Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Quaestiones Geographicae

The Journal of Adam Mickiewicz University

4 Issues per year

CiteScore 2016: 0.43

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.258
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.359

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 35, Issue 2

Organisation and Diversification of the Educational Market in Poland: The Case of the Poznań Agglomeration

Marzena Walaszek
  • Corresponding author
  • Institute of Socio-Economic Geography and Spatial Management, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Poland
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Edyta Bąkowska
  • Institute of Socio-Economic Geography and Spatial Management, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Poland
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2016-06-15 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/quageo-2016-0019


The political changes in Poland after 1989 affected the formation of a self-reliant society. One of the results was the decentralisation of public tasks in the field of education, with the relevant competences transmitted to local governments. Since then, communes have been responsible for ensuring equal access to public education, but at the same time a non-public education market has been developing. Important for changes in the Polish educational system was also a reform started in 1999 which led to the transformation of the two-level system of education existing since 1968 into a three-level structure.

The first non-public schools began to form as an alternative to public ones. Currently, non-public schools are mainly run by non-governmental organisations, religious institutions or social associations. In the general opinion, the quality of education in non-public schools is higher than in public ones (smaller classes, better contact between student and teacher, an individual approach to each student). In the face of education-model changes it is important to create a wide range of learning opportunities for everyone. It is also not about competition, but cooperation among all institutions involved in education provision. In this article, the progressive diversification of the educational market is presented on the example of the Poznań agglomeration.

A diversified educational system, its commercialisation, and the creation of new educational opportunities for children and young people beyond the basic programme of education are undoubtedly benefits for the Polish society. The growing competition among the wide range of educational institutions (also taking into account institutions organising extra-curricular classes), from a theoretical point of view, should help to improve the quality of education in the entire market of educational services. As a consequence, these trends, together with demographic changes, may invite the question about the prospects of public schools in their present form in the future.

Keywords: educational system; compulsory education; decentralisation of education; market for educational services; Poznań agglomeration


  • Centralna Komisja Egzaminacyjna, 2015. O egzaminie gimnazjalnym (On the examination to a lower-secondary school). Online: http://www.cke.edu.pl/index.php/egzamin-gimnazjalny-left/2013-07-27-10-19-18 (accessed 21 February 2015).Google Scholar

  • Council of the European Union, 2008. Conclusions of the Council and of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council of 21 November 2008 on preparing young people for the 21st century: An agenda for European cooperation on schools (2008/C 319/09). Online: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2008:319:0020:0022:EN:PDF (accessed 21 February 2015).Google Scholar

  • Dolata R., 2005. Najważniejsze wyzwania stojące przed polską oświatą (Major challenges facing Polish education). Instytut Spraw Publicznych, Warszawa: 2-6.Google Scholar

  • European Commission, 2014a. Compulsory education in Europe 2014/2015: 5. Online: http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/documents/facts_and_figures/compulsory_education_EN.pdf (accessed 21 February 2015).Google Scholar

  • European Commission, 2014b. The structure of European educational systems 2014/2015: Schematic diagrams. Online: http://eurydice.org.pl/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/education_structures_EN.pdf (accessed: 21 February 2015).Google Scholar

  • Eurydice, 2012. Kluczowe dane o edukacji w Europie 2012 (Key data on education in Europe). Online: http://eurydice.org.pl/wpcontent/uploads/2012/10/KD_2012_PL.pdf (accessed 22 February 2015).Google Scholar

  • Eurydice, 2014. The system of education in Poland. Foundation for the Development of the Educational System. Warsaw.Google Scholar

  • Kuźnik F., 2012. Polityka rozwoju i zarządzanie usługami publicznymi w strukturach samorządowych (Development policy and public services management in local government structures). Studia KPZK PAN CXLIII, Warszawa.Google Scholar

  • Herbst M. (ed.), 2012. Decentralizacja oświaty (Decentralisation of education). Biblioteczka Oświaty samorządowej, Warszawa.Google Scholar

  • Mitch d., 2004. school finance. In: Johnes G., Johnes J. (eds), International Handbook on the Economics of Education. Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton.Google Scholar

  • OECD, 2010. Impact of the 1999 education reform in Poland. Online: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/5kmbjgkm1m9x.pdf?expires=1424547178&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=AD21DFE-80CAC37C18ED2265175BF60A0 (accessed 21 February 2015).Google Scholar

  • OECD, 2014a. Education at a glance. Online: http://www.oecd.org/edu/Education-at-a-Glance-2014.pdf (accessed 22 February 2015).Google Scholar

  • OECD, 2014b. PISA 2012 results in focus. What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. Online: http://ww.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results- overview.pdf (accessed 22 February 2015).Google Scholar

  • Przyszczypkowski k., 2010. Polityka oświatowa samorządów (Educational policy of local governments). In: Korolewska M., Osiecka-Chojnacka J. (eds), Polityka oświatowa. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych 2(22), Warszawa: 41-63.Google Scholar

  • Sześciło d., 2014. O wątpliwościach wokół powierzania prowadzenia szkół samorządowych. Samorząd Terytorialny 3: 5-13.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2015-03-02

Revised: 2016-04-18

Published Online: 2016-06-15

Published in Print: 2016-06-01

Citation Information: Quaestiones Geographicae, Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages 105–114, ISSN (Online) 2081-6383, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/quageo-2016-0019.

Export Citation

© Faculty of Geographical and Geological Sciences, Adam Mickiewicz University. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in