Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Reviews in the Neurosciences

Editor-in-Chief: Huston, Joseph P.

Editorial Board: Topic, Bianca / Adeli, Hojjat / Buzsaki, Gyorgy / Crawley, Jacqueline / Crow, Tim / Gold, Paul / Holsboer, Florian / Korth, Carsten / Lubec, Gert / McEwen, Bruce / Pan, Weihong / Pletnikov, Mikhail / Robbins, Trevor / Schnitzler, Alfons / Stevens, Charles / Steward, Oswald / Trojanowski, John

8 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 2.590
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 3.078

CiteScore 2017: 2.81

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.980
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.804

Online
ISSN
2191-0200
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 24, Issue 1

Issues

Spatial frequencies and emotional perception

Andrea De Cesarei
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, Viale Berti Pichat, 5, I-40127 Bologna, Italy
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Maurizio Codispoti
  • Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, Viale Berti Pichat, 5, I-40127 Bologna, Italy
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2012-11-19 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/revneuro-2012-0053

Abstract

It has been suggested that, during evolution, specific mechanisms developed in order to optimize the detection of threats and opportunities even in perceptually degraded conditions. A naturalistic example of perceptual degradation can be found in blurry images, which contain the coarsest elements of a scene (low spatial frequencies) but lack the fine-grained details (high spatial frequencies). In the past decade, several studies have examined the relation between spatial frequencies and emotions, using a variety of methods, stimuli, and rationales. Here, we conduct a literature survey on the studies that have examined the relation between emotion and spatial frequencies. Some studies have suggested that the low spatial frequencies of emotional stimuli may be processed by a subcortical neural pathway, eventually eliciting emotional responses. However, the evidence provided by the reviewed studies does not support this possibility, for conceptual and methodological reasons (e.g., mistaking the processing of a fuzzy stimulus for subcortical processing). Here, the conceptual and methodological problems present in the reviewed studies are analyzed and discussed, along with suggestions for future research.

Keywords: amygdala; emotion; scene identification; spatial frequencies; visual cortex

About the article

Andrea De Cesarei

Andrea De Cesarei is postdoctoral research fellow at the Department of Psychology of the University of Bologna. His main research interests involve the relationships between perception and emotional responses.

Maurizio Codispoti

Maurizio Codispoti is Professor of Psychology at the Department of Psychology of the University of Bologna, and Director of the Emotional Perception Laboratory. His research focuses on emotion, perception and memory, using a multi-method approach, and includes measures of emotion experience, expressive behavior, autonomic physiology, and brain activation.


Corresponding author: Andrea De Cesarei, Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, Viale Berti Pichat, 5, I-40127 Bologna, Italy


Received: 2012-07-10

Accepted: 2012-08-08

Published Online: 2012-11-19

Published in Print: 2013-02-01


Citation Information: Reviews in the Neurosciences, Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages 89–104, ISSN (Online) 2191-0200, ISSN (Print) 0334-1763, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/revneuro-2012-0053.

Export Citation

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Kirsten Petras, Sanne ten ten Oever, Christianne Jacobs, and Valerie Goffaux
NeuroImage, 2019, Volume 186, Page 103
[2]
Claudia Menzel, Christoph Redies, and Gregor U. Hayn-Leichsenring
Acta Psychologica, 2018, Volume 188, Page 74
[3]
Shan Wang, Christopher Eccleston, and Edmund Keogh
PAIN, 2017, Volume 158, Number 11, Page 2233
[4]
Nicolas Burra, Alexis Hervais-Adelman, Alessia Celeghin, Beatrice de Gelder, and Alan J. Pegna
Neuropsychologia, 2017
[5]
Edwin J. Burns, Joel Martin, Alice H.D. Chan, and Hong Xu
Neuropsychologia, 2017, Volume 102, Page 217
[7]
Andrea De Cesarei, Geoffrey R. Loftus, Serena Mastria, and Maurizio Codispoti
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 2017, Volume 74, Page 44
[8]
Andrea De Cesarei, Serena Mastria, Maurizio Codispoti, and Francesco Di Russo
PLoS ONE, 2013, Volume 8, Number 5, Page e65103
[10]
Jenny Kokinous, Alessandro Tavano, Sonja A. Kotz, and Erich Schröger
Biological Psychology, 2017, Volume 123, Page 155
[11]
Yunzhe Liu, Dandan Zhang, Yanli Zhao, Shuping Tan, and Yuejia Luo
Scientific Reports, 2016, Volume 6, Number 1
[12]
Gewnhi Park, Michael W. Vasey, Grace Kim, Dixie D. Hu, and Julian F. Thayer
Frontiers in Psychology, 2016, Volume 7
[13]
Tamara J. Sussman, Anna Weinberg, Akos Szekely, Greg Hajcak, and Aprajita Mohanty
Cerebral Cortex, 2016, Page bhw104
[14]
Shan Wang, Christopher Eccleston, and Edmund Keogh
PAIN, 2015, Volume 156, Number 9, Page 1670
[15]
Zhengang Lu, Bingbing Guo, Anne Boguslavsky, Marcus Cappiello, Weiwei Zhang, and Ming Meng
Frontiers in Psychology, 2015, Volume 6
[17]
Vladimir Miskovic, Jasna Martinovic, Matthias J. Wieser, Nathan M. Petro, Margaret M. Bradley, and Andreas Keil
Biological Psychology, 2015, Volume 106, Page 11

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in