Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics

Editor-in-Chief: Dziubalska-Kolaczyk, Katarzyna

4 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.250
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.259

CiteScore 2017: 0.36

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.151
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.485

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 52, Issue 4


A developmental approach to diglossia: Bilectalism on a gradient scale of linguality

Kleanthes K. Grohmann / Maria Kambanaros / Evelina Leivada / Charley Rowe
Published Online: 2016-11-16 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2016-0025


The cognitive benefits of bilingualism have an impact on the processing mechanisms that are active during the acquisition process in a way that results in language variation. Within bilingual populations, the notion of “language proximity” is also of key importance for deriving variation. Certain sociolinguistic factors can invest the process of language development and its outcome with an additional layer of complexity that results from the emergence of mesolectal varieties which blur the boundaries of grammatical variants. We report data on the acquisition and development of object clitic placement in the two varieties of Greek spoken in Cyprus, and on performance in executive control tasks by monolingual, bilectal, and bi-/multilingual children. Comparing findings across experiments, the present study identifies the different factors that define “bilectalism” within the greater context of multilingualism, merging sociolinguistic and neurocognitive insights about language variation and how they inform development in diglossic contexts that involve closely related varieties—a study in comparative linguality.

Keywords: Bilectalism; clitics; executive control; mesolect; multilingualism


  • Adesope, O.O., T. Lavin, T. Thompson and C. Ungerleider. 2010. “A systematic review and meta-analysis of the cognitive correlates of bilingualism”. Review of Educational Research 80. 207–245.Google Scholar

  • Agouraki, Y. 1997. “On the enclisis/proclisis alternation”. In: Drachman, G., A. Malikouti-Drachman, J. Fykias and C. Klidi (eds.), Proceedings of the second International Conference on Greek Linguistics (vol. II. Salzburg: University of Salzburg. 393–404.Google Scholar

  • Antoniou, K. 2014. The effects of childhood bilectalism and bilingualism on executive control and implicature understanding. (PhD dissertation, Cambridge University.)Google Scholar

  • Antoniou, K., K.K. Grohmann, M. Kambanaros and N. Katsos. 2016. “The effect of childhood bilectalism and multilingualism on executive control”. Cognition 149. 18–30.Google Scholar

  • Antoniou, K., M. Kambanaros, K.K. Grohmann and N. Katsos. 2014. “Is bilectalism similar to bilingualism? An investigation into children’s vocabulary and executive control skills”. In: Orman, W. and M.J. Valleau (eds.), BUCLD 38: Proceedings of the 38th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (vol. 1. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press. 12–24.Google Scholar

  • Arvaniti, A. 2010. “Linguistic practices in Cyprus and the emergence of Cypriot Standard Greek”. Mediterranean Language Review 17. 15–45.Google Scholar

  • Auer, P. 2005. “Europe’s sociolinguistic unity, or: A typology of European dialect/standard constellations”. In: Delbecque, N., J. van der Auwera and D. Geeraerts (eds.), Perspectives on variation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 7–42.Google Scholar

  • Barac, R. and E. Bialystok. 2012. “Bilingual effects on cognitive and linguistic development: Role of language, cultural background, and education”. Child Development 83. 423–422.Google Scholar

  • Barac, R., E. Bialystok, D.C. Castro and M. Sanchez. 2014. “The cognitive development of young dual language learners: A critical review”. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 29. 699–714.Google Scholar

  • Baum, S. and D. Titone. 2014. “Moving towards a neuroplasticity view of bilingualism, executive control, and aging”. Applied Psycholinguistics 35. 857–894.Google Scholar

  • Benítez-Burraco, A. and C. Boeckx. 2014. “Universal Grammar and biological variation: An EvoDevo agenda for comparative biolinguistics”. Biological Theory 9. 122–134.Google Scholar

  • Bialystok, E. 2001. Bilingualism in development: Language, literacy, and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Bialystok, E. 2009. Bilingualism: The good, the bad, and the indifferent. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, 3–11.Google Scholar

  • Bialystok, E., F. Craik and G. Luk. 2012. “Bilingualism: Consequences for mind and brain”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16. 240–250.Google Scholar

  • Bialystok, E. and M. Viswanathan. 2009. “Components of executive control with advantages for bilingual children in two cultures”. Cognition 112. 494–500.Google Scholar

