Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Review of Economic Perspectives

Národohospodárský obzor; The Journal of Masaryk University

4 Issues per year


SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.143
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.273
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.121

Open Access
Online
ISSN
1804-1663
See all formats and pricing
Volume 14, Issue 4 (Jan 2015)

Issues

Is the Labour Force Participation Rate Non-Stationary in Romania?

Aviral Kumar Tiwari
  • Faculty of Management, IBS Hyderabad, IFHE University, Room No.: Block C- 204, Dontanpalli (Village), Shankerpalli Road, Hyderabad, A.P., Pin: 501203, India, E-mail:
  • Email:
/ Mihai Mutascu
  • Corresponding author
  • West University of Timisoara, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, 16 J.H. Pestalozzi Street, 300115, Timisoara, Romania, and LEO (Laboratoire d'Economie d'Orléans) UMR7322, Faculté de Droit d'Economie et de Gestion, University of Orléans, Rue de Blois - B.P. 6739, 45067, Orléans, France
  • Email:
Published Online: 2015-01-29 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/revecp-2015-0007

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to test hysteresis of the Romanian labour force participation rate, by using time series data, with quarterly frequency, covering the period 1999Q1-2013Q4. The main results reveal that the Romanian labour force participation rate is a nonlinear process and has a partial unit root (i.e. it is stationary in the first regime and non-stationary in the second one), the main breaking point being registered around year 2005. In this context, the value of using unemployment rate as an indicator for capturing joblessness in this country is debatable. Starting from 2005, the participation rate has not followed long-term changes in unemployment rate, the disturbances having permanent effects on labour force participation rate.

Keywords: Labour; Participation; Hysteresis; Process; Nonlinearity; Policy Implications

JEL: J01; J21; C12

References

  • ANDREWS, D. (1993). Tests for Parameter Instability and Structural Change with Unknown Change Point. Econometrica. 61, pp. 821-856.

  • BENATI, L. (2001). Some Empirical Evidence on the “Discouraged Worker” Effect. Economics Letters. 70, pp. 387-395.

  • BLANCHARD, O., SUMMERS, L. (1986). Hysteresis and the European Unemployment Problem. in S. Fischer ed., NBER Macroeconomics Annual, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • CAMARERO, M., CARRION-I-SILVESTRE, J.L., TAMARIT, C. (2008). Unemployment Hysteresis in Transition Countries: Evidence using Stationarity Panel Tests with Breaks. Review of Development Economics.123, pp. 620-635. [Web of Science]

  • CANER, M., HANSEN,B.E. (2001). Threshold Autoregression with a Unit Root. Econometrica. 69, pp. 1555-1596. [Web of Science]

  • DICKEY, D., FULLER, W.A. (1979). Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root. Journal of the American Statistical Association.744, pp. 27-431.

  • DINU, M., SOCOL, C., MARINS, M-C., SOCOL, A-G. (2011). Testing of the Okun's Law in Romania, Economic Computation & Economic Cybernetics Studies & Research. 45, pp. 1-15.

  • DUVAL,R., ERIS, M., FURCERI, D. (2010). Labour Force Participation Hysteresis in Industrial Countries: Evidence and Causes, Working Paper, OECD Economics Department.

  • ELLIOT, G., ROTHENBERG, T.J., STOCK, J.H. (1996). Efficient tests for an auto-regressiveunit root. Econometrica. 64, pp. 813-836.

  • ENDERS, W., LEE, J. (2012). A unit root test using a Fourier series to approximate smooth breaks. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. 74, 574-599. [Web of Science]

  • FRIEDMAN, M. (1968). The Role of Monetary Policy. American Economic Review.58, pp.1-17.

  • FURUOKA, F. (2014). Does Hysteresis Exist in Unemployment? New Findings from Fourteen Regions of the Czech Republic. Czech Journal of Economics and Finance. 64, pp. 59-78.

  • GIL-ALANA, L.A. (2008). Fractional Integration and Structural Breaks at Unknown Periods of Time. Journal of Time Series Analysis. 29, pp. 163-185. [Web of Science]

  • GHOSH, D., DUTT, S. (2008). Nonstationarity and nonlinearity in the us unemployment rate: a re-examination. Journal of Economic Educators. 8, pp. 43-53.

  • GOZGOR, G. (2013). Testing Unemployment Persistence in Central and Eastern European Countries. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues. 3, pp. 694-700.

  • GUSTAVSSON, M., ÖSTERHOLM, P. (2010). Labor-Force Participation Rates and the Informational Value of Unemployment Rates: Evidence from Disaggregated U.S. The National Institute of Economic Research NIER, Working Paper No. 120. [Web of Science]

  • GUSTAVSSON, M., ÖSTERHOLM, P. (2012). Labor-force participation rates and the informational value of unemployment rates: Evidence from disaggregated US data. Economics Letters. 116, 408-410. [Web of Science]

  • KWIATKOWSKI, D., PHILLIPS, P.C.B., SCHMIDT, P., YONGCHEOL, S. (1992). Testing the Null Hypothesis of Stationarity against the Alternative of a Unit RootJournal of Econometrics. 54, pp. 159-178.

