Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Review of Economic Perspectives

Národohospodárský obzor; The Journal of Masaryk University

4 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.50

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.262
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.516

Open Access
Online
ISSN
1804-1663
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 14, Issue 4 (Jan 2015)

Issues

The Impact of Taxation on Economic Growth: Case Study of OECD Countries

Rudolf Macek
  • VSB–Technical University of Ostrava, Faculty of Economics, Sokolská třída 33, 701 21 Ostrava
  • Email:
Published Online: 2015-01-29 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/revecp-2015-0002

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to evaluate the impact of individual types of taxes on the economic growth by utilizing regression analysis on the OECD countries for the period of 2000–2011. The impact of taxation is integrated into growth models by its impact on the individual growth variables, which are capital accumulation and investment, human capital and technology. The analysis in this paper is based on extended neoclassical growth model of Mankiw, Romer and Weil (1992), and for the verification of relation between taxation and economic growth the panel regression method is used. The taxation rate itself is not approximated only by traditional tax quota, which is characteristic by many insufficiencies, but also by the alternative World Tax Index which combines hard and soft data. It is evident from the results of both analyses that corporate taxation followed by personal income taxes and social security contribution are the most harmful for economic growth. Concurrently, in case of the value added tax approximated by tax quota, the negative impact on economic growth was not confirmed, from which it can be concluded that tax quota, in this case as the indicator of taxation, fails. When utilizing World Tax Index, a negative relation between these two variables was confirmed, however, it was the least quantifiable. The impact of property taxes was statistically insignificant. Based on the analysis results it is evident that in effort to stimulate economic growth in OECD countries, economic-politic authorities should lower the corporate taxation and personal income taxes, and the loss of income tax revenues should be compensated by the growth of indirect tax revenues.

Keywords: Taxation; Economic Growth; World Tax Index; Tax Quota; Panel Data

JEL: E22; F21 H20; C50

References

  • ADINA, M. (2009). The Impact of Taxation on the Investment Localization Decision in the Context of Globalization. Analele Stiintifice ale Universitatii Alexandru Ioan Cuza din Iasi. 56 (1), pp. 133-142.Google Scholar

  • AHMED, H., MILLER, S. (1999). Crowding-Out and Crowding-In Effects of the Components of Government Expenditure. University of Connecticut Department of Economics. Working Paper No. 02.Google Scholar

  • ALESINA, A. et al. (1999). Fiscal Policy, Profits and Investment. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper No. 7207.Google Scholar

  • ARNOLD, J. (2008). Do Tax Structures Affect Aggregate Economic Growth? Empirical Evidence from a Panel of OECD Countries. OECD Economic Department. Working Papers No. 643Google Scholar

  • BALTAGI, H. B. (2005). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar

  • BARRO, R., SALA-I-MARTIN, X. (2004). Economic Growth. 2nd ed. London: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • BARRO, R., SALA-I-MARTIN, X. (1995). Economic Growth. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar

  • BARRO, R. (1990). Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous Growth. The Journal of Political Economy. 98 (5), pp. 103-125.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • BECKER, J. (2009). Taxation of Foreign Profits with Heterogeneous Multinational Firms. Center for Economic Studies. Working Paper No. 2889.Google Scholar

  • BECKER, G. (1993). Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • BLECHOVÁ, B. (2008). Charakteristika přístupů používaných v EU pro hodnocení efektivního daňového zatížení příjmu korporací. In: CD od Participants'Reviewed Papers from XIII. International Conference Teoretické a praktické aspekty veřejných financí. Praha: VŠE, (ISBN 978-80-245-1378-2, s. 1-11).Google Scholar

  • BLUNDELL, R. (2009). Optiaml Income Taxation: An Empirical Comparison of th UK and Germany. The Economic Journal. 119 (535), pp. F101-F121.Google Scholar

  • BREBLER, D. (2012). The Impact of Corporate Taxes on Investment: An Exlpanatory Empirical Analysis for Interested Practitioners. ZEW. Working Paper No. 12040.Google Scholar

  • DACKEHAG, M., HANSSON, A. (2012). Taxation of Income and Economic Growth: An Empirical Analysis of 25 Rich OECD Countries. Lund University Department of Economics. Working Paper No. 2012:6.Google Scholar

