Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Reviews on Environmental Health

Editor-in-Chief: Carpenter, David O. / Sly, Peter

Editorial Board Member: Brugge, Doug / Diaz-Barriga, Fernando / Edwards, John W. / Field, R.William / Hales, Simon / Horowitz, Michal / Maibach, H.I. / Shaw, Susan / Stein, Renato / Tao, Shu / Tchounwou, Paul B.

4 Issues per year


SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.776
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.676
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 1.795

Online
ISSN
2191-0308
See all formats and pricing
Volume 28, Issue 4 (Dec 2013)

Issues

Human disease resulting from exposure to electromagnetic fields1)

David O. Carpenter
  • Corresponding author
  • Institute for Health and the Environment, University at Albany, NY, USA
  • Email:
Published Online: 2013-11-27 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2013-0016

Abstract

Electromagnetic fields (EMFs) include everything from cosmic rays through visible light to the electric and magnetic fields associated with electricity. While the high frequency fields have sufficient energy to cause cancer, the question of whether there are human health hazards associated with communication radiofrequency (RF) EMFs and those associated with use of electricity remains controversial. The issue is more important than ever given the rapid increase in the use of cell phones and other wireless devices. This review summarizes the evidence stating that excessive exposure to magnetic fields from power lines and other sources of electric current increases the risk of development of some cancers and neurodegenerative diseases, and that excessive exposure to RF radiation increases risk of cancer, male infertility, and neurobehavioral abnormalities. The relative impact of various sources of exposure, the great range of standards for EMF exposure, and the costs of doing nothing are also discussed.

Keywords: cancer; cell phones; male fertility; power lines

References

  • 1.

    Ramsey JJ, Harper ME, Weindruch R. Restriction of energy intake, energy expenditure, and aging. Free Rad Biol Med 2000;10:946–86.

  • 2.

    Carpenter DO. Human health effects of nonionizing electromagnetic fields. In: Bingham E, Cohressen B, editors. Patty’s Toxicology, 6th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2012;6:109–32. Chapter 100.

  • 3.

    Wertheimer N, Leeper E. Electrical wiring configurations and childhood cancer. Am J Epidemiol 1979;109:273–84.

  • 4.

    Wartenberg D. Residential magnetic fields and childhood leukemia: a meta-analysis. Am J Public Health 1998;88:1787–94. [Crossref]

  • 5.

    Ahlbom A, Day N, Feychting M, Roman E, Skinner J, et al. A pooled analysis of magnetic fields and childhood leukaemia. Brit J Cancer 2000;83:692–98. [Crossref]

  • 6.

    Greenland S, Sheppard AR, Kaune WT, Poole C, Kelsh MA. The Childhood Leukemia-EMF Study Group. A pooled analysis of magnetic fields, wire codes, and childhood leukemia. Epidemiology 2000;11:624–34. [Crossref]

  • 7.

    Hatch EE, Linet MS, Kleinerman RA, Tarone RE, Severson RK, et al. Association between childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia and use of electrical appliances during pregnancy and childhood. Epidemiology 1998;9:234–45. [Crossref]

  • 8.

    US National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council. Possible health effects of exposure to residential electric and magnetic fields. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1997.

  • 9.

    IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer). IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, Vol. 80. Non-ionizing radiation. Part 1: static and extremely low-frequency (ELF) electric and magnetic fields. Lyon: IARC Press, 2002.

  • 10.

    World Health Organization (WHO). Extremely low frequency fields. Environmental health criteria, Vol. 238. Geneva: WHO, 2007.

  • 11.

    Draper G, Vincent T, Kroll ME, Swanson J. Childhood cancer in relation to distance from high voltage power lines in England and Wales: a case-control study. Br Med J 2005;330:1290–4. [Crossref]

  • 12.

    Kabuto M, Nitta H, Yamamoto S, Yamaguch N, Akiba S, et al. Childhood leukemia and magnetic fields in Japan: a case-control study of childhood leukemia and residential power-frequency magnetic fields in Japan. Int J Cancer 2006;119:643–50. [Crossref]

  • 13.

    Mejia-Arangure JM, Fajardo-Gutierrez A, Perez-Saldivar ML, Govodezky C, Martinez-Avalos A, et al. Magnetic fields and acute leukemia in children with Down Syndrome. Epidemiology 2007;18:158–61. [Crossref]

  • 14.