  • LAZEAR, E. (1987). Retirement from the Labor Force, in O. Ashenfelter, O. and R. Layard, (ed.), Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 1.

  • LEE, J.-D., LEE, C.-C., CHANG, C.-P. (2009). Hysteresis In Unemployment Revisited: Evidence From Panel Lm Unit Root Tests With Heterogeneous Structural Breaks. Bulletin of Economic Research.614, pp. 325-334. [Web of Science]

  • LEE, J., STRAZICICH, M. (2001). Break Point Estimation and Spurious Rejections with Endogenous Unit Root Tests. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. 635, pp. 535-558.

  • LEE, J., STRAZICICH, M. (2003). Minimum Lagrange Multiplier Unit Root Test with Two Structural Breaks. Review of Economics and Statistics. 854, pp. 1082-1089.

  • LEE, J., STRAZICICH, M. (2004). Minimum LM Unit Root Test with One Structural Break, Department of Economics, Appalachian State University.

  • LEÓN-LEDESMA, M., MCADAM, P. (2004). Unemployment, Hysteresis and Transition. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 51, pp. 377-401.

  • LIU, D-H. (2012). Hysteresis Hypothesis in Job Creation and Destruction: Evidence from the U.S., Annals of Economics and Finance. 12, pp. 447-455.

  • LIU, D-H. (2014). Labor-Force Participation Rates and the Informational Value of Unemployment Rates in US: Evidence from Regional Data, Social Indicators Research. 116, pp. 447-455. [Web of Science]

  • LUMSDAINE, R., PAPELL, D. (1997). Multiple Trend Breaks and the Unit-Root Hypothesis. Review of Economics and Statistics. 792, pp. 212-218.

  • MADSEN, J.B., MISHRA, V., SMYTH. R. (2008). Are labour force participation rates nonstationary? Evidence from 130 years for G7 countries. Australian EconomicPa-pers. 47, pp. 166-189.

  • MURPHY, K., TOPEL, R. (1997). Unemployment and Nonemployment. American Economic Review. 872, pp. 295-300.

  • NG, S., PERRON, P. (2001). Lag Length Selection and the Construction of Unit Root Tests with Good Size and Power. Econometrica. 69, pp. 1519-1554.

  • NUNES, L., NEWBOLD, P., KUAN,C.-M. (1997). Testing for Unit Roots with Breaks: Evidence on the Great Crash and the Unit Root Hypothesis Reconsidered. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. 594, pp. 435-448.

  • OZDEMIR, Z.A., BALCILAR, M., TANSEL, A. (2013). International Labour Force Participation Rates by Gender: Unit Root or Structural Breaks? Bulletin of Economic Research. 65, Issue Supplement s1, pp. s142-s164. [Web of Science]

  • PERRON, P. (1989). The Great Crash, the Oil Price Shock and the Unit Root Hypothe-sis. Econometrica. 57, pp. 1361-401.

  • PHELPS, E. (1968). Money Wage Dynamics and Labor Market EquilibriumJournal of Political Economy. 76, pp. 678-711.

  • PHILLIPS, P.C.B. (1987). Time Series Regression with Unit Roots. Econometrica. 55, pp. 277-302.

  • PHILLIPS, P., PERRON, P. (1988). Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regres-sion. Biometrika. 752, pp. 335-346.

  • ROBERTS, J., MORIN, N. (1999). Is Hysteresis Important for U.S. Unemployment? Finance and Economics Discussion Series, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, No. 1999-56.

  • ROED, K. (1997). Hysteresis in unemployment. Journal of Economic Surveys. 11, pp. 38-418.

  • STEPHENS, M. (2002). Worker Displacement and the Added Worker Effect. Journal of Labor Economics. 20, pp. 504-537.

  • TIWARI, A.K. (2010). Globalization and Wage Inequality: A Revisit of Empirical Evidences with New Approach. Journal of Asian Business Management. 21, pp. 173-187.

  • TIWARI, A.K. (2012). On the dynamics of Energy Consumption, CO2 Emission and Economic Growth: Evidence from India. Indian economic Review. 47, pp. 57-87.

  • TIWARI, A.K. (2014). Unemployment hysteresis in Australia: evidence using nonlinear and stationarity tests with breaks, Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology. 48, pp. 681-695.

  • QUENEAU, H., SEN, A. (2013). On the Persistence of Labor Force Participation Rates by Gender: Evidence from OECD Countries, preliminary version.

  • ZIVOT, E., ANDREWS, D.W.K. (1992). Further Evidence on the Great Crash, the Oil-Price Shock, and the Unit-Root Hypothesis. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics. 103, pp. 251-270.

About the article

Published Online: 2015-01-29


Citation Information: Review of Economic Perspectives, ISSN (Online) 1804-1663, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/revecp-2015-0007. Export Citation

© 2014 Aviral Kumar Tiwari and Mihai Mutascu. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in