Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Quaestiones Geographicae

The Journal of Adam Mickiewicz University

4 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.43

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.258
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.359

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2081-6383
See all formats and pricing
Online
Open Access
*Prices in US$ apply to orders placed in the Americas only. Prices in GBP apply to orders placed in Great Britain only. Prices in € represent the retail prices valid in Germany (unless otherwise indicated). Prices are subject to change without notice. Prices do not include postage and handling if applicable. RRP: Recommended Retail Price.
More options …
Volume 35, Issue 2

Issues

Volume 37 (2018)

Volume 36 (2017)

Volume 35 (2016)

Volume 34 (2015)

Volume 33 (2014)

Volume 32 (2013)

Volume 31 (2012)

Volume 30 (2011)

Volume 29 (2010)

Urban Development Policy Challenges in East-Central Europe: Governance, City Regions and Financialisation

Ján Buček
  • Department of Human Geography and Demography, Comenius University, Mlynská dolina, 842 15 Bratislava, Slovak Republic
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2016-06-15 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/quageo-2016-0012

Open Access

Download PDF

Abstract

This paper responds primarily to current innovations that have emerged in urban development policy during the last decades also in East-Central Europe. Prior to the change of the social regime, we notice more traditional approaches in the urban development policy - public consumption, economic development and environmental issues. Among current urban development challenges in this region we may focus on governance, city regions, and financialisation. Besides an outline of a general framework, their application is studied in the case of Bratislava. We argue that especially economic development and environmental issues were neglected in the urban development policy during the socialist period. More elementary development issues obtained priority as policy positions during the early transition period. Taking up more current challenges was delayed compared with western cities, and they have specific features. Nevertheless, it seems that cities in this region recognised the importance of the mutually multiplying effects of governance, city regionalism and financialisation in an urban development policy.

Keywords: urban development policy; governance; financialisation; city regions; Bratislava

References

  • Academia Istropolitana Nova, 2010. Program hospodárskeho a sociálneho rozvoja hlavného mesta SR Bratislavy na roky 2010-2020. City Magistracy, Bratislava.Google Scholar

  • Albrechts L., 2012. Reframing strategic spatial planning by using coproduction perspective. Planning Theory 12(1): 46-63.Google Scholar

  • Andrusz G., Harloe M., Szelényi I. (eds), 1996. Cities after socialism: Urban and regional change and conflict in post-socialist societies. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar

  • Barlow M., 1991. Metropolitan government. Routledge, London.Google Scholar

  • Barnovský M., 2007. Industrializácia Slovenska a životné prostredie v období komunistického režimu. Acta Oeconomica Pragensia 15(7): 55-71.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bennett R.J., 1997. Administrative systems and economic spaces. Regional Studies 31(3): 323-336.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bezák A., 2000. Funkčné mestské regióny na Slovensku. Geographia Slovaca 15, Geografický ústav SAV, Bratislava.Google Scholar

  • Blakely E.J., Bradshaw T.k., 2002. Planning local economic development. Sage, Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar

  • Borén T., Gentile M., 2007. Metropolitan processes in post-communist states: An introduction. Geografiska Annaler 89B(2): 95-110.Google Scholar

  • Bratislava City Magistracy, 2003. Press Release - Hlavné mesto SR Bratislava podpísalo úverovú zmluvu na refinancovanie svojho dlhu s ISTROBANkOU, a. s., Bratislava. Available at www.bratislava.sk (accessed 7 June 2015).Google Scholar

  • Bratislava City Magistracy, 2013. Final Accounts of the city of Bratislava 2008-2013. Available at www.bratislava.sk (accessed 25 May 2015).Google Scholar

  • Bratislava City Magistracy, 2014. Informácia o stave prípravy Programového obdobia 2014-2020 pre Bratislavu a Bratislavský kraj. Bratislava City Council - meeting materials - 27 March 2014. Avaiable at www.bratislava.sk (accessed 28 May 2015).Google Scholar

  • Bratislava City Magistracy, 2015. Burza nápadov k Občianskemu rozpočtu bude prebiehať do konca júla. Available at www.bratislava.sk (accessed 11 June 2015).Google Scholar

  • Bratislava Region Tourism, 2015. General Assembly - Official record of the meeting of 9 March 2015. Available at http://www.tourismbratislava.com (accessed 17 June, 2015).Google Scholar

