Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics

Editor-in-Chief: Dziubalska-Kolaczyk, Katarzyna


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.250
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.259

CiteScore 2017: 0.36

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.151
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.485

Online
ISSN
1897-7499
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 53, Issue 1

Issues

Something always sticks? how emotional language modulates neural processes involved in face encoding and recognition memory

Johanna Kissler / Janine Strehlow
Published Online: 2017-05-13 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2017-0004

Abstract

Language can serve to constrain cognitive and emotional representations. Here, we investigate to what extent linguistic emotional information alters processing of faces with neutral expressions. Previous studies have shown that cortical processing of emotional faces differs from that of neutral faces. Electroencephalography (EEG) has revealed emotion effects for early and late event-related potentials (ERPs) such as the N1, the Early Posterior Negativity (EPN) and the Late Positive Potential (LPP). In order to study the effect of language information on face processing, 30 negative and 30 neutral descriptive phrases were presented, each followed by a neutral expression face. Participants were instructed to remember the association. We analyzed the immediate effect of information type on face processing during encoding as well as delayed effects during subsequent recognition. During encoding, faces following negative language information elicited a larger left frontal positivity between 500–700 ms after stimulus onset. During recognition, a left centro-parietal LPP was likewise increased for faces previously associated with a negative description. In addition, the parietal old/new effect was significantly increased for faces with negative information compared to new ones, while no significant effect was observed for faces with neutral information. No information effects on early perceptual ERPs (N1, EPN) were found. Reaction times (RTs) for source memory decisions (negative versus neutral) were significantly shorter for faces with negative versus neutral information. In sum, ERP results indicate that emotional significance can be linguistically induced in faces on a cortical level and, at least in an explicit memory task, this information modulates later stages of face processing and memory. Implications for cognitive effects of public media design are discussed.

Keywords: Emotion; language; faces; perception; memory; EEG

References

  • Abdel Rahman, R. 2011. “Facing good and evil: Early brain signatures of affective biographical knowledge in face recognition”. Emotion 11(6). 1397–1405.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Barrett, L.F., K.A. Lindquist and M. Gendron. 2007. ”Language as context for the perception of emotion“. Trends in cognitive sciences 11(8). 327–332.Blau, V.C., U. Maurer, N. Tottenham and B.D. McCandliss. 2007. “The face-specific N170 component is modulated by emotional facial expression”. Behavioral Brain Functions 3(7). 1–13.Google Scholar

  • Bradley, M.M., M.K. Greenwald, M.C. Petry and P.J. Lang. 1992. “Remembering pictures: pleasure and arousal in memory”. Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 18(2). 379–390.Google Scholar

  • Bublatzky, F., and H.T. Schupp. 2011. ”Pictures cueing threat: Brain dynamics in viewing explicitly instructed danger cues”. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience 7(6). 611–22.Google Scholar

  • Bühler, K. 1934. Sprachtheorie: die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache: mit 9 Abb. Im Text und auf 1 Tafel. Jena: Gustav Fischer Verlag.Google Scholar

  • Baayen, R.H., R. Piepenbrock and L. Gulikers. 1995. The CELEX lexical database (CDROM). Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar

  • de Quervain, D.J., I.T. Kolassa, V. Ertl, P.L. Onyut, F. Neuner, T. Elbert and A. Papassotiropoulos. 2007. “A deletion variant of the α2b-adrenoceptor is related to emotional memory in Europeans and Africans”. Nature Neuroscience 10(9). 1137–1139.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dolcos, F. and R. Cabeza. 2002. “Event-related potentials of emotional memory: Encoding pleasant, unpleasant, and neutral pictures”. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience 2(3). 252–263.Google Scholar

  • Eimer, M. and A. Holmes. 2007. “Event-related brain potential correlates of emotional face processing”. Neuropsychologia 45(1). 15–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ferree, T. C., P. Luu, G.S. Russell and D.M. Tucker. 2001. “Scalp electrode impedance, infection risk, and EEG data quality“. Clinical Neurophysiology 112(3). 536–544.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Flaisch, T., F. Häcker, B. Renner and H.T. Schupp. 2011. “Emotion and the processing of symbolic gestures: an event-related brain potential study”. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience 6(1). 109–118.Google Scholar

