Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics

Editor-in-Chief: Dziubalska-Kolaczyk, Katarzyna


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.347

CiteScore 2018: 0.56

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.252
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.520

Online
ISSN
1897-7499
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 55, Issue 2

Issues

Nominal coreference resolution for Polish

Maciej Ogrodniczuk
  • Corresponding author
  • Institute of Computer Science Polish Academy of Sciences Jana Kazimierza 5 01-248 Warszawa Poland
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2019-08-17 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2019-0014

Abstract

The article presents current research on coreference resolution for Polish, from development of a sufficiently general model of reference relations to implementation of tools using this model to automatically detect coreference in written texts. The task is accomplished using corpus approach, with manual annotation of reference structures, verification of the proposed theory on the corpus data, implementation of automatic tools in different technical architectures and finally assessing their quality using standard evaluation methods.

Keywords: Mention detection; coreference resolution; coreference corpus

References

  • Abadi, M., P. Barham, J. Chen, Z. Chen, A. Davis, J. Dean, M. Devin, et al. 2016. “TensorFlow: A system for large-scale machine learning”. 12th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI 16). 265–283. <https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/osdi16/osdi16-abadi.pdf>

  • Abramowicz, W. A. Filipowska, J. Piskorski, K. Węcel and K. Wieloch. 2006. “Linguistic suite for Polish cadastral system”. Proceedings of the 5th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC 2006) Genova: European Language Resources Association. 2518–2523.Google Scholar

  • Acedański, S. 2010. “A morphosyntactic Brill tagger for inflectional languages”. In: Loftsson, H., E. Rögnvaldsson and S. Helgadóttir (eds.), Advances in natural language processing Heidelberg: Springer. 3–14. <http://ripper.dasie.mimuw.edu.pl/~accek/homepage/wp-content/papercite-data/pdf/ace10dpdf>

  • Aone, C. and S.W. Bennett. 1995. “Evaluating automated and manual acquisition of anaphora resolution strategies”. Proceedings of the 33rd annual meeting on association for computational linguistics (ACL 1995). Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics. 122–129.Google Scholar

  • Bagga, A. and B. Baldwin. 1998. “Algorithms for scoring coreference chains”. Proceedings of the Workshop on Linguistic Coreference at the 1st International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 1998) Granada. 563–566.Google Scholar

  • Bellert, I. 1971. “O pewnym warunku spójności tekstu” [On a certain condition on text coherence]. In: Mayenowa, M.R. (ed.), O spójności tekstu [On text coherence]. Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich. 47–76.Google Scholar

  • Bengtson, E. and Dan Roth. 2008. “Understanding the value of features for coreference resolution”. Proceedings of the conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP 2008). Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics. 294–303.Google Scholar

  • Bennet, E.M., R. Alpert and A.C. Goldstein. 1954. “Communications through limited-response questioning”. Public Opinion Quarterly 18(3). 303–308.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brennan, S.E., M.W. Friedman and C.J. Pollard. 1987. “A centering approach to pronouns”. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 1987) Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics. 155–162. doi:10.3115/981175.981197.Google Scholar

  • Bresnan, J. 2001. Lexical-functional syntax Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Broda, B., M. Marcińczuk, M. Maziarz, A. Radziszewski and A. Wardyński. 2012. “KPWr: Towards a free corpus of Polish”. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2012) Istanbul: European Language Resources Association. 3218–3222.Google Scholar

  • Cai, J. and M. Strube. 2010. “Evaluation metrics for end-to-end coreference resolution systems”. Proceedings of the 11th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue (SIGDIAL 2010) Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics. 28–36.Google Scholar

  • Chen, C. and V. Ng. 2012. “Combining the best of two worlds: A hybrid approach to multilingual coreference resolution”. Joint Conference on EMNLP and CONLL: Proceedings of the Shared Task 56–63.

  • Chollet, F. 2015. Keras. <https://keras.io>; GitHub.

