Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Review of Economic Perspectives

Národohospodárský obzor; The Journal of Masaryk University

4 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.50

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.262
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.516

Open Access
Online
ISSN
1804-1663
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 17, Issue 3 (Sep 2017)

Issues

Determinants of the Shadow Economy in the Czech Regions: A Region-Level Study

Jakub Buček
Published Online: 2017-09-23 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/revecp-2017-0016

Abstract

This paper investigates the size and development of the shadow economy in the Czech Republic on the state-level base over the 2005-2014 period. The multiple indicators multiple causes (MIMIC) model is used to assess the estimation of the shadow economy size. I investigate how labour market, number of people with at least one distraint, and the burden of taxation might contribute to the existence of the shadow economy. While the former two are important determinants of the shadow economy, I find no evidence to prove any significant impact of distraints on the shadow economy size. As for the country’s particular regions, I find that those surrounding big cities, especially Prague, have, on average, a smaller shadow economy size, whereas regions in the borderlands (former Sudetenland) suffer from a larger shadow economy.

Keywords: Shadow Economy; MIMIC Model; Regions; Tax Burden

JEL Classification: O17; H26

References

  • ALLINGHAM, M. G., and A. SANDMO. (1972). Income tax evasion: a theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics. Vol. 1, pp. 323-338. DOI: 10.1016/0047-2727(72)90010-2CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • ANNICCHIARICO, B., and C. CESARONI. (2016). Tax Reforms and the Under-ground Economy: A Simulation-Based Analysis. CEIS Research Paper. Vol. 14, pp. 1-43.Google Scholar

  • ARGENTIERO, A., and C. A. BOLLINO. (2015). Uncovering Unobserved Economy: A General Equilibrium Characterization. Metroeconomica. Vol. 66, pp. 306–338. DOI: 10.1111/meca.12072CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • BUEHN, A. (2011). The Shadow Economy in German Regions: An Empirical Assessment. German Economic Review. Vol. 13, pp. 275-290. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0475.2011.00557.xCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • CHAUDHURI, K., F. SCHNEIDER, and S. CHATTOPADHYAY. (2006). The size and development of the shadow economy: An empirical investigation from states of India. Journal of Development Economics. Vol. 80, pp. 428-443. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2005.02.011CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • ELGIN, C., and O. ÖZTUNALI. (2012). Shadow economy around the world: model based estimates. Working Papers. No. 2012/05, pp. 1-48.Google Scholar

  • FREY, B. S., and H. WECK-HANNEMAN. (1984). The hidden economy as an ‘unobserved’ variable. European Economic Review. Vol. 26, pp. 33-53. DOI: 10.1016/0014-2921(84)90020-5CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • FRIEDMAN, E., S. JOHNSON, D. KAUFMANN, and P. ZOIDO-LOBATON. (2000) Dodging the grabbing hand: the determinants of unofficial activity in 69 countries. Journal of Public Economics. Vol. 76, pp. 459-493.Google Scholar

  • HU, L., and P. M. BENTLER. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. Vol. 6, pp. 1-55. DOI: 10.1080/10705519909540118CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • JOHNSON, S., D. KAUFMANN, and P. ZOIDO-LOBATON. (1998) Regulatory Discretion and the Unofficial Economy. The American Economic Review. Vol. 88, No. 2, pp. 387-392.Google Scholar

  • KLEVEN, H. J., M. B. KNUDSEN, C. T. KREINER, and S. PEDERSEN. (2011). Un-willing or Unable to Cheat? Evidence From a Tax Audit Experiment in Denmark. Econometrica. Vol. 79, pp. 651–692. DOI: 10.3982/ECTA9113CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • KUCERA, D., and L. RONCOLATO. (2008). Informal employment: Two contested policy issues. International Labour Review. Vol. 147, pp. 321–348. DOI: 10.1111/j.1564-913X.2008.00039.xCrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • LACKO, M. (1999). Do Power Consumption Data Tell the Story? - Electricity Intensity and Hidden Economy in PostSocialist Countries. Budapest Working Papers on the Labour Market. No. 1999/2, pp. 1-31.Google Scholar

  • LEONARD, M. (1998). Invisible Work, Invisible Workers: The Informal Economy in Europe and the US. London: MacMillan Press. ISBN 978-0312217600.Google Scholar

  • ORSI, R., D. RAGGI, and F. TURINO. (2014). Size, trend, and policy implications of the underground economy. Review of Economic Dynamics. Vol. 17, pp. 417–436. DOI: 10.1016/j.red.2013.11.001Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • PAPPA, E., R. SAJEDI, and E. VELLA. (2015). Fiscal consolidation with tax evasion and corruption. 37th Annual NBER International Seminar on Macroeconomics. Vol. 96, pp. S56–S75. DOI: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2014.12.004CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • ROSSEEL, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software. Vol. 48, pp. 1-36. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v048.i02CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • SCHNEIDER, F. (2000). The Increase of the size of the shadow economy of 18 OECD countries: Some preliminary explanations. CESifo Working Paper Series. No. 306, pp. 1-31.Google Scholar

  • SCHNEIDER, F. (2015). Size and Development of the Shadow Economy of 31 European and 5 other OECD Countries from 2003 to 2015: Different Developments.Google Scholar

  • SCHNEIDER, F., and D. H. ENSTE. (2000). Shadow Economies: Size, Causes, and Consequences. Journal of Economic Literature. Vol. 38, pp. 77-114. DOI: 10.1257/jel.38.1.77CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • SCHNEIDER, F., and C. C. WILLIAMS. (2013). The Shadow Economy. London: The Institute of Economic Affairs. ISBN 978 0 255 36674 8.Google Scholar

  • TAFENAU, E., H. HERWARTZ, and F. SCHNEIDER. (2010). Regional Estimates of the Shadow Economy in Europe. International Economic Journal. Vol. 24, pp. 629-636. DOI: 10.1080/10168737.2010.526010CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • WISEMAN, T. (2013). US shadow economies: a state-level study. Constitutional Political Economy. Vol. 24, pp. 310–335. DOI: 10.1007/s10602-013-9146-7CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Received: 2017-06-12

Accepted: 2017-08-08

Published Online: 2017-09-23

Published in Print: 2017-09-01


Citation Information: Review of Economic Perspectives, ISSN (Online) 1804-1663, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/revecp-2017-0016.

Export Citation

© 2017 Jakub Buček, published by De Gruyter Open. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in