    Foliart DE, Pollock BH, Mezei G, Iriye R, Silva JM, et al. Magnetic field exposure and long-term survival among children with leukaemia. Br J Cancer 2006;94:161–4. [Crossref]

  • 15.

    Svendsen AL, Weihkoph T, Kaatsch P, Schuz J. Exposure to magnetic fields and survival after diagnosis of childhood leukemia: a German cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16:1167–71. [Crossref]

  • 16.

    Kheifets L, Ahlbom A, Crespi CM, Graper G, Hagihara J, et al. Pooled analysis of recent studies on magnetic fields and childhood leukaemia. Br J Cancer 2010;103:1128–35. [Crossref]

  • 17.

    Infante-Rivard C, Deadman JE. Maternal occupational exposure to extremely low frequency magnetic fields during pregnancy and childhood leukemia. Epidemiology 2003;14:437–41. [Crossref]

  • 18.

    Feychting M, Forssen U, Floderus B. Occupational and residential magnetic field exposure and leukemia and central nervous system tumors. Epidemiology 1997;8:184–9.

  • 19.

    Kheifets LI, Afifi AA, Buffler PA, Zhang ZW, Matkin CC. Occupational electric and magnetic field exposure and leukemia. J Occup Environ Med 1997;39:1074–91. [Crossref]

  • 20.

    Lowenthat RM, Tuck DM, Bray IC. Residential exposure to electric power transmission lines and risk of lymphoproliferative and myeloproliferative disorders: a case-control study. Intern Med J 2007;37:614–9. [Crossref]

  • 21.

    Garcia AM, Sisternas A, Hoyos SP. Occupational exposure to extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields and Alzheimer disease: a meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol 2008;37:329–40. [Crossref]

  • 22.

    Feychting M, Jonsson F, Pedersen NL, Ahlbom A. Occupational magnetic field exposure and neurodegenerative disease. Epidemiology 2003;14:413–9. [Crossref]

  • 23.

    Huss A, Spoerri A, Egger M, Roosli M, for the Swiss National Cohort Study. Residence near power lines and mortality from neurodegenerative diseases: longitudinal study of the Swiss population. Am J Epidemiol 2006;169:167–75.

  • 24.

    Li DK, Chen H, Odouli R. Maternal exposure to magnetic fields during pregnancy in relation to the risk of asthma in offspring. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2011;165:945–50. [Crossref]

  • 25.

    Lai H, Singh NP. Magnetic-field-induced DNA strand breaks in brain cells of the rat. Environ Health Perspect 2004;112:687–94. [Crossref]

  • 26.

    Burdak-Rothkamm S, Rothkamm K, Folkard M, Patel G, Hone P, et al. DNA and chromosomal damage in response to intermittent extremely low-frequency magnetic fields. Mut Res 2009;672:82–9.

  • 27.

    Lin H, Blank M, Rossol-Haseroth K, Goodman R. Regulating genes with electromagnetic response elements. J Cell Biochem 2001;81:143–8. [Crossref]

  • 28.

    Salehi I, Sani KG, Zamani A. Exposure of rats to extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields (ELF-EMF) alters cytokines production. Electromag Biol Med 2012;32:1–8.

  • 29.

    Yang Y, Jin X, Yan C, Tian Y, Tang J, et al. Case-only study of interactions between DNA repair genes (hMLH1, APEX1, MGMT, XRCC1 and XPD) and low-frequency electromagnetic fields in childhood acute leukemia. Leuk Lymph 2008;49:2344–50.

  • 30.

    Sommer AM, Lerchl A. The risk of lymphoma in AKR/J mice does not rise with chronic exposure to 50 Hz magnetic fields (1 μT and 100 μT). Rad Res 2004;162:194–200. [Crossref]

  • 31.

    Glaser ZR. Bibliography of reported biological phenomena (‘effects’) and clinical manifestations attributed to microwave and radiofrequency radiation. Naval Medical Research Institute Research Report Project MF12.524.015-0004B, Report No. 2 4 October 1971.

  • 32.

    McLees BD, Finch ED. Analysis of reported physiologic effects of microwave radiation. Adv Biol Med Physics 1973;14:163–223. [Crossref]

  • 33.

    Pollack H. Epidemiologic data on American personnel in the Moscow Embassy. Bull N.Y. Acad Med 1979;55:1182–6.

