Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Review of Economic Perspectives

Národohospodárský obzor; The Journal of Masaryk University

4 Issues per year

CiteScore 2016: 0.50

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.262
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.516

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 14, Issue 1


Using Data Envelopment Analysis: A Case of Universities

Tomáš Rosenmayer
Published Online: 2014-04-12 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/revecp-2014-0003


The aim of this article is to analyse appropriateness and adequacy of use of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) in several research papers dealing with effectiveness of economy of universities. The Data Envelopment Analysis is an interesting method used for evaluation of technical efficiency of production units. Comparison is the basic method of this article. At the beginning, basic methodological questions of measurement and evaluation of efficiency are analysed, including definitions of terms efficiency and effectiveness, ways of measurement and formulation of appropriate indicators. Based on the given perquisites for measurement and evaluation of efficiency five articles on evaluation of efficiency of universities using DEA method, published in Canada, Australia, Great Britain, Germany and Spain in 1998 - 2008, will be assessed.

DEA is able to use more parameters of input and output to evaluate which of units under examination is the most effective, and to compare other units with it. For this, it is necessary to have a homogenous group of units. The result of assessment shows that all the examined studies focused rather on way of calculation then the point and reason of measurement. The articles contain a discussion concerning choice of appropriate indicators but do not at all deal with the issue of its construction using interventional logic; the articles do not contain any comparison of objectives of the particular universities.

Evaluation of efficiency of universities is a social construct and it will always be a subjective matter related to objectives of a particular stakeholder. This fact explains how to approach the evaluation of efficiency: it is necessary to set an objective function that means to set the objectives of a given stakeholder and his preferred results and outputs. All the studies lack this basic logic.

Keywords: public services; organizational effectiveness; universities; data envelopment analysis


  • ABOTT, M., DOUCOULIAGOS, C. (2003). The efficiency of Australian universities: a data envelopment analysis. Economics of Education Review. 22, pp. 89-97. DOI: 10.1016/S0272-7757(01)00068-1CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • ABZUG, R., WEBB, N. J. (1999). Relationships Between Nonprofit and For-Profit Organizations: A Stakeholder Perspective. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28 (4), pp. 416-431.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • AHN, T., CHARNES, A., COOPER, W.W. (1988). Some Statistical and DEA Evaluations of Relative Efficiencies of Public and Private Institutions of Higher Education, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. 6, pp. 259-269.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • ALLEN, R., TOMASSI, D. (2001). Managing public expenditure. Paris : OECD.Google Scholar

  • BALSER, D., MCCLUSKY, J. (2005). Managing Stakeholder Relationships and Nonprofit Organization Effectiveness. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 15(3), pp. 295-315. DOI: 10.1002/nml.70CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • BESSENT, A.M., BESSENT E.W., CHARNES A., COOPER W.W., THOROGOOD, N.C. (1983). Evaluation of Educational Program Proposals by Means of DEA, Educational Administration Quarterly. 19, pp. 82-107.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • BROWN, E., SLIWINSKI, A. (2006). Nonprofit Organizations and the Market. In POWELL, W.W., STEINBERG, R. (eds.) The Nonprofit sector. A Research Handbook. 2nd. ed. New Haven and London : Yale Univerzity Press.Google Scholar

  • COHN, E., RHINE, S. L.W., SANTOS, M.C (1989). Institutions of Higher Education as Multi-Product Firms: Economies of Scale and Scope,” Review of Economics and Statistics. 71, pp. 275-290.Google Scholar