  • Chomsky, N. 1980. “On binding”. Linguistic Inquiry 11(1). U–46.Google Scholar

  • Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on government and binding Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

  • Clark, H.H. 1977. “Bridging”. In: Johnson-Laird, P. and P.C. Wason (eds.), Thinking: Readings in cognitive science Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 411–420.Google Scholar

  • Cohen, W.W. 1995. “Fast effective rule induction”. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Machine Learning Morgan Kaufmann. 115–123.Google Scholar

  • Connolly, D., J.D. Burger and D.S. Day. 1994. “A machine learning approach to anaphoric reference”. Proceedings of the International Conference on New Methods in Language Processing (NeMLaP) New Brunswick: ACL. 255–261.Google Scholar

  • Denis, P. and J. Baldridge. 2008. “Specialized models and ranking for coreference resolution”. Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Honolulu: Association for Computational Linguistics. 660–669. <http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D08-1069>

  • Dobrzyńska, T. 1996. “Tekst i jego odmiany: Zbiór studiów” [Text and its varieties: A collection of studies]. In: Dobrzyńska, T. (ed.), Tekst – w perspektywie stylistycznej [Text – in a stylistic perspective]. Warszawa: Instytut Badań Literackich PAN. 125–143.Google Scholar

  • Dunin-Kęplicz, B. 1989. Formalna metoda rozwiązywania pewnej klasy polskiej anafory zaimkowej [A formal method of solving a Polish pronominal anaphora class]. (PhD dissertation, Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Kraków.)Google Scholar

  • Duszak, A. 1986. “Niektóre uwarunkowania semantyczne szyku wyrazów w zdaniu polskim” [Some semantic conditions on the word order of Polish sentences]. Polonica XII(12). 59–74.Google Scholar

  • Fall, J. 1988. O anaforze i logicznych metodach jej interpretacji [On anaphora and the logical methods of its interpretation]. (PhD dissertation, Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Kraków.)Google Scholar

  • Fall, J. 2001. “Anafora – logiczne metody interpretacji” [Anaphora – logical methods of interpretation]. Studia Semiotyczne XXIII. 65–97.Google Scholar

  • Filak, T. 2006. Zastosowanie metod automatycznego uczenia do rozstrzygania problemu anafory [Using machine learning methods to solve the problem of anaphora]. (Master’s thesis, Wrocław University of Science and Technology.)Google Scholar

  • Fleiss, J.L. 1971. “Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters”. Psychological Bulletin 76(5). 378–382. doi:10.1037/h0031619.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fontański, H. 1986. Anaforyczne przymiotniki wskazujące w języku polskim i rosyjskim: Problem użycia [Anaphoric indicative adjectives in Polish and Russian]. Katowice: Uniwersytet Śląski.Google Scholar

  • Gajda, S. 1990. Współczesna polszczyzna naukowa: Język czy żargon? [Modern scientific Polish: A language or a jargon]. Opole: Instytut Śląski.Google Scholar

  • Grochowski, M. 1976. “O pojęciu elipsy” [On the concept of ellipsis]. Pamiętnik Lite-racki LXVII(1). 121–136. <http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.47.9143>

  • Grosz, B.J. 1977. The representation and use of focus in dialogue understanding. (PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.)Google Scholar

  • Grosz, B.J., S. Weinstein and A.K. Joshi. 1995. “Centering: A framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse”. Computational Linguistics 21(2). 203–226. <http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.47.9143>

  • Grzegorczykowa, R. 1996. “Polskie leksemy z wbudowaną informacją anaforyzacyjną” [Polish lexemes with built-in anaphorization information]. In: Grochowski, M. (ed.), Anafora w strukturze tekstu [Anaphora in text structure]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Energeia. 71–77.Google Scholar

