Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Review of Economic Perspectives

Národohospodárský obzor; The Journal of Masaryk University

4 Issues per year


SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.143
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.273
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.121

Open Access
Online
ISSN
1804-1663
See all formats and pricing
Volume 14, Issue 4 (Jan 2015)

Issues

EU as a Highly Competitive Social Market Economy –Goal, Options, and Reality

Václav Šmejkal
  • ŠKODA AUTO Vysoká Škola o.p.s., Na Karmeli 1457, 293 01, Mladá Boleslav
  • Email:
/ Stanislav Šaroch
  • ŠKODA AUTO Vysoká Škola o.p.s., Na Karmeli 1457, 293 01, Mladá Boleslav
  • Email:
Published Online: 2015-01-29 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/revecp-2015-0006

Abstract

In paragraph 3 of its Article 3, the Treaty on European Union (TEU) requires the EU to go after the goal of a highly competitive social market economy for the first time. It is noticeable in the aforementioned Treaty clause that although it deals with the EU internal market, its authors burdened it with a mission that is far more socially-oriented than market-oriented. However, is „a highly competitive social market econo-my“ of today a meaningful goal and does the EU in its present form have the project and powers to achieve such an objective? The paper is a combination of economic and legal -political analysis through which the authors try to answer three main questions: What is the contemporary meaning of the term “social market economy” in the both economic and EU-law academic theory? Can the EU within the powers conferred to it positively fulfill such an objective, or can it just approach it by weakening the still pre-vailing tendency towards liberalization and deregulation brought about by the construc-tion of the EU internal market and by the promotion of its freedoms?

Keywords: European Union; Lisbon Treaty; social market economy; social policy

JEL: F15; I38

References

  • ALESINA, A. (2006). Europe. Retrieved March 9, 2014, from http://www.nber.org/reporter/summer06/alesina.html

  • BALDWIN, R. (2005). The royalty of CAP madness. Retrieved March 9, 2014, from http://www.voxeu.org/article/royalty-cap-madness

  • BALDWIN, R. (2008). Globalisation as the great unbundling(s): What should governments do? Retrieved March 9, 2014, from http://www.voxeu.org/article/making-globalisation-work-skills-families-unions-and-welfare-state.

  • BALDWIN, R., WYPLOSZ, Ch. (2012) The Economist of European Integration. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Education.

  • BARNARD, C., DEKAIN, S. (2012). Social Policy and labor Market Regulation. In Jones, E., Menon, A., Weaterhill, S. The Oxford Handbook of The European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • BÉNASSY-QUÉRÉ, A., COEURÉ, B., JACQUET, P., PISANI-FERRY, J. (2010) Economic Policy, Theory and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 4-9.

  • BLANCKE, H.-J, MANGIAMELI, S. (2013). The Treaty on European Union (TEU) A Commentary. Berlin: Springer.

  • BLANPAIN, R. (2013). The Treaty needs to be amended. European Labour Law Journal, 4 (1).

  • BLINDER, A. (1997). Is government too political? Foreign Affairs, 76 (6), pp. 115-126.

  • BLINDER, A. S., (2006). “Offshoring: The Next Industrial Revolution?” Foreign Affairs, 85 (2), pp. 113-128.

  • BLINDER, Alan S., (2008). “Offshoring, Workforce Skills, and the Educational System.” In Virtual Global Economic Symposium.

  • BLOOM, N., KRETSCHMER, T., VAN REENAN, J. (2006). Work-Life Balance, Management Practices and Productivity. In International Differences in the Business Practices and Productivity of Firms. University of Chicago Press, pp. 15-54.

  • BORSCH-SUPAN, A. Savings in Germany-Part 1: Incentives. In Public Policies and Household Savings. University of Chicago Press, pp. 81-104.

  • BUECKER, A. (2013). A Comprehensive social progress protocol is needed more than ever. European Labour Law Journal, 4 (1).

  • BUTI, M. (2014). A consistent trinity for the Eurozone. Retrieved March 9, 2014, from http://www.voxeu.org/article/consistent-trinity-eurozone

  • COSTAMAGNA, F. (2011). The Internal Market and the Welfare State after the Lisbon Treaty. Research Paper Observatoire Social Européen No. 5. Retrieved March 12, 2014, from http://www.ose.be

  • Council of the European Union. (2007). Brussels European Council, Presidency Conclusions 11177/07 REV 1, Brussels.

  • CRAIG, P. (2013). The Lisbon Treaty - Law, Politics, And Treaty Reform, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • DAGILYTE, E. (2012). Social Values in The European Union: Are They Becoming More Important After the Lisbon Treaty? In Europe on the Strand, Jean Monnet Centre of Excellence, London: King's College.

  • DAMJANOVIC, D. (2013). The EU Market Rules as Social Market Rules: Why the EU can be a social market economy. Common Market Law Review, (50).

  • DE GRAUWE, P. (2013). “Design failures in the Eurozone: can they be fixed?” European Economy, Economic Papers No. 491.

