Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Research in Language

The Journal of University of Lodz

4 Issues per year

CiteScore 2016: 0.27

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.271
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.453

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Just Accepted

Native Speaker Perceptions of Accented Speech: The English Pronunciation of Macedonian EFL Learners

Anastazija Kirkova-Naskova
Published Online: 2010-10-19 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10015-010-0004-7

Native Speaker Perceptions of Accented Speech: The English Pronunciation of Macedonian EFL Learners

The paper reports on the results of a study that aimed to describe the vocalic and consonantal features of the English pronunciation of Macedonian EFL learners as perceived by native speakers of English and to find out whether native speakers who speak different standard variants of English perceive the same segments as non-native. A specially designed computer web application was employed to gather two types of data: a) quantitative (frequency of segment variables and global foreign accent ratings on a 5-point scale), and b) qualitative (open-ended questions). The result analysis points out to three most frequent markers of foreign accent in the English speech of Macedonian EFL learners: final obstruent devoicing, vowel shortening and substitution of English dental fricatives with Macedonian dental plosives. It also reflects additional phonetic aspects poorly explained in the available reference literature such as allophonic distributional differences between the two languages and intonational mismatch.

Keywords: foreign accent; speech perception; native speaker; Macedonian English

  • Anderson-Hsieh, J. and K. Koehler. 1988. The effect of foreign accent and speaking rate on native speaker comprehension. Language Learning 38 (4), 561-613.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Anderson-Hsieh, J., R. Jonson and K. Koehler. 1992. The relationship between native speaker judgements of non-native pronunciation and deviance in segmental, prosody and syllable structure. Language Learning 42 (4), 529-555.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Angelovska, T. and A. Hahn. 2009. English with a "native-like" accent: An empirical study on native speakers' perceptions. In Benati, A. (ed.), Issues in Second Language Proficiency. London: Continuum Publishing. 147-166.Google Scholar

  • Archibald, J. 1998. Second Language Phonology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Best, C. T. 1995. A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In Strange, W. (ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Cross-Language Speech Research. Timonium, MD: York Press. 171-203.Google Scholar

  • Birdsong, D. 2007. Native-like pronunciation among late learners of French as a second language. In Bohn, O.-S., and M. J. Munro. (eds.), Language Experience and Second Language Speech Learning: In honour of James Emil Flege (pp. 99-117). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Bohn, O.-S. 1995. Cross-language speech perception in adults: First language transfer doesn't tell it all. In Strange, W. (ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Cross-Language Speech Research. Timonium, MD: York Press. 279-304.Google Scholar

  • Bongaerts, T., C. van Summeren, B. Planken and E. Schils. 1997. Age and ultimate attainment in the pronunciation of a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19, 447-465.Google Scholar

  • Brennan, E. M. and J. S. Brennan. 1981. Accent scaling and language attitudes: Reactions to Mexican American English speech. Language and Speech 23 (3), 207-221.Google Scholar

  • Brown, C. 1998. The role of L1 grammar in the L2 acquisition of segmental structure. Second Language Research 14 (2), 36-193.Google Scholar

  • Catford, J. C. 1987. Phonetics and the teaching of pronunciation: A systemic description of English phonology. In Morley, J. (ed.), Current Perspectives on Pronunciation. Washington, DC: TESOL. 87-99.Google Scholar

  • Čelik, M. 2008. A description of Turkish-English phonology for teaching English in Turkey. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education 4 (1), 159-175.Google Scholar

  • Collins, B. and I. M. Mees. 2006. Practical Phonetics and Phonology: A Resource Book for Students. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Cruttenden, A. (ed.). 2001. Gimson's Pronunciation of English. 6th edition. London: Arnold.Google Scholar

  • Derwing, T. M. and M. J. Munro. 1997. Accent, comprehensibility and intelligibility: Evidence from four L1s. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19, 1-16.Google Scholar

  • Derwing, T. M., M. J. Munro and G. Wiebe. 1998. Evidence in favour of a broad framework for pronunciation instruction. Language Learning 48 (3), 393-410.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Derwing, T. M. and M. J. Rossiter. 2003. The effects of pronunciation instruction on the accuracy, fluency and complexity of L2 accented speech. Applied Language Learning 13 (1), 1-17.Google Scholar

  • Derwing, T. M., M. J. Rossiter and M. J. Munro. 2002. Teaching native speakers to listen to foreign-accented speech. Journal of Multulingual and Multicultural Development 23 (4), 245-259.Google Scholar

  • Derwing, T. M., R. I. Thomson and M. J. Munro. 2006. English pronunciation and fluency development in Mandarin and Slavic speakers, System 34 (2), 183-193.Google Scholar

  • Dimovska, P. 1980. An Outline of the Pronunciation of English. Skopje: Ss. Cyril and Methodius University.Google Scholar

  • Ellis, R. 1995. Understanding Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar

  • Escudero, P. 2005. Linguistic Perception and Second Language Acquisition. PhD Thesis. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar

  • Flege, J. E. 1984. The detection of French accent by American listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 76 (3), 692-707.Google Scholar