  • Gundel, J.K., N. Hedberg and R. Zacharski. 1993. “Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse”. Language 69(2). 274–307.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Głowińska, K. 2012. “Anotacja składniowa” [Syntactic annotation]. In: Przepiórkowski, A., M. Bańko, R.L. Górski and B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (eds.), Narodowy Korpus Języka Polskiego [The National Corpus of Polish]. Warszawa: Wydawnic-two Naukowe PWN. 107–127.Google Scholar

  • Haghighi, A. and D. Klein. 2007. “Unsupervised coreference resolution in a nonparametric Bayesian model”. In: Carroll, J.A., A. van den Bosch and A. Zaenen (eds.), Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics The Association for Computational Linguistics. 848–855.Google Scholar

  • Haghighi, A. and D. Klein. 2009. “Simple coreference resolution with rich syntactic and semantic features”. Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing Singapore: Association for Computational Linguistics. 1152–1161. <http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D/D09/D09-1120>

  • Hahn, U., M. Strube and K. Markert. 1996. “Bridging textual ellipses”. Proceedings of the 16th conference on computational linguistics — volume 1 (COLING ’96). Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics. 496–501. doi:10.3115/992628.992714.Google Scholar

  • Hajnicz, E., B. Nitoń, A. Patejuk, A. Przepiórkowski and M. Woliński. 2015. “Internetowy słownik walencyjny języka polskiego oparty na danych korpusowych” [An Internet valence dictionary of Polish based on corpus data]. Prace Filologiczne LXV. 95–110.Google Scholar

  • Hendrickx, I., O. De Clercq and V. Hoste. 2011. “Analysis and reference resolution of bridge anaphora across different text genres”. Proceedings of the eighth international conference on anaphora processing and applications (DAARC 2011) Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. U–11. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-25917-3_U.Google Scholar

  • Hobbs, J.R. 1976. Pronoun resolution New York: Department of Computer Science, City College, City University of New York.Google Scholar

  • Honowska, M. 1984. “Grzybnia zaimkowa. Przyczynek do zagadnień spójności tekstu” [Pronominal mycelium: A prolegomena to problems of text coherence]. Polonica X. 111–120.Google Scholar

  • Ioffe, S. and C. Szegedy. 2015. “Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift”. ICML (JMLR Workshop and Conference Proceedings) vol. 37. JMLR.org 448–456.

  • Irmer, M. 2010. Bridging inferences in discourse interpretation. (PhD dissertation, University of Leipzig.)Google Scholar

  • Kaczmarek, A. and M. Marcińczuk. 2017. “A preliminary study in zero anaphora coreference resolution for Polish”. Cognitive Studies (17). U–13. doi:10.11649/cs.1316.Google Scholar

  • Kardela, H. 1985. A grammar of English and Polish reflexives Lublin: Uniwersytet Marii Curie- Skłodowskiej.Google Scholar

  • Kehler, A. 1997. “Probabilistic coreference in information extraction”. Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Empirical Methods in NLP (EMNLP-2) 163–173.

  • Kingma, D.P. and J.L. Ba. 2015. “Adam: A method for stochastic optimization”. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference for Learning Representations (ICLR 2015)

  • Klemensiewicz, Z. 1937. Składnia opisowa współczesnej polszczyzny kulturalnej [A descriptive syntax of modern cultural Polish]. Kraków: Polska Akademia Umiejętności.Google Scholar

  • Klemensiewicz, Z. 1968. Zarys składni polskiej [An outline of Polish syntax]. (5th edn.) Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar

  • Kopeć, M. 2014a. “MMAX2 for coreference annotation”. Proceedings of the Demonstrations at the 14th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics Association for Computational Linguistics. 93–96. <http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/k14-2024>

  • Kopeć, M. 2014b. “Zero subject detection for Polish”. Proceedings of the 14th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Volume 2: Short papers Gothenburg: Association for Computational Linguistics. 221–225. <http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/k14-4043>

  • Kopeć, M. 2018. Summarization of Polish press articles using coreference. (PhD dissertaion, Instytut Podstaw Informatyki PAN, Warsaw.)Google Scholar

