Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Review of Economic Perspectives

Národohospodárský obzor; The Journal of Masaryk University

4 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.50

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.262
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.516

Open Access
Online
ISSN
1804-1663
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 17, Issue 1 (Mar 2017)

Issues

New Resonance Approach to Competitiveness Interventions in Lagging Regions: The Case of Ukraine before the Armed Conflict

Roman Guliak
Published Online: 2017-04-01 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/revecp-2017-0002

Abstract

Regional competitiveness is considered to be an alternative basis for the determination of regional interventions. However, the composite competitiveness indicator is quite sensitive to the weights of sub-indicators, no matter what methodology is being used. To avoid this uncertainty in the determination of regional interventions, we proposed a new non-compensatory resonance approach that is focused on the hierarchical coincidence between weaknesses of NUTS 1 and NUTS 2 regions measuring the extensive and intensive components of competitiveness. Such a coincidence, being perceived as a resonance effect, is supposed to increase the effectiveness of interventions triggering synergetic effects and stirring up local regional potentials. The components of competitiveness are obtained through synthesising DEA methodology and Hellwig’s index, correspondingly focusing on the measurement of technical efficiency and resource level. In analysing Ukrainian regions, no correlation between resonance interventions and the composite competitiveness indicator or GDP per capita was found, pointing toward a completely different direction in resonance approach. In western Ukraine, the congestion of six NUTS 2 regions was defined as a homogeneous area of analogous resonance interventions focused on improving business efficiency.

Keywords: Regional competitiveness; Resonance interventions; Weakness coincidence; Resource level; Efficiency; DEA; Hellwig’s indicator

References

  • Ahner D (2009). What do you really know about European Cohesion Policy? Notre Europe, Brussels. www.notre-europe.eu. (Accessed 20 February 2013).Google Scholar

  • Annoni P., Dijsktra L. (2013). EU Regional competitiveness Index RCI 2013, European Commission, Brussels.Google Scholar

  • Annoni P., Dijsktra L., Kozovska K. (2011). A new Regional competitiveness Index: Theory, Methods and Findings. European Commission Working Papers, n. 02/2011.Google Scholar

  • Annoni P., Kozovska K. (2010). EU Regional competitiveness Index RCI 2010. European Commission, Brussels.Google Scholar

  • Aranguren, M., Susana F., et al. (2010). Benchmarking Regional Competitiveness in the European Cluster Observatory. European Commission.Google Scholar

  • Camagni R. Capello R., (2014). Rationale and Design of EU Cohesion Policies in a Period of Crisis with special reference to CEECs. GRINCOH Working Paper Series, Policy Paper n. 1.Google Scholar

  • Camagni, R. (2011). Policy options for the Latin Arc. In Camagni, R., and Capello, R. (eds), Spatial scenarios in a global perspective: Europe and the Latin Arc Countries. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (UK), pp. 175-185.Google Scholar

  • Charles, V., Zegarra, L.F. (2014). Measuring regional competitiveness through Data Envelopment Analysis: A Peruvian case. Expert Systems with Applications, vol.41, is.11, pp. 5371-5381. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.03.003CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Charnes A., Cooper, W. W. Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 429-444. DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cooke P. (2007). To construct regional advantage from innovation systems first build policy platforms. European Planning Studies 15, pp. 179-194. DOI: 10.1080/09654310601078671CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cооке, P. (2004). Competitiveness as cohesion: Social capital and the knowledge economy. Y: Boddy, M. & Parkinson, M. City Matters: Competitiveness, Cohesion and Urban Governance, 153 - 170.Google Scholar

  • Department of Trade and Industry (2002). A Modern Regional Policy for the United Kingdom. DTI, London.Google Scholar

  • European Commission. (2011). European Competitiveness Report. Brussel.Google Scholar

  • Fernandez, E., Navarro, J., et al (2013). Core: A decision support system for regional competitiveness analysis based on multi-criteria sorting. Decision support systems 54 (3), pp. 1417-1426. DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2012.12.009CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Flood, R., Jackson, M. (1991). Critical Systems Thinking: Directed Readings. Wiley, New York: Wiley. 347 p.Google Scholar

  • Flood, R., Romm, N. (1996). Critical Systems Thinking: Current Research and Practice. Plenum Press, New York, 301 p.Google Scholar

  • Florida, R. (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class - and how it’s transforming work, leisure, community, & everyday life. The Perseus Books Group, New York.Google Scholar

  • Gábor B., and Ottaviano G. (2015). Micro-founded measurement of regional competitiveness in Europe. Mimeo, CERS-HAS Google Scholar

  • Harmaakorpi V. (2006). Regional Development Platform Method (RDPM) as a Tool for Regional Innovation Policy. European Planning Studies 14, p.1085-1114.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Harman, H.H. (1976). Modern factor analysis. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago. - 423 p.Google Scholar

  • Hellwig, Z. (1968). “Usage of taxonomic methods for the typological divisions countries”, Stat Overview, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 307-327.Google Scholar

  • Hollanders, H., Tarantola, S. and Loschky, A. (2009). Regional Innovation Scoreboard 2009: Methodology Report.Google Scholar

  • Huggins, R. (2003). Creating a UK Competitiveness Index: Regional and Local Benchmarking. Regional Studies, Vol. 37, pp. 89-96. DOI: 10.1080/0034340022000033420CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Huggins, R.; Davies, W. (2006). European Competitiveness Index 2006-07. United Kingdom: Robert Huggins Associates Ltd. 39 p. ISBN 1-902829-03-4. Google Scholar

