Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Research in Language

The Journal of University of Lodz

4 Issues per year

CiteScore 2016: 0.27

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.271
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.453

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 11, Issue 1

Learner Perspective on English Pronunciation Teaching in an EFL Context

Elina Tergujeff
Published Online: 2013-05-04 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10015-012-0010-z


This paper reports on an interview study with EFL learners that aimed to explore learners’ perceptions and views on English pronunciation teaching. The participants of the present study were ten EFL learners studying in the public educational system of Finland. Six of the participants were pupils attending basic education class nine, i.e. 15- to 16-year-old lower secondary level pupils. Two were primary level pupils attending basic education class four (aged 10), and two were upper secondary school pupils (aged 18). The interviews were thematic, and the learners were encouraged to speak freely about the English pronunciation teaching they were receiving and their opinions on this. In addition, they were asked to discuss their goals in English pronunciation, and to consider their pronunciation learning in class and out of class. The interviews were part of a wider study, mapping English pronunciation teaching practices in the context of Finnish schools.

On the basis of the findings, the learners do not seem to have aspirations to native-like pronunciation, but rather aim at achieving intelligible and fluent speech. Only few reported an accent preference (British or American). The primary level learners expressed satisfaction with the amount of pronunciation teaching, whereas most of the lower and upper secondary level learners claimed that pronunciation teaching was insufficient. Despite their criticisms of their pronunciation teaching, the learners reported that they had learnt English pronunciation at school. In addition, many of the learners described learning pronunciation outside school, e.g. through media and personal encounters.

Keywords : English as a foreign language; EFL; pronunciation teaching; interview

  • Breitkreutz, J.A., T.M. Derwing & M.J. Rossiter 2001. Pronunciation teaching practices in Canada. TESL Canada Journal 19 (1), 51-61.Google Scholar

  • Burgess, J. & S. Spencer 2000. Phonology and pronunciation in integrated language teaching and teacher education. System 28 (2), 191-215.Google Scholar

  • Celce-Murcia, M., D.M. Brinton, J.M. Goodwin & B. Griner 2010. TeachingPronunciation. A Course Book and Reference Guide. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Cenoz, J.M. & L. Garcia Lecumberri 1999. The Acquisition of English Pronunciation: Learners‘ Views. The International Journal of Applied Linguistics 9 (1), 3-17.Google Scholar

  • Cunningham, U. 2009. Models and Targets for Pronunciation of English in Vietnam and Sweden. Research in Language 7 (1), 113-128.Google Scholar

  • Cunningsworth, A. 1984. Evaluating and selecting EFL teaching materials. London: Heineman Educational Books.Google Scholar

  • Dalton-Puffer, C., G. Kaltenboeck & U. Smit 1997. Learner Attitudes and L2 Pronunciation in Austria. World Englishes 16, 115-127.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Denzin, N.K. 1978. The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociologicalmethods. Second edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

  • Derwing, T.M. 2003. What do ESL students say about their accents? Canadian ModernLanguage Review 59, 547-567.Google Scholar

  • Finnish National Board of Education. 2004. National Core Curriculum for BasicEducation. Helsinki: Author. Available at http://www.oph.fi/english/sources_of_information/core_curricula_and_qualification_requirements/basic_education. [Retrieved 4 Feb 2013]Google Scholar

  • Fontana, A. & A.H. Prokos 2007. The Interview: From Formal to Postmodern. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar

  • Foote, J.A., A.K. Holtby & T.M. Derwing 2011. Survey of the Teaching of Pronunciation in Adult ESL Programs in Canada, 2010. TESL Canada 29 (1), 1-22.Google Scholar

  • Fraser, H. 2000. Coordinating Improvements in Pronunciation Teaching for AdultLearners of English as a Second Language. Canberra: DETYA.Google Scholar

  • Gilbert, J.B. 2010. Pronunciation as orphan: What can be done? As We Speak, Newsletterof SPLIS, 2010.Google Scholar

  • Henderson, A., D. Frost, E. Tergujeff, A. Kautzsch, D. Murphy, A. Kirkova-Naskova, E.Google Scholar

  • Waniek-Klimczak, D. Levey, U. Cunningham & L. Curnick 2012. The English Pronunciation Teaching in Europe Survey: Selected results. Research in Language 10.1, 5-27.Google Scholar

  • Iivonen, A. 2005. Fonetiikan merkitys kielenomaksumisessa ja -opetuksessa. In A.Google Scholar

  • Iivonen, R. Aulanko & M. Vainio (eds.), Monikäyttöinen fonetiikka. Mimeographed series of the Department of Phonetics 21, University of Helsinki. 3 edition.Google Scholar

