Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Reviews on Environmental Health

Editor-in-Chief: Carpenter, David O. / Sly, Peter

Editorial Board Member: Brugge, Doug / Diaz-Barriga, Fernando / Edwards, John W. / Field, R.William / Hales, Simon / Horowitz, Michal / Maibach, H.I. / Shaw, Susan / Stein, Renato / Tao, Shu / Tchounwou, Paul B.

4 Issues per year


SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.776
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.676
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 1.795

Online
ISSN
2191-0308
See all formats and pricing
Volume 31, Issue 2 (Jun 2016)

Issues

Epidemiology of musculoskeletal injury in the California film and motion picture industry

Nicholas A. Kusnezov
  • Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center – Orthopedics Texas, TX, USA
/ Hamed Yazdanshenas
  • UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
/ Eddie Garcia
  • New Jersey Medical School, NJ, USA
/ Arya N. Shamie
  • Corresponding author
  • Orthopaedic Spine Surgery, UCLA School of Medicine; Professor (Hon.), Zhejiang University, China; and Expert Reviewer, Medical Board of CA
  • Email:
Published Online: 2016-01-20 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2015-0023

Abstract

Introduction: Musculoskeletal injury exerts a significant burden on US industry. The purpose of this study was to investigate the frequency and characteristics of musculoskeletal injuries in the California (CA) film and motion picture (FMP) industry which may result in unforeseen morbidity and mortality.

Methods: We reviewed the workers’ compensation (WC) claims database of the Workers’ Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau of California (WCIRB) and employment statistics through the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). We analyzed the frequency, type, body part affected, and cause of musculoskeletal injuries.

Results: From 2003 to 2009, there were 3505 WC claims of which 94.4% were musculoskeletal. In the CA FMP industry, the most common injuries were strains (38.4%), sprains (12.2%), and fractures (11.7%). The most common sites of isolated injury were the knee (18.9%), lower back (15.0%), and ankle (8.6%). Isolated musculoskeletal spine injuries represented 19.3% of all injuries. The most common causes of injury were work-directed activity (36.0%) and falls (25.5%).

Conclusion: We present the first report on the unique profile of musculoskeletal injury claims in the FMP industry. This data provides direction for improvement of workplace safety.

Keywords: California; film and motion picture industry; musculoskeletal injury; workers’ compensation

References

  • 1.

    Allen H, Hubbard D, Sullivan S. The burden of pain on employee health and productivity at a major provider of business services. J Occup Environ Med 2005;47(7):658–70.

  • 2.

    Lin R-T, Chan C-C. Effectiveness of workstation design on reducing musculoskeletal risk factors and symptoms among semiconductor fabrication room workers. Int J Ind Ergonom 2007;37(1):35–42. [Web of Science]

  • 3.

    Jenkins L, Webb T, Browne N, Afifi AA, Kraus J. An Evaluation of the Motion Picture Association of America’s Treatment of Violence in PG-, PG-13–, and R-Rated Films. Pediatrics 2005;115(5):e512–e7.

  • 4.

    Escorpizo R. Understanding work productivity and its application to work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Int J Ind Ergonom 2008;38(3):291–7. [Web of Science]

  • 5.

    Kominski GF, Pourat N, Roby DH, Cameron ME. Return to work and degree of recovery among injured workers in California’s Workers’ Compensation system. J Occup Environ Med 2008;50(3):296–305. [Web of Science]

  • 6.

    Leigh JP, McCurdy SA. Differences in workers’ compensation disability and impairment ratings under old and new California law. J Occup Environ Med 2006;48(4):419–25.

  • 7.

    Pourat N, Kominski G, Roby D, Cameron M. Physician perceptions of access to quality care in California’s workers’ compensation system. J Occup Environ Med 2007;49(6): 618–25.

  • 8.

    Kochanek K, Hudson B. Advance report of final mortality statistics. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, CDC, Hyattsville, MD, 1995.

  • 9.

    Combs D, Parrish R, Ing R. Death Investigation in the United States and Canada. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, cdc, Hyattsville, MD, 1990.

  • 10.

