Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Review of Economic Perspectives

Národohospodárský obzor; The Journal of Masaryk University

4 Issues per year

CiteScore 2016: 0.50

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.262
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.516

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 17, Issue 4


Transparency in Lobbying as Perceived by Organisational Representatives in the Czech Republic

Lucie Vnoučková
  • Corresponding author
  • University of Economics and Management, Prague, Czech Republic, Nárožní 2600/9a, 158 00, Praha, Czech Republic
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Milan Žák
  • University of Economics and Management, Prague, Czech Republic, Nárožní 2600/9a, 158 00 Praha 5, Czech Republic
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2017-12-21 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/revecp-2017-0020


This paper focuses on transparency in lobbying as perceived by in sample organisations in the Czech Republic. The paper’s aim is to study how lobbying and its impact on decision-making practices are perceived by organisational representatives and to empirically assess the perceived transparency of lobbying with a view to the potential introduction of lobbying regulations and their role in Czech democracy. Data for the study was gathered from a sample of business institutions in the Czech Republic. In total, 73 organisations/institutions took part in the survey. One respondent was questioned per organisation/institution. 90 % of respondents perceive that transparent and regulated lobbying has a positive impact on democracy. Moreover, according to the respondents, lobbying facilitates more competent decision-making among politicians, brings more information into the decision-making process and makes the process more efficient. There has been a significant shift in the perception of lobbying over the past ten years in the Czech Republic. Regulations aimed at legitimizing lobbying are seen as having a positive impact on democracy.

Keywords: Lobbying; transparency; democracy; stakeholders; regulation; perception


  • BEAUMONT, E. (1999). Democracy and public administration reform linked. The Public Manager, 28(1): 47-50.Google Scholar

  • BELLVER, A. and D. KAUFMANN. (2005). Transparenting Transparency: Initial Empirics and Policy Applications. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper.Google Scholar

  • BENNEDSEN, M. and S. E. FELDMAN. (2002). Lobbying Legislatures. Journal of Political Economy, 110(4): 919-946. DOI: 10.1086/340775CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • BUNTING, R. (2004). The new peer review watchword. The CPA Journal, 74(10): 6-9.Google Scholar

  • CAMPOS, N. F., and F. GIOVANNONI. (2007). Lobbying, corruption and political influence. Public Choice, 131(1-2): 1-21. DOI: 10.1007/s11127-006-9102-4CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • COTTERRELL, R. (1999). Transparency, mass media, ideology and community. Cultural Values, 3(4): 414-426. DOI: 10.1080/14797589909367176CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • DONATH-BURSON-MARSTELLAR. (2005). A Guide to Effective Lobbying in the Czech Republic. Donath-Burson-Marstellar: Prague.Google Scholar

  • FAIRBANKS, J., K. D. PLOWMAN and B. L. RAWLINS. (2007). Transparency in government communication. Journal of Public Affairs, 7: 23-37. DOI: 10.1002/pa.245CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • FINEL, B. I., and K.M. LORD. (1999). The surprising logic of transparency. International Studies Quarterly, 43: 315-339.Google Scholar

  • FLORINI, A. (2004). Behind closed doors: governmental transparency gives way to secrecy. Harvard International Review, 26(1): 18-21.Google Scholar

  • FROST, A. (2003). Restoring faith in government: transparency reform in the United States and the European Union. European Public Law, 9(1): 87-104.Google Scholar

  • FRYE, T. (2002). Capture or exchange? Business lobbying in Russia. Europe-Asia Studies, 54(7): 1017-1036. DOI: 10.1080/0966813022000017113CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • GARNETT, J. L. (1992). Communicating for Results in Government. Jossey-Bass Publishers: San Fransisco.Google Scholar

  • GOODMAN, M. B. (2002). Guest editorial. Corporate Communications, 7(4): 204-205.Google Scholar

  • GRØDELAND, A. (2006). Informality, corruption and public procurement in the Czech Republic, Slovenia, Bulgaria and Romania. In Informal Networks and Political Corruption in Post-Socialist Societies, KUSZNIR, J. (ed.). Koszalin Institute of Comparative European Studies: Koszalin, 25-36.Google Scholar

  • GRUNIG, J., and T. HUNT. (1984). Managing Public Relations. Holt, Rinehart and Winston: New York.Google Scholar

  • HEISE, J. A. (1985). Toward closing the confidence gap: an alternative approach to communication between public and government. Public Affairs Quarterly, 9(2): 196-217.Google Scholar

  • HELLMAN, J. S., G. JONES, and D. KAUFMANN. (2000). ‘‘Seize the state, seize the day’’: state capture, corruption, and influence in transition. Policy Research Working Paper 2444. World Bank: Washington, DC.Google Scholar

  • KALNINŠ, V. (2005). Parliamentary Lobbying Between Civil Rights and Corruption: An Insight into Lobbying Practice in Latvia and Recommendations for the Saeima. Latvian Institute of International Affairs: Riga.Google Scholar

  • KLOUDOVÁ, K., et al. (2012). Kreativní ekonomika. Trendy, výzvy, příležitost. Praha: Grada Publishing.Google Scholar

