Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Reviews on Environmental Health

Editor-in-Chief: Carpenter, David O. / Sly, Peter

Editorial Board: Brugge, Doug / Edwards, John W. / Field, R.William / Garbisu, Carlos / Hales, Simon / Horowitz, Michal / Lawrence, Roderick / Maibach, H.I. / Shaw, Susan / Tao, Shu / Tchounwou, Paul B.

4 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 1.95

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.543
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.885

Online
ISSN
2191-0308
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 30, Issue 4

Issues

Increased mercury release from dental amalgam restorations after exposure to electromagnetic fields as a potential hazard for hypersensitive people and pregnant women

Ghazal Mortazavi / S.M.J. Mortazavi
  • Corresponding author
  • Ionizing and Non-ionizing Radiation Protection Research Center (INIRPRC), Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
  • Medical Physics and Medical Engineering Department, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2015-11-06 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2015-0017

Abstract

Over the past decades, the use of common sources of electromagnetic fields such as Wi-Fi routers and mobile phones has been increased enormously all over the world. There is ongoing concern that exposure to electromagnetic fields can lead to adverse health effects. It has recently been shown that even low doses of mercury are capable of causing toxicity. Therefore, efforts are initiated to phase down or eliminate the use of mercury amalgam in dental restorations. Increased release of mercury from dental amalgam restorations after exposure to electromagnetic fields such as those generated by MRI and mobile phones has been reported by our team and other researchers. We have recently shown that some of the papers which reported no increased release of mercury after MRI, may have some methodological errors. Although it was previously believed that the amount of mercury released from dental amalgam cannot be hazardous, new findings indicate that mercury, even at low doses, may cause toxicity. Based on recent epidemiological findings, it can be claimed that the safety of mercury released from dental amalgam fillings is questionable. Therefore, as some individuals tend to be hypersensitive to the toxic effects of mercury, regulatory authorities should re-assess the safety of exposure to electromagnetic fields in individuals with amalgam restorations. On the other hand, we have reported that increased mercury release after exposure to electromagnetic fields may be risky for the pregnant women. It is worth mentioning that as a strong positive correlation between maternal and cord blood mercury levels has been found in some studies, our findings regarding the effect of exposure to electromagnetic fields on the release of mercury from dental amalgam fillings lead us to this conclusion that pregnant women with dental amalgam fillings should limit their exposure to electromagnetic fields to prevent toxic effects of mercury in their fetuses. Based on these findings, as infants and children are more vulnerable to mercury exposures, and as some individuals are routinely exposed to different sources of electromagnetic fields, we possibly need a paradigm shift in evaluating the health effects of amalgam fillings.

Keywords: dental amalgam fillings; electromagnetic fields; hypersensitive people; mercury release; MRI; pregnancy

References

  • 1.

    Soussa E, Shalaby Y, Maria AM, Maria OM. Evaluation of oral tissue response and blood levels of mercury released from dental amalgam in rats. Arch Oral Biol 2013;58(8):981–8.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 2.

    Melchart D, Kohler W, Linde K, Zilker T, Kremers L, et al. Biomonitoring of mercury in patients with complaints attributed to dental amalgam, healthy amalgam bearers, and amalgam-free subjects: a diagnostic study. Clin Toxicol 2008;46(2):133–40.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 3.

    Pizzichini M, Fonzi M, Gasparoni A, Fonzi L. Salivary mercury levels in healthy donors with and without amalgam fillings. Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol 2000;42(2–3):88–93.Google Scholar

  • 4.

    Freden H, Hellden L, Milleding P. Mercury content in gingival tissues adjacent to amalgam fillings. Odontol Revy 1974;25(2):207–10.Google Scholar

  • 5.

    Zwicker JD, Dutton DJ, Emery JC. Longitudinal analysis of the association between removal of dental amalgam, urine mercury and 14 self-reported health symptoms. Environ Health 2014;13(1):95.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 6.

    Mortazavi SMJ, Motamedifar M, Namdari G, Taheri M, Mortazavi AR, et al. Non-linear adaptive phenomena which decrease the risk of infection after pre-exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Dose Response 2013;12(2):233–45.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 7.

    Mortazavi SMJ, Taeb S, Dehghan N. Alterations of visual reaction time and short term memory in military radar personnel. Iran J Public Health 2013;42(4):428–35.Google Scholar

  • 8.

