Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Psychology

Editor-in-Chief: Kiefer, Markus

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2543-8883
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Reduction of Chronic Stress and Trait Anxiety by Inquiry of Cognitive Appraisals with the Inquiry-Based Stress Reduction (IBSR) Method

Ann Krispenz / Oliver Dickhäuser
Published Online: 2019-04-01 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/psych-2018-0013

Abstract

Background: Chronic stress and anxiety can impair individuals’ health. Appraisal theories assume that stress and anxiety are experienced if individuals appraise a situation as threatening for their well-being. Thus, the modification of cognitive appraisals can be expected to reduce stress and anxiety. A potentially effective method to modify individuals’ appraisals is inquiry-based stress reduction (IBSR; Mitchell & Mitchell, 2003).

Aims: The present study assesses the effects of IBSR on chronic stress and trait anxiety in comparison to a matched control group.

Method: We used a quasi-experimental repeated-measurement design and a non-clinical sample of N = 199. Participants’ chronic stress and anxiety levels were assessed before and three months after a nine-day IBSR training. To account for the consequences of missing randomization, propensity score matching was applied.

Results: As expected, data analyses revealed that in the IBSR training group chronic stress and trait anxiety statistically significantly decreased over the course of three months whereas in the matched control group, the levels of chronic stress and trait anxiety did not statistically significantly change.

Conclusions: IBSR seems to effectively reduce trait anxiety and chronic stress in a non-clinical sample.

Keywords: health psychology; inquiry-based stress reduction; cognitive appraisals

References

  • Anisman, H. (2015). Stress and Your Health: From Vulnerability to Resilience. Wiley Blackwell: West Sussex.Google Scholar

  • Arnold, M. B. (1960). Emotion and personality: Volume 1 – Psychological aspects. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

  • Blascovich, J. (2008). Challenge and treat. In A. J. Elliot (Ed.), Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation (pp. 431–474). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

  • Briñol, P., McChaslin, M. J., & Petty, R. E. (2012). Self-generated persuasion: Effects of the target and direction of arguments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 925–940. Doi: 10.1037/a0027231Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Caliendo, M., & Kopeinig, S. (2005). Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching, No. 1588, IZA Discussion Papers, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).Google Scholar

  • Chen, S., & Chaiken, S. (1999). The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 73–96). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

  • Ellis, A. (2002). Rational emotive behavior therapy. In M. Hersen & W. Sledge (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Psychotherapy (Volume 2, pp. 483–487). Elsevier Science.Google Scholar

  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. Doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heinrich, C., Maffioli, A., & Vázques, G. (2010). A primer for applying propensity score matching, Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar

  • Krispenz, A., & Dickhäuser, O. (2018). Effects of an inquiry-based short intervention on state test anxiety in comparison to alternative coping strategies. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 201. DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00201Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Laux, L., Glanzmann, P., Schaffner, P., & Spielberger, C. D. (1981). Das State-Trait-Angstinventar [State-trait anxiety inventory]. Göttingen: Beltz Verlag.Google Scholar

  • Lazarus, R. S. (1999). Stress and emotion. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

  • Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

  • Leufke, R., Zilcha-Mano, S., Feld, A., & Lev-ari, S. (2013). Effects of „The Work” meditation on psychopathological symptoms. Alternative and Complementary Therapies, 19, 147–151. DOI 10.1089/act.2013.19303CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Levari, S., Zilcha-Mano, S., Rivo, L., Geva, R., & Ron, I. (2013). A prospective pilot clinical trial of „The Work” meditation technique for survivors of breast cancer. European Journal of Integrative Medicine, 6, 487–494. DOI 10.1016/j.eujim.2013.07.003CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McEwan, B. S. (2008). Central effects of stress hormones in health and disease: Understanding the protective and damaging effects of stress and stress mediators. European Journal of Pharmacology, 583, 174–185. DOI 10.1016/j.ejphar.2007.11.071CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Mitchell, B. K., & Mitchell, S. (2003). Loving what is: Four questions that can change your life (2nd edition). New York: Three Rivers Press.Google Scholar

  • Moors, A., Ellsworth, P. C., Scherer, K. R., & Frijda, N. H. (2013). Appraisal theories of emotion: State of the art and future development. Emotion Review, 5, 119–124. DOI 10.1177/1754073912468165CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2, 175–220. DOI 10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychological Review, 18, 315–341. DOI 10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Scherer, K. R. (1984). On the nature and function of emotions: A component process approach. In K. R. Scherer & P. Ekman (Eds.), Approaches to emotion (pp. 293–317). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

  • Schneiderman, N., Ironson, G., & Siegel, S. D. (2005). Stress and health: Psychological, behavioral, and biological determinants. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 607–628. DOI 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.144141CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schulz, P., Schlotz, W., & Becker, P. (2004). Trierer Inventar zum chronischen Stress [Trierer inventory of chronic stress]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar

  • Smernoff, E., Mitnik, I., Kolodner, K., & Lev-ari, S. (2015). The effects of „The Work” meditation (Byron Katie) on psychological symptoms and quality of life – A pilot clinical study. Explore, 11, 24–31.Google Scholar

  • Van Rhijn, M. O., Mitnik, I., & Lev-ari, S. (2015). Inquiry-based stress reduction: Another approach for questioning thoughts. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. DOI 10.18103/mra.v0i4.191CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wessler, R. L. (2002). Cognitive appraisal therapy. In M. Hersen & W. Sledge (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Psychotherapy (Volume 2, pp. 431–434). Elsevier Science.Google Scholar

  • West, S. G., Cham, H., Thoemmes, F., Renneberg, B., Schulze, J., & Weiler, M. (2014). Propensity scores as a basis for equating groups: Basic principles and application in clinical treatment outcome research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82, 906–919. DOI 10.1037/a0036387CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

About the article

Received: 2018-05-15

Accepted: 2019-02-11

Published Online: 2019-04-01

Published in Print: 2019-01-01


Citation Information: Open Psychology, Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages 185–199, ISSN (Online) 2543-8883, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/psych-2018-0013.

Export Citation

© 2019 Ann Krispenz et al., published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License. BY 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in