  • Kopeć, M. and M. Ogrodniczuk. 2012. “Creating a coreference resolution system for Polish”. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2012) Istanbul: European Language Resources Association. 192–195.Google Scholar

  • Kulików, S., J. Romaniuk and N. Suszczańska. 2004. “A syntactical analysis of anaphora in the Polsyn parser”. In: Kłopotek, M.A., S.T. Wierzchoń and K. Trojanowski (eds.), Intelligent information processing and web mining Berlin Springer 444–448. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-39985-8_50.Google Scholar

  • Kunz, K.A. 2010. Variation in English and German nominal coreference: A study of political essays Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

  • Kupść, A. and M. Marciniak. 1997. “Some notes on HPSG binding theory for Polish”. In: Junghanns, U. and G. Zybatow (eds.), Formale slavistik Frankfurt: Vervuert Verlag. 193–204.Google Scholar

  • Langacker, R.W. 2008. Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Lee, H., A. Chang, Y. Peirsman, N. Chambers, M. Surdeanu and D. Jurafsky. 2013. “Deterministic coreference resolution based on entity-centric, precision-ranked rules”. Computational Linguistics 39(4). 885–916. doi:10.1162/COLI_a_00152.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lee, H., Y. Peirsman, A. Chang, N. Chambers, M. Surdeanu and D. Jurafsky. 2011. “Stanford’s multi-pass sieve coreference resolution system at the CoNLL-2011 Shared Task”. Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning: Shared Task (CoNLL Shared Task 2011) Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics. 28–34. <http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2132936.2132938>

  • Lee, K., L. He, M. Lewis and L. Zettlemoyer. 2017. “End-to-end neural coreference resolution”. Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing Copenhagen: Association for Computational Linguistics. 188–197. <https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D17-1018>

  • Luo, X. 2005. “On coreference resolution performance metrics”. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (HLT 2005). Vancouver: Association for Computational Linguistics. 25–32. doi: 10.3115/1220575.1220579.Google Scholar

  • Luo, X., A. Ittycheriah, H. Jing, N. Kambhatla and S. Roukos. 2004. “A mention-synchronous coreference resolution algorithm based on the bell tree”. Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2004) Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics. 135–142. doi:10.3115/1218955.1218973.Google Scholar

  • Luo, X., S. Pradhan, M. Recasens and E. Hovy. 2014. “An extension of BLANC to system mentions”. Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Volume 2: Short papers. Baltimore: Association for Computational Linguistics. 24–29. <http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P14-2005>

  • Marciniak, M. 2002. “Anaphor binding in Polish. Theory and implementation”. In: Branco, A., T. McEnery and R. Mitkov (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Discourse Anaphora and Anaphor Resolution Colloquium (DAARC 2002) Lisbon: Edições Colibri. 117–122.Google Scholar

  • Marciniak, M. (ed.). 2010. Anotowany korpus dialogów telefonicznych [An annotated corpus of telephone conversations]. Warszawa: Akademicka Oficyna Wydawnicza EXIT.Google Scholar

  • Marciszewski, W. 1983. “Spójność strukturalna a spójność semantyczna” [Structural coherence vs. semantic coherence]. In: Dobrzyńska, T. and E. Janus (eds.), Tekst i zdanie [Text and sentence]. Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich. 183–189.Google Scholar

  • Markert, K., M. Nissim and N.N. Modjeska. 2003. “Using the web for nominal anaphora resolution”. Proceedings of the EACL Workshop on the Computational Treatment of Anaphora Budapest. 39–46.Google Scholar

  • McCarthy, J.F. and W.G. Lehnert. 1995. “Using decision trees for coreference resolution”. Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 1995) Montreal. 1050–1055.Google Scholar

  • Mitkov, R., R. Evans, C. Orăsan, L.A. Ha and V. Pekar. 2007. “Anaphora resolution: To what extent does it help NLP applications?” In: Branco, A. (ed.), Anaphora: Analysis, algorithms and applications Berlin: Springer. 179–190.Google Scholar

  • Mitkov, R. and M. Styś. 1997. “Robust reference resolution with limited knowledge: High precision genre-specific approach for English and Polish”. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP-97) 74–81.