  • Bratislavské noviny, 2001. O zodpovednosti za stratu v SkB má rokovať zastupiteľstvo 29 Nov. 2001. Available at www.bratislavskenoviny.sk (accessed June 7, 2015).Google Scholar

  • Brenner N., 2004. Urban governance and the production of new state spaces in Western Europe, 1960-2000. Review of International Political Economy 11(3): 447-488.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Buček J., 2002. The role of local self-government in local development during post-socialist period: The case study of Bratislava. Acta Universitatis Carolinae Geographica 37(2): 105-119.Google Scholar

  • Buček J., 2006. Post-socialist urban development, planning and participation - The case study of Bratislava City Centre. In: Enyedi G., kovács Z. (eds), Social changes and social sustainability in historical urban centres - The case of Central Europe. Centre for Regional Studies of Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Pécs: 65-80.Google Scholar

  • Buček J., 2015. Municipal Property During the Post-socialist Transition in Slovakia. In: Buček J., Ryder A. (eds), Governance in Transition. Springer, Dordrech: 275-307.Google Scholar

  • Buček J., 2013. Priestorová organizácia miestnej samosprávy Bratislavy v teoretickom a medzinárodnom kontexte. In: Buček J., korec P. (eds), Moderná humánna geografia mesta Bratislava: priestorové štruktúry, siete a procesy. Univerzita komenského, Bratislava: 313-342.Google Scholar

  • Buček J., 2014. Urban governance, strategic planning and democracy in post-socialist transitional society. Acta Geographica Universitatis Comenianae 58(1): 45-70.Google Scholar

  • Buček J., korec P., 2013. Directly elected large cities’ mayors during transition: Advantages, risks, leadership style and governance in Slovakia. In: Pradhan P.k., Buček J., Razin E. (eds), 2013. Geography of governance: Dynamics for local development. IGU Commission on Geography of Governance, kathmandu/ Bratislava: 67-76.Google Scholar

  • Bútora I., 2011. kto zbúral podhradie? - Spory o Nový most a tvár Bratislavy. In: Nižňanský E., Bútora I. (eds), Stratené mesto - Bratislava - Pozsony - Pressburg. Marenčin PT, Bratislava: 11-153.Google Scholar

  • Christopherson S., Martin R., Pollard J., 2013. Financialisation: Roots and repercussions. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 6(3): 351-357.Google Scholar

  • Clarke N., 2012. Urban policy mobility, anti-politics, and histories of the transnational municipal movement. Progress in Human Geography 36(1): 25-43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Coq Huelva D., 2013. Urbanisation and financialisation in the context of a rescaling state: The case of Spain. Antipode 45(5): 1213-1231.Google Scholar

  • Cox k.R., 1993. The local and the global in the new urban politics: A critical view. Environment and Planning D, 11, 433-433.Google Scholar

  • Cox k.R., Mair A., 1988. Locality and community in the politics of local economic development. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 78(2): 307-325.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dostál P., kára J., 1992. Territorial administration in Czechoslovakia: An overwiev. In: Dostál P., Illner M., kára J., Barlow M. (eds), Changing territorial administration in Czechoslovakia - International viewpoints. Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam: 17-32.Google Scholar

  • Dunleavy P., 1980. Urban political analysis: The politics of collective consumption. Macmillan, London.Google Scholar

  • Egedy T., kovács Z., 2010. Governance, strategies and policies in the Budapest Metropolitan Region. How to enhance the city’s competitiveness. ACRE report 10.4, Amsterdam: Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research.Google Scholar

  • Ekins P., Newby L., 1998. Sustainable wealth creation at the local level in an age of globalisation. Regional Studies 32(9): 863-871.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Elkin T., McLaren D., Hillman M., 1991. Reviving the city: Towards sustainable urban development. Friends of the Earth, London.Google Scholar

  • European Commission, 2014. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, The Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions: The urban dimension of EU policies - key features of an EU urban agenda. Brussels, 18 July 2014, COM(2014) 490 final.Google Scholar

  • Halás M., klapka P., Bleha B., Bednář M., 2014. Funkčné regióny na Slovensku podľa denných tokov do zamestnania. Geografický časopis 66(2): 89-114.Google Scholar

  • Hamilton F.E.I., Andrews k.D., Pichler-Milanović N. (eds), 2005. Transformation of cities in Central and Eastern Europe: Towards globalisation. United Nations Publications, Tokyo.Google Scholar

