Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Research on Education and Media

2 Issues per year

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Academic Social Networks: How the web is changing our way to make and communicate researches

Giovanni Bonaiuti
Published Online: 2016-02-19 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/rem-2015-0010


Networking is not only essential for success in academia, but it should also be seen as a natural component of the scholarly profession. Research is typically not a purely individualistic enterprise. Academic social network sites give researchers the ability to publicise their research outputs and connect with each other. This work aims to investigate the use done by Italian scholars of 11/D2 scientific field. The picture presented shows a realistic insight into the Italian situation, although since the phenomenon is in rapid evolution results are not stable and generalizable.

Keywords: Academic social network sites; Research strategies; Altmetrics; Scholars visibility


  • Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, Chris. (2009). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar

  • Baynes, G. (2012). Key Issue - Scientometrics, bibliometrics, altmetrics: some introductory advice for the lost and bemused. Insights: The UKSG Journal, 25(3), 311-315. http://doi.org/10.1629/2048-7754.25.3.311CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Beall, J. (2012). Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Nature, 489(7415), 179-179. http://doi.org/10.1038/489179aWeb of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Beech, M. (2014). Key Issue How to share and discuss your research successfully online. Insights: The UKSG Journal, 27(1), 92-95. http://doi.org/10.1629/2048-7754.142CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bik, H. M., & Goldstein, M. C. (2013). An Introduction to Social Media for Scientists. PLoS Biology, 11(4). doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001535CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Bornmann, L., & Mutz, R. (2014). Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references. Eprint arxiv:1402.4578. Retrieved from arXivGoogle Scholar

  • Brenner, J., & Smith, A. (2013). 72 % of Online Adults are Social Networking Site Users groups continue to increase their engagement. Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project, Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/files/oldmedia//Files/Reports/2013/PIP_Social_networking_sites_update_PDF.pdfGoogle Scholar

  • Bullinger, A. C., Hallerstede, S. H., Renken, U., Söldner, J.-H., & Möslein, K. M. (2010). Towards Research Collaboration - a Taxonomy of Social Research Network Sites. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Lima, Peru, August 12-15, 2010 (pp. 1-9). Lima, Peru.Google Scholar

  • Falagas M.E., Pitsouni E.I., Malietzis G.A., & Pappas G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB Journal, 22(2), pp. 338-42.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Galligan, F., & Dyas-Correia, S. (2013). Altmetrics: Rethinking the Way We Measure. Serials Review, 39(1), 56-61. doi:10.1016/j.serrev.2013.01.003Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Greenhow, C., & Gleason, B. (2014). Social scholarship: Reconsidering scholarly practices in the age of social media. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(3), 392-402.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Haglund, L., & Olsson, P. (2008). The impact on university libraries of changes in information behavior among academic researchers: A multiple case study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34(1), 52-59.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Haines, L. L., Light, J., O’Malley, D., & Delwiche, F. a. (2010). Information-seeking behavior of basic science researchers: implications for library services. Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 98(1), 73-81. http://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.98.1.019CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Happell, B., & Cleary, M. (2013). Research career development: The importance of establishing a solid track record in nursing academia. Collegian, 21(3), 233-238. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2013.04.005Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hoffmann, C. P., Lutz, C., & Meckel, M. (2014). Impact Factor 2.0: Applying Social Network Analysis to Scientific Impact Assessment. In Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1576-1586). doi:10.1109/HICSS.2014.202Google Scholar

  • Hugget, S. (2010). Social networking in academia. Research Trends, 16(March), 5-6.Google Scholar

  • Hugget, S. (2010). Social networking in academia. Research Trends, 16(March), 5-6.Google Scholar

  • Jordan, K. (2014). Academics and their online networks: Exploring the role of academic social networking sites. First Monday, 19(11), 1-19.Google Scholar

  • Kinal, J., & Rykiel, Z. (2013). Open Access as a Factor of Enhancing of the Global Information Flow. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 156-160. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.030CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kortelainen, T., & Katvala, M. (2012). “ Everything is plentiful-Except attention” Attention data of scientific journals on social web tools. Journal of Informetrics, 6(4), 661-668. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2012.06.004Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Labrie, N., Amati, R., Camerini, A.-L., Zampa, M., & Zanini, C. (2015). “What’s in it for us?” Six dyadic networking strategies in academia. Studies in Communication Sciences, 15(1), 158-160. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.scoms.2015.03.012CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Li, N., & Gillet, D. (2013). Identifying influential scholars in academic social media platforms. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining - ASONAM ’13 (pp. 608-614). Niagara, Ontario, CAN: ACM. doi:10.1145/2492517.2492614CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Liu, J., & Adie, E. (2013). New perspectives on article-level metrics: developing ways to assess research uptake and impact online. Insights the UKSG Journal, 26(July), 153-158. doi:10.1629/2048-7754.79CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lupton, D. (2014). ‘Feeling Better Connected’: Academics’ Use of Social Media. Canberra: News & Media Research Centre, University of Canberra.Google Scholar

