Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Research in Language

The Journal of University of Lodz

4 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.27

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.271
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.453

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2083-4616
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 14, Issue 4

Profiling a set of personality traits of text author: what our words reveal about us

Tatiana Litvinova / Pavel Seredin / Olga Litvinova / Olga Zagorovskaya
Published Online: 2017-02-23 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/rela-2016-0019

Abstract

Authorship profiling, i.e. revealing information about an unknown author by analyzing their text, is a task of growing importance. One of the most urgent problems of authorship profiling (AP) is selecting text parameters which may correlate to an author’s personality. Most researchers’ selection of these is not underpinned by any theory. This article proposes an approach to AP which applies neuroscience data. The aim of the study is to assess the probability of self-destructive behaviour of an individual via formal parameters of their texts. Here we have used the “Personality Corpus”, which consists of Russian-language texts. A set of correlations between scores on the Freiburg Personality Inventory scales that are known to be indicative of self-destructive behaviour (“Spontaneous Aggressiveness”, “Depressiveness”, “Emotional Lability”, and “Composedness”) and text variables (average sentence length, lexical diversity etc.) has been calculated. Further, a mathematical model which predicts the probability of self-destructive behaviour has been obtained.

Keywords: authorship profiling; neurolinguistics; language personality; computational stylometry; discourse production

References

  • Angst, J. and P. Clayton. 1986. Premorbid Personality of Depressive, Bipolar, and Schizophrenic Patients with Special Reference to Suicidal Issues. Comprehensive Psychiatry 27(6). 511‒532.Google Scholar

  • Argamon, S. et al. 2009. Automatically profiling the author of an anonymous text. Communications of the ACM 52(2). 119‒123.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baddeley, J. L., Daniel, G. R. and J. W. Pennebaker. 2011. How Henry Hellyer’s Use of Language Foretold His Suicide. Crisis 32 (5). 288‒292.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bloom, L. R. et al. 1994. Hemispheric Responsibility and Discourse Production: Contrasting Patients with Unilateral Left and Right Hemisphere Damage. In L. R. Bloom, L. K. Obler, S. D. Santi and J. S. Ehrlich (eds.). Discourse Analysis and Applications: Studies in Adult Clinical Populations, 91-94. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar

  • Chung, C. K. and J. W. Pennebaker. 2009. The psychological functions of function words. In K. Fiedler (ed.), Social communication, 343-359. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

  • Demjen, Z. 2015. Sylvia Plath and the Language of Affective States: Written Discourse and the Experience of Depression. Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

  • Fernбndez-Cabana, M. et al. 2013. Suicidal Traits in Marilyn Monroe’s Fragments: An LIWC Analysis. Crisis: The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention 34(2). 124‒130.Google Scholar

  • Fotekova, T. A. and T. V. Akhutina. 2002. Diagnostika rechevikh narushenii shkol’nikov s ispol’zovaniem neiropsikhologicheskikh metodov [Detecting Speech Impediments in School Children Using Neuropsychological Methods]. Moscow: ARKTI.Google Scholar

  • Handelman, L. D. and D. Lester. 2007. The Content of Suicide Notes from Attempters and Completers. Crisis 28, 102‒104.Google Scholar

  • Joiner, T. E., Brown, J. S. and L. R. Jr. Wingate. 2005. The Psychology and Neurobiology of Suicidal Behaviour. Annu Rev Psychol 56. 287‒314.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jones, N. and C. Bennell. 2007. The Development and Validation of Statistical Prediction Rules for Discriminating Between Genuine and Simulated Suicide Notes. Archives of Suicide Research: Official Journal of the International Academy for Suicide Research 11(2). 219.Google Scholar

  • Koppel, M., Argamon, S. and A. Shimoni. 2003. Automatically Categorizing Written Texts by Author Gender. Lit and Ling Computing 17(4). 401‒412.Google Scholar

  • Lester, D. 2014. The “I” of the Storm: Understanding the Suicidal Mind. De Gruyter Open Ltd.Google Scholar

  • Lightman, E. J. et al. 2007. Using Computational Text Analysis Tools to Compare the Lyrics of Suicidal and non-suicidal Songwriters. In D. S. McNamara & G. Trafton (eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Cognitive Science Society, 1217-1222. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

  • Litvinova, T. A. 2014. Profiling the Author of a Written Text in Russian. Journal of Language and Literature 5(4). 210‒216.Google Scholar

  • Litvinova, T. A., Seredin, P. V. and O. A. Litvinova. 2015. Using Part-of-Speech Sequences Frequencies in a Text to Predict Author Personality: a Corpus Study. Indian Journal of Science and Technology 8(9). 93‒97.Google Scholar

  • Long, D. L., et al. 2012. The Organization of Discourse in the Brain: Results from the Item-Priming-in-Recognition Paradigm. In M. Faust (ed.), The Handbook of the Neuropsychology of Language, 77‒99. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Marciсczuk, M., Zaњko-Zieliсska, M. and M. Piasecki. 2011. Structure Annotation in the Polish Corpus of Suicide Notes. In I. Habernal and V. Matoušek (ed.), Text, Speech and Dialogue. 14th International Conference, TSD 2011, Pilsen, Czech Republic, September 1-5, 2011. Proceedings, 419‒426. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.Google Scholar