  • Grimshaw, G. M. and D. Carmel. 2014. “An asymmetric inhibition model of hemispheric differences in emotional processing“. Frontiers in Psychology 5. 489. 1–7.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Herzmann, G., S.R. Schweinberger, W. Sommer, and I. Jentzsch. 2004. ”What’s special about personally familiar faces? A multimodal approach”. Psychophysiology, 41(5). 688–701.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ille, N., P. Berg and M. Scherg. 2002. “Artifact correction of the ongoing EEG using spatial filters based on artifact and brain signal topographies”. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 19(2). 113–24.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Johansson, M., A. Mecklinger and A.C. Treese. 2004. “Recognition memory for emotional and neutral faces: An Event-Related Potential study”. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16(10). 1840–1853.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Junghöfer, M., and P. Peyk. 2004. “Analysis of electrical potentials and magnetic fields of the brain”. Matlab Select 2. 24–28.Google Scholar

  • Junghöfer, M., M.A. Rehbein, J. Maitzen, S. Schindler and J. Kissler. 2016. “An evil face?-Verbal evaluative Multi-CS conditioning enhances face-evoked mid-latency magnetoencephalographic responses“. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, nsw179.Google Scholar

  • Kensinger, E.A. and S. Corkin. 2003. “Memory enhancement for emotional words: Are emotional words more vividly remembered than neutral words?”Memory & Cognition 31(8). 1169–1180.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kissler, J., R. Assadollahi and C. Herbert. 2006. “Emotional and semantic networks in visual word processing – insights from ERP studies”. Progress in Brain Research 156. 147–184.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kissler, J., C. Herbert, P. Peyk and M. Junghöfer. 2007. ”’Buzzwords’– Early cortical responses to emotional words”. Psychological Science 18(6). 475–80.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kissler, J. and A. Hauswald. 2008. “Neuromagnetic activity during recognition of emotional pictures”. Brain Topography 20(4). 192–204.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kissler, J., C. Herbert, I. Winkler and M. Junghöfer. 2009. “Emotion and attention in visual word processing – An ERP study”. Biological Psychology 80(1). 75–83.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Landau, A.L., L. Aziz-Zadeh and R.B. Ivry. 2010. “The Influence of Language on Perception: Listing to Sentences about Faces Affects the Perception of Faces”. The Journal of Neuroscience 30(45). 15254–15261.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MacNamara, A., D. Foti and G. Hajcak. 2009. ”Tell me about it: Neural activity elicited by emotional pictures and preceding descriptions”. Emotion 9(4). 531–543.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MacNamara, A., K.N. Ochsner and G. Hajcak. 2011. ”Previously reappraised: the lasting effect of description type on picture-elicited electrocortical activity”. Social, Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 6. 348–358.Google Scholar

  • Maratos, E.J. and M.D. Rugg. 2001a. “Electrophysiological correlates of the retrieval of emotional and non-emotional context”. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 13(7). 877–891.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Maratos, E.J., R.J. Dolan, J.S. Morris, R.N.A. Henson, and M.D. Rugg. 2001b. “Neural activity associated with episodic memory for emotional context”. Neuropsychologia 39. 910–920.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mather, M.and M/R. Sutherland. 2011. “Arousal-biased competition in perception and memory”. Perspectives on Psychological Science 6(2). 114–133.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mattarozzi, K., A. Todorov and M. Codispoti. 2014. “Memory for faces: the effect of facial appearance and the context in which the face is encountered”. Psychological Research 79(2). 308–317.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mignault, A. and A. Chaudhuri. 2003. “The many faces of a neutral face: Head tilt and perception of dominance and emotion”. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 27(2). 111–132.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Olofsson, J.K., S. Nordin, H. Sequeira and J. Polich. 2008. “Affective picture processing: an integrative review of ERP findings”. Biological psychology 77(3). 247–265.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pastor, M.C., M.M. Bradley, A. Löw, F. Versace, J. Moltó and J.P. Lang.2008. “Affective picture perception: emotion, context, and the late positive potential”. Brain research 1189. 145–151.Google Scholar

