Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Reviews in the Neurosciences

Editor-in-Chief: Huston, Joseph P.

Editorial Board: Topic, Bianca / Adeli, Hojjat / Buzsaki, Gyorgy / Crawley, Jacqueline / Crow, Tim / Gold, Paul / Holsboer, Florian / Korth, Carsten / Lubec, Gert / McEwen, Bruce / Pan, Weihong / Pletnikov, Mikhail / Robbins, Trevor / Schnitzler, Alfons / Stevens, Charles / Steward, Oswald / Trojanowski, John

8 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 2.590
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 3.078

CiteScore 2017: 2.81

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.980
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.804

Online
ISSN
2191-0200
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 24, Issue 1

Issues

Aversive motivation and the maintenance of monogamous pair bonding

Shanna L. Resendez / Brandon J. Aragona
  • Corresponding author
  • Program in Neuroscience, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
  • Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2012-12-21 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/revneuro-2012-0068

Abstract

Social bonds are important for human health and well-being, and a crucial component of these bonds is the ability to maintain a bond once it has been formed. Importantly, although bond maintenance is required for social attachments, very little is known about the neural mechanisms that mediate this behavior. Recently, laboratory studies utilizing the socially monogamous prairie vole (an excellent animal model for the neurobiology of selective social attachment), have allowed the neural correlates of selective social attachment to begin to unfold. These studies have identified that the activation of both motivational and hedonic processing systems, which mediate other natural rewards, is also important for mediating social behaviors that are characteristic of an established pair bond. These social behaviors include appetitive and positive social interactions with a potential mating partner in sexually naïve prairie voles, the avoidance of novel conspecifics (and sometimes aggressive rejection) that characterizes the established pair bond and, finally, an aversion towards partner separation. The following review will discuss how a balance between opposing endogenous opioid systems – positive (mu-opiod receptors) and aversive (kappa-opioid receptors) – provide essential hedonic signaling that guides socially motivated behaviors.

Keywords: nucleus accumbens shell; opioids; pair bond; prairie voles; social attachment

About the article

Shanna L. Resendez

Dr. Resendez began exploring her interests in the neurobiology of social bonding as an undergraduate student at the University of California, Davis. As a student at UC Davis, she had the opportunity to work in the laboratory of Dr. Karen Bales. Dr. Bales is an expert in the development and evolution of social bonding and under her mentorship, Dr. Resendez gained experience running behavioral assays of social bonding. This experience sparked her interest in the neural processes that guide socially motivated behavior. She therefore pursued her graduate studies with Dr. Brandon Aragona at the University of Michigan – an expert in the neurobiology of social attachment and motivated behavior. In the laboratory of Dr. Aragona, she currently works on projects designed to elucidate how interactions between motivational and hedonic processing systems mediate social decision making, especially in relation to attachment formation and maintenance. Dr. Resendez believes that this research is of great importance to human health as the disruption of significant social bonds has been shown to have profound impacts on mental health.

Brandon J. Aragona

Dr. Aragona began his interest in the neurobiology of motivation by studying the neuroscience of social attachment in prairie voles in Zuoxin Wang’s lab at the Florida State University. He then did his post-doctoral work with Mark Wightman and Gina Carelli at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Since starting his lab at the University of Michigan, Dr. Aragona has continued this work with a particular focus on how social bonding is mediated by aversive motivation. More detail about Dr. Aragona’s lab can be found at www.aragonalab.com.


Corresponding authors: Shanna L. Resendez and Brandon J. Aragona, Program in Neuroscience, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA


Received: 2012-08-10

Accepted: 2012-09-08

Published Online: 2012-12-21

Published in Print: 2013-02-01


Citation Information: Reviews in the Neurosciences, Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages 51–60, ISSN (Online) 2191-0200, ISSN (Print) 0334-1763, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/revneuro-2012-0068.

Export Citation

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Hasse Walum and Larry J. Young
Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2018
[2]
Pierre-Eric Lutz, Philippe Courtet, and Raffaella Calati
Journal of Neuroscience Research, 2018
[3]
Allison M. Perkeybile and Karen L. Bales
The Journal of Experimental Biology, 2017, Volume 220, Number 1, Page 114
[5]
Giovanni Laviola, Francesca Zoratto, Danilo Ingiosi, Valentina Carito, Damien Huzard, Marco Fiore, Simone Macrì, and Alexandra Kavushansky
PLOS ONE, 2017, Volume 12, Number 12, Page e0188907
[7]
Pierre-Eric Lutz, Jeffrey A. Gross, Sabine K. Dhir, Gilles Maussion, Jennie Yang, Alexandre Bramoulle, Michael J. Meaney, and Gustavo Turecki
Biological Psychiatry, 2017
[8]
Marta Fernández, Irene Mollinedo-Gajate, and Olga Peñagarikano
Neuroscience, 2017
[9]
Katie Hinde, Chelsea Muth, Nicole Maninger, Benjamin J. Ragen, Rebecca H. Larke, Michael R. Jarcho, Sally P. Mendoza, William A. Mason, Emilio Ferrer, Simon R. Cherry, Marina L. Fisher-Phelps, and Karen L. Bales
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 2016, Volume 10
[10]
[11]
Christine J. Delevan, Natalia A. Rodriguez, Karine M. Legzim, Fayeza Aliou, Jamie T. Parker, and Maryam Bamshad
Current Zoology, 2016, Page zow087
[12]
Shanna L Resendez, Piper C Keyes, Jeremy J Day, Caely Hambro, Curtis J Austin, Francis K Maina, Lori N Eidson, Kirsten A Porter-Stransky, Natalie Nevárez, J William McLean, Morgan A Kuhnmuench, Anne Z Murphy, Tiffany A Mathews, and Brandon J Aragona
eLife, 2016, Volume 5
[13]
Ting Yee Lim, Mohammed Azmi Al-Betar, and Ahamad Tajudin Khader
Expert Systems with Applications, 2016, Volume 54, Page 241
[14]
Margaret C. Wardle, Anya K. Bershad, and Harriet de Wit
Social Neuroscience, 2016, Volume 11, Number 6, Page 579
[15]
Nora H. Prior, Kang Nian Yap, Hans H. Adomat, Mark C. Mainwaring, H. Bobby Fokidis, Emma S. Guns, Katherine L. Buchanan, Simon C. Griffith, and Kiran K. Soma
Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 2016, Volume 202, Number 1, Page 35
[16]
Oliver J. Bosch, Joanna Dabrowska, Meera E. Modi, Zachary V. Johnson, Alaine C. Keebaugh, Catherine E. Barrett, Todd H. Ahern, JiDong Guo, Valery Grinevich, Donald G. Rainnie, Inga D. Neumann, and Larry J. Young
Psychoneuroendocrinology, 2016, Volume 64, Page 66
[17]
Jon Cavanaugh, Michelle C. Huffman, April M. Harnisch, and Jeffrey A. French
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 2015, Volume 9
[18]
Tomica D. Blocker and Alexander G. Ophir
Animal Behaviour, 2015, Volume 108, Page 1
[19]
Aaryn C. Mustoe, Jon Cavanaugh, April M. Harnisch, Breanna E. Thompson, and Jeffrey A. French
Hormones and Behavior, 2015, Volume 71, Page 83
[21]
Zachary V Johnson and Larry J Young
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 2015, Volume 3, Page 38
[22]
Guro E. Loseth, Dan-Mikael Ellingsen, and Siri Leknes
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 2014, Volume 8
[24]
Mayada Akil and Amit Etkin
Academic Psychiatry, 2014, Volume 38, Number 2, Page 116

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in