  • DANIEL, B., JEFFREY, P. (2013). Investment Taxation and Portfolio Performance. Journal of Public Economics. 97 (1), pp. 245-257.Google Scholar

  • DAVERI, F., TABELLINI, G. (2001). Unemployment, Growth and Taxation in Industrial Countries. Economic Policy. 30 (4), pp. 47-104.Google Scholar

  • DECOSTER, A., HAAN, P. (2010). Empirical Welfare Analysis in Random Utility Models of Labour Supply. German Institute for Economic Research, Working Paper No. 1074.Google Scholar

  • DUCZYNSKI, P. (2003). On Extended Versions of the Solow-Swan Model. Bulletin of Czech Econometric Society. 10 (19), pp. 39-58.Google Scholar

  • DWENGER, N. (2009). Corporate Taxation and Investment: Explaining Investment Dynamics with Firm-Level Panel Data. Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin. Discussion Paper No. 924.Google Scholar

  • FELD, L., HECKEMEYER, J. (2008). FDI and Taxation: A Meta-Study. ZEW. Working Paper No. 08-128.Google Scholar

  • FELD, L., KIRCHGÄSSNER, G. (2001). The Impact of Corporate and Personal Income Taxes on the Location of Firms and on Employment: Some Panel Evidence for Swiss Cantons. Center for Economic Studies. Working Paper No. 455.Google Scholar

  • GREENE, W. (2003). Econometrics Analysis. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

  • GROCHULSKI, B., PISKORSKI, T. (2007). Risky Human Capital and Deferred Capital Income Taxation. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond. Working Paper No. 06-13.Google Scholar

  • HONG, D. (2012). Economic Growth and Welfare State: A Debate of Econometrics. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. Working Paper No. 39685.Google Scholar

  • HUŠEK, R. (1998). Základy ekonometrické analýzy II. Praha: Vysoká škola ekonomická.Google Scholar

  • IM, K., PESARAN, H., SHIN, Y. (2003). Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels. Journal of Econometrics. 115 (1), pp. 53-74.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • JACOBS, B. (2007). Optimal Tax and Education Policies and Investments in Human Capital. In Hartog (ed.), Human Capital: Theory and Evidence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • JONES, L., MANUELLI, R. (1999). On the Taxation of Human Capital. University of Minesota - Department of Economics. Working Paper.Google Scholar

  • JUDD, K. (1985). Redistributive Taxation in a Simple Perfect Foresight Model. Journal of Public Economics. 28 (1), pp. 59-83.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • KING, R., REBELO, S. (1990). Public Policy and Economic Growth: Developing Neoclassical Implications. Journal of Political Economy. 98 (5), pp. 126-150.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • KINKOR, J. (1996). Je ekonomie blahobytu racionální?. Politická ekonomie. 44 (1), pp. 197-212.Google Scholar

  • KLIKOVÁ, Ch., KOTLÁN, I. a kol. (2012). Hospodářská politika. 3. vyd. Ostrava: Sokrates.Google Scholar

  • KNELLER, R., BLEANEY, M., GEMMELL, N. (1999). Fiscal Policy and Growth: Evidence from OECD Countries. Journal of Public Economics. 74 (2), pp. 171-190.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • KOTLÁN, I. (2010). Daňové zatížení a struktura daní v ČR ve srovnání s vybranými zeměmi OECD a EU a legislativní změny ve smyslu de lege ferenda. Praha: Národohospodářský ústav Josefa Hlávky.Google Scholar

  • KOTLÁN, I., MACHOVÁ Z. (2013). Konstrukce alternativního ukazatele daňového zatížení na základě Saatyho metody a jeho využití v růstových modelech. Praha: Národohospodářský ústav Josefa Hlávky.Google Scholar

  • KOTLÁN, I., MACHOVÁ, Z. (2012a). Vliv zdanění korporací na ekonomický růst: selhání daňové kvóty? Politická ekonomie. 60 (6), pp. 743-763.Google Scholar

  • KOTLÁN, I., MACHOVÁ, Z. (2012b). World Tax Index: Methodology and Data. DANUBE: Law and Economics Review. 3 (2), pp. 18-33.Google Scholar