  • DALTON, T. C., FITZPATRICK, L. C. (1985). Productivity measurement and the public organization. Review of Policy Research. 4, pp. 519-531. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.1985.tb00252.x DE GROOT, H., MCMAHON, W.W. , VOLKWEIN, J.F. (1991). The Cost Structure of American Research Universities. Review of Economics and Statistics. 73, pp. 424-431.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • DUNDAR, H., LEWIS, D.R. (1998). Determinants of research productivity in higher education. Research in Higher Education. 39(6), pp. 607-631.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • DENISTON, O. L., ROSENSTOCK, I. M., WELCH, W., GETTING, V. A. (1968). Evaluation of Program Effectiveness. Public Health Reports. 83(4), pp. 323-335. DOI: 10.2307/4593279CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • FLEGG, A. T; ALLEN D.O; FIELD K., THURLOW, T.W. (2003). Measuring the Efficiency and Productivity of British Universities: An Application of DEA and the Malmquist Approach. University of the West of England, Department of Economics, series Discussion Papers n. 304.Google Scholar

  • GARCIA-ARACIL, A., PALOMARES-MONTERO, D. (2008). Evaluation of Spanish Universities: Efficiency, Technology and Productivity Change. Paper presented in the Prime-Latin America Conference at Mexico City, September 24-26th 2008.Google Scholar

  • JOHNES, G. (1992). Performance Indicators in Higher Education: A Survey of Recent Work, Oxford Review of Economic Policy. Vol. 8, pp. 19-34. DOI: 10.1093/oxrep/8.2.19CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • JOHNES, J., JOHNES, G. (1995) Research Funding and Performance in UK University Departments of Economics: A Frontier Analysis. The Economics of Education Review. 14, pp. 301-14. DOI: 10.1016/0272-7757(95)00008-8CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • KEMPKES, G., POHL, C. (2006). The Efficiency of German Universities - Some Evidence form Non-parametric and Parametric Methods. Ifo Working Paper No. 36.Google Scholar

  • MANKIW N. G. (2007). Principles of economics. Mason : Thomson Higher Education.Google Scholar

  • MCMILLAN, M., DATTA, D. (1998). The Relative Efficiencies of Canadian Universities: A DEA Perspective. Canadian Public Policy. University of Toronto Press, 24(4), pp. 485-511.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MUSGRAVE, R. MUSGRAVE, B. (1984). Public finance in theory and practice. 4. ed. New York : McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

  • PEARCE, D. (ed.) (1992). Macmillan dictionary of modern economics. 4th ed. London ; Basingstoke : Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • ROBINSON, M. (2002). Output-Purchase Funding and Budgeting Systems in the Public Sector. Public Budgeting & Systems. 22, pp. 17-33Google Scholar

  • SAMUELSON P., NORDHAUS, W. (1992). Economics. 14th ed. New York : McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

  • SARAFOGLOU, N., HAYNES, K.E. (1996). University Productivity in Sweden: A Demonstration and Explanatory Analysis for Economics and Business Programs, Annals of Regional Science. 30, pp. 285-304. DOI: 10.1007/BF01580523CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • SINUANY-STERN, Z., MEHREZ, A., BARBOY, A. (1994). Academic Departments’ Efficiency via DEA, Computers and Operations Research. 21, pp. 543-56. DOI: 10.1016/0305-0548(94)90103-1CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • STEINBERG, R. (2006). Economic Theories of Nonprofit Organizations. In POWELL, W.W., STEINBERG, R. (eds.) The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook. New Haven & London : Yale University Press. STIGLITZ, J. (2000). Economics of the public sector. 3rd ed. New York : W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar

  • TOMKINS, C., GREEN, R. (1988). An Experiment in the Use of Data Envelopment Analysis for Evaluating the Efficiency of UK University Departments of Accounting. Financial Accountability and Management. 4, pp. 147-164. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0408.1988.tb00066.x CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2014-04-12

Published in Print: 2014-03-01

Citation Information: Review of Economic Perspectives, Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages 34–54, ISSN (Online) 1804-1663, ISSN (Print) 1213-2446, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/revecp-2014-0003.

Export Citation

© by Tomáš Rosenmayer. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Dahlan Abdullah, Saib Suwilo, Tulus, Herman Mawengkang, and Syahril Efendi
Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2017, Volume 890, Page 012102

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in