Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Review of Economic Perspectives

Národohospodárský obzor; The Journal of Masaryk University

4 Issues per year

CiteScore 2016: 0.50

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.262
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.516

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 15, Issue 1


Intra-EU Direct Investment and Enlargement

Andrea Festa
Published Online: 2015-04-18 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/revecp-2015-0009


This paper examines the determinants of the intra-EU direct investment (IDI) into the New Member States (NMS) using a panel dataset of bilateral capital flows for the period 1993-2013. It is found out by using a simple gravity model that EU membership is the most important determinant. Unlike previous studies including non-EU countries, the distance is insignificant, which is caused by proximity of these countries to one another. A separate analysis focused on subgroups of accession countries gives some evidence that even when size of their economy, distance, institutional quality and EU accession are taken into account, Central European countries receive more IDI than the Baltic and the Balkan states. On the contrary to that, the analysis restricted to the Balkan countries which have joined the EU shows the inexistence of a negative Balkans effect in attracting foreign investment. This finding is relevant because previous studies demonstrate a persistent negative Balkans effect for non-EU Balkan countries and suggests a crucial impact of the EU accession in determining the intra-EU capital flows.

Keywords : Intra-EU direct investment; EU membership; New Member States


  • BALDWIN R., FRANCOIS J. and PORTES R. (1997). The costs and benefits of eastern enlargement: The impact on the EU and Central Europe. Economic Policy 24, 125-170.Google Scholar

  • BARRELL, R. and PAIN N. (1999). Domestic institutions, agglomerations and foreign direct investment in Europe. European Economic Review 43, 925-934.Google Scholar

  • BEVAN A. and ESTRIN, S. (2004). The determinants of foreign direct investment into European transition economies. Journal of comparative economics 32 775-787.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • BEVAN A., ESTRIN, S. and MEYER K. (2004). Foreign investment location and institutional development in transition economies. International Business Review 1, 43-64.Google Scholar

  • BOX G.E.P. and PIERCE D.A. (1970), Distribution of residual autocorrelation in autoregressive- integrated moving average time series models, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 65, 1509-1526.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • BLONINGEN B. A. (2005). ‘A review of the empirical literature on FDI determinants’, Atlantic Economic Journal, 33, pp. 383-403.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • BRADA J.C., ALI M. KUTAN and TANER M. YIGIT (2006). ‘The effects of transition and political instability on foreign direct investment inflows: Central Europe and the Balkans’, Economics of Transition, 14 (4), pp. 649-680.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • BRAINARD, S. L. (1997). An empirical assessment of the proximity-concentration trade-off between multinational sales and trade. American Economic Review 87, 520-544.Google Scholar

  • BRENTON P., DI MAURO F. and LÜCKE M. (1999). Economic integration and FDI: An empirical analysis of foreign investment in the EU and in Central and Eastern Europe. Empirica 26, 95-121.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • BREUSCH T.S. and GOFFREY L. (1981), A review of recent work on testing for autocorrelation in dynamic simultaneous models, Macroeconomic Analysis, ed. by Currie D., Nobay R. and Peel London D., Cron-Helm.Google Scholar

  • BREUSCH T.S. and PAGAN A.R. (1979). A Simple Test for Heteroskedasticity and Random Coefficient Variation, Econometrica 47 (5), 1287-1294.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • BUCH C., KOKTA R. and PIAZOLO D. (2003). Does the East get what would otherwise flow to the South? FDI diversion in Europe. Journal of Comparative Economics 31, 94-109.Google Scholar

  • COOK R. D. and WEISBERG S. (1982). Residuals and influence in regression. Chapman and Hall, New York-London.Google Scholar

  • CUMBY R. E. and HUIZINGA J. (1990), Testing the autocorrelation structure of disturbances in ordinary least squares and instrumental variable regressions NBER Technical Working Paper 90.Google Scholar

  • DEMEKAS, D.G., BALAZS H., RIBAKOVA E. and YI WU (2005). ‘Foreign Direct Investment in Southeastern Europe: How (and how much) can policies help?’, IMF Working Paper 05/110Google Scholar

  • DIKOVA D. and VAN WITTELOOSTUIJN A. (2007). ‘Foreign direct investment mode choice: entry and establishment modes in transition economies’, Journal of International Business Studies, 38, pp. 1013-1033.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • DI MAURO F. (1999). The effects of economic integration on FDI flows: an empirical analysis and comparison with trade. Document paper No. 134. Center for European Policy Studies, Brussels.Google Scholar

  • DRISCOLL J.C. and KRAAY, A.C. (1998). Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation with Spatially Dependent Panel Data. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(4), 549-560.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • DURBIN J. (1970). Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression models when some of the regressors are lagged dependent variables, Econometrics, 21, 333-55.Google Scholar

  • ESTRIN S. and UVALIC M. (2013). Foreign direct investment into transition economies: Are the Balkans different? LSE ‘Europe in Question’ Discussion Paper Series.Google Scholar

  • ESTRIN, S., XAVIER R. and BRADA J. (2000). Foreign Direct Investment in Central Eastern Europe: Case Studies of Firms in Transition, Armonk and London: M. E. Sharpe. Google Scholar

  • GARIBALDI, P., MORA, N., SAHAY, R., AND ZETTELMEYER, J. (2001), What Moves Capital to Transition Economies?, IMF Staff Papers, Vol. 48, Special Issue.Google Scholar

  • HUNYA G. (2011). ‘Diverging patterns of FDI recovery’, in WIIW Database on 2011 Foreign Direct Investment in Central, East and Southeast Europe, Vienna: The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies.Google Scholar

  • HUNYA, G. (2012). ‘Short-lived recovery’, in WIIW Database on 2012 Foreign Direct Investment in Central, East and Southeast Europe, Vienna: The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies.Google Scholar

  • JANICKI, P.H. and WUNNAVA V.P. (2004). ‘Determinants of foreign direct investment: empirical evidence from EU accession candidates’, Applied Economics, 36, pp. 505-509.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • KALOTAY K. (2010). ‘Patterns of inward FDI in economies in transition’, Eastern Journal of European Studies, 1 (2), pp. 55-76.Google Scholar

  • KEKIC L. (2005). ‘Foreign direct investment in the Balkans: recent trends and prospects, Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 5.Google Scholar

  • LANKES H.K. and VENABLES A.J. (1996). ‘Foreign direct investment in economic transition: the changing pattern of investments’, Economics of Transition, 4 (2), pp. 331-347.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MAYHEW A. (1998). Recreating Europe. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

  • RESMINI L. (2001). The determinants of foreign direct investment into the CEECs: new evidence from sectoral patterns. Economics of Transition 8, 665-689.Google Scholar

  • UNCTAD. World Investment Report 2011, available on-line.Google Scholar

  • UVALIC M. (2003). ‘Economic Transition in Southeast Europe", Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 3 (1), pp. 63-80.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • WHITE H. (1980), A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity, Econometrica, 48(4 - May), 817-838.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2015-04-18

Published in Print: 2015-03-01

Citation Information: Review of Economic Perspectives, Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages 15–34, ISSN (Online) 1804-1663, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/revecp-2015-0009.

Export Citation

© by Andrea Festa. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in