Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Review of Economic Perspectives

Národohospodárský obzor; The Journal of Masaryk University

4 Issues per year

CiteScore 2016: 0.50

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.262
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.516

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

European railway reforms and efficiency: Review of evidence in the literature

Hana Fitzová
Published Online: 2017-06-15 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/revecp-2017-0005


The objective of the European railway reforms which started in the 1990s was to enable the entry of competition to raise the efficiency of railway transport. This was undertaken because the level of services, particularly in former Eastern Bloc countries, was very low due to neglected investment, and so railway transport market share was in decline. The primary goal of this text is to determine based on available empirical studies whether the reforms affected the efficiency of the railway sector positively, and the secondary aim is to identify the factors which complicate evaluation of the reforms’ impact. According to empirical studies, the effect of competition on efficiency is unclear. The reforms have brought the most benefit to consumers, but their overall effect depends on many other factors. Competition for the market appeared to be a better way of implementing competition than competition in the market. In addition, comprehension of the problems complicating the analysis and their inclusion in the evaluation process constitutes an important point in evaluating the reforms’ effects and could be inspiring for countries that have not yet implemented all reforms.

Keywords: competition; efficiency; European railway reforms; railway transport

JEL Classification: R40; C44; C61


  • Asmild, M., Holvad, T., Hougaard, J. L., Kronborg, D. (2009). Railway reforms: Do they influence operating efficiency? Transportation, 36(5), 617–638. DOI: 10.1007/s11116-009-9216-xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bougna, E., Crozet, Y. (2016). Towards a liberalised European rail transport: Analysing and modelling the impact of competition on productive efficiency. Research in Transportation Economics, 59, 358–367. DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2016.07.014CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cantos Sánchez, P. (2001). Vertical relationships for the European railway industry. Transport Policy, 8(2), 77–83. DOI: 10.1016/S0967-070X(00)00039-1CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cantos Sánchez, P., Pastor, J. M., Serrano, L. (2010). Vertical and horizontal separation in the European railway sector and its effects on productivity. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 44(2), 139–160.Google Scholar

  • Canots Sánchez, P., Pastor J. M., Serrano, L. (2012). Evaluating European railway deregulation using different approaches. Transport Policy, 11(24), 67–72. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.07.008CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cascetta, E., Coppola, P. (2013). Competition on fast track: An analysis of the first competitive market for HSR services. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 111, 176–185. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.050CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • CER. (2011). Public service rail transport in the European Union: An overview. http://www.cer.be/sites/default/files/publication/2265_CER_Brochure_Public_Service_2011.pdf

  • Coelli, T. J., Rao, D. S. P., O’Donell, C. J., Batesse, G. E. (2005). An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. 2nd Ed. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

  • Cooper W. W., Seiford, L. M., Zhu J. (2007). Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

  • Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., Zhu, J. (eds.) (2011). Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

  • Deville, X., Verduyn, F. (2012). Implementation of EU legislation on rail liberalization in Belgium, France, Germany and The Netherlands. Brussels: National Bank of Belgium. (Working Paper No. 221) http://aei.pitt.edu/34882/1/wp221En.pdf

  • Driessen, G., Lijesen, M. G., Mulder, M. (2006). The impact of competition on productive efficiency in European railways. The Hague: CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis. (CPB Discussion Paper 71) http://www.cpb.nl/en/publication/impact-competition-productive-efficiency-european-railways

  • European Commission. (2001). European transport policy for 2010: time to decide. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. White Paper. https://ec.europa.eu/transport/sites/transport/files/themes/strategies/doc/2001_white_paper/lb_com_2001_0370_en.pdf

  • European Commission. (2013a). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 concerning the opening of the market for domestic passenger transport services by rail. Brussels: European Commission. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52013PC0028&from=EN

  • European Commission. (2013b). European Railways at a junction: The Commission adopts proposals for a Fourth Railway Package. Brussels: European Commission. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-13-65_en.htm

  • European Commission. (2016a). Statistical Pocketbook 2016: EU transport in Figures. Brussels: European Commission. DOI: 10.2832/809634CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • European Commission. (2016b). Fifth report on monitoring developments of the rail market. Brussels: European Commission. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52016SC0427&from=EN

  • Friebel, G., Ivaldi, M., Vibes, C. (2010). Railway (de)regulation: A European efficiency comparison. Economica, 77(305) 77–91. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0335.2008.00739.xWeb of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Griffiths, T. (2009). On rail competition: The impact of open access entry on the Great Britain rail market. In: Beck, A., Veeneman, W., van den Velde, D. (eds.). Beyond Competitive Tendering – Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Competition and Ownership in Land Passenger Transport. Delft: Next Generation Infrastructures Foundation.Google Scholar

  • Growitsch, C., Wetzel, H. (2009). Testing for economies of scope in European railways: An efficiency analysis. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 43(1) 1–24.Google Scholar

