Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Review of Economic Perspectives

Národohospodárský obzor; The Journal of Masaryk University

4 Issues per year

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.143
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.273
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.121

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
Volume 15, Issue 3 (Sep 2015)


The Effects of Liberalisation of the Passenger Railway Market on the Situation of Regional Rail Connections in Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia and Austria

Jakub Taczanowski
  • Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Institute of Geography and Spatial Management, 30-387 Kraków, ul. Gronostajowa 7, Poland
  • Email:
Published Online: 2015-10-20 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/revecp-2015-0019


Liberalisation of railway market can be an important instrument for increasing the attractiveness of local rail services and consequently for making the railways more competitive with other means of transport, which could result in changing the modal share in the favour of railways. The differences in the railway liberalisation level as well as in the policies towards rail transport between Central and Eastern European countries are vast, hence the present situation and the future prospects of regional services are diverse. Whereas there is only one railway line in Slovakia which is not operated by the state railway company ZSSK, a few private local connections which complement a very dense network of ČD state railways are in service in the Czech Republic. Poland, by contrast, is a country where liberalisation of railway market is most advanced as several different companies are responsible for transport in the regions. However, the results of this large scale liberalisation are ambiguous as the positive effects (reopening of some lines) are balanced by isolation of the new regional government-owned systems from each other. In Austria, by contrast, the existence of several private and regional government-owned local railways which are an indispensable part of the regional transport networks has contributed to maintain an effective transport system. Although the effects of liberalisation on the local railway networks can often be ambiguous, several cases from the Czech Republic, Austria and Poland show that privatisation and municipalisation may have a positive effect on the railway service as it has enabled to maintain the service on many sections which were at risk of closure. However, the most important condition of the effective transport development seems to be an active cooperation between the railway operators and the local governments as an expression of appropriate transport policy.

Keywords: rail transport; railway liberalisation; regional railway lines; Central Europe

JEL Classification:: R40


  • BARESCH M. (2013), Industrieökonomische Analyse der Liberalisierung des Personenverkehrs der österreichischen Bahn (Diplomarbeit), Johannes Kepler Universität Linz, Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre Abteilung für Industrieökonomie, [Online] http://www.econ.jku.at/members/Francois/files/LVS-WS13/Dipl_Kap_Baresch.pdf.

  • BERIA P., QUINET E., DE RUS G., SCHULZ C. (2010), A comparison of rail liberalisation levels across four European countries, Selected Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Transport Research Society, [Online] http://mpra.ub.unimuenchen.de/29142/.

  • BOŠKOVIĆ B., BUGARINOVIĆ M. (2015), Why and how to manage the process of liberalization of a regional railway market: South-Eastern European case study, Transport Policy, 41, pp 50-59. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.03.009 [Crossref]

  • BRADSHAW B. (2001), Lessons from a Railway Privatisation Experiment, Japan Railway & Transport Review, No 29, pp 4-11.

  • CHARLTON C., GIBB R., SHAW J.(1997), Regulation and continuing monopoly on Britain’s railways, Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp 147-153. DOI: 10.1016/S0966-6923(97)84103-8 [Crossref]

  • DEVILLEX., VERDUYN F. (2012), Implementation of EU legislation on rail liberalisation in Belgium, France, Germany and The Netherlands, National Bank of Belgium. Working Paper Series, No 221.

  • FINGER M. (2014), Governance of competition and performance in European railways: Ananalysis of five cases, Utilities Policy, 31, pp 278-288. DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2014.03.003 [Crossref]

  • GÓRNY J. (2013), Kolejowe regionalne przewozy pasażerskie w Polsce w świetle polityki transportowej Unii Europejskiej, Studia i Prace z Geografii i Geologii, nr 32, Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Bogucki.

  • GÜTTERMANN F. (2013), Volkswirtschaftliche Effekte der Liberalisierung des Eisenbahnpersonenverkehrs in Österreich. [Online] http://www.akeuropa.eu/de/publication-full.html?doc_id=300&vID=43, 2014.

