Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Reviews in the Neurosciences

Editor-in-Chief: Huston, Joseph P.

Editorial Board: Topic, Bianca / Adeli, Hojjat / Buzsaki, Gyorgy / Crawley, Jacqueline / Crow, Tim / Gold, Paul / Holsboer, Florian / Korth, Carsten / Lubec, Gert / McEwen, Bruce / Pan, Weihong / Pletnikov, Mikhail / Robbins, Trevor / Schnitzler, Alfons / Stevens, Charles / Steward, Oswald / Trojanowski, John

8 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 2.590
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 3.078

CiteScore 2017: 2.81

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.980
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.804

Online
ISSN
2191-0200
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 22, Issue 5

Issues

Performance monitoring at the task and the response level

Charlotte Desmet
  • Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
  • Ghent Institute for Functional and Metabolic Imaging of the Brain, Ghent University, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Wim Fias
  • Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
  • Ghent Institute for Functional and Metabolic Imaging of the Brain, Ghent University, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Marcel Brass
  • Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
  • Ghent Institute for Functional and Metabolic Imaging of the Brain, Ghent University, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2011-09-02 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/RNS.2011.040

Abstract

How errors and conflict are processed in the human brain, has been extensively investigated over the last decades. In this review, we argue that error research has mainly focused on one type of errors, namely errors at the response level. Furthermore, research on conflict and errors has primarily used a very restricted set of experimental paradigms, raising the question as to whether the results from this research can be generalized to other forms of errors and conflict. We thus argue to approach errors and conflict from a broader perspective.

Keywords: conflict; error; SRC task; task and response level

About the article

Received: 2011-05-26

Accepted: 2011-07-05

Published Online: 2011-09-02

Published in Print: 2011-10-01


Citation Information: Reviews in the Neurosciences, Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages 575–581, ISSN (Online) 2191-0200, ISSN (Print) 0334-1763, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/RNS.2011.040.

Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Jan R. Wessel
Psychophysiology, 2017, Page e13041

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in