Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Quaestiones Geographicae

The Journal of Adam Mickiewicz University

4 Issues per year


SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.286
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.722
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.500

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2081-6383
See all formats and pricing




Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Waste Management: The Case of Poland

Bartłomiej Kołsut
  • Institute of Socio-Economic Geography and Spatial Management, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Poland
  • :
Published Online: 2016-06-15 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/quageo-2016-0018

Abstract

This article seeks to present the scale of inter-municipal cooperation in waste management in Poland in the light of the role of three key factors of cooperation. The first shows spatial regularities in the distribution of inter-municipal bodies involved in waste management in Poland, both in the system of voivodeships and historical-cultural regions. The second is institutional conditions confirming the scale of the Europeanisation of public policies taking place in Poland. It embraces the implementation of the EU legal framework in the Polish legal system and the cooperative behaviour of municipalities as a result of those changes. The third is a negative verification of the assumptions of the economic theory upholding the role of financial motivation in establishing cooperation (looking for savings and economies of scale to reduce unit cost); the presented results do not corroborate this type of motivation.

Keywords: inter-municipal cooperation; waste management; Europeanisation; Poland

References

  • Amin A., 2009. Institutionalism. In: Gregory D., johnston r., Pratt G., Watts M., Whatmore S. (eds), The Dictionary of Human Geography, 5th edition. Wiley-Blackwell, Malden, Oxford, Chichester: 386.

  • Bartkowski j., 2003. Tradycja i polityka: wpływ tradycji kulturowych polskich regionów na współczesne zachowania społeczne i polityczne (Tradition and politics: Effect of the cultural traditions of Polish regions on modern types of social and political behaviour). Instytut socjologii Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Warszawa.

  • Bel G., Costas A., 2006. Do public sector reforms get rusty? Local privatization in Spain. Journal of Policy Reform 9: 1-24. [Crossref]

  • Bel G., Fageda X., 2006. Between privatization and intermunicipal cooperation: Small municipalities, scale economies and transaction costs. Urban Public Economics Review 6: 13-31.

  • Bel G., Fageda X., 2008. Local privatization, intermunicipal cooperation, transaction costs and political interests: Evidence from Spain. Working Papers, Research Institute of Applied Economics, University of Barcelona.

  • Bel G., Fageda X., Mur M., 2013. Why do municipalities cooperate to provide local public services? An empirical analysis. Local Government Studies 39(3): 435-454. [Crossref]

  • Bel G., Mur M., 2009. Intermunicipal cooperation, privatization and waste management costs: Evidence from rural municipalities. Waste Management 29: 2772-2778. [Crossref]

  • Bel G., Warner M.E., 2013. Factors explaining inter-municipal cooperation in service delivery: A meta-regression analysis. Paper presented at Public Management research Association Conference. Madison, WI, june 22, 2013.

  • Bel G., Warner M., 2015. Inter-municipal cooperation and costs: Expectations and evidence. Public Administration 93(1): 52-67. [Crossref]

  • Blom-Hansen j., 1997. A new institutional perspective on policy networks. Public Administration 75(4): 669-693. [Crossref]

  • Bolgherini S., 2011. Local government and inter-municipal cooperation in Italy and Germany. Institut für Politikwissenschaft, Giessen.

  • Dabrowski M., 2014. EU Cohesion Policy, horizontal partnership and the patterns of sub-national governance: Insights from Central and Eastern Europe. European Urban and Regional Studies 21(4): 364-383. [Crossref]

  • Delcamp A. 1997. La coopération intercommunale en Europe. In: Rangeon F. (ed.), L’intercommunalité Bilan et perspectives. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris: 91-112.

  • DiMaggio P.j., Powell W.W., 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 48(2): 147-160. [Crossref]

  • Dyba M.W., stryjakiewicz T., 2012. Zróżnicowanie poziomu rozwoju społeczno-gospodarczego gmin województwa wielkopolskiego w świetle realizacji polityki intraregionalnej (Differences in the socio-economic development of Wielkopolska municipalities in the light of the implementation of an intra-regional policy). Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznań.

  • Featherstone K., radaelli C., 2003. The politics of Europeanization. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

  • Furmankiewicz M., stefańska j., 2010. Partnerstwa terytorialne jako sieci organizacyjne. Analiza powiązań w trzech wybranych “Lokalnych Grupach Działania” w Polsce (Territorial partnerships as organisational networks. An analysis of links in three selected “Local Action Groups” in Poland). Studia Regionalne i Lokalne 1(39): 5-25.

  • Good practices in inter-municipal cooperation in Europe, 2007. Report of the European Committee on Local and Regional Democracy, Council of Europe, Brussels.

  • Gorzelak G., jałowiecki B., 1996. Koniunktura gospodarcza i mobilizacja społeczna w gminach ’95. raport z I etapu badań (Economic situation and social mobilisation in municipalities ’95). Studia Regionalne i Lokalne 16(49), Uni wersytet Warszawski.