  • KNOWLES R. (1998), Passenger rail privatisation in Great Britain and its implications, especially for urban areas, Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp 117-133. DOI: 10.1016/S0966-6923(98)00005-2 [Crossref]

  • KNOWLES R., HALL D. (1998), Transport Deregulation and Privatisation, Hoyle B., Knowles R., Modern Transport Geography, Chichester, New York, Weinheim, Brisbane, Singapore, Toronto: Wiley& Sons, pp 75-96.

  • KOMUSIŃSKI S. (2010), Przekształcenia przestrzenne sieci pasażerskiego transportu kolejowego w Polsce w latach 1988-2008, Prace Komisji Geografii Komunikacji PTG, tom XVII, pp 1-140.

  • RYNEK-KOLEJOWY.PL (2014) Liczba pasażerów rośnie, ale nie w PKP Intercity, [Online] http://www.rynekkolejowy.pl/51602/liczba_pasazerow_rosnie_ale_nie_w_pkp_intercity.htm, retrieved 4 June 2014, Retrieved 1 April 2014.

  • MILCZAREK A. (2012), Otwarcie polskiego rynku kolejowego przewozów towarowych i pasażerskich – szanse i zagrożenia, Studia i Prace Wydziału Nauk Ekonomicznych i Zarządzania Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, nr 27, pp 101-123.

  • OSTAPOWICZ B. (2012), Liberalizacja polityki transportowej Unii Europejskiej, Studia i Prace Wydziału Nauk Ekonomicznych i Zarządzania Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, nr 27, pp 77-100.

  • PAWŁOWSKI J. (2012), Dzieje kolei wąskotorowych na obszarze byłej Zachodniej DOKP, Keller D. (ed.), Dzieje kolei w Polsce, Rybnik: Eurosprinter, Muzeum w Rybniku, pp 185-210.

  • RAIL LIBERALISATION INDEX 2011. Market Opening: Rail Markets of the Member States of the European Union, Switzerland and Norway in comparison (2011), A study by IBM Global Business Services in conjunction with Prof. Dr.h.c. Christian Kirchner, Humboldt University, Berlin, www.deutschebahn.com, 2014.

  • RODRIGUE J.-P. (2013), The Geography of Transport Systems, New York: Rouledge, [Online] http://people.hofstra.edu/geotrans/index.html, 2013

  • VLAKY.NET (2011) Rok zmien 2011: Liberalizácia trhu osobnej železničnej dopravy, [Online] http://www.vlaky.net/zeleznice/spravy/3857-Rok-zmien-2011-Liberalizaciatrhu-osobnej-zeleznicnej-dopravy/, 2014.

  • RYNEK TRANSPORTU KOLEJOWEGO W POLSCE W 2013– SYNSTEZA (2013), Urząd Transportu Kolejowego, Wydział Analiz, Departament Regulacji Rynku Kolejowego, [Online] www.utk.gov.pl, retrieved 4 June 2014.

  • SIECIOWY ROZKŁAD JAZDY POCIĄGÓW (Polish Railway Timetable) 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011.

  • TACZANOWSKI, J. (2012), A comparative study of local railway networks in Poland and the Czech Republic, Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, No. 18, Nicolaus Toruń: Copernicus University Press, pp. 125–138.

  • TAYLOR Z. (2007), Rozwój i regres sieci kolejowej w Polsce, Warszawa: IGiPZ PAN.

  • TOMEŠ Z. (2006), Konkurence na železnici, Národohospodářský obzor, No. 4, pp 97-103.

Web pages

About the article

Received: 2014-10-15

Accepted: 2015-08-14

Published Online: 2015-10-20

Published in Print: 2015-09-01

Citation Information: Review of Economic Perspectives, ISSN (Online) 1804-1663, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/revecp-2015-0019. Export Citation

© 2015 Jakub Taczanowski, published by De Gruyter Open. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License. (CC BY 4.0)

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Zdeněk Tomeš, Martin Kvizda, Monika Jandová, and Václav Rederer
Transport Policy, 2016, Volume 47, Page 203

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in