  • Blom, E., A.C. Küntay, M. Messer, J. Verhagen and P. Leseman. 2014. “The benefits of being bilingual: Working memory in bilingual Turkish–Dutch children”. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 128. 105–119.Google Scholar

  • Boeckx, C. 2013. “Biolinguistics: Forays into human cognitive biology”. Journal of Anthropological Sciences 91. 1–28.Google Scholar

  • Bourdieu, P. 1993. Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Brojde, C.L., S. Ahmed and E. Colunga. 2012. “Bilingual and monolingual children attend to different cues when learning new words”. Frontiers in Psychology 3. 155.Google Scholar

  • Calvo, A. and E. Bialystok. 2014. “Independent effects of bilingualism and socioeconomic status on language ability and executive functioning”. Cognition 130. 278– 288.Google Scholar

  • Cazden, C.B. 1976. “Play with language and metalinguistic awareness: One dimension of language experience”. In: Bruner, J.S., A. Jolly and K. Sylva (eds.), Play: Its role in development and evolution. New York: Basic Books. 603–608.Google Scholar

  • Chambers, J. 2009. Sociolinguistic theory: Linguistic variation and its social significance. (Rev. edn.) Oxford: Wiley–Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Cheshire, J. and D. Stein. 1997. Taming the vernacular: From dialect to written language. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar

  • Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

  • Cornips, L. 2006. “Intermediate syntactic variants in a dialect–standard speech repertoire and relative acceptability”. In: Fanselow, G., C. Féry, R. Vogel and M. Schlesewsky (eds.), Gradience in grammar: Generative perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 85–105.Google Scholar

  • Costa, A. and N .Sebastián–Gallés. 2014. “How does the bilingual experience sculpt the brain?” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 15. 336–345.Google Scholar

  • de Abreu, P.M.E. 2011. “Working memory in multilingual children: Is there a bilingual effect?” Memory 19. 529–537.Google Scholar

  • de Abreu, P.M.E., A. Cruz–Santos, C.J. Tourinho, R. Martin and E. Bialystok. 2012. “Bilingualism enriches the poor enhanced cognitive control in low-income minority children”. Psychological Science 23. 1364–1371.Google Scholar

  • Du Bois, J.A. 1985. “Competing motivations”. In: Haiman, J. (ed.), Iconicity in syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 343–366.Google Scholar

  • Eckert, P. 2004. “Adolescent language”. In: Finegan, E. and J.R. Rickford (eds.), Language in the USA: Themes for the twenty–first century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 361–374.Google Scholar

  • Eckert, P. 1996. “Vowels and nail polish: The emergence of linguistic style in the preadolescent heterosexual marketplace”. In: Warner, N., J. Ahlers, L. Bilmes, M. Oliver, S. Wertheim and M. Chen (eds.), Gender and belief systems: Proceedings of the fourth Berkeley Women and Language conference. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley Women and Language Group. 183–190.Google Scholar

  • Ferguson, C. A. 1959 [2003]. “Diglossia”. Word 15. 325–340. [Reprinted 2003 in: Bratt Paulston, C. and G.R. Tucker (eds.), Sociolinguistics: The essential readings. Oxford: Blackwell. 345–358.]Google Scholar

  • Fernald A., V.A. Marchman and A. Weisleder. 2012. “SES differences in language processing skill and vocabulary are evident at 18 months”. Developmental Science 16(2). 234–248.Google Scholar

  • Foy, J.G. and V.A. Mann. 2014. “Bilingual children show advantages in nonverbal auditory executive function task”. International Journal of Bilingualism 18. 717–729.Google Scholar

  • Genesee, F., J. Paradis and M.B. Crago. 2011. Dual language development and disorders: A handbook on bilingualism and second language learning. (2nd edn.) Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes.Google Scholar

  • Grohmann, K.K. 2011. “Some directions for the systematic investigation of the acquisition of Cypriot Greek: A new perspective on production abilities from object clitic placement”. In: Rinke, E. and T. Kupisch (eds.), The development of grammar: Language acquisition and diachronic change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 179– 203.Google Scholar

  • Grohmann, K.K. 2014a. “CAT research on object clitic placement: Where we are now”. In: Grohmann, K.K. and T. Neokleous (eds.), Developments in the acquisition of clitics. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 1–40.Google Scholar