  • Gorzelak G., jałowiecki B., 2014. Koniunktura w Polsce lokalnej 2013 (Economic situation in local Poland 2013). Studia Regionalne i Lokalne 4(58): 5-24.

  • Hall P., Taylor R., 1996. Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies 44(5): 936-957. [Crossref]

  • Hausner j. (ed.), 2013. Narastające dysfunkcje, zasadnicze dylematy, konieczne działania. Raport o stanie samorządności terytorialnej w Polsce (Growing dysfunctions, fundamental dilemmas, necessary steps. Report on the state of local self-government in Poland). Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny, Kraków.

  • Helmke G., Levitsky S., 2004. Informal institutions and comparative politics: A research agenda. Perspectives on Politics 2(4): 725-740.

  • Hulst R., van Montfort A., 2007a. Inter-municipal cooperation: A widespread phenomenon. In: Hulst R., van Mont fort A. (eds), Inter-municipal cooperation in Europe. Springer, Dordrecht: 1-21.

  • Hulst R., van Montfort A., 2007b. The Netherlands: Cooperation as the only viable strategy. In: Hulst r., van Montfort A. (eds), Inter-municipal cooperation in Europe. Springer, Dordrecht: 139-168.

  • Hulst R., van Montfort A. 2007c. Comparative analysis and conclusions. In: Hulst R., van Montfort A. (eds), Inter- municipal cooperation in Europe. Springer, Dordrecht: 211-238.

  • Hulst R., van Montfort A. 2012. Institutional features of inter- municipal cooperation: Cooperative arrangements and their national contexts. Public Policy and Administration 27(2): 1-24. [Crossref]

  • Hulst, R., van Montfort A., Haveri, A., Airaksinen j., Kelly j., 2009. Institutional shifts in inter-municipal service delivery. Public Organization Review 9(3): 263-285. [Crossref]

  • John P., 2001. Local governance in Western Europe. sAGE Publications, London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi.

  • Kaczmarek T., Mikuła ł., 2007. Metropolitan areas in Poland: Towards a new scale of urban governance? Quaestiones Geographicae 26B: 97-105.

  • Kaczmarek T., Mikuła ł., 2009. Metropolitan areas in Poland: Problems of development and governance. Quaestiones Geographicae 28B/2: 91-103.

  • Kołsut B., 2015. Zinstytucjonalizowane sieci współdziałania międzygminnego w Polsce (Institutionalised inter-municipal networks in Poland). Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznań.

  • Kowalski M., 2000. Geografia wyborcza Polski. Przestrzenne zróżnicowanie zachowań wyborczych Polaków w latach 1989-1998 (The electoral geography of Poland. Spatial differences in electoral behaviour, 1989-1998). Instytut Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania PAN, Warszawa.

  • Kowalski M., 2003. Polaryzacja zachowań wyborczych w Polsce jako rezultat cywilizacyjnego rozdarcia kraju (Polarisation of electoral behaviour in Poland as a result of the country’s civilisational split). In: Kowalski M. (ed.), Przestrzeń wyborcza Polski. Instytut Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania PAN, Warszawa: 11-48.

  • Labianca M., 2014. Inter-municipal cooperation: from cooperation through rules to cooperation through networks - empirical evidence from Puglia. Regional Studies, Regional Science 1(1): 184-206. [Crossref]

  • Les collectivités locales en chiffres, 2014. Direction générale des collectivités locales. Online: http://www.collectivites-locales.gouv.fr/collectivites-locales-chiffres-2014 (accessed 10 December 2015).

  • March j.G., Olsen j.P., 1987. Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. Free Press, New York.

  • Nieto Garrido E., 2007. Inter-municipal co-operation in Spain: Dealing with microscopic local government. In: Hulst R., van Montfort A. (eds), Inter-municipal cooperation in Europe. Springer, Dordrecht: 169-192.

  • Niziołek M., 2008. Problemy ustroju aglomeracji miejskich ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem Warszawy (Problems in the form of government of urban agglomerations with special focus on Warsaw). Wolters Kluwer Polska, Warszawa.

  • Ofiarska M., 2008. Formy publicznoprawne współdziałania jednostek samorządu terytorialnego. Monografia prawnicza (Public- law forms of cooperation of self-government units. Legal monograph). Wydawnictwo Beck, Warszawa.

  • Ollson A.R., Cars G., 2011. Polycentric spatial development: Institutional challenges to intermunicipal cooperation. Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft 31(2): 155-171.

  • Ostrom E., 1986. An agenda for the study of institutions. Public Choice 48: 3-25. [Crossref]

  • Provan K., Kenis P., 2008. Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18(2): 229-252. [Crossref]

  • Radecki W., 2012. Utrzymanie czystości i porządku w gminach. Komentarz (Keeping cleanliness and order in municipalities. A commentary). Wolters Kluwer Polska, Warszawa.