  • Mabe, M. A. (2010). Scholarly Communication: A Long View. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 16(sup1), 132-144. doi:10.1080/13614533.2010.512242CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Manca, S., & Ranieri, M. (2014). I Social Media vanno all’università? Un’indagine sulle pratiche didattiche degli accademici italiani. ECPS - Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies, (10), 305-339. doi:10.7358/ecps-2014-010-mancCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marino, W. (2012). Fore-cite: tactics for evaluating citation management tools. Reference Services Review, 40(2), 295-310. http://doi.org/10.1108/00907321211228336CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Menendez, M., De Angeli, A., & Menestrina, Z. (2012). Exploring the virtual space of academia. In From Research to Practice in the Design of Cooperative Systems: Results and Open Challenges. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems, COOP 2012 (pp. 49-63). Marseille, France. doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-4093-1_4CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moed, H.F. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation. New York: Springer Mohammadi, E., & Thelwall, M. (2014). Mendeley readership altmetrics for the social sciences and humanities: Research evaluation and knowledge flows. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(8), 1627-1638. doi:10.1002/asi.23071CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Niu, X., Hemminger, B. M., Lown, C., Adams, S., Brown, C., Level, A., … Cataldo, T. (2010). National study of information seeking behavior of academic researchers in the United States. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(5), 869-890. http://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21307Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ortega, J. L. (2015). Relationship between altmetric and bibliometric indicators across academic social sites : The case of CSIC’s members. Journal of Informetrics, 9(1), 39-49. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.11.004CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Ovadia, S. (2014). ResearchGate and Academia.edu : Academic Social Networks. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 33(3), 165-16941. http://doi.org/10.1080/01639269.2014.934093CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Powell, D. a., Jacob, C. J., & Chapman, B. J. (2012). Using Blogs and New Media in Academic Practice: Potential Roles in Research, Teaching, Learning, and Extension. Innovative Higher Education, 37(4), 271-282. doi:10.1007/s10755-011-9207-7CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ranieri, M., Manca, S., & Fini, A. (2012). Why (and how) do teachers engage in social networks? An exploratory study of professional use of Facebook and its implications for lifelong learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(5), 754-769. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01356.x Salem, J., & Fehrmann, P. (2013). Bibliographic Management Software : A Focus Group Study of the Preferences and Practices of Undergraduate Students Bibliographic Management Software : A Focus Group Study of the Preferences and Practices of Undergraduate Students. Public Services Quarterly, 9(October), 110-120. http://doi.org/10.1080/15228959.2013.785878CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Steinfield, C., Ellison, N. B., & Lampe, C. (2008). Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(6), 434-445. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2008.07.002CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tapscott D., Williams A. D. (2007). Wikinomics 2.0: La collaborazione di massa che sta cambiando il mondo, Milano: Etas Libri.Google Scholar

  • Thelwall, M., & Kousha, K. (2014). Academia.edu: Social network or academic network. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(4), 721-731. doi:10.1002/asi.23038CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Thelwall, M., & Kousha, K. (2015). ResearchGate: Disseminating, communicating, and measuring Scholarship? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(4), 876-889. doi:10.1002/asi.23236CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van Eperen, L., & Marincola, F. M. (2011). How scientists use social media to communicate their research. Journal of Translational Medicine, 9(1), 199. doi:10.1186/1479-5876-9-199Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Walters W.H. (2011). Comparative Recall and Precision of Simple and Expert Searches in Google Scholar and Eight Other Databases. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 11(4), pp. 971-1006.Google Scholar

  • Weller, M. (2011). The Digital Scholar. How technology is transforming scholarly practice. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

  • Yang, S., Qiu, J., & Xiong, Z. (2010). An empirical study on the utilization of web academic resources in humanities and social sciences based on web citations. Scientometrics, 84(1), 1-19. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0142-7CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Zhang, Y. (2012). Comparison of Select Reference Management Tools. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 31(1), 45-60. http://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2012.641841 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2016-02-19

Published in Print: 2015-12-01

Citation Information: Research on Education and Media, Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages 3–14, ISSN (Online) 2037-0830, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/rem-2015-0010.

Export Citation

© 2016. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Muhammad Yousuf Ali and Joanna Richardson
IFLA Journal, 2017, Page 034003521774423

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in