  • 34.

    Williams RA, Webb TS. Exposure to radio-frequency radiation from an aircraft radar unit. Aviat Space Environ Med 1980;51:1243–4.

  • 35.

    Forman SA, Holmes CK, McManamon TV, Wedding WR. Psychological symptoms and intermittent hypertension following acute microwave exposure. J Occup Med 1982;24:932–4.

  • 36.

    Schilling CJ. Effects of acute exposure to ultrahigh radiofrequency radiation on three antenna engineers. Occup Environ Med 1997;54:281–4. [Crossref]

  • 37.

    Schilling CJ. Effects of exposure to very high frequency radiofrequency radiation on six antenna engineers in two separate incidents. Occup Med 2000;50:49–56. [Crossref]

  • 38.

    Gultekin DH, Moeller L. NMR imaging of cell phone radiation absorption in brain tissue. PNAS www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1205598109. [Crossref]

  • 39.

    Balcer-Kubiczek EK, Harrison GH. Evidence for microwave carcinogenesis in vitro. Carcinogenesis 1985;6:859–64.

  • 40.

    Repacholi MH, Basten A, Gebski V, Noonan D, Finnie J, et al. Lymphomas in Eu-Pim1 transgenic mice exposed to pulsed 900 MHz electromagnetic fields. Rad Res 1997;147:631–40. [Crossref]

  • 41.

    Goldsmith JR. Epidemiological evidence relevant to radar (microwave) effects. Environ Health Perspect 1997;105: 1579–87.

  • 42.

    Hardell L, Carlberg M. Using the Hill criteria from 1965 for strengths of evidence of the risk for brain tumors associated with use of mobile and cordless phones. Rev Environ Health 2013;28:97–106.

  • 43.

    Hardell L, Carlberg M, Söderqvist F, Hansson Mild K. Meta-analysis of long-term mobile phone use and the association with brain tumours. Int J Oncol 2008;32:1097–103.

  • 44.

    Kundi M. The controversy about a possible relationship between mobile phone use and cancer. Environ Health Perspect 2009;117:316–24.

  • 45.

    INTERPHONE Study Group. Brain tumour risk in relation to mobile telephone use: results of the INTERPHONE international case-control study. Int J Epidemiol 2010;39:675–94.

  • 46.

    Sadetzki S, Chetrit A, Jarus-Hakak A, Cardis E, Deutch Y, et al. Cellular phone use and risk of benign and malignant parotid gland tumors-a nationwide case-control study. Am J Epidemiol 2008;167:457–67. [Crossref]

  • 47.

    Hardell L, Mild KH, Carlberg M, Hallquist A. Cellular and cordless telephone use and the association with brain tumors in different age groups. Arch Environ Health 2004;59:132–7. [Crossref]

  • 48.

    Hardell L, Carlberg M, Hansson Mild K. Use of mobile phones and cordless phones is associated with increased risk for glioma and acoustic neuroma. Pathohysiology 2013;20:85–110. [Crossref]

  • 49.

    Michelozzi P, Capon A, Kirchmayer U, Forastiere F, Biggeri A, et al. Adult and childhood leukemia near a high-power radio station in Rome, Italy. Am J Epidemiol 2002;155:1096–103. [Crossref]

  • 50.

    Park SK, Ha M, Im HJ. Ecological study on residences in the vicinity of AM radio broadcasting towers and cancer death: preliminary observations in Korea. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2004;77:387–94.

  • 51.

    Ha M, Im H, Lee M, Kim HJ, Kim BC, et al. Radio-frequency radiation exposure from AM radio transmitters and childhood leukemia and brain cancer. Am J Epidemiol 2007;166:270–9. [Crossref]

  • 52.

    IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer). Non-ionizing radiation, Part 2: radiofrequency electromagnetic fields 2013. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. World Health Organization, 461 pp.

  • 53.

    Agarwal A, Desai NR, Makker K, Varghese A, Mouradi R, et al. Effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic waves (RF-EMW) from cellular phones on human ejaculated semen: an in vitro pilot study. Fert Steril 2008;92:1318–25.

  • 54.

    Agarwal A, Deepinder F, Sharma RK, Ranga G, Li J. Effect of cell phone usage on semen analysis in men attending infertility clinic: an observational study. Fert Steril 2008;89:124–8. [Crossref]

  • 55.

