Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Reviews in the Neurosciences

Editor-in-Chief: Huston, Joseph P.

Editorial Board: Topic, Bianca / Adeli, Hojjat / Buzsaki, Gyorgy / Crawley, Jacqueline / Crow, Tim / Gold, Paul / Holsboer, Florian / Korth, Carsten / Lubec, Gert / McEwen, Bruce / Pan, Weihong / Pletnikov, Mikhail / Robbins, Trevor / Schnitzler, Alfons / Stevens, Charles / Steward, Oswald / Trojanowski, John

8 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 2.546
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 3.191

CiteScore 2017: 2.81

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.980
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.804

Online
ISSN
2191-0200
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 29, Issue 1

Issues

Computerized neurocognitive interventions in the context of the brain training controversy

Rebeca Isabel García-Betances
  • Corresponding author
  • Life Supporting Technologies (LifeSTech), Superior Technical School of Telecommunications Engineers (ETSIT), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), Av. Complutense no. 30, Ciudad Universitaria, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ María Fernanda Cabrera-Umpiérrez
  • Life Supporting Technologies (LifeSTech), Superior Technical School of Telecommunications Engineers (ETSIT), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), Av. Complutense no. 30, Ciudad Universitaria, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ María T. Arredondo
  • Life Supporting Technologies (LifeSTech), Superior Technical School of Telecommunications Engineers (ETSIT), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), Av. Complutense no. 30, Ciudad Universitaria, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2017-08-19 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/revneuro-2017-0031

Abstract

This article presents, in the form of an analytic narrative review, a complete picture of the state-of-the-art, challenges, and perspectives in the field of information and communication technology (ICT)-based neurocognitive interventions for older adults. The narrative particularly focuses on applications aimed at mild cognitive impairment and similar age-related cognitive deficits, which are analyzed in the context of the brain training controversy. Clarifying considerations are provided about the nature and present extent of the brain training debate, regarding the possible influence it has on the support received by research and development initiatives dealing with innovative computerized neurocognitive interventions. It is recommended that, because of the preliminary nature of most data currently available in this area, further research initiatives must be supported in the quest for better effectiveness of computer-based interventions intended for age-related cognitive impairment. The conclusion suggests that advanced ICT-based tools, such as virtual and augmented reality technologies, are the most fitting platforms for applying nonpharmacological computerized neurocognitive interventions.

Keywords: computerized cognitive training; mild cognitive impairment; noninvasive cognitive interventions; virtual reality

References

  • Allaire, J.C., Bäckman, L., Balota, D.A., Bavelier, D., Bjork, R.A., and Bower, G.H. (2014). A consensus on the brain training industry from the scientific community. Max Planck Institute for Human Development and Stanford Center on Longevity. Available at: http://longevity.stanford.edu/a-consensus-on-the-brain-training-industry-from-the-scientific-community-2/. Accessed 2 May 2017.

  • Alzheimer’s Association. (2017). Alzheimer’s Association Report: 2017 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimer’s Dementia 13, 325–373.Google Scholar

  • Anguera, J.A., Boccanfuso, J., Rintoul, J.L., Al-Hashimi, O., Faraji, F., Janowich, J., Kong, E., Larraburo, Y., Rolle, C., Johnston, E., et al. (2013). Video game training enhances cognitive control in older adults. Nature 501, 97–101.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Ball, K., Berch, D.B., Helmers, K.F., Jobe, J.B., Leveck, M.D., Marsiske, M., Morris, J.N., Rebok, G.W., Smith, D.M., Tennstedt, S.L., et al. (2002). Effects of cognitive training interventions with older adults: a randomized controlled trial. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 288, 2271–2281.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bennett, C.R., Corey, R.R., Giudice, U., and Guidice, N.A. (2016). Immersive virtual reality simulation as a tool for aging and driving research. International Conference on Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population (ITAP 2016): (Toronto, Canada: Healthy and Active Aging), pp. 377–385.Google Scholar

  • Bourrelier, J., Ryard, J., Dion, M., Merienne, F., Manckoundia, P., and Mourey, F. (2016). Use of a virtual environment to engage motor and postural abilities in elderly subjects with and without mild cognitive impairment (MAAMI Project). IRBM 37, 75–80.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cavallo, M., Hunter, E.M., van der Hiele, K., and Angilletta, C. (2016). Computerized structured cognitive training in patients affected by early-stage Alzheimer’s disease is feasible and effective: a randomized controlled study. Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol. 31, 868–876.Google Scholar