  • Nini, A. 2014. Authorship Profiling in a Forensic Context. PhD thesis. Aston University.Google Scholar

  • Noecker Jr, J. W., Ryan, M. and P. Juola. 2013. Psychological Profiling Through Textual Analysis. Lit Linguist Computing 28(3). 382‒387.Google Scholar

  • Oborneva, I. V. 2005. Avtomatizatsiia otsenki kachestva vostriiatiya vospriiatiya teksta [Automatisation of the Assessment of Perception of a Text]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gorodskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta [Herald Journal of Moscow State Pedagogical University] 2(5). 86‒92.Google Scholar

  • Pennebaker, J. W. 2011. The Secret Life of Pronouns: What Our Words Say About Us. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Pennebaker, J. W., Mehl, M. R. and K. Niederhoffer. 2003. Psychological Aspects of Natural Language Use: Our Words, Our Selves. Annual Review of Psychology 54. 547‒577.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pennebaker, J. W. and L. D. Stone. 2004. What Was She Trying To Say? A Linguistic Analysis of Katie’s Diaries. In D. Lester (ed.), Katie’s Diary: Unlocking the Mystery of a Suicide, 55‒80. New York: Brunner-Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Pestian, J. et al. 2010. Suicide Note Classification Using Natural Language Processing: A Content Analysis. Biomed Inform Insights 3. 19‒28.Google Scholar

  • Pilyagina, G. Ya. 2003. Mekhanismi suitsidogeneza i otsenka suitsidal’nogo riska pri razlichnikh formah autoagressivnogo povedeniya [Mechanisms of Suicidogenesis and Assessments of Suicidal Risks in Different Forms of Self-destructive Behaviour]. Arhiv psihiatriї [Psychiatry Archives] 9(4). 18‒26.Google Scholar

  • Rangel, F. et al. 2014. Overview of the 2nd Author Profiling Task at PAN 2014. In L. Cappellato, N. Ferro, M. Halvey and W. Kraaij (eds.), CLEF 2014 Labs and Workshops, Notebook Papers. CEUR-WS.org, vol. 1180 898‒827.Google Scholar

  • Rangel, F. et al. 2015. Overview of the 3rd Author Profiling Task at PAN 2015. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings. [Online] Available from: http://www.sensei-conversation.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/15-pan@clef.pdf [Accessed: 19.12.2016]

  • Rozanov, V. A. 2004. Neirobiologicheskie osnovi suitsidal’nogo povedeniya [Neurobiuological Foundations of Suicidal Behaviour]. Vestnik biologicheskoj psihiatrii [Herald Journal of Biological Psychiatry] 6. [Online] Available from: http://scorcher.ru/neuro/science/data/mem102.php [Accessed: 19.12.2016]

  • Rude, S., Gortner, E. M. and J. Pennebaker. 2004. Language use of depressed and depression-vulnerable college students. Cognition and Emotion 18(8). 1121-1133.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sakharniy, L. V. 1994. Chelovek i tekst: dve grammatiki teksta [Man and Text: Two Grammars of a Text]. Chelovek – tekst – kul’tura [Man – Text – Culture]. Yekaterinburg. 17‒20.Google Scholar

  • Schler, J. et al. 2006. Effects of Age and Gender on Blogging. In Proc. of AAAI Spring Symposium on Computational Approaches for Analyzing Weblogs, 199-205. AAAI.Google Scholar

  • Sedov, K. F. 2007. Neiropsikholingvistika [Neurolinguistics]. Moscow: Labirint.Google Scholar

  • Stirman, S. W. and J. W. Pennebaker. 2001. Word Use in the Poetry of Suicidal and Non-Suicidal Poets. Psychosom Med 63(4). 517‒522.Google Scholar

  • Tausczik, Y. R. and J. W. Pennebaker. 2010. The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods. Journal of Language And Social Psychology 29(1). 24‒54.Google Scholar

  • Yegorov, A. Yu. 1999. Koordinatsiya dejatel’nosti polusharii mozga cheloveka pri osushestvlenii kognitivnikh funktsii [Coordination of the Activities of the Right Hemisphere of the Human Brain]: abstract of thesis for PhD in Medicine. Saint Petersburg.Google Scholar

  • Yegorov, A. Yu. and O. V. Ivanov. 2007. Osobennosti individual’nykh profilei funktsional’noi assimetrii u lits sovershivshikh suitsidal’nuiu popytku [Features of Individual Profiles of Functional AssymetryAsymmetry in Individuals Committed a Suicidal Attempt]. Social and Clinical Psychiatry 2. 20‒24.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-02-23

Published in Print: 2016-12-01


Citation Information: Research in Language, Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages 409–422, ISSN (Online) 2083-4616, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/rela-2016-0019.

Export Citation

© 2016 De Gruyter Open. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in