    Wdowiak A, Wdowiak L, Wiktor H. Evaluation of the effect of using mobile phones on male fertility. Ann Agric Environ Med 2007;14:169–72.

  • 56.

    Liu X, Duan W, Zu SC, Chen C, He M, et al. Exposure to 1800 MHz radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation induces oxidative DNA base damage in a mouse spermatocyte-derived cell line. Toxicol Letts 2013;218:2–10. [Crossref]

  • 57.

    DeIlullis GN, Newey RJ, Kiing BV, Aitken RJ. Mobile phone radiation induces reactive oxygen species production and DNA damage in human spermatozoa in vitro. PLoS One 2009;4:ee6446.

  • 58.

    Rolland M, Le Moal J, Wagner V, Royere D, DeMouzon J. Decline in semen concentration and morphology in a sample of 26,609 men close to general population between 1989 and 2005 in France. Human Reprod 2013;28:462–70.

  • 59.

    Havas M. Radiation from wireless technology affects the blood, the heart, and the autonomic nervous system. Rev Environ Health 2013;28:75–84.

  • 60.

    Hallberg O, Oberfeld G. Letter to the editor: will we all become electrosensitive? Electromag Biol Med 2006;35:189–91. [Crossref]

  • 61.

    World Health Organization. Electromagnetic fields and public health: electromagnetic hypersensitivity. Fact sheet N 296, December 2005. http://www.who.int/mediacentr/facsheets/fs296/en/index.html.

  • 62.

    Genius SJ, Lipp CT. Electromagnetic hypersensitivity: fact or fiction? Sci Total Environ 2011;414:103–12.

  • 63.

    Rubin GJ, Hillert L, Nieto-Hernandez R, van Rongen E, Oftedal G. Do people with idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields display physiological effects when exposed to electromagnetic fields? A systematic review of provocation studies. Bioelectromagnetics 2011;32:593–609. [Crossref]

  • 64.

    McCarty DE, Carrubba S, Chesson AL, Frilot C, Gonzalez-Toledo E, et al. Electromagnetic hypersensitivity: evidence for a novel neurological syndrome. Int J Neurosci 2011;121:670–6. [Crossref]

  • 65.

    Frey AH. Behavioral biophysics. Psdychol Bull 1965;65: 322–37. [Crossref]

  • 66.

    Huber R, Graf T, Cote KA, Wittmann L, Gallmann E, et al. Exposure to pulsed high-frequency electromagnetic field during waking affects human sleep EEG. NeuroReport 2000;11:3321–5. [Crossref]

  • 67.

    Wiholm C, Lowden A, Hillert L, Kuster N, Arnetz BB, et al. The effects of 884 MHz GSM wireless communication signals on spatial memory performance: an experimental provocation study. PIERS Proceedings, August 27–30, 2007 Prague, Czech Republic; 526–9.

  • 68.

    Ellyahu I, Luira R, Hareuveny R, Margallot M, Meiran N, et al. Effects of radiofrequency radiation emitted by cellular telephones on the cognitive functions of humans. Bioelectromagnetics 2006;27:110–19.

  • 69.

    Barth A, Winker R, Ponocny-Seliger E, Mayhofer W, Ponocny I, et al. A meta-analysis for neurobehaviorual effects due to electromagnetic field exposure emitted by GSM mobile phones. Occup Environ Med 2008;65:342–6. [Crossref]

  • 70.

    Aalto S, Haarala C, Bruck A, Sipila H, Hamalainen H, et al. Mobile phone affects cerebral blood flow in humans. J Cereb Blood Flor Metabol 2006;26:885–90. [Crossref]

  • 71.

    Volkow ND, Tomasi D, Wang GF, Vaska P, Fowler JS, et al. Effects of cell phone radiofrequency signal exposure on brain glucose metabolism. J Am Med Assoc 2011;305:808–14.

  • 72.

    Divan HA, Kheifets L, Obel C, Olsen J. Prenatal and postnatal exposure to cell phone use and behavioral problems in children. Epidemiology 2008;19:523–9. [Crossref]

  • 73.

    Aldad TS, Gan G, Gao XB, Taylor HS. Fetal radiofrequency radiation exposure from 800–1900 MHz-rated cellular telephones affects neurodevelopment and behavior in mice. Sci Rep 2012;2:312.

  • 74.