  • Hugins, R. and Thompson, P. (2010). UK Competitiveness INDEX 2010. Cardiff: Centre for International Competitiveness.Google Scholar

  • Huovari, J., Kangasharju, A. and Alanen, A. (2001). Constructing an Index for Regional Competitiveness. Helsinki: Peelervo Economic Research Institute - Working paper No 44.Google Scholar

  • Jackson, M. (1991). Systems methodology for the management sciences. New York: Plenum Press, 398 p.Google Scholar

  • Kiszová, Z. & Nevima, J. (2012). Usage of analytic hierarchy process for evaluating of regional competitiveness in case of the Czech Republic. Proceedings of the 30th international conference MME, pp. 402-407l.Google Scholar

  • Kuznets, S. S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review, 45, pp. 1-28. Google Scholar

  • Luhmann, N. (2002). Introduction to Systems Theory. Polity press. Cambridge: 65 Bridge Street. ISBN 074-5-645-720, 978-0-745-645-728.Google Scholar

  • Martin, P. (1999). Are European regional policies delivering? EIB Papers, 4, pp. 10-23.Google Scholar

  • Martin, P. and G. I. P. Ottaviano (2001). Growth and agglomeration. International Economic Review, 42, pp. 947-968. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2354.00141CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Melecký L., Staníčková M. (2011). The Competitiveness of Visegrad Four NUTS 2 Regions and its Evaluation by DEA Method Application. Proc. 29th Inter. Conf. on Mathematical Methods in Economics, p. 474-479.Google Scholar

  • Meyer, Dietmar - Lackenbauer, Jörg. (2005). „EU Cohesion Policy and the Equity Efficiency Trade-Off: Adding Dynamics to Martin’s Model”. Andrássy Working Paper Series No. XIII.Google Scholar

  • Midelfart, K. H. (2004). Regional policy design: An analysis of relocation, efficiency and equity. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 4321, Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), London.Google Scholar

  • Midgley G. (2014). Systemic Intervention. Research Memorandum 95, November 2014. Centre for Systems Studies, Hull University Business School. ISBN 978-1-906422-32-5.Google Scholar

  • Mingers, J., Gill, A. (1997). Multimethodology: The Theory and Practice of Combining Management Science Methodologies. Wiley, Chichester, 442 p.Google Scholar

  • Myrdal, G. (1957). Economic Theory and under-developed regions. London: Duckworth Google Scholar

  • Nevima, J., and Ramík, J. (2009). Application of multicriteria decision making for evaluation of regional competitiveness. Proceedings of the 27th international conference Mathematical methods in economics, pp.239-244.Google Scholar

  • OECD-JRC. (2008). Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators. Methodology and User guide. Paris: Paris: OECD Google Scholar

  • Oliva, M., Miguel , M. (2005). Objective Competitiveness Ranking amongst EU Regions (Objective Method for Quantifying Regional Competitiveness - a case study applied to EU15 Regions). 45th Congress of the European Regional Science Association.Google Scholar

  • Perroux, F. (1955). Note sur la notion de “pôle de croissance”. Economie appliquée, 1-2, pp. 307-320.Google Scholar

  • Pessoa, A. (2013). Competitiveness, clusters and policy at the regional level: rhetoric vs. practice in designing policy for depressed regions. Regional Science Inquiry Journal, Vol. V, (1), 2013, pp. 101-116.Google Scholar

  • Pluta W. (1977). Multidimensional Comparative Analysis in economic research. National Economic Publishing House, Warsaw.Google Scholar

  • Porter, M., & Ketels, C. (2003). UK Competitiveness: Moving to the Next Stage. DTI Economics Paper.Google Scholar

  • Puga, D. (2002). European regional policies in light of recent location theories. Journal of Economic Geography, 2, pp. 373-40. DOI: 10.1093/jeg/2.4.373 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pооt, J. (2000). Reflections on Local and Economy- Wide Effects of Territorial Competition. In: BATEY, FRIEDRICH, P.: Regional Competition, Springer.Google Scholar

  • Ramík, J., and Hančlová, J. (2012). Multicriteria methods for evaluating competitiveness of regions in V4 countries. Multiple Criteria Decision Making 12. Katowice: The Karol Adamiecki University of Economics.Google Scholar

  • Różańska-Putek J., Jappens M., Willaert D. & Van Bavel J. (2009). Recoding the Regions of the European Social Survey into the NUTS 1 Regional Classification. Illustration: regional indicators of intergenerational solidarity. Interface Demography, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussel, Belgium.Google Scholar

  • Schaffer, A.; Simar, L.; Rauland, J. (2011). “Decomposing Regional Efficiency,” Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 51, No 5, 2011, p. 931-947. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00731.x CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Snieška, V. and Bruneckienė, J. (2009). Measurement of Lithuanian Regions by Regional Competitiveness Index. Engineering Economics, 1(61), p. 45-57.Google Scholar

  • Storper, M. (1997). The regional world: Territorial development in a global economy. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar

  • Tetsuya, S., Matsumoto, T. (2010). “Policies to Enhance the Physical Urban Environment for Competitiveness: A New Partnership between Public and Private Sectors”, OECD Regional Development Working Papers, 2010/1, OECD Publishing, © OECD.Google Scholar

  • UNDP (2008). Regional Competitiveness Index Croatia 2007. Zagreb: United Nations Development Programme. Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2016-03-04

Accepted: 2017-02-25

Published Online: 2017-04-01

Published in Print: 2017-03-01


Citation Information: Review of Economic Perspectives, ISSN (Online) 1804-1663, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/revecp-2017-0002.

Export Citation

© by Roman Guliak. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in