Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Quaestiones Geographicae

The Journal of Adam Mickiewicz University

4 Issues per year

CiteScore 2016: 0.43

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.258
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.359

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 31, Issue 4

Boosting Indonesia’S Creative Industries: Identification of People’S Characteristics and Creative Behaviour

Nugroho J. Setiadi / Agoestiana Boediprasetya / Wahdiaman
Published Online: 2013-01-16 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10117-012-0035-3


The purpose of this paper is to suggest an empirical model to assess personal characteristics and creative behaviour among creative workers in Indonesia’s creative industries. It is critical for people to do their best to ensure and realise that creativity is one of the most important elements in order to achieve high performance. Although a few previous studies have focused on the understanding of how the myriad of interacting potential creators can foster their performance, the characteristics and behaviour patterns of Indonesia’s creative workers are not well identified yet. Considering this, a new measure has been developed and evaluated with a group of creative workers (N = 220). This study presents data supporting the reliability (internal consistency) and validity (criterion and construction) of this multidimensional instrument. The results of factor analysis indicated a fivefactor solution. These factors demonstrated adequate internal consistency and correlations with the established measures of the Big-Five personality (e.g. the NEO-FFI of Costa & McCrae 1992). It was found that the most important elements determining the characteristics of creative people are enthusiasm, a low depression level, self-discipline, trust, and ideas.

Keywords: creativity; creative workers; personal characteristics; creative behaviour; creative industry

  • Amabile T.M., 1983. The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45: 357-376.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Amabile T.M., 1996, Creativity in context. Westview, Oxford.Google Scholar

  • Barron F.B. & Harrington D.M., 1981. Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32: 439-476.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Buttner E.H. & Gryskiewicz N., 1993. Entrepreneurs’ problem-solving styles: an empirical study using the Kirton adaption/innovation theory. Journal of Small BusinessManagement, 1: 22-31.Google Scholar

  • Cook P., 1998. Best practice creativity. Penguin Books, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar

  • Costa P.T. Jr.. & McCrae R.R., 1992. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL.Google Scholar

  • Couger J.D., 1995. Creative problem solving and opportunity finding. Boyd and Fraser, Danvers, Mass.Google Scholar

  • Cronbach L.J., 1951. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16: 297-334.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Departemen Perdagangan RI. (Ministry of Trade), 2008. Pengembangan Ekonomi Kreatif Indonesia 2025: Rencana Pengembangan Ekonomi Kreatif Indonesia 2009-2015 (Indonesia Creative Economy Portal 2009-2015). Indonesia Design-Power Teamwork, Jakarta.Google Scholar

  • Feist G.J., 1998. A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4: 290-309.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Feldhusen J.F. & Goh B.E., 1995. Assessing and accessing creativity: An integrative review of theory, research, and development. Creative Resources Journal, 8(3): 231-247.Google Scholar

  • Florida R., 2002. The rise of the Creative Class: And how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. Perseus Book Group, New York.Google Scholar

  • Ford C.M., 1996. A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. Academy of Management Review, 21(4): 1112-1142.Google Scholar

  • Freud S., 2010. The interpretation of dreams. Bartleby.Com., New York.Google Scholar

  • Gorney E., 2007. Dictionary of creativity: Terms, concepts, theories and findings in creativity research. http://creativity.netslova.ru/ (accessed April, 2012).Google Scholar

  • Hair J.F., Black W.C., Babin B.J., Anderson R.E. & Tatham R.L., 2006. Multivariate data analysis. 6th ed. Pearson Education, Inc., New Jersey.Google Scholar

  • Hoban M., 2012. An exploration of creative traits and behaviors. http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/bb/neuro/neuro02/web3/m1hoban.html (accessed 3 May 2012).Google Scholar

  • Hudson L., 1970. The question of creativity. In: Vernon P.E. (ed.), Creativity: Selected readings. Penguin Books, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar

  • James W., 1884. What is an emotion? Mind 9(34): 188-205.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jamison K.R., 1996. Touched with fire: Manic depressive illness and the artistic temperament. Free Press, New York.Google Scholar

  • Kroeck K.G & Brown K.W., 2004. Work applications of the Big Five model of personality. In: Thomas J.C. & Hersen M. (eds). Comprehensive handbook of psychological assessment. Vol. 4: Industrial & organizational assessment. John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey.Google Scholar

  • Lamm H. & Trommsdorff G., 1973. Group versus individual performance on tasks requiring ideational proficiency (brainstorming): A review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3: 361-387.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Maslow A., 1968. Toward a psychology of being. Van Nostrand, Reinhold, New York.Google Scholar

  • Mullen B., Johnson C. & Salas E., 1991. Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12(1): 3-23.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mumford M.D. & Gustafson S.B., 1988. Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103: 27-43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Razik T., 1976. Programming creative behaviour. British Journal of Education Technology, 3(7): 5-21.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Setiadi N.J., Boediprasetya A. & Wahdiaman, 2011. Seberapa kreatifkah pekerja Anda? Panduan mengukur potensi dan kinerja kreatif seseorang (How creative are your employees? A guide to measure someone’s creative potential and performance). Prenada Media, Publishers, Jakarta.Google Scholar

  • Simonton D.K., 1999. Origins of genius: Darwinian perspectives on creativity. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

  • Stavridou A. & Furnham A., 1996. The relationship between psychoticism, trait-creativity and the attentional mechanism of cognitive inhibition. Personality and Individual Differences, 21(1), 143-153.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Taylor W.C., 1988. Various approaches to and definitions of creativity. In: Stenberg R.J. (ed.), The nature of creativity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

  • Tolstoy L., 1955. What is art? (transl. by Pevear R. & Volokhonsky L.) Penguin Books, London.Google Scholar

  • Torrance E.P., 1988. The nature of creativity as manifest in testing. In: Stenberg R.J. (ed.), The nature of creativity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

  • Wallas G., 1926. The art of thought. Harcourt Brace, New York.Google Scholar

  • Zhou J. & Shalley C.E., 2003. Research on employee creativity: A critical review and directions for future research. In: Martocchio J. (ed.), Research in personnel and human resource management. Elsevier, Oxford, England: 165-217.Google Scholar

  • Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2013-01-16

Published in Print: 2012-12-01

Citation Information: Quaestiones Geographicae, Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages 53–62, ISSN (Online) , ISSN (Print) 0137-477X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10117-012-0035-3.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in