Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Radiochimica Acta

International Journal for chemical aspects of nuclear science and technology

Editor-in-Chief: Qaim, Syed M.

12 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 1.271
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.286

CiteScore 2016: 1.20

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.486
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.761

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 97, Issue 9


Proton induced reactions on 89Y with particular reference to the production of the medically interesting radionuclide 89Zr

H. M. Omara / K. F. Hassan / S. A. Kandil / F. E. Hegazy / Z. A. Saleh
Published Online: 2009-09-25 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1524/ract.2009.1645


Excitation functions of the reactions 89Y(p,n) 89Zr, 89Y(p,2n) 88Zr and 89Y(p,pn) 88Y were measured from their respective thresholds up to 17.7 MeV, with particular emphasis on data for the production of the medically important radionuclide 89Zr. The conventional stacked-foil technique was used, and the samples for irradiation were prepared by the sedimentation process. The excitation functions obtained were compared with those calculated theoretically using the ALICE-IPPE code. The measured data were also compared with the available literature values. From the experimental data the theoretical yields of the investigated radionuclides were calculated as a function of proton energy. The excitation function for the 89Y(p,n) 89Zr reaction measured in the proton energy range 5.1 to 17.7 MeV shows a pronounced broad peak in the energy range 16→11 MeV. On the other hand and because of the high threshold energy of the two other reactions 89Y(p,2n) 88Zr and 89Y(p,pn) 88Y, their excitation functions were measured only in the proton energy range 14.3 to 17.7 MeV. Differential and integral yields for the production of the three radionuclides were calculated. It was found that the suitable energy range for the production of 89Zr is 14→9 MeV; over this energy range the 89Zr amounts to 58 MBq/μA h. In the proton energy range provided by MGC-20 cyclotron [Ep(max)=18 MeV], only 89Zr can be produced in a suitable activity and with a high purity. Production of 88Zr and 88Y needs proton energy higher than that provided by this type of cyclotron.

Keywords: Medical radionuclide; Radionuclides Y-88, Zr-89, Zr-88; Excitation function; Cross section; Integral yield

About the article

* Correspondence address: Cycloton Project, Nuclear Research Center, Atomic Energy Authority, Kairo, Ägypten,

Published Online: 2009-09-25

Published in Print: 2009-08-01

Citation Information: Radiochimica Acta International journal for chemical aspects of nuclear science and technology, Volume 97, Issue 9, Pages 467–471, ISSN (Print) 0033-8230, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1524/ract.2009.1645.

Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

T. Amin, A. Infantino, R. Barlow, and C. Hoehr
Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 2018, Volume 133, Page 61
Mozhgan Sharifian, Mahdi Sadeghi, Behrouz Alirezapour, Mohammad Yarmohammadi, and Khosro Ardaneh
Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 2017
Amir R. Jalilian and Joao Alberto Osso
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 2017
Mozhgan Sharifian, Mahdi Sadeghi, and Behrouz Alirezapour
Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 2017, Volume 127, Page 161
Sujata Saha Das, Sankha Chattopadhyay, Luna Barua, Md. Nayer Alam, Madhusmita, and Umesh Kumar
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 2017, Volume 313, Number 3, Page 641
Jeanne M. Link, Kenneth A. Krohn, and Matthew J. O'Hara
Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 2017, Volume 122, Page 211
Yu Tang, Shuntao Li, Yuanyou Yang, Wen Chen, Hongyuan Wei, Guanquan Wang, Jijun Yang, Jiali Liao, Shunzhong Luo, and Ning Liu
Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 2016, Volume 118, Page 326
Raisa N. Krasikova, Ramiz A. Aliev, and Stepan N. Kalmykov
Mendeleev Communications, 2016, Volume 26, Number 2, Page 85
Angelo Infantino, Elisabeth Oehlke, Domiziano Mostacci, Paul Schaffer, Michael Trinczek, and Cornelia Hoehr
Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, 2016, Volume 366, Page 117
P.I. Ivanov, S.M. Jerome, G.A. Bozhikov, O.D. Maslov, G.Ya. Starodub, and S.N. Dmitriev
Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 2014, Volume 90, Page 261
A. Wooten, Evelyn Madrid, Gordon Schweitzer, Luke Lawrence, Efrem Mebrahtu, Benjamin Lewis, and Suzanne Lapi
Applied Sciences, 2013, Volume 3, Number 3, Page 593
William D. Webster, Geoffrey T. Parks, Dmitry Titov, and Paul Beasley
Nuclear Medicine and Biology, 2014, Volume 41, Page e7
Dexing Zeng and Carolyn J. Anderson
Solvent Extraction and Ion Exchange, 2013, Volume 31, Number 4, Page 337
Melissa A. Deri, Brian M. Zeglis, Lynn C. Francesconi, and Jason S. Lewis
Nuclear Medicine and Biology, 2013, Volume 40, Number 1, Page 3
Mahdi Sadeghi, Milad Enferadi, and Mahdi Bakhtiari
Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2012, Volume 41, Page 97
Mayeen Uddin Khandaker, Kwangsoo Kim, Man-Woo Lee, Kyung-Sook Kim, Guinyun Kim, and Naohiko Otuka
Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, 2012, Volume 271, Page 72
M. Sadeghi and M. Enferadi
Radiochemistry, 2011, Volume 53, Number 5, Page 539
Khaled F. Hassan, Shaban A. Kandil, Hossam M. Abdel-Aziz, and Tharwat Siyam
Chromatography Research International, 2011, Volume 2011, Page 1
David S. Urch
Annual Reports Section "A" (Inorganic Chemistry), 2010, Volume 106, Page 458

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in