  • Harvey D., 1989. From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation of urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler 71B(1): 3-17.Google Scholar

  • Haughton G., 1997. Developing sustainable urban development models. Cities 14(4): 189-195.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Healey P., 2004. Collaborative planning in perspective. Planning Theory 2(2): 101-123.Google Scholar

  • Hendrikse R.P., Sidaway J.D., 2014. Financial wizardry and the Golden City: Tracking the financial crisis through Pforzheim, Germany. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 39(2): 195-208.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Illner M., 1992. Municipalities and industrial paternalism in a ‘real socialist’ society. In: Dostál P., Illner M., kára J., Barlow M. (eds), Changing territorial administration in Czechoslovakia - International viewpoints. Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam: 39-47.Google Scholar

  • Jessop B., 1998. The rise of governance and the risks of failure: The case of economic development. International Social Science Journal 50(155): 29-45.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jonas A.E., 2012. Region and place regionalism in question. Progress in Human Geography 36(2): 263-272.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jonas A.E., Ward k., 2007. Introduction to a debate on city regions: New geographies of governance, democracy and social reproduction. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 31(1): 169-178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kaczmarek T., Mikuła Ł. 2007. Metropolitan areas in Poland: Towards a new scale of urban governance. Quaestiones Geographicae 26: 97-105.Google Scholar

  • Kamal-Chaoui L., Sanchez-Reaza J. (eds), 2012. Urban trends and policies in OECD countries. OECD Regional Development Working Papers, 2012/01, OECD Publishing, Paris.Google Scholar

  • Keresztély k., Scott J.W., 2012. Urban regeneration in the post-socialist context: Budapest and the search for a social dimension. European Planning Studies 20(7): 1111-1134.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Korec P., 2013. Pozícia Bratislavy a jej regiónu v regionálnej štruktúre Slovenska. In: Buček J., korec P. (eds) Moderná humánna geografia mesta Bratislava: priestorové štruktúry, siete a procesy. Univerzita komenského, Bratislava: 27-54.Google Scholar

  • Korec P., Ondoš S., 2009. The development of urban structure of Bratislava in the time of post-socialist transformation. Quaestiones Geographicae 28: 31-43.Google Scholar

  • Kostelecký T., Patočková V., Illner M., 2012. Problémové rezidenční čtvrti a politiky k jejich regeneraci v postsocialistickém městě - studie Prahy. Sociologický časopis/ Czech Sociological Review 48(1): 39-63.Google Scholar

  • Krätke S., 2014. Cities in contemporary capitalism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38(5): 1660-1677.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kresánek P., Vajda M., Štefáková A., 1998. Ako v Bratislave - Občiansky almanach o živote a službách hlavného mesta. Inštitút pre verejné otázky, Bratislava.Google Scholar

  • Križan F., Šveda M., 2012. Prejavy komerčnej suburbanizácie vo vybraných odvetviach hospodárstva v zázemí Bratislavy. Ekonomický časopis 60(5): 460-481.Google Scholar

  • Kubeš J., 2013. European post-socialist cities and their near hinterland in intra-urban geography literature. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-Economic Series 19: 19-43.Google Scholar

  • Lackowska M., Zimmermann k., 2011. New forms of territorial governance in metropolitan regions? A Polish-German comparison. European Urban and Regional Studies 18(2): 156-169.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Le Galès P., 2005. Elusive urban policies in Europe. In: kazepov Y. (ed.), Cities of Europe: Changing contexts, local arrangements, and the challenge to social cohesion. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford: 235-254.Google Scholar

  • Leitner H., 1990. Cities in pursuit of economic growth: The local state as entrepreneur. Political Geography Quarterly 9(2): 146-170.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Leitner H., 1994. Capital markets, the development industry, and urban office market dynamics: Rethinking building cycles. Environment and Planning A 26(5): 779-802.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Logan J.R., Molotch H.L. (eds), 1987. Urban fortunes: The political economy of place. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar

  • Lowndes V., 2009. New institutionalism and urban politics. In: Davies J.S., Imbroscio D.L. (eds), Theories of urban politics. Sage, London: 91-105.Google Scholar

  • Machala B., 2014. The uneven struggle for bluefields: Waterfront transformation in post-socialist Bratislava. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 63(3): 335-352.Google Scholar