  • Moosavi, N.S. and M. Strube. 2016. “Which coreference evaluation metric do you trust? A proposal for a link-based entity aware metric”. Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. (Volume 1: Long papers) Berlin: Association for Computational Linguistics. 632–642. <http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P16-1060>

  • Müller, C. and M. Strube. 2001. “MMAX: A tool for the annotation of multi-modal corpora”. Proceedings of the 2nd IJCAI Workshop on Knowledge and Reasoning in Practical Dialogue Systems 45–50.

  • Nair, V. and G.E. Hinton. 2010. “Rectified linear units improve restricted Boltzmann machines”. In: Fürnkranz, J. and T. Joachims (eds.), Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-10) Haifa: Omnipress. 807–814. <http://www.icml2010.org/papers/432.pdf>

  • Nedoluzhko, A., M. Novák and M. Ogrodniczuk. 2018. “PAWS: A multi-lingual parallel treebank with anaphoric relations”. Proceedings of the NAACL-HLT Workshop on Computational Models of Reference, Anaphora and Coreference (CRAC 2018) New Orleans: Association for Computational Linguistics. 68–76.Google Scholar

  • Ng, V. and C. Cardie. 2002. “Improving machine learning approaches to coreference resolution”. Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2002) Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics. 104–111.Google Scholar

  • Nitoń, B. 2013. “Evaluation of Uryupina’s coreference resolution features for Polish”. Proceedings of the 6th Language and Technology Conference: Human Language Technologies as a Challenge for Computer Science and Linguistics (LTC 2013) Poznań: Wydawnictwo Poznańskie, Fundacja Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza. 122–126.Google Scholar

  • Nitoń, B., P. Morawiecki and M. Ogrodniczuk. 2018. “Deep neural networks for coreference resolution for Polish”. Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018) Miyazaki: European Language Resources Association. 395–400.Google Scholar

  • Nitoń, B. and M. Ogrodniczuk. 2017. “Multi-pass sieve coreference resolution system for Polish”. Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Language, Data and Knowledge (LDK 2017) Springer Berlin Heidelberg. U–15. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-59888-8_20.Google Scholar

  • Ogrodniczuk, M. 2013. “Translation- and projection-based unsupervised coreference resolution for Polish”. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Intelligent Information Systems Berlin: Springer. 125–130.Google Scholar

  • Ogrodniczuk, M., K. Głowińska, M. Kopeć, A. Savary and M. Zawisławska. 2013. “Interesting linguistic features in coreference annotation of an inflectional language”. 12th China National Conference on Computational Linguistics (CCL) and the 1st International Symposium on Natural Language Processing Based on Naturally Annotated Big Data (NLP-NABD). Berlin: Springer. 97–108.Google Scholar

  • Ogrodniczuk, M., K. Głowińska, M. Kopeć, A. Savary and M. Zawisławska. 2015. Co-reference in Polish: Annotation, resolution and evaluation Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Ogrodniczuk, M. and M. Kopeć. 2011a. “End-to-end coreference resolution baseline system for Polish”. Proceedings of the 5th Language and Technology Conference: Human Language Technologies as a Challenge for Computer Science and Linguistics (LTC 2011) Poznań: Wydawnictwo Poznańskie, Fundacja Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza. 167–171.Google Scholar

  • Ogrodniczuk, M. and M. Kopeć. 2011b. “Rule-based coreference resolution module for Polish”. Proceedings of the 8th Discourse Anaphora and Anaphor Resolution Colloquium (DAARC 2011) Faro. 191–200.Google Scholar

  • Ogrodniczuk, M., A. Wójcicka, K. Głowińska and M. Kopeć. 2014. “Detection of nested mentions for coreference resolution in Polish”. Advances in Natural Language Processing: Proceedings of the Oth International Conference on NLP, PolTAL 2014 Warszawa: Springer International Publishing. 270–277.Google Scholar