  • Grohmann, K.K. 2014b. “Towards comparative bilingualism”. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 4. 336–341.Google Scholar

  • Grohmann, K.K. and M. Kambanaros. 2016. “The gradience of multilingualism in typical and impaired language development: Positioning bilectalism within comparative bilingualism”. Frontiers in Psychology: Language Sciences 7. 37.Google Scholar

  • Grohmann, K.K. and E. Leivada. 2011. “Towards disentangling bi-x: Metalinguistic awareness and competing motivations”. Paper presented at the 2011 UIC Bilingualism Forum, University of Illinois at Chicago (14–15 April 2011).Google Scholar

  • Grohmann, K.K. and E. Leivada. 2012. “Interface ingredients of dialect design: Bi-x, socio-syntax of development, and the grammar of Cypriot Greek”. In: Di Sciullo, A.M. (ed.), Towards a biolinguistic understanding of grammar: Essays on interfaces. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 239–262.Google Scholar

  • Grohmann, K.K. and E. Leivada. 2013. “Lightverbhood in child language: Evidence from Cypriot Greek”. In: Blom, E., J. Verhagen and I. van de Craats (eds.), Dummy auxiliaries in first and second language acquisition. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 141–170.Google Scholar

  • Grohmann, K.K. and E. Papadopoulou. 2011. “Question(able) issues in Cypriot Greek”. Linguistic Analysis 37. 8–38.Google Scholar

  • Grohmann, K.K., E. Papadopoulou and C. Themistocleous. Submitted. “Acquiring clitic placement in bilectal settings: Interactions between social factors”.Google Scholar

  • Grohmann, K.K., E. Theodorou, N. Pavlou, E. Leivada, E. Papadopoulou and S. Martínez-Ferreiro. 2012. “The development of object clitic placement in Cypriot Greek and the Romance connection”. In: Ferré, S., P. Prévost, L. Tuller and R. Zebib (eds.), Selected proceedings of the Romance Turn IV workshop on the acquisition of Romance languages. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 128–152.Google Scholar

  • Hadjioannou, X., S. Tsiplakou and M. Kappler. 2011. “Language policy and language planning in Cyprus”. Current Issues in Language Planning 12. 503–569.Google Scholar

  • Henry, A. 2005. “Non–standard dialects and linguistic data”. Lingua 115. 1599–1617.Google Scholar

  • Kambanaros, M. and K.K. Grohmann. 2015a. “More GAPs in children with SLI? Evidence from Greek for not fully lexical verbs in language development”. Applied Psycholinguistics 36. 1029–1057.Google Scholar

  • Kambanaros, M., and K.K. Grohmann. 2015b. “Grammatical class effects across impaired child and adult populations”. Frontiers in Psychology: Language Sciences 6. 1670.Google Scholar

  • Kambanaros, M., K.K. Grohmann and M. Michaelides. 2013. “Lexical retrieval for nouns and verbs in typically developing bilectal children”. First Language 33. 182– 199.Google Scholar

  • Karpava, S. 2014. Vulnerable domains for cross-linguistic influence in L2 acquisition of Greek. (PhD dissertation, University of Cyprus, Nicosia.)Google Scholar

  • Karpava, S. and K.K. Grohmann. 2014. “Bilingual acquisition of Cypriot Greek object clitic placement”. In: Grohmann, K.K. and T. Neokleous (eds.), Developments in the acquisition of clitics. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 87–137.Google Scholar

  • Kovács, Á.M. and J. Mehler. 2009. “Cognitive gains in 7-month-old bilingual infants”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106. 6556–6560.Google Scholar

  • Kroch, A. 1994. “Morphosyntactic variation”. In: Beals, K., J. Denton, R. Knippen, L. Melnar, H. Suzuki and E. Zeinfeld (eds.), Papers from the 30th regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society: Parasession on variation and linguistic theory. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society. 180–201.Google Scholar

  • Kroch, A. and A. Taylor. 2000. “Verb–object order in Middle English”. In: Pintzuk, S., G. Tsoulas and A. Warner (eds.), Diachronic syntax: Models and mechanisms. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 132–163.Google Scholar

  • Kroll, J.F. and E. Bialystok. 2013. “Understanding the consequences of bilingualism for language processing and cognition”. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 25. 497–514.Google Scholar

