Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Psychology

Editor-in-Chief: Kiefer, Markus

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2543-8883
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Committed to change? Human resource management practices and attitudes towards organizational change

Sabine Raeder / Mariya V. Bokova
Published Online: 2019-11-11 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/psych-2018-0022

Abstract

Organizations rely on human resource management (HRM) practices to steer organizational change, but little is known about the effects of HRM practices on employees’ attitudes towards change. This study aims to investigate the relationship between employees’ perception of HRM practices and their commitment to change. The sample comprised 221 employees of a public organization after it underwent an organizational change. Data were analyzed through structural equation modeling, considering HRM practices as individual predictors or as a second-order factor of aligned HRM practices. The results indicate that the model with individual HRM practices achieved a superior fit, but only two practices – communication and autonomy – were related to affective commitment to change. The model with a second-order factor of aligned HRM practices showed a clear positive relationship with affective and normative commitment to change, and a clear negative relationship with continuance commitment to change. Investing in HRM practices to support an ongoing change helps organizations to convince employees of the necessity and value of the change. This study provides empirical evidence that HRM practices are important for supporting employees’ commitment to change and encouraging their positive behavior towards change.

Keywords: Organizational change; Commitment to change; Human resource management practices

References

  • Alfes, K., Truss, C., & Gill, J. (2010). The HR manager as change agent: Evidence from the public sector. Journal of Change Management, 10, 109-127. doi:10.1080/14697010903549465Google Scholar

  • Antila, E. M. (2006). The role of HR managers in international mergers and acquisitions: A multiple case study. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17, 999-1020. doi:10.1080/09585190600693322CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Armenakis, A. A., Harris, S. G., & Feild, H. S. (1999). Making change permanent. A model for institutionalizing change interventions. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 12, 97-128. doi:10.1016/S0897-3016(99)12005-6CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Becker, T. E. (2005). Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations. Organizational Research Methods, 8, 274-289. doi:10.1177/1094428105278021Google Scholar

  • Bouckenooghe, D. (2012). The role of organizational politics, contextual resources, and formal communication on change recipients’ commitment to change: A multilevel study. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21, 575-602. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2011.591573CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Bouckenooghe, D., Schwarz, G. M., & Minbashian, A. (2015). Herscovitch and Meyer’s three-component model of commitment to change: Meta-analytic findings. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24, 578-595. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2014.963059Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brayfield, A. H., & Rothe, H. F. (1951). An index of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 35, 307-311. doi:10.1037/h0055617CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Caldwell, R. (2001). Champions, adapters, consultants and synergists: The new change agents in HRM. Human Resource Management Journal, 11, 39-52. doi:10.1111/j.1748-8583.2001.tb00044.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Clinton, M., & Guest, D. E. (2013). Testing universalistic and contingency HRM assumptions across job levels. Personnel Review, 42, 529-551. doi:10.1108/PR-07-2011-0109Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cole, M. S., Bruch, H., & Vogel, B. (2006). Emotion as mediators of the relations between perceived supervisor support and psychological hardiness on employee cynicism. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 27, 463-484. doi:10.1002/job.381CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Conway, E., & Monks, K. (2008). HR practices and commitment to change: An employee-level analysis. Human Resource Management Journal, 18, 72-89. doi:10.1111/j.1748-8583.2007.00059.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Delery, J. E., & Doty, D. H. (1996). Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictors. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 802-835. doi:10.2307/256713CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350-383. doi:10.2307/2666999CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fugate, M. (2012). The impact of leadership, management, and HRM on employee reactions to organizational change. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 31, 181-212. doi:10.1108/S0742-7301(2012)0000031007CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Giauque, D. (2014). Attitudes toward organizational change among public middle managers. Public Personnel Management 44, 70-98. doi:10.1177/0091026014556512Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Giauque, D., Resenterra, F., & Siggen, M. (2010). The relationship between HRM practices and organizational commitment of knowledge workers. Facts obtained from Swiss SMEs. Human Resource Development International, 13, 185-205. doi:10.1080/13678861003703716CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Herscovitch, L., & Meyer, J. P. (2002). Commitment to organizational change: extension of a three-component model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 474-487. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.87.3.474CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hill, N. S., Seo, M.-G., Kang, J. H., & Taylor, M. S. (2012). Building employee commitment to change across organizational levels: The influence of hierarchical distance and direct managers’ transformational leadership. Organization Science, 23, 758-777. doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0662CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Hirst, G., Mann, L., Bain, P., Pirola-Merlo, A., & Richvera, A. (2004). Learning to lead: the development and testing of a model of leadership learning. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 311-327. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.02.011CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hox, J. (2010). Multilevel analysis. Techniques and applications (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Jackson, S. E., Schuler, R. S., & Jiang, K. (2014). An aspirational framework for strategic human resource management. The Academy of Management Annals, 8, 1-56. doi:10.1080/19416520.2014.872335CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jackson, S. E., & Seo, J. (2010). The greening of strategic HRM scholarship. Organization Management Journal, 7, 278-290. doi:10.1057/omj.2010.37CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jaros, S. (2010). Commitment to organizational change: A critical review. Journal of Change Management, 10, 79-108. doi:10.1080/14697010903549457Google Scholar

