Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Research in Language

The Journal of University of Lodz

4 Issues per year

CiteScore 2016: 0.27

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.271
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.453

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

The English pronunciation teaching in Europe survey: selected results

Alice Henderson / Dan Frost / Elina Tergujeff / Alexander Kautzsch / Deirdre Murphy / Anastazija Kirkova-Naskova / Ewa Waniek-Klimczak / David Levey / Una Cunnigham / Lesley Curnick
Published Online: 2012-10-21 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10015-011-0047-4


This paper provides an overview of the main findings from a European-wide on-line survey of English pronunciation teaching practices. Both quantitative and qualitative data from seven countries (Finland, France, Germany, Macedonia, Poland, Spain and Switzerland) are presented, focusing on teachers' comments about:

● their own pronunciation,

● their training,

● their learners’ goals, skills, motivation and aspirations,

● their preferences for certain varieties (and their perception of their students' preferences).

The results of EPTiES reveal interesting phenomena across Europe, despite shortcomings in terms of construction and distribution. For example, most respondents are non-native speakers of English and the majority of them rate their own mastery of English pronunciation favourably. However, most feel they had little or no training in how to teach pronunciation, which begs the question of how teachers are coping with this key aspect of language teaching. In relation to target models, RP remains the variety of English which teachers claim to use, whilst recognizing that General American might be preferred by some students. Differences between countries are explored, especially via replies to open-ended questions, allowing a more nuanced picture to emerge for each country. Other survey research is also referred to, in order to contextualise the analyses and implications for teaching English and for training English teachers

  • Donovan, P.J. 2001. Making Pronunciation a Priority for EFL Teachers and Learners. In Levey, D., Losey, M.A. & González, M.A. (Eds.). English Language Teaching Changing Perspectives in Context. Cádiz: Universidad de Cádiz (Servicio de Publicaciones). 245-249.Google Scholar

  • Duchet, J-L. 1991. Code de l'anglais oral. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar

  • Dürmüller, U. 2002. English in Switzerland: From Foreign Languages to Lingua Franca. In D.Allerton, P.Skandera, C.Tschichold (Eds), Perspectives on English as a World Language, Basel: Schwabe. 114-123.Google Scholar

  • Foote, J.A., Holtby, A.K. & Derwing, T.M. 2011. Survey of the Teaching of Pronunciation in Adult ESL Programs in Canada, 2010. TESL Canada Journal 29(1), 1-22.Google Scholar

  • Frost, D. 2010. Stress cues in English and French: a perceptual study. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 41(01): 67-84.Google Scholar

  • Gonet, W., Szpyra-Kozłowska, J. & Święciński, R. 2010. Clashes with ashes - The acquisition of vowel reduction by Polish students of English. In Waniek Klimczak, E. (Ed.) Issues in Accents of English 2. pp. 213-232. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Hilgendorf, Suzanne K. 2007. English in Germany: Contact, Spread, and Attitudes. World Englishes. 26.2: 131-148.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hirst, D. & A. Di Cristo (Eds.). 1998. Intonation Systems: A Survey of Twenty Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Janicka, K., M. Kul, & J. Weckwerth. 2005. Polish students’ attitudes to native English accents. In Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K. &. Przedlacka, J. (Eds.) English pronunciation Models: A changing scene. Bern: Peter Lang. pp. 251-292.Google Scholar

  • Kangasvieri, T., E. Miettinen, P. Kukkohovi & M. Härmälä. 2011. Kielten tarjonta ja kielivalintojen perusteet perusopetuksessa. Muistiot 2011:3. Helsinki: Finnish National Board of Education.Google Scholar

  • Kopperoinen, A. 2011. Accents of English as a lingua franca: a study of Finnish textbooks. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 21(1), 71-93.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Levey, D. 2001. Stressing Intonation. In Harris, T., Roldan, I., Sanz, I, &. Torreblanco, M. (Eds.) ELT2000: Thinking Back, Looking Forward. Granada: Greta. 35-45.Google Scholar

  • Levey, D. 1999. Half Truths and White Lies: A Practical Pronunciation Guide for Spanish Speakers. In Harris, T. & Sanz, I. (Eds.) ELT: Through the Looking Glass. Granada: Greta. 215-226.Google Scholar

  • Lintunen, P. 2004. Pronunciation and Phonemic Transcription: A study of advanced Finnish learners of English. Turku: University of Turku.Google Scholar

  • Murphy, D. 2011. An investigation of English pronunciation teaching in Ireland. English Today, 27(4), 10-18.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Murphy, J.M. 1997. Phonology courses offered by MA TESOL programs in the US. TESOL Quarterly 31, 741-761.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Paunović, T. 2009. Plus ça change... Serbian EFL students’ attitudes towards varieties of English. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 45(4), 511-533. Retrieved from <http://versita.metapress.com/content/6563h54842u858nm/fulltext.pdf>Google Scholar

  • Pavon, V. 2001. El Papel del Profesor en la Enseñanza de la Pronunciación. In Levey, D., Losey, M.A. & González, M.A. (Eds.). English Language Teaching Changing Perspectives in Context. Cádiz: Universidad de Cádiz (Servicio de Publicaciones). 289-300.Google Scholar

  • Pavon, V. & Rosado, A. 2003. Guía de Fonética y Fonología para Estudiantes de Filología Inglesa en el Umbral del Siglo XXI. Granada: Comares Sajavaara, K., Luukka, M-R. & Pöyhönen, S. 2007. Kielikoulutuspolitiikka Suomessa: Lähtökohtia, ongelmia ja tulevaisuuden haasteita. In Pöyhönen, S. & Luukka, M-R. (Eds.), Kohti tulevaisuuden kielikoulutusta. Kielikoulutuspoliittisen projektin loppuraportti. University of Jyväskylä: Centre for Applied Language Studies.Google Scholar