  • Matlovič R., Ira V., korec P., Ondoš S., 2009. Urban structures and their transformation (the contribution of Slovak geography). Geographia Slovaca 26: 71-99.Google Scholar

  • McCann E.J., 2011. Urban policy mobilities and global circuits of knowledge: Toward a research agenda. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 101(1): 107-130.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McGuirk P., 2012. Geographies of urban politics: Pathways, intersections, interventions. Geographical Research 50(3): 256-268.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Meegan R., kennett P., Jones G., Croft J., 2014. Global economic crisis, austerity and neoliberal urban governance in England. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 7(1): 137-153.Google Scholar

  • Mikuła Ł., 2015. Theories of metropolitan government and the post-socialist experience: The case of Poznań Metropolitan Area. In: Buček J., Ryder A. (eds), Governance in transition. Springer, Dordrecht: 91-107.Google Scholar

  • Miller D.Y., Lee J.H., 2011. Making sense of metropolitan regions: A dimensional approach to regional governance. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 41(1): 126-145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Musil J. 2001. Vývoj a plánování měst ve střední Evropě v období komunistických režimů: Pohled historické sociologie. Sociologický Časopis/ Czech Sociological Review 37(3): 275-296.Google Scholar

  • National Bank of Slovakia, 2015. Selected macroeconomic indicators - residential propety prices. Available at http://www.nbs.sk (accessed 12 June 2015).Google Scholar

  • Novy A., Redak V., Jäger J., Hamedinger A., 2001. The end of red Vienna recent ruptures and continuities in urban governance. European Urban and Regional Studies 8(2): 131-144.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ondoš S., korec P., 2008. The rediscovered city: A case study of post-socialist Bratislava. Geografický časopis 60(2): 199-211.Google Scholar

  • Operational Programme Bratislava Region - revision, 2011. Bratislava, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development of the Slovak Republic.Google Scholar

  • Ouředníček M., Nemeškal J., Hampl M., Špačková P., Novák J., 2014. Vymezení funkčního území Pražské metropolitní oblasti pro potřeby uplatnéní integrovaných teritoriálních investic. Univerzita karlova, Přírodovědecká fakulta, katedra sociální geografie a regionálního rozvoje, Praha.Google Scholar

  • Parysek J.J., Mierzejewska L., 2006. Poznań. Cities 23(4): 291-305.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Peterson P.E., 1981. City limits. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar

  • Pierre J., 1999. Models of urban governance: the institutional dimension of urban politics. Urban Affairs Review 34(3): 372-396.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rodgers S., Barnett C., Cochrane A., 2014. Where is urban politics? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38(5): 1551-1560.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rodríguez-Pose A., 2008. The rise of the ‘city-region’ concept and its development policy implications. European Planning Studies 16(8): 1025-1046.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Savitch H.V., Vogel R.k., 2000. Introduction: Paths to new regionalism. State & Local Government Review 32(3): 158-168.Google Scholar

  • Sarre P., Jehlička P., 2007. Environmental movements in space-time: The Czech and Slovak Republics from Stalinism to post-socialism. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 32(3): 346-362CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Saunders P., 1982. Why study central local relations? Local Government Studies 8(2): 55-66.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Silva C.N., Buček J. (eds), Fiscal austerity and innovation in local governance in Europe. Ashgate, Farnham.Google Scholar

  • Sintomer Y., Herzberg C., Röcke A., 2008. Participatory budgeting in Europe: Potentials and challenges. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 32(1): 164-178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • SITA, 2014. Bratislave nevyhovuje finančné zaťaženie z integrovanej dopravy. SITA Press Agency - Press Release, 6 June 2014.Google Scholar

  • SITA, 2015. Vodárenská spoločnosť nedodržiava zákon, tvrdí riaditeľ IRBk. SITA Press Agency - Press Release, 26 March 2015.Google Scholar

  • Slavík V., klobučník M., kohútová k., 2011. Vývoj rezidenčnej suburbanizácie v regióne Bratislava v rokoch 1990-2009. Forum Statisticum Slovacum 7(6): 169-175.Google Scholar

  • SME, 2015. Bratislava má byť jedno mesto a nie pätnásť dedín (interview with Mayor of Bratislava I. Nesrovnal). Sme, 27 July 2015, p. 7.Google Scholar

