Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Quaestiones Geographicae

The Journal of Adam Mickiewicz University

4 Issues per year

CiteScore 2016: 0.43

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.258
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.359

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Criteria to Distinguish Between Periglacial, Proglacial and Paraglacial Environments

Olav Slaymaker
  • Department of Geography, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
Published Online: 2011-03-22 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10117-011-0008-y

Criteria to Distinguish Between Periglacial, Proglacial and Paraglacial Environments

Clarification of the differences between the terms periglacial, proglacial and paraglacial is based on consideration of their conventional definitions, and noting that the term "periglacial" is a function of process, "proglacial" is a function of location and "paraglacial" is a function of degree and mode of recovery from the disturbance of continental glaciation. Periglacial and proglacial environments are commonly viewed as being adjusted to contemporary process, though important questions have been raised about relict periglacial landscapes in this regard. Paraglacial environments are explicitly out of adjustment with contemporary process and retain in their configuration a glacial signature. All three concepts are seen to be essential to comprehensive understanding of glaciated environments. It is a nested set of concepts which overlap in the field but none of the terms is redundant. Criteria for differentiation of these cold environment descriptors are proposed.

Keywords: periglacial; proglacial; paraglacial; disturbance regime

  • Andre M. F., 2003. Do periglacial areas evolve under periglacial conditions? Geomorphology 52: 149-164.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ballantyne C. K., 2002. Paraglacial geomorphology. Quaternary Science Reviews 21: 1935-2017.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Benn D. I., Evans D. J. A., 1998. Glaciers and Glaciation. Edward Arnold, London: 734.Google Scholar

  • Brardinoni F., Hassan M., 2006. Glacial erosion, evolution of river profiles and the organization of process domains in mountain drainage basins of British Columbia. Journal of Geophysical Research 11: DOI:10.1029/2005JF000358CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cammeraat L. H., 2002. A review of two strongly contrasting geomorphological systems within the context of scale. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 27: 1201-1222.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Church M., Gilbert R., 1975. Proglacial fluvial and lacustrine environments. In: A. V. Jopling, B. C. MacDonald (eds). Glaciofluvial and glaciolacustrine sedimentation. Special Publication 23. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralopists: Tulsa: 155-176.Google Scholar

  • Church M., Ryder J. M., 1972. Paraglacial sedimentation: a consideration of fluvial processes conditioned by glaciation. Geological Society of America Bulletin 83: 3072-3095.Google Scholar

  • Church M., Slaymaker O., 1989. Disequilibrium of Holocene sediment yield in glaciated British Columbia. Nature 337: 452-454.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Church M., 1972. Baffin Island sandurs: a study of arctic fluvial processes. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin 216.Google Scholar

  • Church M., 1998. The landscape of the Pacific North West. In: D. L. Hogan, P. J. Tschaplinski, S. Chatwin (eds). Carnation Creek and Queen Charlotte Islands Fish/Forestry Workshop: applying 20 years of coast research to management solutions. B. C. Land Management Handbook. BC Forestry Research Branch, Victoria: 13-22.Google Scholar

  • Church M., 2002. Fluvial sediment transfer in cold regions. In: K. Hewitt et al. (eds). Landscapes of Transition. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht: 93-118.Google Scholar

  • Curry A. M., 2000. Observations on the distribution of paraglacial reworking of glacigenic drift in western Norway. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift 54: 139-147.Google Scholar

  • DeWolf Y., 1988. Stratified slope deposits. In: M. J. Clark (ed). Advances in Periglacial Geomorphology. John Wiley, Chichester: 91-110.Google Scholar

  • Embleton-Hamann C., 2004. Proglacial landforms. In: A. S. Goudie (ed). Encyclopedia of Geomorphology vol. 2. Routledge, London: 810-813.Google Scholar

  • Evans D. J. A., Clark C. D., Mitchell W. A., 2005. The last British Ice Sheet: a review of the evidence utilized in the compilation of the Glacial Map of Britain. Earth Science Reviews 70: 253-312.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Forbes D. L., Syvitski J. P. M., 1994. Paraglacial coasts. In: R. W. G. Carter, C. D. Woodroffe (eds). Coastal Evolution: Late Quaternary Shoreline Morphodynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 373-424.Google Scholar

  • French H. M., Guglielmin M., 2000. Cryogenic weathering of granite, Northern Victoria Land, Antarctica. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes 11: 305-314.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • French H. M., Thorn C., 2006. The changing nature of periglacial geomorphology. Géomorphologie: relief, processus, environnement 3: 1-33.Google Scholar

  • French H. M., 2000. Does Lozinski's periglacial realm exist today? A discussion relevant to the usage of the term "periglacial". Permafrost and Periglacial Processes 11: 35-42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • French H. M., 2007. The Periglacial Environment. John Wiley V. C. H., Chichester: 478 p.Google Scholar

  • Hambrey M., 1994. Glacial Environments. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver: 296 p.Google Scholar

