Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Advances in Rehabilitation

The Journal of Academy of Physical Education, Warsaw

4 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.04

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.104
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.014

Open Access
Online
ISSN
1734-4948
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Research in physiotherapy – selected problems

Aleksandra Chudobina / Anna Pilch
Published Online: 2013-08-31 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rehab-2013-0047

Abstract

Research in the field of physiotherapy creates some controversy. This article seeks to explore and find out the solutions for this issue. Two aspects are discussed: the difficulties in reconciling the specificity of physiotherapy research with methodological standards and the concerns related to patients’ participation in the research. These problems affect the physiotherapists involved in the creation of ethically and methodologically valuable research project. Physiotherapists conducting research struggle to reconcile two sets of values: the role of a researcher and the role of a professional helper. This article discusses the possibility of creating a valuable research project based on the methodological standards within EBM paradigm in relation to the practical aspects of physiotherapy, such as therapy effectiveness and patient-therapist interaction.

  • 1. The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (US). The Belmont Report. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office; 1978 [cited 2012 Nov 15]. Available from: URL: http://videocast.nih.gov/pdf/ohrp_belmont_report.pdf.Google Scholar

  • 2. Przyłuska- Fiszer A, Wójcik A. Problemy metodologiczne badań naukowych. Diametros 2009; 19: 119-31.Google Scholar

  • 3. Jaeschke R, Cook DJ, Guyatt GH. Ocena artykułów o leczeniu lub zapobieganiu- cz. I: ocena wiarygodności. Med Prakt 1998; 2: 149-55.Google Scholar

  • 4. Haslam N. Humanising medical practice: The role of empathy. Med J Aust 2007; 187: 381-2.Google Scholar

  • 5. Elwyn G, Buetow S, Hibbard J, Wensing M. Respecting the subjective: Quality measurement from the patient’s perspective. BMJ 2007; 335: 1021-2.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 6. Carter MJ. Evidence-based medicine: an overview of key concepts. Ostomy Wound Manage 2010; 56: 68-85.Google Scholar

  • 7. Sackett DL, Straus SE, Richardson WS, et al. Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM. 2d ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2000.Google Scholar

  • 8. Rutten GM, Harting J, Rutten ST, et al. Measuring physiotherapists' guideline adherence by means of clinical vignettes: A validation study. J Eval Clin Pract 2006; 12: 491-500.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 9. Fundacja na rzecz Wspierania Rozwoju Polskiej Farmacji i Medycyny. Raport Polskiego Pacjenta Portret Własny. Warszawa; 2010 [cited 2012 Nov 15]. Available from: URL: http://www.polpharma.pl/pl/fundacja/compliance/raport-z-badania-compliance. Google Scholar

  • 10. Burrell G, Morgan G. Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. London: Heinemann Educational Books; 1979.Google Scholar

  • 11. World Health Organisation (WHO). Adherence to Long Term Therapies - Evidence for Action. Geneva; 2003.Google Scholar

  • 12. Hayden JA, van Tulder MW, Tomlinson G. Systematic review: strategies for using exercise therapy to improve outcomes in chronic low back pain. Ann Intern Med 2005; 142(9): 776-85.Google Scholar

  • 13. Vasey L. DNAs and DNCTs - why do patients fail to begin or complete a course of physiotherapy treatment? Physiotherapy 1990: 76; 575-78.Google Scholar

  • 14. Vermeire E, Hearnshaw H, Van Royen P, et al. Patient adherence to treatment: three decades of research. A comprehensive review. J Clin Pharm Ther 2001; 26(5): 331-42.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 15. Kirsten J, Sionnadh M, Klaber J, et al. Barriers to treatment adherence in physiotherapy outpatient clinics: A systematic review. Man Ther 2010; 15(3-2): 220-8.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 16. Szczerbińska K, Zalewski Z, Gąsowski J, et al. Udział osób starszych w badaniach klinicznych prezentacja założeń projektu PREDICT. Gerontol Pol 2010; 18(4): 176-182.Google Scholar

  • 17. Guyatt G. Praktyczne aspekty EBM. Med Prakt Ginekol Poł 2003; 3: 72-3.Google Scholar

  • 18. Deci EL, Ryan RM. The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychol Inq 2000; 11(4): 227-68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2013-08-31

Published in Print: 2012-12-01


Citation Information: Advances in Rehabilitation, Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages 35–39, ISSN (Online) 1734-4948, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rehab-2013-0047.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in