  • Rayle L., Zegras C., 2012. The emergence of inter-municipal collaboration: Evidence from metropolitan planning in Portugal. European Planning Studies 21(6): 867-889. [Crossref]

  • Rija M., Tenuta P., 2011. Forms of association of Italian municipalities: Empirical evidence. Global Journal of Business Research 5(2): 85-96.

  • Rodríguez-Pose A., Krøijer A., 2009. Fiscal decentralization and economic growth in Central and Eastern Europe. Growth and Change 40(3): 387-417.

  • Sorrentino M., Simonetta M., 2013. Incentivising inter-municipal collaboration: the Lombard experience. Journal of Management & Governance 17(4): 887-906. [Crossref]

  • Sørensen E., Torfing j., 2007. Introduction: Governance network research: Towards a second generation. In: Sørensen E., Torfing j. (eds), Theories of democratic network governance. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, New York: 1-21.

  • Sørensen R.J., 2007. Does dispersed public ownership impair efficiency? The case of refuse collection in Norway. Public Administration 85(4): 1045-1058. [Crossref]

  • Stachowiak K., stryjakiewicz T., 2008. Institutional approach in economic geography and its relevance to regional studies. Quaestiones Geographicae 27/1: 7-20.

  • Swianiewicz P., 2009. Reformy konsolidacji terytorialnej - teoria i praktyka krajów Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej (Territorial consolidation reforms: The theory and practice of East-Central European countries). Samorząd Terytorialny 4: 5-22.

  • Swianiewicz P., 2011. Demanded but difficult: Intermunicipal cooperation in Central and Eastern Europe. In: Swianiewicz P. (ed.), Working together. Intermunicipal cooperation in five Central European countries. Open Society Foundations, Budapest: 1-18.

  • Swianiewicz P., Herbst M., 2002. Korzyści i niekorzyści skali w działaniach samorządu terytorialnego (Economies and diseconomies of scale in self-government activities). Samorząd Terytorialny 6: 14-24.

  • Swianiewicz P., Herbst j., Lackowska M., Mielczarek A., 2008. Szafarze darów europejskich. Kapitał społeczny a realizacja polityki regionalnej w polskich województwach (Dispensers of European gifts. Social capital and the regional policy implemented in Polish voivodeships). Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, Warszawa.

  • Warner M.E., 2006. Inter-municipal cooperation in the U.S.: A regional governance solution? Urban Public Economics Review 7: 132-151.

  • Warner M.E., Hefetz A., 2003. rural-urban differences in privatization: Limits to the competitive state. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 21(4): 703-718.

  • Wassenaar M., Groot T., Gradus R., 2010. Contracting out: An empirical study on motives. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1722547 (accessed 22 january 2014).

  • West K., 2007. Inter-municipal co-operation in France: Incentives, instrumentality and empty shells. In: Hulst R., van Montfort A. (eds), Inter-municipal cooperation in Europe. Springer, Dordrecht: 67-90.

  • Władyka A., 2008. sprawność funkcjonowania jednostek samorządu terytorialnego - studia z zastosowaniem podejścia prakseologicznego (Efficiency of self-government units: A study using a praxeological approach). Samorząd Terytorialny 1-2: 17-27.

  • Współpraca JST w Polsce. Stan i potrzeby ( jsT cooperation in Poland. Current state and needs), 2013. Raport w ramach projektu “Budowanie kompetencji do współpracy międzysamorządowej i międzysektorowej jako narzędzi rozwoju lokalnego i regionalnego”. Związek Miast Polskich, Poznań.

  • Wollmann H., 2010. Comparing two logics of interlocal cooperation: The cases of France and Germany. Urban Affairs Review 46(2): 263-292. [Crossref]

  • Zafra-Gómez j.L., Prior D., Plata Díaz A.M., López-Hernández A.M., 2013. Reducing costs in times of crisis: Delivery forms in small and medium sized local governments’ waste management services. Public Administration 91(1): 51-68. [Crossref]

  • Zarycki T., 1997. Nowa przestrzeń społeczno-polityczna Polski (The new socio-political space of Poland). Studia Regionalne i Lokalne 23(56), Uniwersytet Warszawski.

  • Zarycki T., 2004. Kapitał społeczny a trzy polskie drogi do nowoczesności (Social capital and three Polish ways to modernity). Kultura i Społeczeństwo XLVIII, 2: 45-65.


Received: 2016-03-10

Revised: 2016-04-29

Published Online: 2016-06-15

Published in Print: 2016-06-01


Citation Information: Quaestiones Geographicae. Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages 91–104, ISSN (Online) 2081-6383, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/quageo-2016-0018, June 2016

© Faculty of Geographical and Geological Sciences, Adam Mickiewicz University. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.