  • Ogrodniczuk, M. and M. Zawisławska. 2016. “Bridging relations in Polish: Adaptation of existing typologies”. Proceedings of the Workshop on Coreference Resolution Beyond OntoNotes (CORBON 2016) San Diego: Association for Computational Linguistics. 16–22. <http://aclweb.org/anthology/W/W16/W16-0703.pdf>

  • Paduczewa, J. 1992. Wypowiedź i jej odniesienie do rzeczywistości. (Referencyjne aspekty znaczenia zaimków) [The utterance and its relation to reality. (Referential aspects of pronominal meanings.)]. Warszawa: PWN.Google Scholar

  • Piasecki, M., S. Szpakowicz and B. Broda. 2009. A Wordnet from the ground up Wrocław: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej.Google Scholar

  • Pisarek, J. 2012. Językowe mechanizmy nawiązania w tekstach publicystycznych na przykładzie felietonów ,, Tygodnika Powszechnego” [The linguistic mechanisms of reference in journalistic texts on the example of feature articles in the „Tygodnik Powszechny”]. Kraków: Wydział Polonistyki Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego Rozprawa doktorska.Google Scholar

  • Pisarkowa, K. 1969. Funkcje składniowe polskich zaimków odmiennych [The syntactic functions of Polish declinable pronouns]. Kraków: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich. Polska Akademia Nauk, Oddział w Krakowie.Google Scholar

  • Poesio, M., T. Ishikawa, S. Schulte im Walde and R. Vieira. 2002. “Acquiring lexical knowledge for anaphora resolution”. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2002) Las Palmas. 1220–1224. <http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2002/pdf/117.pdf>

  • Poesio, M. and R. Vieira. 1998. “A corpus-based investigation of definite description use”. Computational Linguistics 24(2). 183–216.Google Scholar

  • Poesio, M., R. Vieira and S. Teufel. 1997. “Resolving bridging references in unrestricted text”. Proceedings of a Workshop on Operational Factors in Practical, Robust Anaphora Resolution for Unrestricted Texts (ANARESOLUTION ’97) Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics. U–6.Google Scholar

  • Pollard, C. and I.A. Sag. 1994. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Pradhan, S., A. Moschitti, N. Xue, O. Uryupina and Y. Zhang. 2012. “CoNLL-2012 Shared Task: Modeling multilingual unrestricted coreference in OntoNotes”. Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL 2012) Jeju. U–40.Google Scholar

  • Prasad, R., B. Webber and A. Joshi. 2014. “Reflections on the Penn Discourse Tree-bank, comparable corpora, and complementary annotation”. Computational Linguistics 40(4). 921–950. doi:10.1162/COLI\_a\_00204.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Presspublica. 2002. Rzeczpospolita Corpus. [electronic resource]. <http://www.cs.put.poznan.pl/dweiss/rzeczpospolita>

  • Przepiórkowski, A., M. Bańko, R.L. Górski and B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (eds.). 2012. Narodowy Korpus Języka Polskiego [The National Corpus of Polish]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.Google Scholar

  • Przepiórkowski, A. and A. Buczyński. 2007. “Spejd: Shallow parsing and disambiguation engine”. Proceedings of the 3rd Language and Technology Conference Poznań. 340–344.Google Scholar

  • Przepiórkowski, A.,A. Kupść, M. Marciniak and A. Mykowiecka. 2002. Formalny opis języka polskiego: Teoria i implementacja [A formal description of Polish. Theory and implementation]. Warszawa: Akademicka Oficyna Wydawnicza EXIT. <http://nlp.ipipan.waw.pl/~adamp/Papers/2002-hpsg-book/>

  • Raghunathan, K., H. Lee, S. Rangarajan, N. Chambers, M. Surdeanu, D. Jurafsky and C. Manning. 2010. “A multi-pass sieve for coreference resolution”. Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2010) Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics. 492–501. <http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1870658.1870706>

