Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Research in Language

The Journal of University of Lodz

4 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.27

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.271
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.453

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2083-4616
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Fluctuations in Learners’ Willingness to Communicate During Communicative Task Performance: Conditions and Tendencies

Anna Mystkowska-Wiertelak / Mirosław Pawlak
Published Online: 2014-10-15 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rela-2014-0019

Abstract

A person’s willingness to communicate (WTC), believed to stem from a combination of proximal and distal variables comprising psychological, linguistic, educational and communicative dimensions of language, appears to be a significant predictor of success in language learning. The ability to communicate is both a means and end of language education, since, on the one hand, being able to express the intended meanings in the target language is generally perceived as the main purpose of any language course and, on the other, linguistic development proceeds in the course of language use. However, MacIntyre (2007, p. 564) observes that some learners, despite extensive study, may never become successful L2 speakers. The inability or unwillingness to sustain contacts with more competent language users may influence the way learners are evaluated in various social contexts. Establishing social networks as a result of frequent communication with target language users is believed to foster linguistic development. WTC, initially considered a stable personality trait and then a result of context-dependent influences, has recently been viewed as a dynamic phenomenon changing its intensity within one communicative event (MacIntyre and Legatto, 2011; MacIntyre et al., 2011). The study whose results are reported here attempts to tap into factors that shape one’s willingness to speak during a communicative task. The measures employed to collect the data - selfratings and surveys - allow looking at the issue from a number of perspectives.

Keywords: L2 willingness to communicate; classroom interaction; communicative tasks

References

  • Asker, B. 1998. Student reticence and oral testing: A Hong Kong study of willingness to communicate. Communication Research Reports 15(2): 162-169. DOI: 10.1080/08824099809362110CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baker, S. C. and MacIntyre, P. D. 2000. The role of gender and immersion in communication and second language orientations. Language Learning, 50(2): 311-341. DOI: 10.1111/0023-8333.00119CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Burgoon, J. K. 1976. The unwillingness-to-communicate: Development and validation. Communication Monographs 43, 60-69. DOI: 10.1080/03637757609375916CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cao, Y. and Philp, J. 2006. Interactional context and willingness to communicate: A comparison of behavior in whole class, group and dyadic interaction. System, 34(4): 480-493. DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2006.05.002CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chan, B. M. and McCroskey, J. C. 1987. The WTC scale as a predictor of classroom participation. Communication Research Reports 4: 47-50.Google Scholar

  • Clément, R. and Gardner, R. C. 2001. Second language mastery. In H. Giles and W. P. Robinson (eds) Handbook of language and social psychology. London, UK: Wiley: 489-504.Google Scholar

  • Clément, R., Baker, S. C., and MacIntyre, P. D. 2003. Willingness to communicate in a second language: The effects of context, norms, and vitality. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 22(2): 190-209. DOI: 10.1177/0261927X03022002003CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Clément, R. and Kruidenier, B. G. 1985. Aptitude, attitude and motivation in second language proficiency: A test of Clément's model. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 4(1): 21-37. DOI: 10.1177/0261927X8500400102CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dörnyei, Z. 2005. The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

  • Dörnyei, Z. 2009. The L2 Motivational self system. In Z. Dörnyei and E. Ushioda (eds) Motivation, language identity and the L2 self. Bristol: Multilingual Matters: 9-42.Google Scholar

  • Gardner, R. C. 1985. Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitude and motivation. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

  • Gregersen, T. and P.D. MacIntyre 2013. Capitalizing on language learners’ individuality. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

  • Hashimoto, Y. 2002. Motivation and willingness to communicate as predictors of reported L2 use. Second Language Studies 20(2): 29-70.Google Scholar

  • Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., and Cope, J. 1986. Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2): 125-132. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05256.x CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kang, S. 2005. Dynamic emergence of situational willingness to communicate in a second language, System 33: 277-292. DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2004.10.004CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kuhl, J. 1994a. A theory of action and state orientations. In J. Kuhl and J. Beckmann (eds),Volition and personality. Gottingen: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers: 9-46Google Scholar

  • Kuhl, J. 1994b. Action vs. state orientation: Psychometric properties of the Action Control Scale (ACS-90). In J. Kuhl and J. Beckmann (eds),Volition and personality.Google Scholar

  • Gottingen: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers: 47-59Google Scholar

  • Lantolf, J. P. 2006. Sociocultural Theory and L2: State of the art. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28: 67-109. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060037CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Long, M. H. 1985c. Input and second language acquisition theory. In S.M. Gass and C.G. Madden (eds). Input in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House: 377-393.Google Scholar

  • Long. M. H. 1996. The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie and T. K. Bhatia (eds). Handbook of research on second language acquisition. New York: Academic Press: 413-468.Google Scholar

  • MacIntyre, P. D. 1994. Variables underlying willingness to communicate: A causal analysis. Communication Research Reports 11: 135-142. DOI: 10.1080/08824099409359951CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MacIntyre, P. D. 2007. Willingness to communicate in the second language: Understanding the decision to speak as a volitional process. The Modern Language Journal 91(4): 564-576. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00623.x CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MacIntyre, P. D., Burns, C., and Jessome, A. 2011. Ambivalence about communicating in a second language: A qualitative study of French immersion students' willingness to communicate. The Modern Language Journal 95(1): 81-96. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01141.x CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MacIntyre, P. D. and Charos, C. 1996. Personality, attitudes, and affect as predictors of second language communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 15(1): 3-26. DOI: 10.1177/0261927X960151001CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MacIntyre, P. D. and Clement, R. 1996. A model of willingness to communicate in a second language: The concept, its antecedents and implications. Paper presented at the 11th World Congress of Applied Linguistics, Jyväskylä, Finland.Google Scholar

