Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Quaestiones Geographicae

The Journal of Adam Mickiewicz University

4 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.43

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.258
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.359

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2081-6383
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Comparison of Values of Pearson's and Spearman's Correlation Coefficients on the Same Sets of Data

Jan Hauke
  • Institute of Socio-Economic Geography and Spatial Management, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
/ Tomasz Kossowski
  • Institute of Socio-Economic Geography and Spatial Management, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Published Online: 2011-06-24 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10117-011-0021-1

Comparison of Values of Pearson's and Spearman's Correlation Coefficients on the Same Sets of Data

Spearman's rank correlation coefficient is a nonparametric (distribution-free) rank statistic proposed by Charles Spearman as a measure of the strength of an association between two variables. It is a measure of a monotone association that is used when the distribution of data makes Pearson's correlation coefficient undesirable or misleading. Spearman's coefficient is not a measure of the linear relationship between two variables, as some "statisticians" declare. It assesses how well an arbitrary monotonic function can describe a relationship between two variables, without making any assumptions about the frequency distribution of the variables. Unlike Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient, it does not require the assumption that the relationship between the variables is linear, nor does it require the variables to be measured on interval scales; it can be used for variables measured at the ordinal level. The idea of the paper is to compare the values of Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient as well as their statistical significance for different sets of data (original - for Pearson's coefficient, and ranked data for Spearman's coefficient) describing regional indices of socio-economic development.

Keywords: Pearson's correlation coefficient; Spearman's rank correlation coefficient; Kendall's tau; regional indices of socio-economic development

  • Anderson T.W., 1996. R.A. Fisher and multivariate analysis. Statistical Science 11 (1): 20-34.Google Scholar

  • Bravais A., 1846. Analyse mathématique sur les probabilités des erreurs de situation d'un point. Mémoires présentés par divers savants à l'Académie Royale des Sciences de l'Institut de France 9: 255-332.Google Scholar

  • Daniels H.E., 1944. The relation between measures of correlation in the universe of sample permutations. Biometrika 33 (2): 129-135.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fisher R.A., 1915. Frequency distribution of the values of the correlation coefficient in samples from an indefinitely large population. Biometrika 10: 507-521.Google Scholar

  • Fisher R.A., 1921. On the "probable error" of a coefficient of correlation deduced from a small sample. Metron 1: 3-32.Google Scholar

  • Galton F., 1869. Hereditary genius. An inquiry into its laws and consequences. MacMillan, London.Google Scholar

  • Galton F., 1875. Statistics by intercomparison. Philosophical Magazine 49: 33-46.Google Scholar

  • Galton F., 1885. Regression towards mediocrity in hereditary stature. Journal of the Anthropological Institute 15: 246-263.Google Scholar

  • Galton F., 1877. Typical laws of heredity. Proceedings of the Royal Institution 8: 282-301.Google Scholar

  • Galton F., 1888. Co-relations and their measurement, chiefly from anthropometric data. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 45: 135-145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Galton F., 1890. Kinship and correlation. North American Review 150: 419-431.Google Scholar

  • Griffith D.A., 2003. Spatial autocorrelation and spatial filtering. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar

  • Haining R., 1991. Bivariate correlation with spatial data. Geographical Analysis 23 (3): 210-227.Google Scholar

  • Kendall M.G., 1938. A new measure of rank correlation. Biometrika 30: 81-89.Google Scholar

  • Kendall M.G., 1948. Rank correlation methods. 4th ed. Griffin, London.Google Scholar

  • Pearson K., 1896. Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. III. Regression, heredity, and panmixia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Ser. A 187: 253-318.Google Scholar

  • Pearson K., 1900. Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. VII. On the correlation of characters not quantitatively measurable. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Ser. A 195: 1-47.Google Scholar

  • Pearson K., 1920. Notes on the history of correlation. Biometrika 13: 25-45.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Piovani J.I., 2008. The historical construction of correlation as a conceptual and operative instrument for empirical research. Quality & Quantity 42: 757-777.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Plata S., 2006. A note on Fisher's correlation coefficient. Applied Mathematical Letters 19: 499-502.Google Scholar

  • Rodgers J.L. & Nicewander W.A., 1988. Thirteen ways to look at the correlation coefficient. The American Statistician 42 (1): 59-66.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Spearman C.E, 1904a. The proof and measurement of association between two things. American Journal of Psychology 15: 72-101.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Spearman C.E, 1904b. General intelligence, objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology 15: 201-293.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Spearman C.E., 1910. Correlation calculated from faulty data. British Journal of Psychology 3: 271-295.Google Scholar

  • Stigler S.M., 1988. Francis Galton's account of the invention of correlation. Statistical Science 4 (2): 73-86.Google Scholar

  • Student, 1908. Probable error of a correlation coefficient. Biometrika 6: 302-310.Google Scholar

  • Valz P.D. & Thompson M.E., 1994. Exact inference for Kendall's S and Spearman's rho. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 3: 459-472.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Walker H. M., 1928. The relation of Plana and Bravais to theory of correlation. Isis 10 (2): 466-484.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Weida F.M., 1927. On various conceptions of correlation. The Annals of Mathematics, Second Series 29 (1/4): 276-312.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Xu Weichao, Yunhe Hou, Hung Y. S. & Yuexian Zou, 2010. Comparison of Spearman's rho and Kendall's tau in normal and contaminated normal models. Manuscript submitted to IEEE Transactions on Information Theory ( http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1011/1011.2009v1.pdf

  • Yule G.U., 1897a. On the significance of Bravais' formulae for regression, in the case of skew correlation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Ser. A 60: 477-489.Google Scholar

  • Yule G.U., 1897b. On the theory of correlation. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Ser. A 60: 812-854.Google Scholar

  • Yule G.U., 1903. Notes on the theory of association of attributes in statistics. Biometrika 2: 121-134.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yule G.U., 1907. On the theory of correlation for any number of variables, treated by a new system of notation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 79: 182-193.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article


Published Online: 2011-06-24

Published in Print: 2011-06-01


Citation Information: Quaestiones Geographicae, ISSN (Print) 0137-477X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10117-011-0021-1.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in