  • Rahman, A. and V. Ng. 2009. “Supervised models for coreference resolution”. Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2009) Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics. 968–977.Google Scholar

  • Rahman, A. and V. Ng. 2012. “Translation-based projection for multilingual coreference resolution”. Proceedings of the Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (HLT-NAACL 2012) Montreal: Association for Computational Linguistics. 720–730. <http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/N12-1090.>

  • Ratinov, L. and D. Roth. 2012. “Learning-based multi-sieve co-reference resolution with knowledge”. Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics. 1234–1244.Google Scholar

  • Recasens, M. 2010. Coreference: Theory, annotation, resolution and evaluation. (PhD dissertation, University of Barcelona PhD thesis.) <http://stel.ub.edu/cba2010/phd/phd.pdf>

  • Recasens, M. and E. Hovy. 2011. “BLANC: Implementing the Rand Index for coreference evaluation”. Natural Language Engineering 17(4). 485–510. doi:10.1017/S135132491000029X.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Recasens, M., E. Hovy and M.A. Martı́. 2011. “Identity, non-identity, and near-identity: Addressing the complexity of coreference”. Lingua 121(6). 1138–1152.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Reinders-Machowska, E. 1991. “Binding in Polish”. In: Koster, J. and E. Reuland (eds.), Long distance anaphora Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 137–150.Google Scholar

  • Ryant, N. and T. Scheffler. 2006. “Binding of anaphors in LTAG”. Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Tree Adjoining Grammar and Related Formalisms Sydney: Association for Computational Linguistics. 65–72.Google Scholar

  • Sidner, C.L. 1979. Towards a computational theory of definite anaphora comprehension in English discourse Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar

  • Soon, W.M., H.T. Ng and C.Y. Lim. 1999. “Corpus-based learning for noun phrase coreference resolution”. 1999 Joint SIGDAT Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Very Large Corpora College Park: The Association for Computer Linguistics. 285–291. <http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W99-0634>

  • Soon, W.M., H.T. Ng and C.Y. Lim. 2001. “A machine learning approach to coreference resolution of noun phrases”. Computational Linguistics 27(4). 521–544.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Srivastava, N., G. Hinton, A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever and R. Salakhutdinov. 2014. “Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting”. Journal of Machine Learning Research 15. 1929–1958. <http://jmlr.org/papers/v15/srivastava14a.html>

  • Stoyanov, V., N. Gilbert, C. Cardie and E. Riloff. 2009. “Conundrums in noun phrase coreference resolution: Making sense of the state-of-the-art”. Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP Suntec, Singapore: Association for Computational Linguistics. 656–664. <http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P/P09/P09-1074>

  • Stroińska, M. 1992. “Styl bezosobowy a spójność referencjalna w dyskursie” [The impersonal style and referential coherence in discourse]. In: Dobrzyńska, T. (ed.), Typy tekstów: Zbiór studiów [Text types: A collection of studies]. Warszawa: Instytut Badań Literackich Polskiej Akademii Nauk. 15–25.Google Scholar

  • Stuckardt, R. 2001. “Design and enhanced evaluation of a robust anaphor resolution algorithm”. Computational Linguistics 27(4). 479–506. doi:10.1162/089120101753342635.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Studnicki, F. and B. Polanowska. 1983. “Zautomatyzowane rozwiązywanie odesłań występujących w tekstach prawnych” [Automated solution of reference in legal text]. Studia Semiotyczne 13. 65–90.Google Scholar

  • Szkudlarek-Śmiechowska, E. 2003. Wskaźniki nawiązania we współczesnych tekstach polskich (na materiale współczesnej nowelistyki polskiej) [Indicators of reference in modern Polish texts]. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.Google Scholar

  • Szwedek, A. 1975. “Coreference and sentence stress in English and Polish”. Papers and Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 3. 209–213.Google Scholar