    Mortazavi SMJ, Rouintan MS, Taeb S, Dehghan N, Ghaffarpanah AA, et al. Human short-term exposure to electromagnetic fields emitted by mobile phones decreases computer-assisted visual reaction time. Acta Neurol Belg 2012;112(2):171–5.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 9.

    Mortazavi SMJ, Mosleh-Shirazi MA, Tavassoli AR, Taheri M, Mehdizadeh AR, et al. Increased radioresistance to lethal doses of gamma rays in mice and rats after exposure to microwave radiation emitted by a GSM mobile phone simulator. Dose Response 2013;11(2):281–92.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 10.

    Mortazavi S, Mosleh-Shirazi M, Tavassoli A, Taheri M, Bagheri Z, et al. A comparative study on the increased radioresistance to lethal doses of gamma rays after exposure to microwave radiation and oral intake of flaxseed oil. Iran J Radiat Res 2011;9(1):9–14.Google Scholar

  • 11.

    Mortazavi SMJ, Habib A, Ganj-Karimi AH, Samimi-Doost R, Pour-Abedi A, et al. Alterations in TSH and thyroid hormones following mobile phone use. Oman Med J 2009;24:274–8.Google Scholar

  • 12.

    Mortazavi SMJ, Daiee E, Yazdi A, Khiabani K, Kavousi A, et al. Mercury release from dental amalgam restorations after magnetic resonance imaging and following mobile phone use. Pak J Biol Sci 2008;11(8):1142–6.Google Scholar

  • 13.

    Mortazavi SMJ, Ahmadi J, Shariati M. Prevalence of subjective poor health symptoms associated with exposure to electromagnetic fields among University students. Bioelectromagnetics 2007;28(4):326–30.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 14.

    Mortazavi SMJ. Safety issue of mobile phone base stations. J Biomed Phys Eng 2013;3(1):1–2.Google Scholar

  • 15.

    Mortazavi SMJ. Adaptive responses after exposure to cosmic and natural terrestrial radiation. Indian J Radiat Res 2004;1(1):104–12.Google Scholar

  • 16.

    Mortazavi SMJ, Tavasoli AR, Ranjbari F, Moamaei P. Effects of laptop computers’ electromagnetic field on sperm quality. J Reprod Fertil 2010;11(4):251–9.Google Scholar

  • 17.

    Mortazavi SM, Vazife-Doost S, Yaghooti M, Mehdizadeh S, Rajaie-Far A. Occupational exposure of dentists to electromagnetic fields produced by magnetostrictive cavitrons alters the serum cortisol level. J Nat Sci Biol Med 2012;3(1):60–4.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 18.

    Mortazavi SM, Daiee E, Yazdi A, Khiabani K, Kavousi A, et al. Mercury release from dental amalgam restorations after magnetic resonance imaging and following mobile phone use. Pak J Biol Sci 2008;11(8):1142–6.Google Scholar

  • 19.

    Mortazavi SMJ, Neghab M, Anoosheh SMH, Bahaeddini N, Mortazavi G, et al. High-field MRI and Mercury release from dental amalgam fillings. Int J Occup Environ Med 2014;5(2): 101–5.Google Scholar

  • 20.

    Zhang Y, Li Z, Gao Y, Zhang C. Effects of fetal microwave radiation exposure on offspring behavior in mice. J Radiat Res 2015;56(2):261–8.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 21.

    Tang J, Zhang Y, Yang L, Chen Q, Tan L, et al. Exposure to 900 MHz electromagnetic fields activates the mkp-1/ERK pathway and causes blood-brain barrier damage and cognitive impairment in rats. Brain Res 2015;1601:92–101.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 22.

    Urbinello D, Joseph W, Verloock L, Martens L, Roosli M. Temporal trends of radio-frequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) exposure in everyday environments across European cities. Environ Res 2014;134:134–42.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 23.

    Sadetzki S, Langer CE, Bruchim R, Kundi M, Merletti F, et al. The MOBI-Kids study protocol: challenges in assessing childhood and adolescent exposure to electromagnetic fields from wireless telecommunication technologies and possible association with brain tumor risk. Front Public Health 2014;2:124.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 24.

    Fiocchi S, Parazzini M, Liorni I, Samaras T, Ravazzani P. Temperature increase in the fetus exposed to UHF RFID readers. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2014;61(7):2011–9.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 25.

    Hardell L, Sage C. Biological effects from electromagnetic field exposure and public exposure standards. Biomed Pharmacother 2008;62(2):104–9.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 26.