  • KRUSS, G., S. MCGRATH, I. H. PETERSEN, and M. GASTROW. (2015). Higher education and economic development: The importance of building technological capabilities. International Journal of Educational Development, 43: 22-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2015.04.011CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • LABOUTKOVÁ, Š., and P. VYMĚTAL. (2017). Measures of Transparent Lobbying: How to Approach It and Evaluate It: A Preliminary Stage. In: Matějová, L. (ed.) Proceedings of the 21st International Conference Current Trends in Public Sector Research 2017. Brno: Masaryk University, pp. 50-57.Google Scholar

  • LABOUTKOVÁ, Š., and M. ŽÁK. (2016). Transparency of lobbying: A theoretical approach. Proceedings of the 14th International Scientific Conference Economic Policy in the European Union Member Countries. Petrovice u Karviné: Silesian University in Opava, School of Business Administration in Karvina.Google Scholar

  • MCGRATH, C. (2008). The development and regulation of lobbying in the new member states of the European Union. Journal of Public Affairs, 8: 15-32. DOI: 10.1002/pa.284CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MOE, T. M. (1984). The New Economics of Organization. American Journal of Political Science, 28(4): 739-777.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • OECD. (2006). Governance Arrangements to Ensure Transparency in Lobbying: Comparative Overview. Public Governance Committee, GOV/PGC/ETH (2006). Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development: Paris.Google Scholar

  • PÉREZ-SOLÓRZANO BORRAGÁN, N. (2006). Post-communist interest politics: a research agenda. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 7(2): 134-154. DOI: 10.1080/15705850600839868CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • PAVLÍK, M. (2013). Transparency in the Allocation of Municipal Grants for Sports and Voucher Systems in the Czech Republic. Review of Economic Perspectives - Národohospodářský obzor, 13(1): 43-57. DOI:10.2478/v10135-012-0015-5.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • PUTNAM, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1): 65-78. DOI: 10.1353/jod.1995.0002CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • REDOANO, M. (2010). Does Centralization affect the Number and Size of Lobbies? Journal of Public Economic Theory, 12 (3): 407-435. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9779.2010.01459.xWeb of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • REYNOLDS, M. (2005). Secretive lobbyists still wield influence. Prague Post, 7 September 2005.Google Scholar

  • SEVELLA, J. (2006). The state of Central European public affairs in Brussels. In Challenge and Response: Essays on Public Affairs and Transparency. SPENCER, T., and C. MCGRATH. (eds). Landmarks: Brussels; 89-94.Google Scholar

  • SCHLOZMAN, K. L., and J. T. TIERNEY. (1986). Organized Interests and American Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

  • SOPÓCI, J. (2001). Economic interest groups in Slovak politics in Nineties. Sociológia, 33(6): 535-548.Google Scholar

  • STOKER, K., and B. RAWLINS. (2004). Light and air hurt no one: The moral and practical imperative for transparency. Seventh Annual Interdisciplinary Public Relations Research Conference, Miami, Florida.Google Scholar

  • STRITON L., and M. LODGE. (2001). Transparency mechanisms: building publicness into public services. Journal of Law and Society, 28(4): 471-489. DOI: 10.1111/1467-6478.00199CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • STUBB, A. (2008). Report on the development of the framework for the activities of interest representatives (lobbyists) in the European institutions, (2007/2115(INI)), European Parliament, Committee on Constitutional Affairs.Google Scholar

  • SULLIVAN, J. D., K. E. BETTCHER, and A. SHKOLNIKOV. (2006). Business associations, business climate, and economic growth: evidence from transition economies. Annual meeting of the International Society for New Institutional Economics.Google Scholar

  • SYKES, S. (2002). Talent, diversity and growing expectations. Journal of Communication Management, 7(1): 79-86. DOI: 10.1108/13632540310807278CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL (2017). Corruption Perceptions Index 2016. Retrieved May 14, 2017 from https://www.transparency.cz/wpcontent/uploads/Corruption-Perceptions-Index-2016.pdfGoogle Scholar

  • URBANCOVÁ, H., L. VNOUČKOVÁ, and Š. LABOUTKOVÁ (2016). Knowledge Transfer in a Knowledge-Based Economy. E+M Economics and Management, 19(2): 73-86.Google Scholar

  • VISHWANATH, T. and D. KAUFMANN. (1999). Towards Transparency in Finance and Governance. Policy Research Working Paper. World Bank, Washington D.C.Google Scholar

  • WIESENTHAL, H. (1996). Organized interests in contemporary East Central Europe: theoretical perspectives and tentative hypotheses. In Parliaments and Organized Interests: The Second Steps, ÁGH, A., and G. ILONSZKI. (eds). Hungarian Centre for Democracy Studies: Budapest; 40-58.Google Scholar

  • WISZOWATY, M. M. (2006). Legal regulation of lobbying in new member states of the European Union. In Participation of Civil Society in New Modes of Governance, The Case of the New EU Member States. Part 2: Questions of Accountability. Research Centre for East European Studies: Bremen, 46-56.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2017-05-22

Accepted: 2017-10-09

Published Online: 2017-12-21

Published in Print: 2017-12-20

Citation Information: Review of Economic Perspectives, Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages 381–397, ISSN (Online) 1804-1663, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/revecp-2017-0020.

Export Citation

© by Lucie Vnoučková. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in