  • Topolińska, Z. 1984. “Składnia grupy imiennej” [The syntax of the noun phrase]. In: Grochowski, M., S. Karolak and Z. Topolińska (eds.), Składnia [Syntax]. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe. 301–389.Google Scholar

  • Trawiński, B. 2007. “Referential relations in Polish”. Book of Abstracts of the 7th European Conference on Formal Description of Slavic Languages (FDSL-7) Leipzig: University of Leipzig. 109–111.Google Scholar

  • Trofimiec, S. 2007. “Konstrukcje anaforyczne jako wskaźniki nawiązania w tekstach prasowych” [Anaphoric constructions as indicators of reference in press texts]. Język Polski LXXXVII(1). 24–28.Google Scholar

  • Uryupina, O. 2007. Knowledge acquisition for coreference resolution. (PhD dissertation, Saarland University.). <http://scidok.sulb.uni-saarland.de/volltexte/2007/1255/pdf/olga_phd.pdf>

  • Vater, H. 2009. Wstęp do lingwistyki tekstu. Struktura i rozumienie tekstów [An introduction to text linguistics]. Wrocław: Atut.Google Scholar

  • Versley, Y., S.P. Ponzetto, M. Poesio, V. Eidelman, A. Jern, J. Smith, X. Yang and A. Moschitti. 2008. “BART: A modular toolkit for coreference resolution”. Proceedings of the ACL-08: HLT Demo Session (companion volume) Columbus: Association for Computational Linguistics. O–12.Google Scholar

  • Vieira, R. and S. Teufel. 1997. “Towards resolution of bridging descriptions”. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics Madrid: Association for Computational Linguistics. 522–524. doi:10.3115/976909.979689.Google Scholar

  • Vilain, M., J. Burger, J. Aberdeen, D. Connolly and L. Hirschman. 1995. “A model-theoretic coreference scoring scheme”. Proceedings of the 6th Message Understanding Conference (MUC-6) Columbia: Association for Computational Linguistics. 45–52.Google Scholar

  • Wajszczuk, J. 1978. Syntaktyczny stosunek nawiązania (na materiale współczesnego języka rosyjskiego) [The syntactic relation of reference (on the material of modern Russian]. (PhD dissertation, Uniwersytet Warszawski.)Google Scholar

  • Waszczuk, J., K. Głowińska, A. Savary, A. Przepiórkowski and M. Lenart. 2013. “Annotation tools for syntax and named entities in the National Corpus of Polish”. International Journal of Data Mining, Modelling and Management 5(2). 103–122.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Willim, E. 1995. “In defence of the subject: Evidence from Polish”. In: Gussmann, E. (ed.), Licensing in syntax and phonology Lublin: Folium. 147–164.Google Scholar

  • Woliński, M. 2014. “Morfeusz reloaded”. Proceedings of the Oth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2014) Reykjavík: European Language Resources Association. 1106–1111.Google Scholar

  • Zeyrek, D., A. Mendes, Y. Grishina, M. Kurfalı, S. Gibbon and M. Ogrodniczuk. 2018. “TED Multilingual Discourse Bank (TED-MDB): A parallel corpus annotated in the PDTB style”. Language Resources and Evaluation

  • Zhou, G. and J. Su. 2004. “A high-performance coreference resolution system using a constraint-based multi-agent strategy”. Proceedings of COLING 2004 Geneva: COLING. 522–528.Google Scholar

  • Zikánová, S., E. Hajičová, B. Hladká, P. Jínová, J. Mírovský, A. Nedoluzhko, L. Poláková, K. Rysová, M. Rysová and J. Václ. 2015. Discourse and coherence. From the sentence structure to relations in text Prague: Charles University.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2019-08-17

Published in Print: 2019-06-26


Citation Information: Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, Volume 55, Issue 2, Pages 367–396, ISSN (Online) 1897-7499, ISSN (Print) 0137-2459, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2019-0014.

Export Citation

© 2019 Faculty of English, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in