  • Hunold, M., Wolf, C. (2013). Competitive procurement design: Evidence from regional passenger railway services in Germany. Mannheim: ZEW Centre for European Economic Research. (ZEW Discussion Paper No. 13-009) http://ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/dp/dp13009.pdf

  • Ivaldi, M. (2005). Restructuring railways: In theory and practice. CESifo DICE Report, 3(4), 3–9.Google Scholar

  • IRG-Rail. (2016). Fourth Annual Market Monitoring Report. Paris: Independent Regulators’ Group – Rail. http://www.irg-rail.eu/public-documents/2016/

  • Jablonský, J., Dlouhý, M. (2004). Modely hodnocení efektivnosti produkčních jednotek. Prague: Professional Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Johnson, D., Nash, C. (2012). Competition and the provision of rail passenger services: A simulation exercise. Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management, 2(1), 14–22. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrtpm.2012.09.001.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Komárek, O. (2014). Open Access Konkurence na Trati Wien – Salzburg (Master’s thesis). Brno: Masaryk University.Google Scholar

  • Ksoll M. (2004). Integration of infrastructure and transport: An assessment from industrial economics and railway perspectives. Paper from 2nd Conference on Railroad Industry Structure, Competition and Investment, Evanston, IL, USA, October 2004.Google Scholar

  • Lang, M., Lamperrouza, M., Finger, M. (2011). Competition effects in a liberalized railway market. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 13(3), 375–398. DOI: 10.1007/s10842-011-0117-2CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Link, H. (2004). Rail infrastructure charging and on-track competition in Germany. International Journal of Transport Management, 2(1), 17–27. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijtm.2004.05.002CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mizutani, F., Uranishi, S. (2013). Does vertical separation reduce cost? An empirical analysis of the rail industry in European and East Asian OECD Countries. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 43(1), 31–59. DOI: 10.1007/s11149-012-9193-4CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nash, C. (2008). Passenger railway reform in the last 20 years – European experience reconsidered. Research in Transportation Economics, 22(1), 61–70. DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2008.05.020CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nash, C. (2013). Rail transport. In: Finger, M.; Holvad, T. (eds.). Regulating Transport in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Nigrin, T. (2014). Open competition or discrimination on tracks? Examples of anti-competitive behaviour of the Deutsche Bahn. Review of Economic Perspectives, 14(1), 16–33. DOI: 10.2478/revecp-2014-0002CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pittman, R. (2005). Structural separation to create competition? The case of freight railways. Review of Network Economics, 4(3), 181–196.Google Scholar

  • Preston, J., Whelan, G., Wardman, M. (1999). An analysis of the potential for on-track competition in the British passenger rail industry. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 33(1), 77–94.Google Scholar

  • Thompson, L. S. (1997). The Benefits of Separating Rail Infrastructure from Operations. Washington, DC: World Bank. (Viewpoint: Public Policy for the Private Sector; Note No. 135)Google Scholar

  • Tomeš, Z, Jandová, M. (2015). Přístupy k liberalizaci osobní železniční dopravy v ČR. Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, 24(1). DOI: 10.18267/j.aop.499Google Scholar

  • Tomeš, Z., Kvizda, M., Jandová, M., Rederer, V. (2016). Open access passenger rail competition in the Czech Republic. Transport Policy, 47, 203-211.Google Scholar

  • Shires, J. D., Preston, J., M., Nash, C. A., Wardman, M. (1994). Rail Privatisation: The Economic Theory. Leeds: Institute of Transport Studies, University of Leeds. (ITS Working Paper 419)Google Scholar

  • Vickers, J. (1995). Concepts of competition. Oxford Economic Papers, 47(1), 1–23. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2663661

  • Vigren, A. (2016). Competition in Swedish passenger railway: entry in an open-access market (No. 2016: 18). CTS-Centre for Transport Studies Stockholm (KTH and VTI).Google Scholar

  • Wetzel, H. (2008). European Railway Deregulation: The Influence of Regulatory and Environmental Conditions on Efficiency. Lüneburg: Leuphana University of Lüneburg. (Working Paper Series in Economics No. 86)Google Scholar

  • World Bank. (2011). Railway Reform: Toolkit for Improving Rail Sector Performance. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/529921469672181559/Railway-reform-Toolkit-for-improving-rail

About the article

Received: 2017-02-09

Accepted: 2017-04-20

Published Online: 2017-06-15

Published in Print: 2017-06-01

Citation Information: Review of Economic Perspectives, Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages 103–120, ISSN (Online) 1804-1663, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/revecp-2017-0005.

Export Citation

© 2017 Hana Fitzová, published by De Gruyter Open. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Daniel Simonet
Journal of Public Affairs, 2017, Page e1686

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in