  • ETUC Joint Declaration ETUC/EUCDW, (2010). “For a social Europe and a social market economy” Brussels. Retrieved March 12, 2014, from http://www.etuc.org/sites/www.etuc.org/files/ETUC-EUCDW_Papier-Endfassung_final_8_Feb_10_1.pdf

  • EUCKEN, W. Zásady hospodářského řádu. Praha: Liberální institut 2004.

  • European Parliament (2008). Committee on Constitutional Affairs. Report on the Treaty of Lisbon. (2007/2286(INI)).

  • FALKNER, G. (2008). EU Policies in the Lisbon Treaty: A Comparative Analysis. Working Paper No 03/2008. Austrian Academy of science.

  • Final report of Working Group XI (2003). Social Europe CONV 516/1/03, Brussels, Retrieved March 12, 2014, from

  • http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs_all/committees/conv/20030206/cv00516-r1.en03.pdf

  • GRIMMEL, A. (2013). The European Court of Justice growing role in the domain of fundamental rights is not a sign of judicial activism, but political insufficiencies. EROPP - European Politics and Policy, LSE London.

  • HAY, C., WINCOTT, D. (2012). The Political Economy of European welfare Capitalism. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • House of Lords, European Union Committee (2008). The Treaty of Lisbon: an impact assessment Vol. I: Report, HL Paper 62-I.

  • JOERGES, C., ROEDL, F. (2004). Social Market Economy as Europe's Social Model? EUI Working Papers Law No. 2004/8 Badia Fiesolana, San Domenico.

  • KINDLEBERGER, Ch.,P. French Planning. In Planning in Individual Countries. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, pp. 279-303.

  • KLAUS, V. (2011). Je evropská unifikace (a záměrné oslabování států) řešením nebo spíše krokem ke stále se zvětšujícímu problému? „Challenging Prospects”, Vídeň, from http://www.klaus.cz/clanky/2760

  • KLAUS, V. (2013). Evropská ekonomika a její perspektivy. Praha: Kongresové centrum ČNB.

  • KRABEC, T. (2003). Ordoliberalismus a sociální tržní hospodářství. Politická ekonomie, 6, pp. 881-889.

  • KRABEC, T. (2004). Německé zkušenosti z hospodářsko-politického poradenství. Politická ekonomie, 6, pp. 677-691.

  • KRABEC, T. (2006). Teoretická východiska soutěžní politiky. Praha: Národohospodářský ústav Josefa Hlávky.

  • MICOSSI, S., TOSATO, G.I. Eds. (2009). The European Union in the 21ts Century, Brussels: CEPS.

  • MOUSSIS, N. (2011). Access to European Union, Law Economics Policies 20th Ed. Retrieved March 12, 2014, from http://www.europedia.moussis.eu/books/Book_2/

  • MÜLLER-ARMACK, A. (1974). Genealogie der Sozialen Marktwirtschaft. Switzerland: Haupt.

  • MURRAY, Ch. Příliš mnoho dobra. Praha: Občanský institut 1998.

  • Official Journal of the European Union, 47. (2004). Retrieved March 12, 2014, from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2004:310:SOM:en:HTML

  • O'GORMAN, R. (2011). The EHCR, the EU and the Weakness of Social Rights Protection at the European Level. German Law Journal, 12 (10).

  • PARIS, P., WYPLOSZ, Ch. (2014). PADRE: Politically Acceptable Debt Restructuring in the Eurozone, In Geneva Special Report on the World Economy 3, ICMB and CEPR.

  • PELKMANS, J. (2010). How social the single market? CEPS Commentary, Brussels: CEPS. Retrieved March 12, 2014, from http//:www.ceps.eu

  • PISANI-FERRY, J. (2012). “The euro Crisis and the new Impossible Trinity.” In Moneda y Credito 234.

  • ROTH, F. (2009). The Effect of the Financial Crisis on Systemic Trust. Intereconomics, July/August 2009, pp. 203-208.

  • SCHARPF, F. W. (2010). The Socio-Economic Assymetries of European Integration or Why the EU cannot be a „Social Market Economy. In Swedish Institute for European European Policy Studies, European Policy Analysis, (10).

  • SCHOEMANN, I. (2010). The Lisbon Treaty: a more social Europe at last? ETUI Policy Brief, European Social Policy, (1), Brussel.

  • SOJKA, M. (2010). Dějiny ekonomických teorií. Praha: Havlíček Brain Team

  • SYLLOVÁ, J., PÍTROVÁ, L., PALDUSOVÁ, H. a kol. (2010). Lisabonská smlouva, Komentář, Praha: CH BECK.

  • ŠPIDLA, V. (2009). Social aspects of the Lisbon Treaty. Speech in the European Parliament, Brussels.

  • WEISS, M. (2013). The Potential of the Treaty has to be used to its full extent. European Labour Law Journal, 4 (1).

About the article

Published Online: 2015-01-29


Citation Information: Review of Economic Perspectives, ISSN (Online) 1804-1663, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/revecp-2015-0006. Export Citation

© 2014 Václav Šmejkal and Stanislav Šaroch. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in