Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics

Editor-in-Chief: Dziubalska-Kolaczyk, Katarzyna

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.347

CiteScore 2018: 0.56

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.252
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.520

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 52, Issue 4


Interaction between input frequency, transparency and productivity in acquisition of noun plural inflection in Danish

Laila Kjærbæk / Hans Basbøll
Published Online: 2016-11-16 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2016-0026


Acquisition of the Danish noun plural system is interesting in regard to testing hypotheses on input frequency effects: whereas English is characterized by having one default inflectional marker for a grammatical category (e.g. the plural suffix -s) and a minor number of exceptions to this default rule, Danish has several competing inflectional markers. Furthermore, there are important interactions between phonology and morphology in the Danish system (Basbøll et al. (2011)). In the present study we test theses on input frequency effects in a phonological perspective and explore the impact of phonetics on grammar. This will be done in three types of empirical data from monolingual Danish children: Naturalistic child directed speech and child speech from six children aged 0;10–3;11; Structured interviews with 80 children aged 3–9 years; Experimental data from 160 children aged 3–10 years. We present a scale with three degrees of transparency of the plural stem and of the plural suffix as well as a more differentiated scale of transparency of the Danish plural markers. We furthermore present a scale with three degrees of productivity, and analyze the relation between acquisition rate and degree of transparency as well as degree of productivity.

Keywords: Danish; first language acquisition; frequency effect; morphology; noun plural


  • Albirini, A. 2015. “Factors affecting the acquisition of plural morphology in Jordanian Arabic”. Journal of Child Language 42(2). 734–762.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Ambridge, B., E. Kidd, C.F. Rowland and A. Theakston. 2015. “The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition”. Journal of Child Language 42(2). 239–273.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Basbøll, H. 2005. The phonology of Danish. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Basbøll, H., D. Bleses, T. Cadierno, A. Jensen, H.J. Ladegaard, T.O. Madsen, S. Millar, C. Sinha and P. Thomsen. 2002. “The Odense Language Acquisition Project”. Child Language Bulletin 22. 11–12.Google Scholar

  • Basbøll, H., L. Kjærbæk and C. Lambertsen. 2011. “The Danish noun plural landscape”. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia: International Journal of Linguistics 43(2). 81–105.Google Scholar

  • Berko, J. 1958. “The child’s learning of English morphology”. Word 4. 150–177.Google Scholar

  • Diessel, H. 2015. “Frequency shapes syntactic structure”. Journal of Child Language 42(2). 278–281.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Dressler, W.U. 2003. “Degrees of grammatical productivity in inflectional morphology”. Italian Journal of Linguistics 15(1). 31–62.Google Scholar

  • Gillis, S., A. Souman, S. Dhollander, I. Molemans, L. Kjærbæk, K. Rehfeldt, H. Basbøll, C. Lambertsen, S. Laaha, J. Bertl, W.U. Dressler, N. Lavie, R. Levie and D. Ravid. 2008. “The classical task: From singular to plural form in Dutch, Danish, Austrian German, and Hebrew”. Paper presented at the XIth Congress of the International Association for the Study of Child Language (IASCL), Edinburgh.Google Scholar

  • Grønnum, N. 2007. Rødgrød med Fløde – En lille bog om dansk fonetik [Red berry pudding with cream – A small book on Danish phonetics]. Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar

  • Kjærbæk, L. 2013. Tilegnelse af bøjningsmorfologi: En undersøgelse af substantivernes pluralisbøjning hos normaltudviklede børn i alderen 0–10 år [The acquisition of inflectional morphology: A study of noun plural inflection in typically developing Danish children aged 0–10 years]. (PhD dissertation, University of Southern Denmark, Odense.)Google Scholar

  • Kjærbæk, L. 2015. “Danske børns tilegnelse af bøjningsmorfologi – Udviklingen af substantivernes pluralisbøjning i alderen 0–10 år” [Danish children’s acquisition of inflectional morphology – The development of noun plural inflection at the ages of 0– 10 years]. Nydanske Sprogstudier (NyS) 48. 106–138.Google Scholar

  • Kjærbæk, L. and H. Basbøll. 2015. “Testing hypotheses on frequency effects – Noun plural inflection in Danish children”. In: Babatsouli, E. and D. Ingram (eds.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Monolingual and Bilingual speech 2015. 168–181.Google Scholar

  • Kjærbæk, L., R. dePont Christensen and H. Basbøll. 2014. “Sound structure and input frequency impact on noun plural acquisition: Hypotheses tested on Danish children across different data types”. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 37(1). 47–86.Google Scholar

  • Laaha, S. and W.U. Dressler. 2012. “Suffix predictability and stem transparency in the acquisition of German noun plurals”. In: Kiefer, F., M. Ladánvi and P. Siptár (eds.), Current issues in morphological theory: (ir)regularity, analogy and frequency. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 217–236.Google Scholar

  • Laaha, S., L. Kjærbæk, H. Basbøll and W.U. Dressler. 2011. “The impact of sound structure on morphology: An experimental study on children’s acquisition of German and Danish noun plurals focusing on stem change”. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia: International Journal of Linguistics 43(2). 106–126.Google Scholar

  • MacWhinney, B. 2000a. The Childes Project: Tool for analyzing talk. (Vol. 1: Transcription format and programs.) Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

  • MacWhinney, B. 2000b. The Childes Project: Tool for Analyzing Talk. (Vol. 2: The database.) Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

  • Madsen, T., H. Basbøll and C. Lambertsen. 2002. “OLAM – Et semiautomatisk og lydstrukturelt kodningssystem for dansk” [OLAM – A semiautomatic morphological and phonological coding system for Danish]. Odense Working Papers in Language and Communication 24. 43–56.Google Scholar

  • Plunkett, K. 1985. Preliminary approaches to language development. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar

  • Plunkett, K. 1986. “Learning strategies in two Danish children’s language development”. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 27. 64–73.Google Scholar

  • Ravid, D., W.U. Dressler, B. Nir-Sagiv, K. Korecky-Kröll, A. Souman, K. Rehfeldt, S. Laaha, J. Bertl, H. Basbøll and S. Gillis. 2008. “Core morphology in child directed speech: Crosslinguistic corpus analyses of noun plurals”. In: Behrens, H. (ed.), Corpora in language acquisition research: History, methods, perspectives. (Trends in Language Acquisition Research 6.) 25–60.Google Scholar

  • Rowe, M. 2015. “Input versus intake – A commentary on Ambridge, Kidd, Rowland, and Theakston’s ‘The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition’”. Journal of Child Language 42(2). 301–305.Google Scholar

About the article

Laila Kjærbæk Department of Language and Communication University of Southern Denmark Campusvej 55 Odense M, 5230 Denmark

Published Online: 2016-11-16

Published in Print: 2016-11-01

Citation Information: Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, Volume 52, Issue 4, Pages 663–686, ISSN (Online) 1897-7499, ISSN (Print) 0137-2459, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2016-0026.

Export Citation

© Faculty of English, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in