  • Chaikham, A., Putthinoi, S., Lersilp, S., Bunpun, A., and Chakpitak, N. (2016). Cognitive training program for Thai older people with mild cognitive impairment. Proc. Environ. Sci. 36, 42–45.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chicchi Giglioli, I.A., Pallavicini, F., Pedroli, E., Serino, S., and Riva, G. (2015). Augmented reality: a brand new challenge for the assessment and treatment of psychological disorders. Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2015, Article 862942.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Clare, L. (2017). Rehabilitation for people living with dementia: a practical framework of positive support. PLoS Med. 14, Article e1002245.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, J.D., Daw, N., Engelhardt, B., Hasson, U., Li, K., Niv, Y., Norman, K.A., Pillow, J., Ramadge, P.J., Turk-Browne, N.B., et al. (2017). Computational approaches to fMRI analysis. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 304–313.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Darviri, C., Zavitsanou, C., Delikou, A., Giotaki, A., Artemiadis, A., Terentiou, A., and Chrouso, G.P. (2016). A novel non-pharmaceutical treatment for patients with mild cognitive impairment. Psychology 7, 678–686.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dascal, J., Reid, M., IsHak, W.W., Spiegel, B., Recacho, J., Rosen, B., and Danovitch, I. (2017). Virtual reality and medical inpatients: a systematic review of randomized, controlled trials. Innov. Clin. Neurosci. 14, 14–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • de la Torre-Luque, A., Valero-Aguayo, L., and de la Rubia Cuestas, E.J. (2017). Visuospatial orientation learning through virtual reality for people with severe disability. Int. J. Disabil. Dev. Educ. 64, 1–6.Google Scholar

  • Draganski, B., Gaser, C., Busch, V., Schuierer, G., Bogdahn, U., and May, A. (2004). Neuroplasticity: changes in grey matter induced by training. Nature 427, 311–312.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Fitzgerald, S. (2017). Is successful brain training fake news? Neurologists parse out the messaging for patients? Neurol. Today 17, 8–18.Google Scholar

  • Foloppe, D.A., Richard, P., Yamaguchi, T., Etcharry-Bouyx, F., and Allain, P. (2015). The potential of virtual reality-based training to enhance the functional autonomy of Alzheimer’s disease patients in cooking activities: a single case study. Neuropsychol. Rehabil. 2015, 1–25.Google Scholar

  • Forman, E.M., Goldstein, S.P., Flack, D., Evans, B.C., Manasse, S.M., and Dochat, C. (2017). Promising technological innovations in cognitive training to treat eating-related behavior. Appetite. Epub ahead of print 14 Apr 2017.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Foroughi, C.K., Monfort, S.S., Paczynski, M., McKnight, P.E., and Greenwoo, P.M. (2016). Placebo effects in cognitive training. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 7470–7474.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • FTC vs. LUMOS Labs, Inc. (2016). San Francisco Division of the US District Court for the Northern District of California, Complaint for Permanent Injunction and Other Equitable Relief, The FTC vs. LUMOS Labs, Inc., Case 3:16-cv-00001 Document 1, Filed 1/4/16. Available at: https://www.FTC.gov/system/files/documents/cases/160105lumoslabscmpt.pdf.

  • García, L., Kartolo, A., and Méthot-Curtis, E. (2012). A Discussion of the Use of Virtual Reality in Dementia. Virtual Reality in Psychological, Medical and Pedagogical Applications. C. Eichenberg, ed. (New York, USA: InTech), pp. 123–136.Google Scholar

  • García-Betances, R.I., Jiménez-Mixco, V., Arredondo, M.T., and Cabrera-Umpiérrez, M.F. (2015a). Using virtual reality for cognitive training of the elderly. Am. J. Alzheimers Dis. Other Demen. 30, 49–54.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • García-Betances, R.I., Arredondo Waldmeyer, M.T., Fico, G., and Cabrera-Umpiérrez, M.F. (2015b). A succinct overview of virtual reality technology use in Alzheimer’s disease. Front. Aging Neurosci. 7, Article 80.Google Scholar

  • García-Betances, R.I., Cabrera-Umpiérrez, M.F., Ottaviano, M., Pastorino, M., and Arredondo, M.T. (2016). Parametric cognitive modeling of information and computer technology usage by people with aging- and disability-derived functional impairments. Sensors 16, Article 266.Google Scholar

  • García-Casal, J.A., Loizeau, A., Csipke, E., Franco-Martín, M., Perea-Bartolomé, M.V., and Orrell, M. (2016). Computer-based cognitive interventions for people living with dementia: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Aging Mental Health 21, 454–467. Corrigendum, Aging Mental Health 21, 2016.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Goghari, V.M. and Lawlor-Savage, L. (2017). Comparison of cognitive change after working memory training and logic and planning training in healthy older adults. Front. Aging Neurosci. 9, Article 39.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Gooding, A.L., Choi, J., Fiszdon, J.M., Wilkins, K., Kirwin, P.D., van Dyck, C.H., Devanand, D., Bell, M.D., and Rivera Mindt, M. (2015). Comparing three methods of computerised cognitive training for older adults with subclinical cognitive decline. Neuropsychol. Rehabil. 26, 1–12.Google Scholar

