Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics

Editor-in-Chief: Dziubalska-Kolaczyk, Katarzyna

4 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.250
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.259

CiteScore 2017: 0.36

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.151
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.485

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 44, Issue 4


Measuring Foreign Language Learning Aptitude. Polish Adaptation of The Modern Language Aptitude Test By Carroll and Sapon

Jacek Rysiewicz
Published Online: 2009-01-23 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10010-008-0027-6

Measuring Foreign Language Learning Aptitude. Polish Adaptation of The Modern Language Aptitude Test By Carroll and Sapon

This article sets itself two main aims. The first is to describe the rationale behind the decision to adapt for Polish learners the Modern Language Aptitude Test (MLAT) by Carroll and Sapon (1959), rather than to develop a new measure. The reasons behind the decision are discussed in the context of the relevant individual differences (ID) research in Poland and the need for a reliable and theoretically valid measure of foreign language (FL) aptitude for L1 Polish is articulated.

The other aim is to describe the development, piloting and initial validation of the Polish MLAT-based adaptation of a new measure of FL aptitude. Two methods of test adaptation (translation and paraphrase) are discussed and justified with relation to the current project. It was decided that all four components of FL aptitude, as proposed by Carroll (1981), would be represented in the Polish adaptation of the MLAT. The piloting was done on approximately 200 secondary school learners aged 19, while the data for the initial validation study, in the form of second language (L2) English proficiency test results as well as simple measures of motivation, length of study, social background and others, came from ca. 250 subjects, aged 18-22.

Keywords: Testing; test adaptation; aptitude; measurement; individual differences

  • Anastasi, A. and S. Urbina. 1997. Psychological testing. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

  • Brzeziński, J. 2002. Metodologia badań psychologicznych. Warszawa: PWN.Google Scholar

  • Brown, J. D. 1988. Understanding research in second language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Carroll, J. B. 1968. "The psychology of language testing". In: Davies, A. (ed.), Language testing symposium: A psycholinguistic approach. London: Oxford University Press. 46-59.Google Scholar

  • Carroll, J. B. 1973. "Implications of aptitude test research and psycholinguistic theory for foreign language teaching". International Journal of Psycholinguistics 2. 5-14.Google Scholar

  • Carroll, J. B. 1981. "Twenty-five years of research on foreign language aptitude". In: Diller, K. C. (ed.), Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. 83-118.Google Scholar

  • Carroll, J. B. 1993. Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar

  • Carroll, J. B. and S. M. Sapon. 2002 [1959]. Modern Language Aptitude Test. Bethesda, MD: Second Language Testing.Google Scholar

  • Cattell, R. B. and H. E. P. Cattell. 1973. Measuring intelligence with the Culture Fair Tests. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.Google Scholar

  • Cohen, L. and L. Manion. 1995. Research methods in education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Dönyei, Z. and P. Skehan. 2003. "Individual differences in second language learning". In: Doughty, C. J. and M. H. Long (eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell. 589-630.Google Scholar

  • Dönyei, Z. 2005. The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

  • Ellis, R. 2004. "Individual differences in second language learning". In: Davies, A. D. and C. Elder (eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell. 525-551.Google Scholar

  • Figarski, W. 1984. Wyznaczniki powodzenia w szkolnej nauce jezyka rosyjskiego. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Szkolne i Pedagogiczne.Google Scholar

  • Gardner, R. C. and W. E. Lambert. 1965. "Language aptitude, intelligence and second language achievement". Journal of Educational Psychology 56.191-199.Google Scholar

  • Grigorenko, E. L., R. J. Sternberg and M. E. Ehrman. 2000. "A theory-based approach to the measurement of foreign language learning ability: The CANAL-F theory and test". Modern Language Journal 84(3). 390-405.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hambleton, R. K. 2006. Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Hambleton, R. K. and L. Pastula. 1999. "Increasing the validity of adapted tests: Myths to be avoided and guidelines for improving test adaptation practices". Journal of Applied Testing Technology (August 1999).Google Scholar

  • Hornowska, E. 2003. Testy psychologiczne. Teoria i praktyka. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.Google Scholar

  • Hornowska, E. and W. J. Paluchowski. 2004. "Kulturowa adaptacja testów psychologicznych". In: Brzeziński, J. (ed.), Metodologia badań psychologicznych. Wybór tekstów. Warszawa: PWN. 151-191.Google Scholar