  • Hasholt B., Walling D. E., Owens P. N., 2000. Sedimentation in arctic proglacial lakes: Mittivakkat Glacier, southeast Greenland. Hydrological Processes 14: 679-699.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hewitt K., 2002. Introduction: landscape assemblages and transitions in cold regions. In: K. Hewitt et al., (eds). Landscapes of Transition. Kluwer Academic: Dordrecht: 1-8.Google Scholar

  • Hewitt K., 2006. Disturbance regime landscapes: mountain drainage systems interrupted by large rockslides. Progress in Physical Geography 30: 365-393.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Holling C. S., 2001. Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological and social systems. Ecosystems 4: 390-405.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Howat I. M., Joughin I., Tulaczyk S., Gogineni S., 2005. Rapid retreat and acceleration of Helheim Glacier, east Greenland. Geophysical Research Letters 32: L22502, DOI:10.1029/2005GL024737.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Iturrizaga L., 2003. The distribution and genesis of lateroglacial valleys in the Karakoram Mountains (Pakistan). Zeitschrift fur Geomorphologie Supplementband 130: 51-74.Google Scholar

  • Iturrizaga L., 2008. Paraglacial landform assemblages in the Hindu Kush and Karakoram Mountains. Geomorphology 95: 27-47.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Johnson P. G., 1984. Paraglacial conditions of instability and mass movement: a discussion. Zeitschrift fur Geomorphologie 28: 235-250Google Scholar

  • Jordan P., Slaymaker O., 1991. Holocene sediment production in Lillooet River basin: a sediment budget approach. Geographie physique et Quaternaire 45: 45-57.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lozinski W. von. 1912. Die periglaziale Fazies der mechanischen Verwitterung. Comptes Rendus, XI Congres Internationale Geologie, Stockholm 1910: 1039-1053.Google Scholar

  • Matthews J. A., Shakesby R. A., Berrisford M. S., McEwen L. J., 1998. Periglacial patterned ground in the Styggedalsbreen glacier foreland, Jotunheiment, southern Norway: microtopographical, paraglacial and geochronological controls. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes 9: 147-166.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mercier D., Etienne S., 2008. Paraglacial geomorphology: processes and paraglacial context. Geomorphology 95: 1-2.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Mercier D., 2002. La dynamique paraglaciaire des versants du Svalbard. Zeitschrift fur Geomorphologie 46: 203-222.Google Scholar

  • Moreau M., Mercier D., Laffly D., Roussel E., 2008. Impacts of recent paraglacial dynamics on plant colonization: a case study on Midtre Lovenbreen foreland, Spitsbergen (79°N). Geomorphology 95: 48-60.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Penck A., Bruckner E., 1909. Die Alpen im Eiszeitalter. 3 vols. Tauchnitz, Leipzig: 1199 p.Google Scholar

  • Phillips J. D., 2003. Sources of non-linearity and complexity in geomorphic systems. Progress in Physical Geography 27: 1-23.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Putkonen J., Connolly J., Orloff T., 2008. Landscape evolution degrades the geologic signature of past glaciations. Geomorphology 97: 208-217.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shaw J., Archer J., 1979. Deglaciation and glaciolacustrine sedimentation conditions, Okanagan valley, B. C. In: C. Schluchter (ed). Moraines and Varves. Balkema, Rotterdam: 347-355.Google Scholar

  • Sissons J. B., 1979. The limit of the Loch Lomond Advance in Glen Roy and vicinity. Scottish Journal of Geology 15: 31-42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Slaymaker O., Kelly R. E. J., 2007. The Cryosphere and Global Environmental Change. Blackwell, Oxford: 261.Google Scholar

  • Slaymaker O., 2009. Proglacial, periglacial or paraglacial? In: Knight J., Harrison S. (eds). Periglacial and Paraglacial Processes and Environments Special Publication 320. The Geological Society of London: 71-84.Google Scholar

  • Teller J. T., 1987. Proglacial lakes and the southern margin of the Laurentide Ice Sheet. In: W. F. Ruddiman, H. E. Wright (eds). North America and Adjacent Oceans during the Last Deglaciation. Geological Society of America, The Geology of North America, v.K-3: 39-69.Google Scholar

  • Thorn C. E., Loewenherz D. S., 1987. Spatial and temporal trends in alpine periglacial studies: implications for paleo-reconstruction. In: J. Boardman (ed). Periglacial Processes and Landforms in Britain and Ireland. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 57-65.Google Scholar

  • Washburn A. L., 1979. Geocryology: A Survey of Periglacial Processes and Environments. Edward Arnold, London: 406 p.Google Scholar

  • Wolman M. G., Gerson R., 1978. Relative scales of time and effectiveness of climate in watershed geomorphology. Earth Surface Processes 3: 189-208.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2011-03-22

Published in Print: 2011-01-01

Citation Information: Quaestiones Geographicae, ISSN (Print) 0137-477X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10117-011-0008-y.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in