Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Radiochimica Acta

International Journal for chemical aspects of nuclear science and technology

Editor-in-Chief: Qaim, Syed M.


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 1.202

CiteScore 2017: 1.22

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.409
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.869

Online
ISSN
2193-3405
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 98, Issue 9-11

Issues

Influence of Boom Clay organic matter on the adsorption of Eu3+ by illite – geochemical modelling using the component additivity approach

C. Bruggeman / D. J. Liu / Norbert Maes
Published Online: 2010-11-23 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1524/ract.2010.1759

Abstract

The solid–liquid distribution of europium (Eu) between an adsorptive surface and a solution phase containing a competitive colloid is the result of a delicate balance between several individual chemical reactions. In this study, adsorption isotherms of Eu in presence of dissolved Boom Clay natural organic matter were experimentally determined under conditions relevant for a geological repository (trace Eu concentrations, anoxic conditions, ∼0.014 mol l−1 NaHCO3 background electrolyte). It was found that both the concentration and size distribution (or operational cut-off used to discriminate between “mobile” and “immobile” colloids) of natural organic matter has a strong influence on the observed solid–liquid distribution.

The experimental data were subsequently modelled using a component additive approach with two well-established sorption/interaction models: the 2 SPNE SC/CE model for describing Eu adsorption on illite, and Humic Ion-Binding Model VI for describing Eu complexation to natural organic matter. Model parameters were gathered from dedicated measurements in batch systems containing only Eu and the interacting phase under study, under similar conditions as in the ternary isotherm experiments. Mutual interactions between illite and natural organic matter were studied and quantified. Under the experimental conditions of this study, it was found that these interactions were only of minor importance.

The two models were subsequently combined to blind predict the Eu solid–liquid distribution in the ternary batch experiments. Within an error margin of 0.5logߙKd units, the additivity approach succeeded well in predicting Eu uptake in all experimental systems studied. A sensitivity analysis was performed to select the most important model parameters influencing the Eu uptake, and the robustness of the model. This study has shown that the component additivity approach for describing and predicting uptake of trivalent lanthanides/actinides under Boom Clay conditions, is promising, and may help in unraveling the complex behaviour of these radionuclides witnessed in migration experiments.

Keywords: Europium; Sorption modelling; Natural organic matter; Boom Clay; Complexation

About the article

* Correspondence address: SCK CEN, Waste and Disposal Department, Boeretang 200, B 2400 Mol, Belgien,


Published Online: 2010-11-23

Published in Print: 2010-11-01


Citation Information: Radiochimica Acta International journal for chemical aspects of nuclear science and technology, Volume 98, Issue 9-11, Pages 597–605, ISSN (Print) 0033-8230, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1524/ract.2010.1759.

Export Citation

© by Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag, Mol, Germany.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Mohamed A. Cherif, Arnaud Martin-Garin, Frédéric Gérard, and Olivier Bildstein
Applied Geochemistry, 2017, Volume 87, Page 22
[2]
Michael Descostes, Ingmar Pointeau, Jean Radwan, Jenna Poonoosamy, Jean-Luc Lacour, Denis Menut, Thomas Vercouter, and Romain V.H. Dagnelie
Journal of Hydrology, 2017, Volume 544, Page 125
[3]
D. Durce, N. Maes, C. Bruggeman, and L. Van Ravestyn
Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2016, Volume 185-186, Page 14
[4]
D. Durce, C. Bruggeman, N. Maes, L. Van Ravestyn, and G. Brabants
Applied Geochemistry, 2015, Volume 63, Page 169
[5]
Yubing Sun, Jiaxing Li, and Xiangke Wang
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2014, Volume 140, Page 621
[6]
Noémie Janot, Marc F. Benedetti, and Pascal E. Reiller
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2013, Volume 123, Page 35
[7]
Horst Geckeis, Johannes Lützenkirchen, Robert Polly, Thomas Rabung, and Moritz Schmidt
Chemical Reviews, 2013, Volume 113, Number 2, Page 1016
[8]
N. Maes, C. Bruggeman, J. Govaerts, E. Martens, S. Salah, and M. Van Gompel
Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 2011, Volume 36, Number 17-18, Page 1590
[9]
David S. Urch
Annual Reports Section "A" (Inorganic Chemistry), 2011, Volume 107, Page 519
[10]
E. Martens, Norbert Maes, E. Weetjens, M. Van Gompel, and L. Van Ravestyn
Radiochimica Acta, 2010, Volume 98, Number 9-11

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in