    Carpenter DO, Sage C. Setting prudent public health policy for electromagnetic field exposures. Rev Environ Health 2008;23:91–117. [Crossref]

  • 75.

    Garaj-Vrhovac V, Gajski G, Pazanin S, Sarolic A, Domijan AM, et al. Assessment of cytogenetic damage and oxidative stress in personnel occupationally exposed to the pulsed microwave radiation of marine radar equipment. Internat J Hyg Environ Health 2011;214:59–65. [Crossref]

  • 76.

    Luukkonen J, Hakulinen P, Maki-Paakkanen J, Juutilainen J, Naarala J. Enhancement of chemically induced reactive oxygen species production and DNA damage in human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells by 872 MHz radiofrequency radiation. Mut Res 2009;662:54–8.

  • 77.

    Karaca E, Durmaz B, Altug H, Yildiz T, Guducu C, et al. The genotoxic effect of radiofrequency waves on mouse brain. J Neurooncol 2012;106:53–8. [Crossref]

  • 78.

    Zhao TY, Zou SP, Knapp PE. Exposure to cell phone radiation up-regulates apoptosis genes in prmary cultures of neurons and astrocytes. Neurosci Lett 2007;41:34–8. [Crossref]

  • 79.

    Sakurai T, Kiyokawa T, Narita E, Suzuki Y, Taki M, et al. Analysis of gene exptression in a human-derived glial cell line exposed to 2.45 GHz continuous radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. J Radiat Res 2011;52:185–92. [Crossref]

  • 80.

    Yan JG, Agresti M, Zhang LL, Yan Y, Mathoub HS. Upregulation of specific mRNA levels in rat brain after cell phone exposure. Electromag Biol Med 2008;27:147–54. [Crossref]

  • 81.

    Luo Q, Jiang Y, Jin M, Xu J, Huang HF. Proteomic analysis on the alteration of protein expression in the early-stage placental villous tissue of electromagnetic fields associated with cell phone exposure. Reprod Sci 2013;20:1055–61. [Crossref]

  • 82.

    Gerner C, Haudek V, Schandl U, Bayer E, Gundacker N, et al. Increased protein synthesis by cells exposed to a 1,800-MHz radio-frequency mobile phone electromagnetic field, detected by proteome profiling. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2010;83:691–702.

  • 83.

    Ruediger HW. Genotoxic effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. Pathophysiology 2009;16:89–102. [Crossref]

  • 84.

    Tice RR, Hook GG, Donner M, McRee DI, Guy AW. Genotoxicity of radiofrequency signals. I. Investigation of DNA damage and micronuclei induction in cultured human blood cells. Bioelectromagnetics 2002;23:113–26. [Crossref]

  • 85.

    Diem E, Schwarz C, Adkofer F, Jahn O, Rudiger H. Non-thermal DNA breakage by mobile-phone radiation (1800 MHz) in human fibroblasts and in transformed GFSH-R17 rat granulosa cells in vitro. Nut Res 2005;583:178–81.

  • 86.

    Xu S, Chan G, Chen C, Sum C, Zhang D, et al. Cell type-dependent induction of DNA damage by 1800 MHz radiofrequency electromagnetic fields does not result in significant cellular dysfunctions. PLoS One 2013;8:e54906. [Crossref]

  • 87.

    Markova E, Malmgren LOG, Belyaev IY. Microwave from mobile phones inhibit 53BP1 focus formation in human stem cells more strongly than in differentiated cells: possible mechanistic link to cancer risk. Environ Health Perspect 2010;118:394–9.

  • 88.

    Hoyto A, Juutilainen J, Naarala J. Ornithine decarboxylase activity is affected in primary astrocytes but not in secondary cell lines exposed to 872 MHz RF radiation. Int J Radiat Biol 2007;83:367–74.

  • 89.

    McNamee JP, Chauhan V. Radiofrequency radiation and gene/protein expression: a review. Rad Res 2009;172:265–87. [Crossref]

  • 90.

    Brusick D, Albertini R, McRee D, Peterson D, Williams G, et al. Genotoxicity of radiofrequency radiation. Enviorn Mol Mut 1998;32:1–16.

  • 91.

    Vignati M, Giuliani L. Radiofrequency exposure near high-voltage lines. Environ Health Perspect 1997;105(Suppl 6): 1563–73.

  • 92.