  • Guidolin, D., Marcoli, M., Maura, G., and Agnati, L.F. (2017). New dimensions of connectomics and network plasticity in the central nervous system. Rev. Neurosci. 28, 113–132.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Hardy, J.L., Nelson, R.A., Thomason, M.E., Sternberg, D.A., Katovich, K., Farzin, F., and Scanlon, M. (2015). Enhancing cognitive abilities with comprehensive training: a large, online, randomized, active-controlled trial. PLoS One 10, e0134467.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Harvey, P.D., Cosentino, S., Curiel, R., Goldberg, T.E., Kaye, J., Loewenstein, D., Marson, D., Salmon, D., Wesnes, K., and Posner, H. (2017). Performance-based and observational assessments in clinical trials across the Alzheimer’s disease spectrum. Innov. Clin. Neurosci. 14, 30–39.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Hill, N.T., Mowszowski, L., Naismith, S.L., Chadwick, V.L., Valenzuela, M., and Lampit, A. (2017). Computerized cognitive training in older adults with mild cognitive impairment or dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Psychiatry 174, 329–340.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ienca, M., Fabrice, J., Elger, B., Caon, M., Pappagallo, A.S., Kressig, R.W., and Wangmo, T. (2017). Intelligent assistive technology for Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias: a systematic review. J. Alzheimers Dis. 56, 1301–1340.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Jaeggi, S.M., Buschkueh, M., Jonides, J., and Shah, P. (2011). Short- and long-term benefits of cognitive training. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 10081–10086.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jean, L., Bergeron, M.-E., Thivierge, S., and Simard, M. (2010). Cognitive intervention programs for individuals with mild cognitive impairment: systematic review of the literature. Am. J. Geriat. Psychiatry 18, 281–296.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kaeberlein, M., Rabinovitch, P.S., and Martin, G.M. (2015). Healthy aging: the ultimate preventative medicine. Science 350, 1191–1193.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Kallio, E.-L., Öhman, H., Kautiainen, H., Hietanen, M., and Pitkälä, K. (2017). Cognitive training interventions for patients with Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review. J. Alzheimers Dis. 56, 1349–1372.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Kane, R.L. and Parsons, T.D., eds. (2017). The Role of Technology in Clinical Neuropsychology (UK: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

  • Kujawska, A., Kujawski, S., Gajos, M., Perkowski, R., Androsiuk, J., Jarecka, J., Kożuchowski, M., Kasperska, P., Płusa, S., and Topka, W. (2016). New ways of treatment in geriatrics and perception of those methods by patients. J. Educ. Cult. Soc. 1, 75–95.Google Scholar

  • Leung, N.T.Y., Tam, H.M.K., Chu, L.W., Kwok, T.C.Y., Chan, F., Lam, L.C.W., Woo, J., and Lee, T.M.C. (2015). Neural plastic effects of cognitive training on aging brain. Neural Plast. 2015, Article 535618.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Lindenberger, U., Wenger, E., and Lövdén, M. (2017). Comment: towards a stronger science of human plasticity. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 18, 1–2.Google Scholar

  • Liu, X.Y., Li, L., Xiao, J.Q., He, C.Z., Lyu, X.L., Gao, L., Yang, X.W., Cui, X.G., and Fan, L.H. (2016). Cognitive training in older adults with mild cognitive impairment. Biomed. Environ. Sci. 29, 356–364.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Lledó, L.D., Díez, J.A., Bertomeu-Motos, A., Ezquerro, S., Badesa, F.J., Sabater-Navarro, J.M., and García-Aracil, N. (2016). A comparative analysis of 2D and 3D tasks for virtual reality therapies based on robotic-assisted neurorehabilitation for post-stroke patients. Front. Aging Neurosci. 8, 205.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Maffei, L., Picano, E., Andreassi, M.G., Angelucci, A., Baldacci, F., Baroncelli, L., Begenisic, T., Bellinvia, P.F., Berardi, N., Biagi, L., et al. (Train the Brain Consortium) (2017). Randomized trial on the effects of a combined physical/cognitive training in aged MCI subjects: the Train the Brain study. Sci. Rep. 7, Article 39471.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Magaro, P.A., Brotter, B., and Jalees, M. (2015a). Nine months of memory training increases Cognistat measured memory in 79–89 year-old mild cognitively impaired individuals. Adv. Aging Res. 4, 79–88.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Magaro, P.A., Brotter, B., and Jalees, M. (2015b). Memory training and task specificity in 90–99-year-old seniors with mild cognitive impairment. Adv. Aging Res. 4, 1–12.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mahncke, H.W., Bronstone, A., and Merzenich, M.M. (2006). Brain plasticity and functional losses in the aged: scientific bases for a novel intervention. Prog. Brain Res. 157, 81–109.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Makin, S. (2016). Brain training: memory games. Nature 531, S10–S11.Google Scholar

  • Manera, V., Chapoulie, E., Bourgeois, J., Guerchouche, R., David, R., Ondrej, J., