Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Review of Economic Perspectives

Národohospodárský obzor; The Journal of Masaryk University

4 Issues per year

CiteScore 2016: 0.50

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.262
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.516

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 14, Issue 4


Is the Labour Force Participation Rate Non-Stationary in Romania?

Aviral Kumar Tiwari
  • Faculty of Management, IBS Hyderabad, IFHE University, Room No.: Block C- 204, Dontanpalli (Village), Shankerpalli Road, Hyderabad, A.P., Pin: 501203, India, E-mail:
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Mihai Mutascu
  • Corresponding author
  • West University of Timisoara, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, 16 J.H. Pestalozzi Street, 300115, Timisoara, Romania, and LEO (Laboratoire d'Economie d'Orléans) UMR7322, Faculté de Droit d'Economie et de Gestion, University of Orléans, Rue de Blois - B.P. 6739, 45067, Orléans, France
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2015-01-29 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/revecp-2015-0007


The purpose of this paper is to test hysteresis of the Romanian labour force participation rate, by using time series data, with quarterly frequency, covering the period 1999Q1-2013Q4. The main results reveal that the Romanian labour force participation rate is a nonlinear process and has a partial unit root (i.e. it is stationary in the first regime and non-stationary in the second one), the main breaking point being registered around year 2005. In this context, the value of using unemployment rate as an indicator for capturing joblessness in this country is debatable. Starting from 2005, the participation rate has not followed long-term changes in unemployment rate, the disturbances having permanent effects on labour force participation rate.

Keywords: Labour; Participation; Hysteresis; Process; Nonlinearity; Policy Implications

JEL: J01; J21; C12


  • ANDREWS, D. (1993). Tests for Parameter Instability and Structural Change with Unknown Change Point. Econometrica. 61, pp. 821-856.Google Scholar

  • BENATI, L. (2001). Some Empirical Evidence on the “Discouraged Worker” Effect. Economics Letters. 70, pp. 387-395.Google Scholar

  • BLANCHARD, O., SUMMERS, L. (1986). Hysteresis and the European Unemployment Problem. in S. Fischer ed., NBER Macroeconomics Annual, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • CAMARERO, M., CARRION-I-SILVESTRE, J.L., TAMARIT, C. (2008). Unemployment Hysteresis in Transition Countries: Evidence using Stationarity Panel Tests with Breaks. Review of Development Economics.123, pp. 620-635.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • CANER, M., HANSEN,B.E. (2001). Threshold Autoregression with a Unit Root. Econometrica. 69, pp. 1555-1596.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • DICKEY, D., FULLER, W.A. (1979). Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root. Journal of the American Statistical Association.744, pp. 27-431.Google Scholar

  • DINU, M., SOCOL, C., MARINS, M-C., SOCOL, A-G. (2011). Testing of the Okun's Law in Romania, Economic Computation & Economic Cybernetics Studies & Research. 45, pp. 1-15.Google Scholar

  • DUVAL,R., ERIS, M., FURCERI, D. (2010). Labour Force Participation Hysteresis in Industrial Countries: Evidence and Causes, Working Paper, OECD Economics Department.Google Scholar

  • ELLIOT, G., ROTHENBERG, T.J., STOCK, J.H. (1996). Efficient tests for an auto-regressiveunit root. Econometrica. 64, pp. 813-836.Google Scholar

  • ENDERS, W., LEE, J. (2012). A unit root test using a Fourier series to approximate smooth breaks. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. 74, 574-599.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • FRIEDMAN, M. (1968). The Role of Monetary Policy. American Economic Review.58, pp.1-17.Google Scholar

  • FURUOKA, F. (2014). Does Hysteresis Exist in Unemployment? New Findings from Fourteen Regions of the Czech Republic. Czech Journal of Economics and Finance. 64, pp. 59-78.Google Scholar

  • GIL-ALANA, L.A. (2008). Fractional Integration and Structural Breaks at Unknown Periods of Time. Journal of Time Series Analysis. 29, pp. 163-185.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • GHOSH, D., DUTT, S. (2008). Nonstationarity and nonlinearity in the us unemployment rate: a re-examination. Journal of Economic Educators. 8, pp. 43-53.Google Scholar

  • GOZGOR, G. (2013). Testing Unemployment Persistence in Central and Eastern European Countries. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues. 3, pp. 694-700.Google Scholar

  • GUSTAVSSON, M., ÖSTERHOLM, P. (2010). Labor-Force Participation Rates and the Informational Value of Unemployment Rates: Evidence from Disaggregated U.S. The National Institute of Economic Research NIER, Working Paper No. 120.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • GUSTAVSSON, M., ÖSTERHOLM, P. (2012). Labor-force participation rates and the informational value of unemployment rates: Evidence from disaggregated US data. Economics Letters. 116, 408-410.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • KWIATKOWSKI, D., PHILLIPS, P.C.B., SCHMIDT, P., YONGCHEOL, S. (1992). Testing the Null Hypothesis of Stationarity against the Alternative of a Unit RootJournal of Econometrics. 54, pp. 159-178.Google Scholar

  • LAZEAR, E. (1987). Retirement from the Labor Force, in O. Ashenfelter, O. and R. Layard, (ed.), Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 1.Google Scholar

  • LEE, J.-D., LEE, C.-C., CHANG, C.-P. (2009). Hysteresis In Unemployment Revisited: Evidence From Panel Lm Unit Root Tests With Heterogeneous Structural Breaks. Bulletin of Economic Research.614, pp. 325-334.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • LEE, J., STRAZICICH, M. (2001). Break Point Estimation and Spurious Rejections with Endogenous Unit Root Tests. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. 635, pp. 535-558.Google Scholar

  • LEE, J., STRAZICICH, M. (2003). Minimum Lagrange Multiplier Unit Root Test with Two Structural Breaks. Review of Economics and Statistics. 854, pp. 1082-1089.Google Scholar

  • LEE, J., STRAZICICH, M. (2004). Minimum LM Unit Root Test with One Structural Break, Department of Economics, Appalachian State University.Google Scholar

  • LEÓN-LEDESMA, M., MCADAM, P. (2004). Unemployment, Hysteresis and Transition. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 51, pp. 377-401.Google Scholar

  • LIU, D-H. (2012). Hysteresis Hypothesis in Job Creation and Destruction: Evidence from the U.S., Annals of Economics and Finance. 12, pp. 447-455.Google Scholar

  • LIU, D-H. (2014). Labor-Force Participation Rates and the Informational Value of Unemployment Rates in US: Evidence from Regional Data, Social Indicators Research. 116, pp. 447-455.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • LUMSDAINE, R., PAPELL, D. (1997). Multiple Trend Breaks and the Unit-Root Hypothesis. Review of Economics and Statistics. 792, pp. 212-218.Google Scholar

  • MADSEN, J.B., MISHRA, V., SMYTH. R. (2008). Are labour force participation rates nonstationary? Evidence from 130 years for G7 countries. Australian EconomicPa-pers. 47, pp. 166-189.Google Scholar

  • MURPHY, K., TOPEL, R. (1997). Unemployment and Nonemployment. American Economic Review. 872, pp. 295-300.Google Scholar

  • NG, S., PERRON, P. (2001). Lag Length Selection and the Construction of Unit Root Tests with Good Size and Power. Econometrica. 69, pp. 1519-1554.Google Scholar

  • NUNES, L., NEWBOLD, P., KUAN,C.-M. (1997). Testing for Unit Roots with Breaks: Evidence on the Great Crash and the Unit Root Hypothesis Reconsidered. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. 594, pp. 435-448.Google Scholar

  • OZDEMIR, Z.A., BALCILAR, M., TANSEL, A. (2013). International Labour Force Participation Rates by Gender: Unit Root or Structural Breaks? Bulletin of Economic Research. 65, Issue Supplement s1, pp. s142-s164.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • PERRON, P. (1989). The Great Crash, the Oil Price Shock and the Unit Root Hypothe-sis. Econometrica. 57, pp. 1361-401.Google Scholar

  • PHELPS, E. (1968). Money Wage Dynamics and Labor Market EquilibriumJournal of Political Economy. 76, pp. 678-711.Google Scholar

  • PHILLIPS, P.C.B. (1987). Time Series Regression with Unit Roots. Econometrica. 55, pp. 277-302.Google Scholar

  • PHILLIPS, P., PERRON, P. (1988). Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regres-sion. Biometrika. 752, pp. 335-346.Google Scholar

  • ROBERTS, J., MORIN, N. (1999). Is Hysteresis Important for U.S. Unemployment? Finance and Economics Discussion Series, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, No. 1999-56.Google Scholar

  • ROED, K. (1997). Hysteresis in unemployment. Journal of Economic Surveys. 11, pp. 38-418.Google Scholar

  • STEPHENS, M. (2002). Worker Displacement and the Added Worker Effect. Journal of Labor Economics. 20, pp. 504-537.Google Scholar

  • TIWARI, A.K. (2010). Globalization and Wage Inequality: A Revisit of Empirical Evidences with New Approach. Journal of Asian Business Management. 21, pp. 173-187.Google Scholar

  • TIWARI, A.K. (2012). On the dynamics of Energy Consumption, CO2 Emission and Economic Growth: Evidence from India. Indian economic Review. 47, pp. 57-87.Google Scholar

  • TIWARI, A.K. (2014). Unemployment hysteresis in Australia: evidence using nonlinear and stationarity tests with breaks, Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology. 48, pp. 681-695.Google Scholar

  • QUENEAU, H., SEN, A. (2013). On the Persistence of Labor Force Participation Rates by Gender: Evidence from OECD Countries, preliminary version.Google Scholar

  • ZIVOT, E., ANDREWS, D.W.K. (1992). Further Evidence on the Great Crash, the Oil-Price Shock, and the Unit-Root Hypothesis. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics. 103, pp. 251-270.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2015-01-29

Citation Information: Review of Economic Perspectives, Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages 411–426, ISSN (Online) 1804-1663, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/revecp-2015-0007.

Export Citation

© 2014 Aviral Kumar Tiwari and Mihai Mutascu. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in