Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Review of Economic Perspectives

Národohospodárský obzor; The Journal of Masaryk University

4 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.50

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.262
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.516

Open Access
Online
ISSN
1804-1663
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 14, Issue 4 (Jan 2015)

Issues

The Origins of the Income Theory of Money

Josef Menšík
  • Masaryk University, Faculty of Economics and Administration, Department of Economics, Lipová 41a, Brno, 602 00, Czech Republic
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2015-01-29 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/revecp-2015-0005

Abstract

The income theory of money was conceived in the 19th century, and in the first half of the 20th century it formed the backbone of all the main monetary approaches of the time. Yet, since it did so mostly implicitly rather than explicitly, and since the later developments moved economic theory in a different direction, the income theory of money is hardly remembered at present. While mainly accounting for the origins of the approach, I am also offering a brief comparison with the present mainstream economics and I shortly address the question of the possible future of the theory too. The income theory of money explains how nominal prices are formed by interaction of nominal expenditures streams with real streams of goods sold. While various ideas leading to this theory were expressed already by John Law, Richard Cantillon, and Jean-Baptiste Say, it is perhaps only Thomas Tooke whom we might want to call the originator of the theory. Within the Classical School of Political Economy, Tooke's ideas were further elaborated by John Stuart Mill. The theory reached a momentous formulation in the works of Knut Wicksell, in many respects a similar exposition was delivered also by Friedrich Wieser. The recognition of the theory was impaired by a change of the main-stream paradigm as well as by a surge in emphasis laid on the quantitative modelling in economics. Yet, there are certain fundamental questions of the monetary theory which the general equilibrium style models cannot cope with, while the income theory of money can, at least to a certain degree. This might give the theory some hope for the future.

Keywords: Money; Prices; History of Economic Thought; Thomas Tooke; John Stuart Mill; Knut Wicksell; Friedrich Wieser; The Income Theory of Money; The Income Approach to Money; The Income Theory of Prices

JEL: B20; B50; E30; E40; E50

References

  • CANTILLON, R. (1959 [1755]). Essay on the Nature of Trade in General, Engl. trans. published together with the original text Essai sur la Nature du Commerce en Général}, London: Frank Cass and Company Ltd.Google Scholar

  • FESTRÉ, A. (2006). Knut Wicksell and Ludwig von Mises on Money, Interest, and Price Dynamics. Journal of the History of Economic Thought. 28(3), pp. 333-57.Google Scholar

  • LAW, J. (1705). Money and Trade Considered: With a Proposal for Supplying the Nation with Money. Edinburgh: Andrew Anderson.Google Scholar

  • MARGET, A. W. (1966 [1938-42]). The Theory of Prices. Reprinted. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.Google Scholar

  • MAS-COLELL, A., MICHALE, D. W., and GREEN, J. R. (1995). Microeconomic Theory. New York: Oxford University Press, ISBN-13 9780195073409.Google Scholar

  • MILL, J. S. (1965 [1848]). Principles of Political Economy with some of their Applications to Social Philosophy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

  • SAY, J.-B. (1880 [1803]). A Treatise on Political Economy, Philadelphia: Claxton, Remsen & Haffelfinger.Google Scholar

  • SKAGGS, N. T. (2003). Thomas Tooke, Henry Thornton, and the Development of British Monetary Orthodoxy. Journal of the History of Economic Thought. 25, pp. 177197.Google Scholar

  • SMITH, M. (2001). Endogenous money, interest and prices: Tooke's monetary thought revisited. Contributions to Political Economy. 20, pp. 31-55.Google Scholar

  • SMITH, M. (2002). Tooke's approach to explaining prices. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought. 9(3), pp. 333-58.Google Scholar

  • TOOKE, T. (1844). An Inquiry into the Currency Principle. London: Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans.Google Scholar

  • UHR, C. G. (1951). Knut Wicksell: A Centennial Evaluation, American Economic Review. 41(5), pp. 829-60.Google Scholar

  • WALRAS, L. (1977 [1871]). Elements of Pure Economics. Originaly published in Frech as Elements d'économie politique pure. Translated by William Jaffé 1954. Reprinted, New Jersey: Augustus M. Kelley.Google Scholar

  • WICKSELL, K. (1965 [1898]). Interest and Prices, A Study of the Causes Regulating the Value of Money. Originally published 1898 in German as Geldzins und Güterpreise, eine Studie über die den Tauschwert des Geldes bestimmenden Ursachen. English translation first published 1936. Reprinted. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.Google Scholar

  • WICKSELL, K. (1907). The Influence of the Rate of Interest on Prices. The Economic Journal. 17(66), pp. 213-220.Google Scholar

  • WICKSELL, K. (1935 [1906]). Lectures on Political Economy, Volume Two: Money. Originally published 1906 in Swedish as Föreläsningar i nationalekonomi. English edition first published 1935. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar

  • WICKSELL, K. (1965 [1925]). The Monetary Problem of Scandinavian Countries. Originally published in Sweedish as: Valutaspörsmâlet i de skandinaviska länderna. Ekonomisk Tidsskrift. 1925, pp. 205-222. English translation published as appendix in: WICKSELL, K. Interest and Prices, A Study of the Causes Regulating the Value of Money. First published 1936. Reprinted. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.Google Scholar

  • WIESER, F. (1904). Der Geldwert und seine geschichtlichen Veränderungen. Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft, Sozialpolitik und Verwaltung. XIII Band. Wien.Google Scholar

  • WIESER, F. (1910). Der Geldwert und seine Veränderungen. Schriften des Vereins für Sozialpolitik. 132 Band. Verhandlungen des Vereins für Socialpolitik in Wien, 1909. Leipzig: Duncker und Humblot, 1910, pp. 497-540.Google Scholar

  • WIESER, F. (1967 [1914]). Social Economics. Originally published 1914 in German as Theorie der gesellschaftlichen Wirtschaft. English translation first published 1927. Reprinted. New York: Augustus M. Kelley Publishers.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2015-01-29


Citation Information: Review of Economic Perspectives, ISSN (Online) 1804-1663, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/revecp-2015-0005.

Export Citation

© 2014 Josef Menšík. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in