    Mortazavi SMJ, Mortazavi G. Effects of X-rays and magnetic resonance imaging on mercury release from dental amalgam into artificial saliva. Oral Radiol 2015:31(3):199–200.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 27.

    Avoaka-Boni MC, Adou-Assoumou NM, Sinan AA, Abouattier-Mansilla EC. [Dental amalgams and mercury polemic in Abidjan]. Odontostomatol Trop 2007;30(120):7–14.Google Scholar

  • 28.

    Prochazkova J, Podzimek S, Tomka M, Kucerova H, Mihaljevic M, et al. Metal alloys in the oral cavity as a cause of oral discomfort in sensitive patients. Neuro Endocrinol Lett 2006;27(Suppl 1):53–8.Google Scholar

  • 29.

    Yilmaz S, Misirlioglu M. The effect of 3 T MRI on microleakage of amalgam restorations. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2013;42(8):20130072.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 30.

    Shahidi SH, Bronoosh P, Alavi AA, Zamiri B, Sadeghi AR, et al. Effect of magnetic resonance imaging on microleakage of amalgam restorations: an in vitro study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009;38(7):470–4.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 31.

    Roulet JF. Benefits and disadvantages of tooth-coloured alternatives to amalgam. J Dent 1997;25(6):459–73.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 32.

    Clarkson TW, Magos L, Myers GJ. The toxicology of mercury–current exposures and clinical manifestations. N Engl J Med 2003;349(18):1731–7.Google Scholar

  • 33.

    Taut C. Dental amalgam: is this the end? J Conserv Dent 2013;59(6):311–7.Google Scholar

  • 34.

    Ucar Y, Brantley WA. Biocompatibility of dental amalgams. Int J Dent 2011;2011:981595.Google Scholar

  • 35.

    Mutter J. Is dental amalgam safe for humans? The opinion of the scientific committee of the European Commission. J Occup Med Toxicol 2011;6(1):2.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 36.

    Palkovicova L, Ursinyova M, Masanova V, Yu Z, Hertz-Picciotto I. Maternal amalgam dental fillings as the source of mercury exposure in developing fetus and newborn. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2008;18(3):326–31.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 37.

    Luglie PF, Campus G, Chessa G, Spano G, Capobianco G, et al. Effect of amalgam fillings on the mercury concentration in human amniotic fluid. Arch Gynecol obstet 2005;271(2): 138–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 38.

    Bjornberg KA, Vahter M, Petersson-Grawe K, Glynn A, Cnattingius S, et al. Methyl mercury and inorganic mercury in Swedish pregnant women and in cord blood: influence of fish consumption. Environ Health Persp 2003;111(4):637–41.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 39.

    Drasch G, Schupp I, Hofl H, Reinke R, Roider G. Mercury burden of human fetal and infant tissues. Eur J Pediatr 1994;153(8):607–10.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 40.

    Holmes AS, Blaxill MF, Haley BE. Reduced levels of mercury in first baby haircuts of autistic children. Int J Toxicol 2003;22(4):277–85.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 41.

    Homme KG, Kern JK, Haley BE, Geier DA, King PG, et al. New science challenges old notion that mercury dental amalgam is safe. Biometals 2014;27(1):19–24.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 42.

    Herbert MR, Sage C. Autism and EMF? Plausibility of a pathophysiological link – Part I. Pathophysiology 2013;20(3):191–209.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 43.

    Herbert MR, Sage C. Autism and EMF? Plausibility of a pathophysiological link part II. Pathophysiology 2013;20(3):211–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 44.

    Geier DA, Kern JK, Geier MR. A prospective study of prenatal mercury exposure from maternal dental amalgams and autism severity. Acta Neurobiol Exp 2009;69(2):189–97.Google Scholar

  • 45.

    Mutter J, Naumann J, Schneider R, Walach H, Haley B. Mercury and autism: accelerating evidence? Neuro Endocrinol Lett 2005;26(5):439–46.Google Scholar

  • 46.

    Obrenovich ME, Shola D, Schroedel K, Agrahari A, Lonsdale D. The role of trace elements, thiamin (e) and transketolase in autism and autistic spectrum disorder. Front Biosci 2015;7:229–41.Google Scholar

  • 47.