  • Smętkowski M., Gorzelak G., kozak M., Olechnicka A., Płoszaj A., Wojnar k., 2011. The European metropolises and their regions: From economic landscapes to metropolitan networks. EUROREG, Warsaw.Google Scholar

  • Smith A., Rochovská A., 2006. Neo-liberalism and post-socialist urban transformations: Poverty, inequality and the city. Acta Geographica Universitatis Comenianae 48(1): 43-54.Google Scholar

  • Sokol M., 2013. Towards a ‘newer’economic geography? Injecting finance and financialisation into economic geographies. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 6(3): 501-515.Google Scholar

  • Sýkora L., Bouzarovski S., 2012. Multiple transformations conceptualising the post-communist urban transition. Urban Studies 49(1): 43-60.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Swyngedouw E., Moulaert F., Rodriguez A., 2002. Neoliberal urbanisation in Europe: Large-scale urban development projects and the new urban policy. Antipode 34(2): 432-577.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Szelenyi I., 1996. Cities under socialism - and after. In: Andrusz G., Harloe M., Szelényi I. (eds), Cities after socialism: Urban and regional change and conflict in post-socialist societies. Blackwell, Oxfrd: 286-317.Google Scholar

  • Šuška P., 2014a. Aktívne občianstvo a politika premien mestského prostredia v postsocialistickej Bratislave. Geographia Slovaca 29, 145 p.Google Scholar

  • Šuška P., 2014b. Politické a diskurzívne príležitosti lokálneho environmentálneho aktivizmu: prípad premien bratislavského ochranárstva. Sociológia-Slovak Sociological Review 46(1): 60-87.Google Scholar

  • Šveda M., Podolák P., 2014. Fenomén neúplnej evidencie migrácie v suburbánnej zóne (na príklade zázemia Bratislavy). Geografický časopis 66(2): 115-132.Google Scholar

  • Šveda M., Šuška P., 2014. k príčinám a dôsledkom živelnej suburbanizácie v zázemí Bratislavy: príklad obce Chorvátsky Grob. Geografický časopis 66(3): 225-246.Google Scholar

  • Tasan-kok T., 2010. Entrepreneurial governance: Challenges of large-scale property-led urban regeneration projects. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 101(2): 126-149.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Temelová J., 2007. Flagship developments and the physical upgrading of the post-socialist city: The Golden Angel project in Prague. Geografiska Annaler, Series B, Human Geography 89(2): 169-181.Google Scholar

  • Tosics I., 2007. City-regions in Europe: The potentials and the realities. Town Planning Review 78(6): 775-795.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tosics I., Dukes T., 2005. Urban development programmes in the context of public administration and urban policy. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 96(4): 390-408.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Union of Cities, 2013. Mestské regióny. Documents from Union of Cities meeting in Bratislava, 25 January 2013 - A supplement. Available at www.unia-miest.sk (accessed February 15 2015).Google Scholar

  • Utopia o.z., 2013. Za funkčný participatívny rozpočet v Bratislave - otvorený list. Available at https://utopia.sk/liferay/rss-feeds/-/asset_publisher/Gjz3/content/id/2848386 (accessed June 12 2015).Google Scholar

  • Van den Berg G.L., Van Klink H.A., Van den Meer J., 2004. A survey of metropolitan government in Europe. In: Phares D. (ed.), Metropolitnan governance without metropolitan government? Ashgate, Aldershot: 79-102.Google Scholar

  • Van Kempen R., Vermeulen M., Baan, E. (eds), 2005. Urban issues and urban policies in the new EU countries. Ashgate, Aldershot.Google Scholar

  • Weber R., 2010. Selling city futures: The financialisation of urban development policy. Economic Geography 86(3): 251-274.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zemko J. et al., 1984. Územný a sociálny rozvoj sídiel. Veda, Bratislava. Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2016-01-07

Revised: 2016-03-15

Published Online: 2016-06-15

Published in Print: 2016-06-01

Citation Information: Quaestiones Geographicae, Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages 7–26, ISSN (Online) 2081-6383, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/quageo-2016-0012.

Export Citation

© Faculty of Geographical and Geological Sciences, Adam Mickiewicz University. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Thomas Borén and Craig Young
Eurasian Geography and Economics, 2016, Volume 57, Number 4-5, Page 588

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in