  • Flege, J. E. 1995. Second language speech learning: Theory, findings and problems. In Strange, W. (ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Cross-Language Speech Research. Timonium, MD: York Press. 233-277.Google Scholar

  • Flege, J. E. 2002. Interactions between the native and second-language phonetic systems. In Burmeister, P., T. Piske and A. Rhode (eds.), An Integrated View of Language Development: Papers in honor of Henning Wode. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag. 217-244.Google Scholar

  • Flege, J. E. 2003. Assessing constraints on second-language segmental production and perception. In Meyer, A. and N. Schiller (eds.), Phonetics and Phonology in Language Comprehension and Production, Differences and Similarities. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 319-355.Google Scholar

  • Flege, J. E. and I. R. A. MacKay. 2004. Perceiving vowels in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26, 1-34.Google Scholar

  • Giegerich, H. J. 2005. English Phonology. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar

  • Gimson, A. C. 1994. An Introduction to the Pronunciation of English, revised 4th edition. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

  • Hansen, J. 2006. Acquiring a Non-Native Phonology: Linguistic Constraints and Social Barriers. London: Continuum IPG Ltd.Google Scholar

  • Jenkins, J. 2000. The Phonology of English as an International Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar

  • Kirkova-Naskova, A. 2009. Markers of Foreign Accent in Macedonian-English Interlanguage. Unpublished MA Thesis. Skopje: Faculty of Philology.Google Scholar

  • Kuhl, P. 2000. A new view of language acquisition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 97, 11850-11857.Google Scholar

  • Leather, J. and A. James. 1996. Second language speech. In Ritchie, W. C. and T. K. Bahtia (eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. San Diego: Academic Press, Inc. 269-316.Google Scholar

  • Magen, H. 1998. The perception of foreign-accented speech. Journal of Phonetics 26 (4), 381-400.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Major, R. C. 1986. Paragoge and degree of foreign accent in Brazilian English. Second Language Research 2, 53-71.Google Scholar

  • Major, R. C. 1998. Interlanguage phonetics and phonology: An introduction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20, 131-137.Google Scholar

  • Major, R. C. 2001. Foreign Accent: The Ontogeny and Phylogeny of Second Language Phonology. Mahwah, New Jersey, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar

  • McDermott, W. L. C. 1986. The Scalability of Degrees of Foreign Accent. PhD Thesis. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar

  • Moyer, A. 1999. Ultimate attainment in L2 phonology: the critical factors of age, motivation, and instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21, 81-108.Google Scholar

  • Munro, M. J. and T. M. Derwing. 1995. Processing time, accent, and comprehensibility in the perception of native and foreign-accented speech. Language and Speech 38 (3), 289-306.Google Scholar

  • Munro, M. J. and T. M. Derwing. 1998. The effects of speaking rate on listener evaluations of native and foreign-accented speech. Language Learning 48 (2), 159-182.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Munro, M. J. and T. M. Derwing. 1999. Foreign accent, comprehensibility and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. In Leather, J. (ed.), Phonological Issues in Language Learning. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. 285-310.Google Scholar

  • Odlin, T. 2000. Language Transfer: Cross-Linguistic Influence in Language Learning. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar

  • Pennington, M. C. 2007. The context of phonology. In Pennington, M. C. (ed.), Phonology in Context. Basingstoke: Palgrave. 1-24.Google Scholar

  • Piper, T. and D. Cansin. 1988. Factors influencing the foreign accent. The Canadian Modern Language Review 44 (2), 334-342.Google Scholar

  • Purcell, E. T. and R. W. Suter. 1980. Predictors of pronunciation accuracy: A re-examination. Language Learning 30 (2), 271-287.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Piske, T., I. MacKay and J. E. Flege. 2001. Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics 29, 191-215.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Scovel, T. 1995. Differentiation, recognition and identification in the discrimination of foreign accents. In Archibald, J. (ed.), Phonological Acquisition and Phonological Theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 161-181.Google Scholar

  • Siljanoski, V. 1976. A Contrastive Analysis of English and Macedonian Phonological Systems. PhD Thesis. Skopje: Faculty of Philology.Google Scholar

  • Siljanoski, V. 1993. Introduction to English Pronunciation. Skopje: Ss Cyril and Methodius University.Google Scholar

  • Strange, W. 2007. Cross-language phonetic similarity of vowels: theoretical and methodological issues. In Bohn, O.-S. and M. J. Munro (eds.), Language Experience and Second Language Speech Learning: In honour of James Emil Flege. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 35-56.Google Scholar

  • Thompson, I. 1991. Foreign accents revisited: The English pronunciation of Russian immigrants. Language Learning 41 (2), 177-204.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • van Els, T. and K. de Bot. 1987. The role of intonation in foreign accent. The Modern Language Journal 71 (2), 147-155.Google Scholar

  • Weinberger, S. H. 1998. The speech accent archive [electronic database]. George Mason University. http://accent.gmu.edu/index.php http://accent.gmu.edu/index.php

About the article

Published Online: 2010-10-19

Published in Print: 2010-09-30

Citation Information: Research in Language, Volume 8, Issue , Pages 1–21, ISSN (Online) 2083-4616, ISSN (Print) 1731-7533, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10015-010-0004-7.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in