  • Janicka, K., M. Kul & J. Weckwerth 2005. Polish Students’ Attitudes to Native English Accents as Models for EFL Pronunciation. In K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk & J. Przedlacka (eds.), English Pronunciation Models: A Changing Scene. Bern: Peter Lang. 251-292.Google Scholar

  • Jenkins, J. 2000. Phonology of English as an international language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Jones, K.W. 2001. "I've Called 'em Tom-ah-toes All My Life and I'm Not Going to Change!": Maintaining Linguistic Control over English Identity in the U.S. SocialForces 79 (3), 1061-1094.Google Scholar

  • Kachru, B.B. 1985. Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In R. Quirk and H. Widdowson (eds.), English in theworld: Teaching and learning the language and literatures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 11-36.Google Scholar

  • Kumpulainen, T. (ed.) 2010. Koulutuksen määrälliset indikaattorit 2010. Helsinki: Finnish National Board of Education. Available at http://www.oph.fi/download/130716_Koulutuksen_maaralliset_indikaattorit_2010.pdf. [Retrieved 4 Feb 2013]Google Scholar

  • Kvale, S. 2007. Doing interviews. London: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Leppänen, S., A. Pitkänen-Huhta, T. Nikula, S. Kytölä, T. Törmäkangas, K. Nissinen, L.Google Scholar

  • Kääntä, T. Räisänen, M. Laitinen, P. Pahta, H. Koskela, S. Lähdesmäki & H.Google Scholar

  • Jousmäki 2011. National Survey on the English Language in Finland: Uses,meanings and attitudes. Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English, Vol. 5. Available at http://www.helsinki.fi/varieng/journal/volumes/05. [Retrieved 4 Feb 2013]Google Scholar

  • Lintunen, P. 2004. Pronunciation and Phonemic Transcription: A study of advancedFinnish learners of English. Turku: University of Turku.Google Scholar

  • Luukka, M-R., S. Pöyhönen, A. Huhta, P. Taalas, M. Tarnanen & A. Keränen 2008. Maailma muuttuu - mitä tekee koulu? Äidinkielen ja vieraiden kieltentekstikäytänteet koulussa ja vapaa-ajalla. University of Jyväskylä: Centre for Applied Language Studies.Google Scholar

  • Macdonald, S. 2002. Pronunciation - views and practices of reluctant teachers. Prospect 17 (3), 3-18.Google Scholar

  • Morley, J. 1991. The Pronunciation Component in Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages. TESOL Quarterly 25 (3), 481-520.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pihko, M-K. 1997. His English Sounded Strange. The Intelligibility of Native and Non-Native English Pronunciation to Finnish Learners of English. University of Jyväskylä: Centre for Applied Language Studies.Google Scholar

  • Purcell, E.T. & R. W. Suter 1980. Predictors of pronunciation accuracy: A reexamination. Language Learning 30 (2), 271-287.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Saito, K. 2012. Effects of Instruction on L2 Pronunciation Development: A Synthesis of 15 Quasi-Experimental Intervention Studies. TESOL Quarterly 46 (4), 842-854.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Suomi, K., J. Toivanen & R. Ylitalo 2008. Finnish sound structure: Phonetics,phonology, phonotactics and prosody. Oulu: University of Oulu.Google Scholar

  • Suter, R.W. 1976. Predictors of pronunciation accuracy in second language learning. Language Learning 26 (2), 233-253.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tergujeff, E. 2010. Pronunciation teaching materials in Finnish EFL textbooks. In A. Henderson (ed.), English Pronunciation: Issues and Practices (EPIP): Proceedingsof the First International Conference. June 3-5 2009, Université de Savoie,Chambéry, France. Université de Savoie: Laboratoire LLS. 189-205.Google Scholar

  • Tergujeff, E. 2012a. English pronunciation teaching: Four case studies from Finland. Journal of Language Teaching and Research 3 (4), 599-607.Google Scholar

  • Tergujeff, E. 2012b. The English Pronunciation Teaching in Europe Survey: Finland. Apples - Journal of Applied Language Studies 6 (1), 29-45.Google Scholar

  • Waniek-Klimczak, E. 1997. Context for Teaching English Phonetics and Phonology at Polish Universities and Colleges: A Survey. In Waniek-Klimczak, E. (ed.), TeachingEnglish Phonetics and Phonology II. Accents ’97. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego. 5-17.Google Scholar

  • Waniek-Klimczak, E. & K. Klimczak 2005. Target in Speech Development: Learners’ Views. In K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk & J. Przedlacka (eds.), English PronunciationModels: A Changing Scene. Bern: Peter Lang. 229-249.Google Scholar

  • Wells, J.C. 1996. Why phonetic transcription is important. Malsori 31-32, 239-242.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2013-05-04

Published in Print: 2013-03-01

Citation Information: Research in Language, Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 81–95, ISSN (Online) 2083-4616, ISSN (Print) 1731-7533, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10015-012-0010-z.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in