  • KOTLÁN, I., MACHOVÁ, Z., JANÍČKOVÁ, L. (2011). Vliv zdanění na dlouhodobý ekonomický růst. Politická ekonomie. 59 (5), pp. 638-658.Google Scholar

  • KUBÁTOVÁ, K., ŘÍHOVÁ, L. (2009). Regresní analýza faktorů ovlivňujících výnosy korporativní daně v zemích OECD. Politická ekonomie. 57 (4), pp. 451-470.Google Scholar

  • LEVIN, A., LIN, Ch., CHU, Ch. (2002). Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite-Sample Properties. Journal of Econometrics. 108 (1), pp. 1-24.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • LIN, S. (2001). Taxation, Human Capital Accumulation and Economic Growth. Japanese Economic Review. 52 (2), pp. 185-197.Google Scholar

  • LUCAS, R. (1988). On the Mechanics of Economic Development. Journal of Monetary Economics. 22 (1), pp. 3-42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MADDALA, G., WU, S. (1999). A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and a New Simple Test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics And Statistics. 61 (0), pp. 631-652.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MACHOVÁ, Z., KOTLÁN, I. (2013). World Tax Index: New Methodology for OECD Countries 2000-2010. DANUBE: Law and Economics Review. 2013 (2), pp. 165-179.Google Scholar

  • MANKIW, G., ROMER, D., WEIL, D. (1992). A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 107 (2), pp. 407-437.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • OVERESCH, M., VOELLER, D. (2010). The Impact of Personal and Corporate Taxation on Capital Structure Choices. Financz Archiv. 66 (3), pp. 263-294.Google Scholar

  • PARETO. V. (1971). Manual of Political Economy. New York: A. M. Kelley.Google Scholar

  • PFAFFERMAYER, M., STOCKL, M., WINNER, H. (2008). Capital Structure, Corporate Taxation and Firm Age. University of Innsbruck. Working Paper No. 2008-09Google Scholar

  • ROMER, P. (1986). Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth. The Journal of Political Economy. 94 (5), pp. 1002-1037.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • SALANIÉ, B. (2003). The Economics of Taxation. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • SCHRATZENSTALEER, M., WAGENER, A., KOHLER-TOGLHOFER, W. (2005). Company Taxation in an Enlarged European Union. Monetary Policy and the Economy. 5 (1), pp. 96-102.Google Scholar

  • SOLOW, R. (1956). A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quartely Journal of Economics. 70 (1), pp. 65-94.Google Scholar

  • SWAN, T. (1956). Economic Growth and Capital Accumulation. The Economic Record. 32 (2), pp. 334-361.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • SZAROWSKA, I. (2011). Jak vysoké je korporátní daňové zatížení? Acta Academia Karvinesia. 13 (2), pp. 196-207.Google Scholar

  • SZAROWSKA, I. (2010). Changes in Taxation and Their Impact on Economic Growth in the European Union. Munich Personal PePEc Archive. Working Paper No. 32354.Google Scholar

  • TAPLOS, I., VANCU, I. (2009). Corporate Income Taxation Effect on Investment Decisions in the European Union. Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica. 11 (1), pp. 513-518.Google Scholar

  • TEIXEIRA, A., FORTUNA, N. (2003). Human Capital, Innovation Capablility and Economic Growth. Faculdade de Economia. Working Paper No. 131.Google Scholar

  • VILLELA, L., BARREIX, A. (2002). Taxation and Investment Promotion. Banco Inter-americanode Desarrollo. Working Paper.Google Scholar

  • WONG, K. (2011). Progressive Taxation and the Intensity and Timing of Investment. Economic Modelling. 28 (1), pp. 100-108.Google Scholar

  • WOOLDRIDGE, J. (2009). Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. Mason: South-Western CENGAGE Learning.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2015-01-29


This paper was financially supported by the VŠB - Technical University SGS grant project No. SP2014/145 “The Influence of Structure of Government Spending and Taxes in Selected Sectors and Economic Growth in the Czech Republic“.


Citation Information: Review of Economic Perspectives, ISSN (Online) 1804-1663, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/revecp-2015-0002.

Export Citation

© 2014 Rudolf Macek. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in