    Mortazavi G, Haghani M, Rastegarian N, Zarei S, Mortazavi S. Increased release of mercury from dental amalgam fillings due to maternal exposure to electromagnetic fields as a possible mechanism for the high rates of autism in the offspring: introducing a hypothesis. J Biomed Phys Eng 2015, in press.Google Scholar

  • 48.

    Chen Z, Myers R, Wei T, Bind E, Kassim P, et al. Placental transfer and concentrations of cadmium, mercury, lead, and selenium in mothers, newborns, and young children. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2014;24(5):537–44.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 49.

    Kursun S, Öztas B, Atas H, Tastekin M. Effects of X-rays and magnetic resonance imaging on mercury release from dental amalgam into artificial saliva. Oral Radiol 2014;30(2):142–6.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Corresponding author: Professor S.M.J. Mortazavi, PhD, Medical Physics and Medical Engineering Department, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran, Phone: +98-711-2349332, Fax: +98-711-2349332/+98-711-2289113, E-mail: ; and Ionizing and Non-ionizing Radiation Protection Research Center (INIRPRC), Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran


Received: 2015-07-12

Accepted: 2015-10-03

Published Online: 2015-11-06

Published in Print: 2015-12-01


Conflicts of interest statement: None declared.


Citation Information: Reviews on Environmental Health, Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages 287–292, ISSN (Online) 2191-0308, ISSN (Print) 0048-7554, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2015-0017.

Export Citation

©2015 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Giuseppe Genchi, Maria Sinicropi, Alessia Carocci, Graziantonio Lauria, and Alessia Catalano
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2017, Volume 14, Number 7, Page 761
[2]
S. Mortazavi, Ghazal Mortazavi, and Maryam Paknahad
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2017, Volume 14, Number 7, Page 733
[3]
S. Mortazavi, Ghazal Mortazavi, and Maryam Paknahad
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2017, Volume 14, Number 5, Page 481
[4]
Danize Aparecida Rizzetti, João Guilherme Dini Torres, Alyne Goulart Escobar, Taiz Martins da Silva, Paola Zambelli Moraes, Raquel Hernanz, Franck Maciel Peçanha, Marta Miguel Castro, Dalton Valentim Vassallo, Mercedes Salaices, Maria Jesús Alonso, and Giulia Alessandra Wiggers
Environmental Research, 2017, Volume 155, Page 182
[5]
SMJ Mortazavi, Ghazal Mortazavi, and Maryam Paknahad
Workplace Health & Safety, 2017, Volume 65, Number 2, Page 52
[6]
Seyed Mohammad Javad Mortazavi, Ghazal Mortazavi, and Maryam Paknahad
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2017, Volume 24, Number 9, Page 8889
[7]
Terence E. Donovan, Riccardo Marzola, Kevin R. Murphy, David R. Cagna, Frederick Eichmiller, James R. McKee, James E. Metz, and Jean-Pierre Albouy
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2016, Volume 116, Number 5, Page 663
[8]
Seyed Mohammad Javad Mortazavi, Ghazal Mortazavi, and Maryam Paknahad
Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 2016, Volume 44, Number 5, Page 512
[9]
S. M. J. Mortazavi, Ghazal Mortazavi, S. A. R. Mortazavi, and Maryam Paknahad
Biological Trace Element Research, 2017, Volume 176, Number 1, Page 37
[10]
Maryam Paknahad, S. M. J. Mortazavi, Shoaleh Shahidi, Ghazal Mortazavi, and Masoud Haghani
Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, 2016, Volume 14, Number 1
[11]
Fahad Khaliq, Nadeem Afzal, Muhammad Kashif, and Faheem Shahzad
Journal of Oral Research, 2016, Volume 5, Number 4, Page 153
[13]
S.M.J. Mortazavi, Ghazal Mortazavi, and Maryam Paknahad
Environmental Research, 2016, Volume 150, Page 652
[14]
S. M. J. Mortazavi, G. Mortazavi, and M. Paknahad
Journal of Endocrinological Investigation, 2016, Volume 39, Number 11, Page 1363
[15]
S. M. J. Mortazavi, Ghazal Mortazavi, and Maryam Paknahad
The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 2017, Volume 30, Number 5, Page 594
[16]
S. M. J. Mortazavi, Ghazal Mortazavi, and Maryam Paknahad
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2016, Volume 23, Number 12, Page 12480
[18]
S.M.J. Mortazavi, Ghazal Mortazavi, and Maryam Paknahad
Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2016, Volume 310, Page 278

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in