  • Legate, J. and C. Yang. 2007. “Morphosyntactic learning and the development of tense”. Language Acquisition 14. 315–344.Google Scholar

  • Leivada, E., and K.K. Grohmann. In press. “Language acquisition in bilectal environments: Competing motivations, metalinguistic awareness, and the socio-syntax of development hypothesis”. In: Katerbow, M. and G. de Vogelaer (eds.), Variation in language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Leivada, E., M. Kambanaros and K.K. Grohmann. 2016. “The universally preserved loci hypothesis: Evidence from Greek”. Paper presented at Language Disorders in Greek 6, Technological Educational Institute of Western Greece, Patras (3–4 June 2016).Google Scholar

  • Leivada, E., N. Pavlou and E. Papadopoulou. 2016. “From competing grammars to mixing grammars: A corpus study of bilectalism”. Paper presented at the 2016 UIC Bilingualism Forum, University of Illinois at Chicago (20–21 October 2016).Google Scholar

  • Leivada, E., P. Mavroudi and A. Epistithiou. 2010. “Metalanguage or bidialectism? Acquisition of clitic placement by Hellenic Greeks, Greek Cypriots and binationals in the diglossic context of Cyprus”. In: Botinis, A. (ed.), Proceedings of ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop on Experimental Linguistics 2010. Athens: ISCA and the University of Athens. 97–100.Google Scholar

  • Lenneberg, E.H. 1967. Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

  • Lewis, M. P., G.F. Simons and C.D. Fennig (eds.). 2015. Ethnologue: Languages of the world. (18th edn.) Dallas, TX: SIL International. Available at: <http://www.ethnologue.com>.

  • Lightfoot, D. 1999. The development of language: Acquisition, change, and evolution. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Llama, R., W. Cardoso and L. Collins. 2009. “The influence of language distance and language status on the acquisition of L3 phonology”. International Journal of Multilingualism 7. 39–57.Google Scholar

  • Manti, R. 2011. Diglossia in Cyprus and its impact in the university classroom setting. (Ms., University of Cyprus, Nicosia.)Google Scholar

  • Marinis, T. 2000. “The acquisition of clitic objects in Modern Greek: Single clitics, clitic doubling, clitic left dislocation”. ZAS Working Papers 15. 259–281.Google Scholar

  • McEntee-Atalianis, L. and S. Pouloukas. 2001. “Issues of identity and power in a Greek–Cypriot community”. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 22. 19–38.Google Scholar

  • Meisel, J.M. 2009. “Second language acquisition in early childhood”. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 28. 5–34.Google Scholar

  • Milroy, L. 1987. Language and social networks. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Miyake, A. and N.P. Friedman. 2012. “The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions four general conclusions”. Current Directions in Psychological Science 21. 8–14.Google Scholar

  • Miyake, A., N.P. Friedman, M.J. Emerson, A.H. Witzki, A. Howerter and T.D. Wager. 2000. “The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex ‘frontal lobe’ tasks: A latent variable analysis”. Cognitive Psychology 41. 49–100.Google Scholar

  • Montrul, S. 2008. Incomplete acquisition in bilingualism: Re-examining the age factor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Morales, J., A. Calvo and E. Bialystok. 2013. “Working memory development in monolingual and bilingual children”. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 114. 187–202.Google Scholar

  • Newton, B. 1972. Cypriot Greek: Its phonology and inflections. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

  • Newton, B. 1983. “Stylistic levels in Cypriot Greek”. Mediterranean Language Review 1. 55–63.Google Scholar

  • Paap, K.R. and Z.I. Greenberg. 2013. “There is no coherent evidence for a bilingual advantage in executive processing”. Cognitive Psychology 66. 232–258.Google Scholar

  • Paap, K.R. and O. Sawi. 2014. “Bilingual advantages in executive functioning: Problems in convergent validity, discriminant validity, and the identification of the theoretical constructs”. Frontiers in Psychology: Language Sciences 5. 962.Google Scholar

  • Papadakis, Y. 2003. “Linguistic varieties and social practices in Cyprus”. In: Gefou-Madianou, D. (ed.), Self and 'other': Conceptualizations, identities and practices in Greece and Cyprus. Athens: Gutenberg. 535–564.Google Scholar