  • Kiss, C., and M. Nikolov. 2005. "Developing, piloting, and validating an instrument to measure young learners' aptitude". Language Learning 55(1). 99-100.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kuliniak, R. 2002. Test Predyspozycji Językowych dla uczniów gimnazjum. Wałbrzych: Bimart.Google Scholar

  • Lewowicki, T. 1975. Psychologiczne różnice indywidualne a osiągnięcia uczniów. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Szkolne i Pedagogiczne.Google Scholar

  • Niżegorodcew, A. 1975. "Przydatność tzw. testu prognostycznego jako metody pomiaru zdolności do uczenia się języka obcego u młodzieży licealnej". Języki Obce w Szkole 3/4. 299-303.Google Scholar

  • Niżegorodcew, A. 1979. "Rola specjalnych uzdolnień w nauce języków obcych w szkole". Przegląd Glottodydaktyczny 3(1). 31-41.Google Scholar

  • Pearson. 1995. Otis-Lennon School Ability Test.Google Scholar

  • Ozga, J. and E. Tabakowska. 1973. "Egzamin wstępny z języka angielskiego dla kandydatów na filologię angielską Uniwersytetu Jagielońskiego w Krakowie". Języki Obce w Szkole 1. 46-57.Google Scholar

  • Pimsleur, P. 1966 [2003]. The Pimsleur Language Aptitude Battery. Bethesda, MD: Second Language Testing.Google Scholar

  • Pimsleur, P. 1968. "Language aptitude testing". In: Davies, A. (ed.), Language testing symposium: A psycholinguistic approach. London: Oxford University Press. 98-106.Google Scholar

  • Reber, A. S. 1985. The Penguin dictionary of psychology. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

  • Robinson, P. 2005. "Aptitude and second language acquisition". Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 25. 46-73.Google Scholar

  • Robinson, P. 2007. "Aptitudes, abilities, contexts, and practice". In: DeKeyser, R. M. (ed.), Practice in second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 256-286.Google Scholar

  • Rybacka, A. 2008. A critical analysis of the validity of two Polish foreign language aptitude tests. [Unpublished MA thesis, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań.]Google Scholar

  • Sasaki, M. 1996. Second language proficiency, foreign language aptitude and intelligence. Quantitative and qualitative analyses. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

  • Skehan, P. 1989. Individual differences in language learning. London: Arnold.Google Scholar

  • Skehan, P. 1992. "Foreign language learning ability: Cognitive or linguistic?" Thames Valley University Working Papers in English Language Teaching 2. 151-191.Google Scholar

  • Skehan, P. 1998. A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Skehan, P. 2001. "Theorizing and updating aptitude". In: Robinson, P. (ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 69-94.Google Scholar

  • Sparks, R. and L. Ganschow. 1991. "Foreign language learning difficulties: Affective or native language aptitude differences?". Modern Language Journal 75(1). 3-16.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sparks, R. and L. Ganschow. 2001. "Aptitude for learning a foreign language". Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 21(1). 90-111.Google Scholar

  • Spolsky, B. 1995. Measured words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Stansfield, C. W. and D. J. Reed. 2003. "Adaptation of the Modern Language Aptitude Test and The Pimsleur Language Aptitude Battery for examinees whose first language is not English". (Paper read at the 2nd Annual Conference of the East Coast Organization of Language Testers, 20-21 March 2003, Washington, D. C.)Google Scholar

  • Stansfield, C. W. and D. J. Reed. 2004. "The story behind the Modern Language Aptitude Test: An interview with John B. Carroll (1916-2003)". Language Assessment Quarterly 1(1). 43-56.Google Scholar

  • Tabakowska, E. and J. Ozga. 1975. "Przydatność testu prognostycznego przy rekrutacji kandydatów na filologię angielską". Języki Obce w Szkole 1. 35-37.Google Scholar

  • Terman, L. M. 1970. Concept Mastery Test. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar

  • Thurstone, L. L. 1938. Primary mental abilities. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Wechsler, D. 1981. WAIS-R manual: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar

  • Wojtowicz, M. 2006. Test Zdolności Językowych. Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych Polskiego Towarzystwa Psychologicznego.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2009-01-23

Published in Print: 2008-12-01

Citation Information: Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages 569–595, ISSN (Online) 1897-7499, ISSN (Print) 0137-2459, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10010-008-0027-6.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in