    Conroy C. Movie Production and Television Production Work-related Deaths between 1980–1985. National Traumatic Occupational Fatality Database, Division of Safety Research, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, WV, 1988.

  • 11.

    Motion Picture, Commercial, or Television Production Statistics Overview between 2006–2010. Workers’ Compensation Board of British Columbia, Vancouver, 2010.

  • 12.

    Fan J, McLeod CB, Koehoorn M. Descriptive epidemiology of serious work-related injuries in British Columbia, Canada. PloS one 2012;7(6):e38750.

  • 13.

    Hu K, Rahmandad H, Smith-Jackson T, Winchester W. Factors influencing the risk of falls in the construction industry: a review of the evidence. Construction Management and Economics 2011;29(4):397–416.

  • 14.

    Van der Molen HF, Frings-Dresen MH. Strategies to reduce safety violations for working from heights in construction companies: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC public health 2014;14(1):541. [Web of Science]

  • 15.

    Mroz TM, Carlini AR, Archer KR, Wegener ST, Hoolachan JI, et al. Frequency and cost of claims by injury type from a state workers’ compensation fund from 1998 through 2008. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2014;95(6):1048–54. e6. [Web of Science]

  • 16.

    Virkki H. Stunts, scenes and safety: introduction to movie stunts. Finland: Klaava Media, 2015.

  • 17.

    Robb G, Sultana S, Ameratunga S, Jackson R. A systematic review of epidemiological studies investigating risk factors for work-related road traffic crashes and injuries. Injury prevention 2008;14(1):51–8.

  • 18.

    Neumark D. The workers compensation crisis in California. California Public Policy 2005;1:1–19.

  • 19.

    Butler RJ, Gardner HH, Kleinman NL. Workers’ compensation: occupational injury insurance’s influence on the workplace. Handbook of insurance. New York: Springer, 2013:449–69.

  • 20.

    Quigley P, Bulat T, Kurtzman E, Olney R, Powell-Cope G, Rubenstein L. Fall prevention and injury protection for nursing home residents. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2010;11(4):284–93.

  • 21.

    Hymel PA, Loeppke RR, Baase CM, Burton WN, Hartenbaum NP, et al. Workplace health protection and promotion: a new pathway for a healthier – and safer – workforce. J Occup Environ Med 2011;53(6):695–702.

  • 22.

    Da Costa BR, Vieira ER. Risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review of recent longitudinal studies. Am J Ind Med 2010;53(3):285–323. [Web of Science]

  • 23.

    Bigos SJ, Holland J, Holland C, Webster JS, Battie M, et al. High-quality controlled trials on preventing episodes of back problems: systematic literature review in working-age adults. Spine J 2009;9(2):147–68. [Web of Science]

  • 24.

    Bell JA, Burnett A. Exercise for the primary, secondary and tertiary prevention of low back pain in the workplace: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil 2009;19(1):8–24. [Web of Science]

  • 25.

    Sengupta I, Reno VP, Burton Jr JF, Baldwin ML. Workers’ compensation: Benefits, coverage, and costs. Washington, DC: National Academy of Social Insurance, 2012.

  • 26.

    Tullar JM, Brewer S, Amick III BC, Irvin E, Mahood Q, et al. Occupational safety and health interventions to reduce musculoskeletal symptoms in the health care sector. J Occup Rehabil 2010;20(2):199–219. [Web of Science]

  • 27.

    Yassi A, Lockhart K. Work-relatedness of low back pain in nursing personnel: a systematic review. Int J Occup Environ Health 2013;19(3):223–44. [Web of Science]

About the article

Corresponding author: Arya N. Shamie, Orthopaedic Spine Surgery, UCLA School of Medicine; Professor (Hon.), Zhejiang University, China; and Expert Reviewer, Medical Board of CA, E-mail:


Received: 2015-08-07

Accepted: 2015-11-16

Published Online: 2016-01-20

Published in Print: 2016-06-01


Citation Information: Reviews on Environmental Health, ISSN (Online) 2191-0308, ISSN (Print) 0048-7554, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2015-0023. Export Citation

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in