Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Review of Artistic Education

2 Issues per year

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

8. Industrial Design: The Roles and Factors of Aesthetics, Modeling, Styling, Product Brand and Branding in Design/Design Education

Obasuyi Osa-Francis Efer
Published Online: 2017-03-17 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/rae-2017-0024


This paper examined the roles and factors of Aesthetics viz-a-viz those of modeling, styling and the product Brand (Branding) as viewed against their fundamental relevance as core ingredients for the actualization of any Design initiative and creative endeavour. These roles, influences and place of Aesthetics (and its allied components, makes up the very soul, content and essence of what the product is all about. Its Form, Shape, Morphological / physical attributes and characteristics. The paper established that the aesthetic components of beauty, colour, shape, (form) fonts, (lettering or typography) and all other general Aesthetic Ambience gives the given product the desired quality/beauty that it exudes to help determine its marketability / profitability as a Brand. The paper also reviewed the aspects /implications of these roles and influences on Design Education alongside highlighting the potentials of the Design Educator - learner experience, while exploiting the Teachers ability to effectively harmonise the various approaches and practices of a functional Design-led Educational programme viz-a-viz piloting such talents/skills achieved to practicable and useful ends as professionals in Design and Technology. The paper also seeks to establish that the roles and factors of modeling styling and Branding of the product which is best exemplified through the adaptation of Design inputs and features such as ornamentation, edge delineation, texture movement/flow of linear form, symmetry or Assymetry of shapes, colour, granularity (of matter/particles large or small) or coarseness, play of light (sunlight) and shade, transcendence (state of being or existence of a product beyond the limits of material experience) and that of total harmony. The paper recommends that for any product Brand to succeed it must incorporate all of the above components together with the inclusion of the other qualities that makes up the intangible content of the Brand such as, Brand Name, Logo, Tagline (catchphrase) the Graphics (elements of Design) Brand Shape, Brand colour, culminating in the establishment of what the Brand mission statement is about, its function, role or job it is intended to perform.

Keywords: Granularity/Coarseness,Transcendence of material; Alliteration; Initialism; Neologisms of Brand; “Form Begat Form”; Form Follows Function


  • 1. Alberty, H.B. & Alberty, E.J. (Eds.). (1962). Re-organising the High School curriculum. New York: Macmillian.Google Scholar

  • 2. Aprostosoaie-Iftimi, A.M. (2016). The openness of the visual art curriculum towards a new visual art language. Review of Artistic Education, 11/12, 175-182.Google Scholar

  • 3. Aspelund, K. (2010). Design process. New York: Fawchild Book Pub.Google Scholar

  • 4. Baynes, K. (1978). Project on Design in General Education - Department of Design, Royal College of Art. London: Addision-Wesley prof. Pub.Google Scholar

  • 5. Brooks, F.P. (2010). The Designs of Designs. London: Addison-Wesley Prof. Pub.Google Scholar

  • 6. David, F. W. & Noller, N. (1982). Experimental modeling in Engineering. London: Butter Worths Pub.Google Scholar

  • 7. Drexler, A. (1992). Nanosystems, molecular machinery, manufacturing and computation. New York: John Wiley and Son.Google Scholar

  • 8. Frankenberger, E & Badke-Schaub, P. (1998). Designers - The Key to successful product Development. London: Springer Pub.Google Scholar

  • 9. Harahan, J. (1978). Design in General Education (Eight Projects) Jolly and Barber Limited. London: Rugby and Design Council Pub.Google Scholar

  • 10. Hopper. L. (1977). The curriculum context, design and development Oliver and Boyd. Edinburgh: Open University Press.Google Scholar

  • 11. Knapp, D. (2008). The Brand Promise. New York: MacGraw Hill Pub.Google Scholar

  • 12. Korsmeyer, C. (Ed.). (1998). Aesthetics the Big question. Chicago: Basic Books.Google Scholar

  • 13. Langdon, R. (1978). Project on Design in General Education. Department of Design research, Royal College of Art London publichsed by Design Council.Google Scholar

  • 14. Lindkal, C.M. (1984). Defining Education Objective. Pittsburgh Pennsytvama: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar

  • 15. Loewy, R. (1980). Industrial Design. London: Fourth estate Ltd. Pub.Google Scholar

  • 16. Lucie-Smith, E. (Ed.). (2001). History of Industrial Design. Oxford: Oxford Phaidon Press.Google Scholar

  • 17. Martins, J. S. (2000). The Emotional Nature of a Brand. Rio-Brazil: Marts Plan Imagen Ltd press.Google Scholar

  • 18. Milton, K. (1995). Design Principles and practice - creativity and conceptual Design. London: Open university press/pub.Google Scholar

  • 19. Morris, R. (2009). The Fundamentals of Product Design. London: AVA Pub.Google Scholar

  • 20. Obasuyi, O.F.E. (2010). Industrial Design the Nexus between Arts & Technology. Nigeria, Art Reflections. Journal of Society of Nigerian Artist, 9.Google Scholar

  • 21. Ollins, W. (2003). On Brand. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar

  • 22. Papanek, V. (2009). Design for the Real World. In Human Ecology and Social Change (2nd ed.) London: Thames and Hudson Pub.Google Scholar

  • 23. Roozenburg, J. M & Eekels, J. (1995). Product Design fundamentals and methods of Design. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar

  • 24. Rusu, M. & Chandrinou, T. (2015). Characteristics and Principles of Art Education. Review of Artistic Education, 10/11.Google Scholar

  • 25. Schmidt, K. & Ludlow, C. (2002). Inclusive Branding. Basingstoke: Palmgrave Macmillan Pub.Google Scholar

  • 26. Shimura, A. P. & Palmer, S. E. (2012). Aesthetic Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • 27. Squires, S. & Byrne, B. (2002). Creating Breakthrough Ideas. The Collaboration of Anthropologists and Designer in the Product Development Industry. Westport, CT. USA: Bergin and Garvey Pub.Google Scholar

  • 28. Wang, T. J. (2011). Designing for Designing. ICT Technologies and professional Education. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 30. Wilson, J. (2002). The design of objects and the objects of design. In Design and the Social Sciences. New York: Taylor and FrancisGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-03-17

Published in Print: 2017-03-02

Citation Information: Review of Artistic Education, Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages 186–199, ISSN (Online) 2501-238X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/rae-2017-0024.

Export Citation

© 2017. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in