Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Review of Artistic Education

2 Issues per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2501-238X
See all formats and pricing
More options …

2. Artistic Personality in the Light of Socio - Cultural Integration

Marinela Rusu
Published Online: 2016-04-04 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/rae-2016-0026

Abstract

Artistic personality was interpreted in various ways through the ages. The power of creativity, individual perseverance and imaginative force made the artist a special person, different from most people, being equipped with unique, unrepeatable skills. This paper presents some of the most important approaches to the personality of the creator, from the questionable Freudian theory to the psycho-biological approaches of Peckham. Through his works, the artist expresses not only his personal anxieties or emotional ardent feelings but also, reflects a conscious level of the social group, being himself adapted to human values, characteristic of the era and society to which he belongs. Maybe, sometimes, wrong regarded as deviant personalities or too much exposed to excesses, artists remain, undoubtedly, brave in Creativity, in the cultural and social original development process. Their integration in this ensemble completes the picture we have about development and social evolution, and gives us access to more elevated human values.

Keywords: artist; culture; society; social development; creativity

References

  • 1. Bascom, W. (1969). Creativity and Style in African Art. New York: Rinehart and WinstonGoogle Scholar

  • 2. Bateson, G. (1949). Ball: The Value System of a Steady State. New York: Ballentine BooksGoogle Scholar

  • 3. Berlyne, D. E. (1966). Curiosity and Exploration. Science, 153(3731)Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 4. Davenport, W.H. (1968). Sculpture of the Easter Solomons. Expedition, 10(2)Google Scholar

  • 5. D'Azevedo, W. L. (1958). A Structural Approach to Esthetics: Toward a Definition of Art III Anthropology. American Anthropologist, 60: 702/714, Bloomington: Indiana U. PressCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 6. Devereux, G. (1961). Art and Mythology: A General Theory, In KaplanGoogle Scholar

  • 7. Dubois, C. (1960). The People of Alor. Cambridge Mass, Harvard University.Google Scholar

  • 8. Freud, S. (1913). The Interpretation of Dreams. New York: MacmillanGoogle Scholar

  • 9. Freud, S. (1950). Totem and Taboo. New York: NortonGoogle Scholar

  • 10. Goodale, J.C. & Koss, J.D. (1971). The Cultural Context of Creativity Among the Tiwi, In OttenGoogle Scholar

  • 11. Jung, C.G. (1964). Man and His Symbols. Doubleday, Garden CityGoogle Scholar

  • 12. Kardiner, A. & Linton, R. (1939). The Individual and His Society. New York: Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar

  • 13. Kavolis, V. (1965). The Value-Orientations Theory of Style. Anthropologica Quarterly, 38(1)CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 14. Kubler, G. (1962). The Shape of Time: Remarks on the History of Things. New Haven: Yale U PressGoogle Scholar

  • 15. Mead, M. (1935). Sex and Temperament in Three Primitive Societies, London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar

  • 16. (1940). The Arts in Bali, Yale Review 30: 335-347Google Scholar

  • 17. (1959). Creativity in Cross-Cultural Perspective, Winter, BostonGoogle Scholar

  • 18. Muensterberger, W. (1951). The Roots of Primitive Art. In Wilbur G. B. (ed.) Psychiatry and Culture: Essays in Honor of Geza, Roheim. New York: John WileyGoogle Scholar

  • 19. Peckham, M. (1965). Man's Rage for Chaos: Biology, Behavior, and the Arts. Philadelphia: Chilton BooksGoogle Scholar

  • 20. Rusu, M. (2015a). Principiile morale și expresia lor în artăcontraste și controverse, co-autor Ioana Olaru, conf. dr. Univ. de Arte “G. Enescu”, Iași, în Vol 1, coord. Marinela Rusu, “Etic și estetic”, p. 17-32Google Scholar

  • 21. Rusu, M. (2015b). Arta și modelarea culturală a personalității. In Popa, D.M. & Iftimie, N.M. Alteritate și Identitate, (p. 205-212), Iași: PerformanticaGoogle Scholar

  • 22. Rusu, M. (2015c). Experiența estetică – Creativitate, ideal și interpretare, în vol. colectiv, coord. C. Tofan și C. Sârbu, “Artă și Tradiție în Europa”, Ediția a-VI-a, 15 iulie, p. 103-108Google Scholar

  • 23. (2014). Dimensiuni ale dezvoltării conștiinței prin artă, în “Artă și Personalitate”, vol. I, coord. M. Rusu, Ed. Ars Longa, Iași, p. 78-112.Google Scholar

  • 24. Spencer, R. F. and J. Jesse et al. (1977). The Native Americans. New York: Harper and RowGoogle Scholar

  • 25. Thompson, R.F. (1969). Àbátàn: A Master Potter of the Egbado Yoruba, Berkeley: California PressGoogle Scholar

  • 26. Tuzin, D., F. (1980). The Voice of the Tambaran: Truth and Illusion in Ilahita Arapesh Religion. Berkeley: U of California PressGoogle Scholar

  • 27. Wallace, A. & Fogelson, R. (1961). Culture and Personality, Biennial Review of Anthropology, 2: 42-78Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2016-04-04

Published in Print: 2016-03-01


Citation Information: Review of Artistic Education, ISSN (Online) 2501-238X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/rae-2016-0026.

Export Citation

© 2016 Marinela Rusu, published by De Gruyter Open. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in