  • Sockett, G. 2011. From the cultural hegemony of English to online informal learning: Cluster frequency as an indicator of relevance in authentic documents, Asp, la revue du GERAS, 60, 5-20.Google Scholar

  • Statistisches Bundesamt (www.desatis.de). 2003a. Bildung und Kultur. Allgemeinbildende Schulen [Education and Culture. Schools of general Education]. Fachserie 11, Reihe1. Wiesbaden. [http://www.destatis.de/jetspeed/portal/cms/Sites/destatis/Internet/DE/Content/Publikationen/Fachveroeffentlichungen/BildungForschungKultur/Schulen/Allgemeinbilden deSchulen2110100037004,property=file.pdf; retrieved 2012-02-13]Google Scholar

  • Statistisches Bundesamt (www.desatis.de). 2011a. Bildung und Kultur. Allgemeinbildende Schulen [Education and Culture. Schools of general Education]. Fachserie 11, Reihe1. Wiesbaden. [http://www.destatis.de/jetspeed/portal/cms/Sites/destatis/Internet/DE/Content/Publikationen/Fachveroeffentlichungen/BildungForschungKultur/Schulen/AllgemeinbildendeSchulen2110100117004,property=file.pdf; retrieved 2012-02-13]Google Scholar

  • Statistisches Bundesamt (www.desatis.de). 2003b. Bildung und Kultur. Berufliche Schulen [Education and Culture. Vocational schools]. Fachserie 11, Reihe1. Wiesbaden. [http://www.destatis.de/jetspeed/portal/cms/Sites/destatis/Internet/DE/Content/Publikationen/Fachveroeffentlichungen/BildungForschungKultur/Schulen/BeruflicheSchulen2110200047004,property=file.pdf; retrieved 2012-02-13]Google Scholar

  • Statistisches Bundesamt (www.desatis.de). 2011b. Bildung und Kultur. Berufliche Schulen [Education and Culture. Vocational schools]. Fachserie 11, Reihe1. Wiesbaden. [http://www.destatis.de/jetspeed/portal/cms/Sites/destatis/Internet/DE/Content/Publikationen/Fachveroeffentlichungen/BildungForschungKultur/Schulen/BeruflicheSchulen2110200117004,property=file.pdf; retrieved 2012-02-13]Google Scholar

  • Taillefer, G. 2002. L’anglais dans les formations spécialisées à l’Université :un cheveu sur la soupe? Peut-on rendre le plat plus appétissant ?, ASP 37-38, 155-172.Google Scholar

  • Tergujeff, E. 2009. Accent addition in Finnish EFL textbooks. Presentation given at the 3rd International conference on native and non-native accents of English, 12.12.2009 Lodz, Poland.Google Scholar

  • Tergujeff, E. 2010a. Pronunciation teaching materials in Finnish EFL textbooks. In Henderson, A. (Ed.), English Pronunciation: Issues and Practices (EPIP): Proceedings of the First International Conference. June 3-5 2009, Université de Savoie, Chambéry, France. Université de Savoie: Laboratoire LLS.Google Scholar

  • Tergujeff, E. 2010b. Model pronunciation in Finnish EFL textbooks. Presentation given at NAES-FINSSE 2010: English in the North, 11.6.2010 Oulu, Finland.Google Scholar

  • Tergujeff, E. (in print). English pronunciation teaching: Four case studies from Finland. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 43.Google Scholar

  • Tergujeff, E., Ullakonoja, R. & Dufva, H. (2011). Phonetics and Foreign Language Teaching in Finland. In Werner, S. & Kinnunen, T. (eds.), XXVI Fonetiikan päivät 2010. Joensuu, Finland: University of Eastern Finland. 63-68. Nowacka, M. 2010. The ultimate attainment of English pronuncitaion by Polish college students: A longitudinal study. In Waniek-Klimczak, E. (Ed.) Issues in Accents of English 2.Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 233-260.Google Scholar

  • Vaissière, J. 2002. Cross-Linguistic Prosodic Transcription: French versus English. Problems and Methods in Experimental Phonetics, In honour of the 70th anniversary of Prof. L.V. Bondarko,. N. B. Volslkaya, N. D. Svetozarova and P. A. Skrelin. St.-Petersburg. 147-164.Google Scholar

  • Waniek-Klimczak, E. & K. Klimczak. 2005. Target in speech development: learners’ views. In K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk &. J. Przedlacka (Eds.) English pronunciation Models: A changing scene. Bern: Peter Lang. 229-250.Google Scholar

  • Google Scholar

About the article

Henderson and Frost are listed first because they did the final editing. Thereafter, authors are listed in alphabetical order of the country whose data they gathered and analysed. The order of the other authors thus reflects neither hierarchy nor significance of individual contributions, as this is a truly collaborative project and article

Published Online: 2012-10-21

Published in Print: 2012-10-01

Citation Information: Research in Language, Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages 5–27, ISSN (Online) 2083-4616, ISSN (Print) 1731-7533, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10015-011-0047-4.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Larissa Buss
Language Teaching Research, 2016, Volume 20, Number 5, Page 619
Erin Carrie
International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2017, Volume 27, Number 2, Page 427
Graeme Couper
Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 2016, Volume 2, Number 1, Page 29

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in