Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Review of Economic Perspectives

Národohospodárský obzor; The Journal of Masaryk University

4 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.50

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.262
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.516

Open Access
Online
ISSN
1804-1663
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 16, Issue 3 (Sep 2016)

Issues

Technical efficiency of FDI firms in the Vietnamese manufacturing sector

Hoang Duong Vu
  • Student at Faculty of Management and Economics, Tomas Bata University in Zlin Viet Nam
  • Researcher at Vietnam Institute of Economics, Vietnam Academy of Social Sciences, Viet Nam
  • Email:
Published Online: 2016-10-13 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/revecp-2016-0013

Abstract

The study examines technical efficiency of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) firms in the Vietnamese manufacturing sector by applying stochastic production frontier model and making use of cross-sectional data in the period 2009-2013. The average level of technical efficiency of FDI firms is about 60% and it is higher than that of domestic firms (including private firms and state-owned firms). In addition, the study also analyses correlation between technical efficiency of FDI firms and other factors. It finds that there are positive correlations between FDI technical efficiency and net revenue per labour, firm’s age or export activities in 2013. However, the study is unable to find evidence of a relationship between FDI technical efficiency and infrastructure or firm’s investment activities.

Keywords: FDI; Stochastic production frontier; Technical efficiency; Vietnam

References

  • Aigner, D., Lovell, C.A.K. & Schmidt, P. (1977). Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics. 6(1), pp.21-37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Aigner, D.J. & Chu, S.F. (1968) On Estimating the Industry Production Function. The American Economic Review. 58(4). pp.826-839.Google Scholar

  • Aw Bee-Yan, Sukkyn Chung & Mark J. Roberts. (2000) Productivity and Turnover in the Export Market: Micro-level Evidence from the Republic of Korea and Taiwan. The World Bank Economic Review.14(1). pp. 65-90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Badunenko, O., Fritsch, M. & Stephan, A. (2006) What Determines the Technical Efficiency of a Firm? The Importance of Industry, Location, and Size. Available at: http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:jen:jenasw:2006-33.Google Scholar

  • Bernard, Andrew B. & J. Bradford Jensen. (1999) Exceptional Exporter Performance: Cause, Effect, or Both?.Journal of International Economics.47(1). pp. 1-25.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Blancas, L.C. et al. (2014) Efficient Logistics: A Key to Vietnam’s Competitiveness. Available at: http://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/abs/10.1596/978-1-4648-0103-7.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Burki, A. & T. Dek. (1998) Measuring Production Efficiency of Small Firms in Pakistan.World Development 26(1).pp.155-169CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Caves, R. (1992) Determinants of Technical Efficiency in Australia. In: Caves, R. (ed.) Industrial Efficiency in Six Nations. MIT Press. p. 241-272.Google Scholar

  • Clerides, K. Sofronis, Saul Lach& James R. Tybout. (1998) Is Learning by Exporting Important? Micro-Dynamic Evidence from Colombia, Mexico, and Morocco.Quarterly Journal of Economics. 8. pp. 903-947.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Farrell, M.J. (1957) The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General). 120(3). pp.253-290. DOI: 10.2307/2343100CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ferragina, A.M. & Mazzotta, F. (2014) FDI spillovers on firm survival in Italy: absorptive capacity matters! Journal of Technology Transfer. 39(6), pp.859-897. DOI: 10.1007/s10961-013-9321-z CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Ghali, S. & Rezgui, S. (2011) FDI Contribution to Technical Efficiency in the Tunisian Manufacturing Sector: Evidence from Micro-panel Data. International Economic Journal. 25(2), pp.319-339. DOI: 10.1080/10168737.2010.504215CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Girma, S. (2005) Absorptive Capacity and Productivity Spillovers from FDI : A Threshold Regression. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. 67(3), pp.281-306. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0084.2005.00120.x CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gorg H. & Greenaway, D. (2004) Much Ado about Nothing? Go Domestic Firms really Benefit from Foreign Direct Investment? The World Bank Research Observer. 19(2): 171-197D CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gumbau-Albert M. &Maudos, J. (2002) Determinants of efficiency: the case of the Spanish industry. Applied Economics. 34. pp. 1941-1948CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ishita G. Tripathi, Yadav S.S. & Sharma S. (2009) Measuring the Efficiency of Pharmaceutical Firms in India: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis and Tobit Estimation. Proceedings of the 9th Comparative Analysis of Enterprise (Micro) Data Conference Oct 2-4, 2009, Tokyo.Google Scholar

  • Kalotay, K. (2000) Is the sky the limit? The absorptive capacity of Central Europe for FDI K. Kalotay, ed. Transnational corporations. 9(3). pp.137-162. Google Scholar