    Milham S, Morgan LL. A new electromagnetic exposure metric: high frequency voltage transients associated with increased cancer incidence in teachers in a California school. Am J Ind Med 2008;51:579–86. [Crossref]

  • 93.

    Markova E, Hillert L, Malmgren L, Persson BRR, Belyaev IY. Micowaves from GSM mobile telephones affect 53 BP1 and γ-HeAX foci in human lymphocytes from hypersensitive and healthy persons. Environ Health Perspect 2005;113:1172–7.

  • 94.

    Before the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California; Pacific Gas and Electric Company’s Response to Administrative Law Judge’s October 18, 2011 Ruling Directing it to File Clarifying Radio Frequency Information. November 1, 2011.

  • 95.

    Murrill BJ, Liu EC, Thompson RM II. Smart meter data: privacy and cybersecurity. Congressional Research Service: CRS Report for Congress. February 3, 2012.

  • 96.

    Khalid M, Mee T, Peyman A, Addison D, Caleron C, et al. Exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields from wireless computer networks: duty factor of Wi-Fi devices operating in schools. Prog Biophy Mol Biol 2011;107:412–20. [Crossref]

  • 97.

    Findlay RP, Dimbylow PJ. SAR in a child voxel phantom from exposure to wireless computer networks (Wi-Fi). Phys Med Biol 2010;55:N405-N411. [Crossref]

  • 98.

    Peyman A, Khalid M, Calderon C, Addison D, Mee T, et al. Assessment of exposure to electromagnetic fields from wireless computer networks (Wi-Fi) in schools: results of laboratory measurement. Health Phys 2011;100:594–612. [Crossref]

  • 99.

    Haumann T, Sierck P, Munzenberg U. HF-radiation of GSM cellular phone towers in residential areas. Proceedings of “Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields – 2nd International Workshop”. Rhodes, Greece 2002;7:327–33.

  • 100.

    Frei P, Mohler E, Neubauer G, Theis G, Burgi A, et al. Temporal and spatial variability of personal exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields. Environ Res 2009;109:770–85.

  • 101.

    ICNIRP. Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). Health Phy 1998:74:494–522.

  • 102.

    Radiation Protection Standard. Maximum exposure levels to radiofrequency fields 3 kHz to 300 GHz. Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency, Radiation Protection Series No. 3. 2008.

  • 103.

    Huss A, Egger M, Hug K, Huwiler-Munterner K, Roosli M. Source of funding and results of studies of health effects of mobile phone use: systematic review of experimental studies. Environ Health Perspec 2007;115:1–4.

  • 104.

    Ginsberg GL. Assessing cancer risks from short-term exposures in children. Risk Anal 2003;23:19–34. [Crossref]

  • 105.

    Pritchard C, Mayers A, Baldwin D. Changing patterns of neurological mortality in the 10 major developed countries – 1979–2010. Public Health 2013;127:357–68.

  • 106.

    American Academy of Environmental Medicine. Letter Concerning Proposed Decision of Commissioner Peevey (Mailed 11/22/2011) Before the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California on the proposed decision 11/03/014. Mailed January 19; 2012.

  • 107.

    American Academy of Pediatrics. Letter to The Honorable Dennis Kucinich. Dated December 12, 2012.

About the article

Corresponding author: David O. Carpenter, MD, 5 University Place, Room A217, Rensselaer, NY 12144, USA, Phone: +518-525-2660, Fax: +518-525-2665, E-mail:


Received: 2013-10-23

Accepted: 2013-11-07

Published Online: 2013-11-27

Published in Print: 2013-12-01


Citation Information: Reviews on Environmental Health, ISSN (Online) 2191-0308, ISSN (Print) 0048-7554, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2013-0016. Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Yusuf Olgar, Enis Hidisoglu, Murat Cenk Celen, Bilge Eren Yamasan, Piraye Yargicoglu, and Semir Ozdemir
International Journal of Radiation Biology, 2015, Page 1
[2]
Zhaopin Wang, Ying Fei, Hui Liu, Shuangshuang Zheng, Zheyuan Ding, Wen Jin, Yifeng Pan, Zexin Chen, Lijuan Wang, Guangdi Chen, Zhengping Xu, Yongjian Zhu, and Yunxian Yu
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 2015
[3]
Lisa Gherardini, Gastone Ciuti, Selene Tognarelli, and Caterina Cinti
International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2014, Volume 15, Number 4, Page 5366

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in