  • MacIntyre, P. and Doucette, J. 2010. Willingness to communicate and action control. System 38: 161-171. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.12.013CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MacIntyre, P. D. and Legatto, J. J. 2011. A dynamic system approach to willingness to communicate: Developing an idiodynamic method to capture rapidly changing affect. Applied Linguistics 32(2): 149-171. DOI: 10.1093/applin/amq037CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clément, R., and Conrod, S. 2001. Willingness to communicate, social support, and language-learning orientations of immersion students. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23(3): 369-388. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/ CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clément, R., and Donovan, L. A. 2002. Sex and age effects on willingness to communicate, anxiety, perceived competence, and L2 motivation among junior high school French immersion students. Language Learning 52(3): 537-564. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9922.00194CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MacIntyre, P. D., Clément, R., Dörnyei, Z., and Noels, K. A. 1998. Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. Modern Language Journal 82: 545-562. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb05543.x CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McCroskey, J. C. 1992. Reliability and validity of the willingness to communicate scale. Communication Quarterly 40(1): 16-25. DOI: 10.1080/01463379209369817CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McCroskey, J. C. and Richmond, V. P. 1982. Communication apprehension and shyness: Conceptual and operational distinctions. Central States Speech Journal 33: 458-468. DOI: 10.1080/10510978209388452CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McCroskey, J. C. and Richmond, V. P. 1991. Willingness to communicate: A cognitive view. In M. Booth-Butterfield (ed), Communication, cognition, and anxiety.Google Scholar

  • Newbury Park, CA: Sage: 19-37.Google Scholar

  • Munezane, Y. 2013. Attitudes, affect and ideal L2 self as predictors of willingness to communicate. In R. Leah, A. Ewert, M. Pawlak, and M. Wrembel (eds), EUROSLA Yearbook: Volume 13: 176-198. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/eurosla.13.09mun CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pawlak, M. and Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A. (in press). Investigating the dynamic nature of L2 willingness to communicate.Google Scholar

  • Noels, K. A. 2001. New orientations in language learning motivation: Toward a contextual model of intrinsic, extrinsic, and integrative orientations and motivation.In Z. Dörnyei and R. Schmidt (eds), Motivation and second language acquisition. Honolulu, HI: Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa: 43-68.Google Scholar

  • Noels, K.A., Pelltier, L.G., Clément, R. and Vallerand, R.J. 2000. Why are you learning a second language? Motivational orientations and self-determination theory.Language Learning 50: 57-85. DOI: 10.1111/0023-8333.00111CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Peng, J. 2007. Willingness to communicate in the Chinese EFL classroom: A cultural perspective. In J. Liu (ed), English language teaching in China: New approaches, perspectives, and standards. London: Continuum: 250-269.Google Scholar

  • Peng, J. E. 2012. Towards an ecological understanding of willingness to communicate in EFL classrooms in China. System 40(2): 203-213. DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2012.02.002CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Peng, J. E. 2014. Willingness to communicate inside the EFL classroom: An ecological perspective. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

  • Peng, J. E. and Woodrow, L. J. 2010 Willingness to communicate in English: A model in the Chinese EFL classroom context. Language Learning 60: 834-876. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00576.x CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ryan, S. 2009. Self and identity in L2 motivation in Japan: The ideal L2 self and Japanese learners of English. In Z. Dörnyei and E. Ushioda (eds), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self. Bristol: Multilingual Matters: 120-143.Google Scholar

  • Swain, M. 1985. Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass, and C. Madden (eds) Input in second language acquisition. New York: Newbury House: 235-256.Google Scholar

  • Swain, M. 1998. Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty and J.Google Scholar

  • Williams (eds), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 64-81.Google Scholar

  • Ushioda, E. 2009. A person-in-context relational view of emergent motivation, self and identity. In Z. Dörnyei and E. Ushioda (eds), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self. Bristol: Multilingual Matters: 215-228).Google Scholar

  • Vygotsky, L.S. 1978. Mind in Society Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Yashima, T. 2002. Willingness to communicate in a second language: The Japanese EFL context. The Modern Language Journal 86(1): 54-66. DOI: 10.1111/1540-4781.00136CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yashima, T. 2009. International posture and the ideal L2 self in the Japanese EFL context. In Z. Dörnyei and E. Ushioda (eds), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self. Bristol: Multilingual Matters: 144-192.Google Scholar

  • Yashima, T. 2012. Willingness to communicate: Momentary volition that results in L2 behaviour. In S. Mercer, S. Ryan and M. Williams (eds), Psychology for language learning: Insights from research, theory and practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan: 119-135.Google Scholar

  • Yashima, T., Zenuk-Nishide, L., and Shimizu, K. 2004. The influence of attitudes and affect on willingness to communicate and second language communication.Language Learning 54(1): 119-152. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00250.x CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2014-10-15

Published in Print: 2014-09-01


Citation Information: Research in Language, ISSN (Online) 2083-4616, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rela-2014-0019.

Export Citation

© De Gruyter Open. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Mariusz Kruk
International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2017
[2]
Mirosław Pawlak, Anna Mystkowska-Wiertelak, and Jakub Bielak
Language Teaching Research, 2016, Volume 20, Number 5, Page 654
[3]

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in