  • Khai, H. V., & Yabe, M. (2011) Technical Efficiency Analysis Of Rice Production. ISSAAS.17(1), 135-146.Google Scholar

  • Kumbhakar C.S & Knox Lovell C.A. (2004) Stochastic Frontier Analysis.Cambrigde University Press, United Kingdom Google Scholar

  • Le, V., & Harvie, C. (2010) How do Vietnamese SMEs perform ? Technical efficiency of SMEs in the manufacturing sector and its sub-sectors.Korea and the World Economy.IX, 1-37.Google Scholar

  • Lundvall, K. & Battese, E. (2000) Firm size, age and efficiency: Evidence from Kenyan Manufacturing firms. Journal of Development Studies.36(3). pp. 146-163CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mahadeven, R. (2000) How Technically Efficient are Singapore’s Manufacturing Industries. Applied Economics 32. pp. 2007-20014Google Scholar

  • Marcin, K. (2008) How does FDI inflow affect productivity of domestic firms? The role of horizontal and vertical spillovers, absorptive capacity and competition. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development. 17(1), pp.155-173.Google Scholar

  • Minh, N. K., Long, G. T., & Thang, B. N. (2007) Technical Efficiency Of Small And Medium Manufacturing Firms In Vietnam : Parametric And Non-Parametric Approaches. The Korean Economic Review. 23(1).pp.187-221.Google Scholar

  • Mitra, A., Sharma, C. & Veganzones, M.-A. (2011) Total Factor Productivity and Technical Efficiency of Indian Manufacturing: The Role of Infrastructure and Information & Communication Technology. Available at: https://halshs.archivesouvertes.fr/halshs-00597656.Google Scholar

  • Sinani E., Jones D.C. &Mygind N. (2007) Determinants of firm level Technical efficiency: A stochastic frontier approach. Proceedings of the 29th European International Business Association Annual Conference. Copenhagen 2003Google Scholar

  • Tang, Y., & Zhang, K. H. (2016) Absorptive capacity and benefits from FDI: Evidence from Chinese manufactured exports. International Review of Economics & Finance, 42, pp. 423-429. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2015.10.013CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tingum N.E. (2014) Technical efficiency and manufacturing export performance in Cameroon, A firm Level analysis. PhD. Dissertation.University of Dares Salaam.Google Scholar

  • Torii, S. (1992) Technical Efficiency in Japanese Industries. In: Caves, R. (ed.) Industrial Efficiency in Six Nations. MIT Press. pp. 31-120.Google Scholar

  • Tran, N. T. M. T. (2007) Technical Efficiency of The Vietnam’s Manufacture of Chemical and Chemical Products: A Dual Approach. DEPOCEN working paper 2007/17.Google Scholar

  • Vu Hung Cuong& Bui Trinh (2014) Doanhnghiệpngoàinhànước: vaitròvàthựctrạng [State-owned enterprises: the role and current state]. TạpchíNghiêncứukinhtế (10). pp. 38-44 Google Scholar

  • Vu, Q.N. (2003) Technical Efficiency of Industrial State-Owned Enterprises in Vietnam. Asian Economic Journal.vol. 17(1). pp. 87-101. DOI: 10.1111/1351-3958.00163CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vu, T. B. L. (2012) Technical Efficiency of Vietnamese Manufacturing Firms and Its Determinants : A Preliminary Analysis. Proceedings of International conference: Sustainable Manufacturing and Environment Management, 2012.Google Scholar

  • Worthington, A. & Dollery, B. (2000) An Empirical Survey of Frontier Efficiency Measurement Techniques in Local Government. Local Government Studies. 26(2). pp.23-52.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Worthington, A.C. (2001) An Empirical Survey of Frontier Efficiency Measurement Techniques in Education. Education Economics. 9(3). pp.245-268. DOI: 10.1080/09645290110086126CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wu, Y. (2000) Measuring the performance of foreign direct investment: a case study of China. Economics Letters. 66(2), pp.143-150. DOI: 10.1016/S0165-1765(99)00225-6CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zhang, C., Guo, B. & Wang, J. (2014) The different impacts of home countries characteristics in FDI on Chinese spillover effects: Based on one-stage SFA. Economic Modelling. 38. pp.572-580. DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2014.02.007Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Legislation Decision no. 879.QD - TTg dated 9th June, 2014 on approving the strategy on Vietnam’s industrial development through 2025, with a vision toward 2035.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2016-02-26

Accepted: 2016-07-29

Published Online: 2016-10-13

Published in Print: 2016-09-01


Citation Information: Review of Economic Perspectives, ISSN (Online) 1804-1663, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/revecp-2016-0013.

Export Citation

© by Hoang Duong Vu. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in