Sprague & Kjersti G. Stensrud (eds.), Proceedings from the annual meeting of the Chicago linguistic society 41. 1. The main session, 95–109. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar

  • Inhoff, Albrecht W. 1985. The effect of factivity on lexical retrieval and postlexical processes during eye fixations in reading. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 14(1). 45–56.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Karttunen, Lauri. 1971. The logic of English predicate complement constructions. Bloomington: Publications of the Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar

  • Karttunen, Lauri. 2016. Presupposition: What went wrong? In Mary Moroney, Carol-Rose Little, Jacob Collard & Dan Burgdorf (eds.), Semantics and linguistic theory (SALT) 26, 705–731. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar

  • Karttunen, Lauri & Annie Zaenen. 2005. Veridicity. In Annotating, extracting and reasoning about time and events. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings 05151. http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2005/314/.

  • Kiparsky, Paul & Carol Kiparsky. 1971 [1970]. Fact. In Danny D. Steinberg & Leon A. Jakobovits (eds.), Semantics. An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology, 345–369. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Kornfilt, Jaklin & John Whitman. 2011. Afterword: Nominalizations in syntactic theory. Lingua 121(7). 1297–1313.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kryk, Barbara. 1980. Is factivity a fact? Some syntactic evidence from English and polish. Studia Filologiczne 10. 7–21.Google Scholar

  • Leonetti, Manuel. 1999. La subordinación sustantiva: Las subordinadas enunciativas en los complementos nominales. In Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, 2083–2104. Madrid: Espasa-Real Academia Española.Google Scholar

  • Levinson, Stephen. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Matsumoto, Yoshiko, Bernard Comrie & Peter Sells (eds.). 2017. Noun-modifying clause constructions in languages of Eurasia. Rethinking theoretical and geographical boundaries. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Mendívil Giró, José Luis. 1999. Las palabras disgregadas. Sintaxis de las expresiones idiomáticas y los predicados complejos. Zaragoza: Prensas Universitarias de Zaragoza.Google Scholar

  • Nairn, Rowan, Cleo Condoravdi & Lauri Karttunen. 2006. Computing relative polarity for textual inference. In Proceedings of ICoS-5 (Inference in Computational Semantics). http://web.stanford.edu/~cleoc/icos2006-final.pdf

  • Palmerini, Mónica. 2006. Factividad en la nominalización: Sobre la estructura [el hecho/il fatto + subordinada] en español e italiano. In Cristina Mourón Figueroa & Teresa Moralejo Gárate (eds.), Studies in contrastive linguistics. Proceedings of the 4th international contrastive linguistics conference, 761–768. Santiago de Compostela: Universidad de Santiago de Compostela.Google Scholar

  • Panagiotidis, E. Phoevos & Kleanthes K. Grohmann. 2009. Mixed projections: Categorial switches and prolific domains. Linguistic Analysis 35(1–4). 141–161.Google Scholar

  • Peres, João Andrade & Telmo Móia. 1995. Áreas críticas da língua portuguesa [Problematic areas of the Portuguse language]. Lisbon: Caminho.Google Scholar

  • Pérez-Saldanya, Manuel. 1999. El modo en las subordinadas relativas y adverbiales. In Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, 3253–3322. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar

  • Picallo, M. Carme. 2002. Abstract agreement and clausal arguments. Syntax 5(2). 116–147.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pires de Oliveira, Roberta S., Sandra Silvério & M. Cristina Figueiredo Silva. 1999. Notas para uma semântica da factividade [Notes for a semantic analysis of factivity]. Ms Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina.Google Scholar

  • Plann, Susan. 1981. The two el + infinitive constructions in Spanish. Linguistic Analysis 7(3). 203–240.Google Scholar

  • Raposo, Eduardo. 1987. Case theory and Inf-to-Comp: The inflected infinitive in European Portuguese. Linguistic Inquiry 18(1). 85–110.Google Scholar

  • Roussou, Anna. 2010. Selecting complementizers. Lingua 120(3). 582–603.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schmid, Hans-Jorg. 2000. English abstract nouns as conceptual shells: From corpus to cognition. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Schulz, Petra. 2003. Factivity: Its nature and acquisition. Tübingen: M. Niemeyer.Google Scholar

  • Serrano, Silvia. 2014. The article at the left periphery. In Andreas Dufter & Álvaro S. Octavio de Toledo (eds.), Left sentence peripheries in Spanish: Diachronic, variationist and comparative perspectives, 185–214. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Serrano, Silvia. 2015. Subordinación y determinación: completivas precedidas de artículo definido en español. Ph.D. dissertation. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid and Instituto Universitario Ortega y Gasset.Google Scholar

  • Spenader, Jennifer. 2001. Presupposition or anaphora: Constraints on choice of factive complements in spoken discourse. In Ivana Kruijff-Korbayová & Mark Steedman (eds.), Information structure, discourse structure and discourse semantics. Workshop proceedings, 161–174. http://www.helsinki.fi/esslli/courses/readers/K50.pdf.

  • Spenader, Jennifer. 2002. Presuppositions in spoken discourse. Ph.D. dissertation. Stockholm University.Google Scholar

  • Tonhauser, Judith, David Beaver, Craige Roberts & Mandy Simons. 2013. Towards a taxonomy of projective content. Language 89(1). 66–109.Google Scholar

  • Zubizarreta, María Luisa. 1982. On the relationship of the lexicon to syntax. Ph.D. dissertation. MIT.Google Scholar

Corpora

About the article

Published Online: 2019-05-10

Published in Print: 2019-05-27


Citation Information: Probus, Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages 1–27, ISSN (Online) 1613-4079, ISSN (Print) 0921-4771, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/probus-2018-1007.

Export Citation

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in