  • Papadopoulou, E., E. Leivada and N. Pavlou. 2014. “Acceptability judgments in bilectal populations: Competition, gradience, and socio-syntax”. Linguistic Variation 14. 109–128.Google Scholar

  • Papapavlou, A. 1998. “Attitudes towards the Greek Cypriot dialect: Sociocultural implications”. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 13. 15–28.Google Scholar

  • Paradis, J. 2011. “Individual differences in child English second language acquisition: Comparing child-internal and child-external factors”. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 1. 213–237.Google Scholar

  • Paradis, J., K. Emmerzael and T.S. Duncan. 2010. “Assessment of English language learners: Using parent report on first language development”. Journal of Communication Disorders 43. 474–497.Google Scholar

  • Paradis, J. and F. Genesee. 1996. “Syntactic acquisition in bilingual children: Autonomous or independent?” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18. 1–25.Google Scholar

  • Paradis, J., A. Tremblay and M. Crago. 2008. “Bilingual children’s acquisition of English inflection: The role of language dominance and task type”. BUCLD 32: Proceedings of the 32nd annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (vol. 1). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press. 378–389.Google Scholar

  • Parodi, T. and I.M. Tsimpli. 2005. “‘Real’ and apparent optionality in second language grammars: Finiteness and pronouns in null operator structures”. Second Language Research 21. 250–285.Google Scholar

  • Petinou, K. and A. Terzi. 2002. “Clitic misplacement among normally developing children and children with specific language impairment and the status of Infl heads”. Language Acquisition 10. 1–28.Google Scholar

  • Poarch, G.J. and J.G. van Hell. 2012. “Executive functions and inhibitory control in multilingual children: Evidence from second-language learners, bilinguals, and trilinguals”. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 113. 535–551.Google Scholar

  • Ringbom, H. 2006. Cross-linguistic similarity in foreign language learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

  • Romaine, S. 1981. “The status of variable rules in sociolinguistic theory”. Journal of Linguistics 17. 93–119.Google Scholar

  • Rowe, C. and K.K. Grohmann. 2013. “Discrete bilectalism: Towards co-overt prestige and diglossic shift in Cyprus”. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 224. 119–142.Google Scholar

  • Rowe, C. and K.K. Grohmann. 2014. “Canaries in a coal mine: Native speakerhood and other factors as predictors of moribundity, death, and diglossic shift in Cypriot Greek”. Mediterranean Language Review 21. 121–142.Google Scholar

  • Siegal, M., A. Matsuo, C. Pond and Y. Otsu. 2007. “Bilingualism and cognitive development: Evidence from scalar implicatures”. In:. Otsu, Y. (ed.), Proceedings of the eighth Tokyo conference on psycholinguistics. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo. 265–280.Google Scholar

  • Siegal, M., L. Iozzi and L. Surian. 2009. “Bilingualism and conversational understanding in young children”. Cognition 110. 115–122.Google Scholar

  • Siegal, M., L. Surian, A. Matsuo, A. Geraci, L. Iozzi, Y. Okumura and S. Itakura. 2010. “Bilingualism accentuates children’s conversational understanding”. PLoS ONE 5. e9004.Google Scholar

  • Siegel, J. 2010. Second dialect acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Sophocleous, A. 2011. “Two languages in the classroom: The inconsistency between national and local objectives in formal education in Cyprus”. Journal of Language, Identity & Education 10. 266–281.Google Scholar

  • Sophocleous, A. and C. Wilks. 2010. “Standard Modern Greek and Greek–Cypriot dialect in kindergarten classroom interaction: Teachers’ and learners’ language attitudes and language use”. Language, Culture and Curriculum 23. 51–69.Google Scholar

  • Theodorou, E. 2013. Specific language impairment in Cypriot Greek: Diagnostic and experimental investigations. (PhD dissertation, University of Cyprus, Nicosia.)Google Scholar

  • Theodorou, E. and K.K. Grohmann. 2013. “The acquisition of relative clauses in Cypriot Greek: Production and comprehension”. Diacrítica 26. 271–300.Google Scholar

  • Theodorou, E., M. Kambanaros and K.K. Grohmann. 2016. “Diagnosing bilectal children with SLI: Determination of identification accuracy”. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics.Google Scholar