  • Righart, R. and B. de Gelder. 2005. ”Context influences early perceptual analysis of faces – An electrophysiological study”. Cerebral Cortex 16. 1249–1257.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Righi, S., T. Marzi, M. Toscani, S. Baldassi, S. Ottonello and M.P. Viggiano. 2012. “Fearful expressions enhance recognition memory: electrophysiological evidence”. Acta psychologica 139(1). 7–18.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rugg, M.D. and T. Curran. 2007. “Event-related potentials and recognition memory”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11(6). 251–257.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ruchkin, D. S., R.S. Berndt, R. Johnson, W. Ritter, J. Grafman and H.L. Canoune. 1997. “Modality-specific processing streams in verbal working memory: evidence from spatio-temporal patterns of brain activity“. Cognitive Brain Research 6(2). 95–113.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sands, S.F. 2009. Sample size analysis for brainwave collection (EEG) methodologies. White Paper.Google Scholar

  • Sato, W., T. Kochiyama, S. Yoshikawa and M. Matsumura. 2001. ”Emotional expression boosts early visual processing of the face: ERP recording and its decomposition by independent component analysis”. Neuroreport 12. 709–714.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schaefer, A., K. Fletcher, C.L. Pottage, K. Alexander and C. Brown. 2009. “The effects of emotional intensity on ERP correlates of recognition memory”. Neuroreport 20(3). 319–324.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schaefer, A., C.L. Pottage and A.J. Rickart. 2011. “Electrophysiological correlates of remembering emotional pictures“. Neuroimage 54(1). 714–724.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schindler, S., M. Wegrzyn, I. Steppacher and J. Kissler. 2014. “It’s all in your head–how anticipating evaluation affects the processing of emotional trait adjectives”. Frontiers in psychology 5. 1292. 1–10.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schupp, H.T., B.N. Cuthbert, M.M. Bradley, J.T. Cacioppo, T. Ito and P.J. Lang. 2000. “Affective picture processing: The late positive potential is modulated by motivational relevance”. Psychophysiology 37. 257–261.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schupp, H.T., M. Junghöfer, A.I. Weike and A.O. Hamm. 2003. “Emotional facilitation of sensory processing in the visual cortex”. Psychological Science 14. 7–13.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schupp, H.T., M. Junghöfer, A.I. Weike and A.O. Hamm. 2004a. “The selective processing of briefly presented affective pictures: An ERP analysis”. Psychophysiology 41. 441–449.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schupp, H.T., A. Öhman, M. Junghöfer, A.I. Weike, J. Stockburger and A.O. Hamm. 2004b. “The facilitated processing of threatening faces: An ERP analysis”. Emotion 4. 189–200.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sharot, T.and E.A. Phelps. 2004. “How arousal modulates memory: disentangling the effects of attention and retention”. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience 4(3). 294–306.Google Scholar

  • Tanaka, J.W., T. Curran, A.L. Porterfield and D. Collins. 2006. “Activation of preexisting and acquired face representations: The N250 event-related potential as an index of face familiarity”. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18(9). 1488–1497.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tottenham, N., J.W. Tanaka, A.C. Leon, T. McCarry, M. Nurse, T.A. Hare, D.J. Marcus, A. Westerlund and C. Nelson. 2009. “The NimStim set of facial expressions: Judgments from untrained research participants”. Psychiatry Research 168(3). 242249.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Weymar, M., A. Löw, C.A. Melzig and A.O. Hamm. 2009. “Enhanced long-term recollection for emotional pictures: Evidence from high density ERPs”. Psychophysiology 46(6). 1200–1207.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Weymar, M., M.M. Bradley, A.O. Hamm and P.J. Lang. 2013. “When fear forms memories: Threat of shock and brain potentials during encoding and recognition”. Cortex 49(3). 819–826.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wieser, M.J., A. Gerdes, I Büngel, K.A. Schwarz, A. Mühlberger and P. Pauli. 2014. “Not so harmless anymore: How context impacts the perception and electrocortical processing of neutral faces”. NeuroImage 92. 74–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-05-13

Published in Print: 2017-05-24


Citation Information: Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, Volume 53, Issue 1, Pages 63–93, ISSN (Online) 1897-7499, ISSN (Print) 0137-2459, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2017-0004.

Export Citation

© 2017 Faculty of English, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in