  • Jiang, K., Lepak, D. P., Hu, J., & Baer, J. C. (2012). How does human resource management influence organizational outcomes? A meta-analytic investigation of mediating mechanisms. Academy of Management ]ournal, 55, 1264-1294. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0088CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kinnie, N., Hutchinson, S., Purcell, J., Rayton, B., & Swart, J. (2005). Satisfaction with HR practices and commitment to the organisation: why one size does not fit all. Human Resource Management Journal, 15, 9-29. doi:10.1111/j.1748-8583.2005.tb00293.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lepak, D. P., & Shaw, J. D. (2008). Strategic HRM in North America: looking to the future. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19, 1486-1499. doi:10.1080/09585190802200272Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MacKinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L., & Lockwood, C. M. (2000). Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prevention Science, 1, 173-181. doi:10.1023/A:1026595011371CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Maheshwari, S., & Vohra, V. (2015). Identifying critical HR practices impacting employee perception and commitment during organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 28, 872-894. doi:10.1108/JOCM-03-2014-0066CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus user’s guide (Vol. 7th). Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.Google Scholar

  • Neves, P. (2011). Building commitment to change: The role of perceived supervisor support and competence. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20, 437-450. doi:10.1080/13594321003630089CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Oreg, S., Vakola, M., & Armenakis, A. (2011). Change recipients’ reactions to organizational change: A 60-year review of quantitative studies. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 47, 461–524. doi:10.1177/0021886310396550CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Parish, J. T., Cadwallader, S., & Busch, P. (2008). Want to, need to, ought to: Employee commitment to organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 21, 32-52. doi:10.1108/09534810810847020CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Purcell, J., & Hutchinson, S. (2007). Front-line managers as agents in the HRM-performance causal chain: theory, analysis and evidence. Human Resource Management Journal, 3-20. doi:10.1111/j.1748-8583.2007.00022.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rogiest, S., Segers, J., & Witteloostuijn, A. v. (2015). Climate, communication and participation impacting commitment to change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 28, 1094-1106. doi:10.1108/JOCM-06-2015-0101Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8, 23-74. doi:10.1.1.509.4258Google Scholar

  • Seo, M.-G., Taylor, M. S., Hill, N. S., Zhang, X., Tesluk, P. E., & Lorinkova, N. M. (2012). The role of affect and leadership during organizational change. Personnel Psychology, 65, 121-165. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01240.xCrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Shin, J., Seo, M.-G., Shapiro, D. L., & Taylor, M. S. (2015). Maintaining employees’ commitment to organizational change: The role of leaders’ informational justice and transformational leadership. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 51, 501–528. doi:10.1177/0021886315603123Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tomas, J. M., & Oliver, A. (1999). Rosenberg’s self-esteem scale: Two factors or method effects. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 84-98. doi:10.1080/10705519909540120CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vandenberg, R. J., Richardson, H. A., & Eastman, L. J. (1999). The impact of high involvement work processes on organizational effectiveness : A second-order latent variable approach. Group & Organization Management, 24, 300-339. doi:10.1177/1059601199243004CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Whelan-Berry, K. S., & Somerville, K. A. (2010). Linking Change Drivers and the Organizational Change Process: A Review and Synthesis. Journal of Change Management, 10, 175-193. doi:10.1080/14697011003795651Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2018-11-21

Accepted: 2019-08-13

Published Online: 2019-11-11

Published in Print: 2019-01-01


Citation Information: Open Psychology, Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages 345–358, ISSN (Online) 2543-8883, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/psych-2018-0022.

Export Citation

© 2019 Sabine Raeder et al., published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License. BY 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in