  • Trudgill, P. 1972. “Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich”. Language in Society 1. 179–195.Google Scholar

  • Tsimpli, I.M. 2003. “Clitics and articles in L2 Greek”. In: Liceras, J.M., H. Zobl and H. Goodluck (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition conference (GASLA 2002). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. 331–339.Google Scholar

  • Tsimpli, I.M. 2014. “Early, late or very late: Timing acquisition and bilingualism”. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 4. 393–402.Google Scholar

  • Tsimpli, I.M., M. Kambanaros and K.K. Grohmann. In press. “Language pathology”. In: Roberts, I.G. (ed.), The Oxford handbook of universal grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Tsimpli, I.M. and M. Mastropavlou. 2007. “Feature interpretability in L2 acquisition and SLI: Greek clitics and determiners”. In: Liceras, J.M., H. Zobl and H. Goodluck (eds.), The role of formal features in second language acquisition. London: Routledge. 142–183.Google Scholar

  • Tsiplakou, S. 2009. “Language alternation, competing grammars and interlanguage: Another facet of the Cyprus problem”. In: Giannakis, G., M. Baltazani, G. Xydopoulos and T. Tsangalidis (eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Greek Linguistics. Ioannina: University of Ioannina. 1195–1209.Google Scholar

  • Tsiplakou, S. 2014. “How mixed is a ‘mixed’ system? The case of the Cypriot Greek koiné”. Linguistic Variation 14. 161–178.Google Scholar

  • Unsworth, S., Argyri, F., Cornips, L., Hulk, A., Sorace, A. and I.M. Tsimpli. 2014. “On the role of age of onset and input in early child bilingualism in Greek and Dutch”. Applied Psycholinguistics 35. 765–805.Google Scholar

  • Vangsnes, Ø.A., G.B.W. Söderlund and M. Blekesaune. 2015. “The effect of bidialectal literacy on school achievement”. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism.Google Scholar

  • Varlokosta, S., K. Konstantzou and M. Nerantzini. 2014. “On the production of direct object clitics in Greek typical development and specific language impairment: The effect of task selection”. In: Grohmann, K.K. and T. Neokleous (eds.), Developments in the acquisition of clitics. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 188– 211.Google Scholar

  • Varlokosta, S., A. Belletti, J. Costa, N. Friedmann, A. Gavarró, K.K. Grohmann, M.T. Guasti, L. Tuller, et al. 2016. “A crosslinguistic study of the acquisition of pronoun and clitic production”. Language Acquisition 23. 1–26.Google Scholar

  • Westergaard, M., N. Mitrofanova, R. Mykhaylyk and Y. Rodina. 2016. “Crosslinguistic influence in the acquisition of a third language: The linguistic proximity model”. International Journal of Bilingualism.Google Scholar

  • Wildgen, W. 2008. “Sketch of an evolutionary grammar based on comparative biolinguistics”. In: Röska-Hardy, L. S. and E.M. Neumann-Held (eds.), Learning from animals? Examining the nature of human uniqueness. Hove: Psychology Press. 45–59.Google Scholar

  • Yang, C. 2000. “Internal and external forces in language change”. Language Variation and Change 12. 231–250.Google Scholar

  • Yang, C. 2004. “Toward a theory of language growth”. In: Jenkins, L. (ed.), Variation and universals in biolinguistics. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 37–56.Google Scholar

  • Yiakoumetti, A. 2007. “Choice of classroom language in bidialectal communities: To include or to exclude the dialect?” Cambridge Journal of Education 37. 51–66.Google Scholar

About the article

Department of English Studies, University of Cyprus, 75 Kallipoleos, P.O. Box 20537, Nicosia, 1678, Cyprus

Published Online: 2016-11-16

Published in Print: 2016-11-01

Citation Information: Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, Volume 52, Issue 4, Pages 629–662, ISSN (Online) 1897-7499, ISSN (Print) 0137-2459, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2016-0025.

Export Citation

© Faculty of English, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Julia M. Schmitt, Peter Auer, and Evelyn C. Ferstl
Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 2018, Page 1
Maria Kambanaros, Nikoletta Christou, and Kleanthes K. Grohmann
Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 2018, Page 1
Tammer Castro, Jason Rothman, and Marit Westergaard
Frontiers in Psychology, 2017, Volume 8

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in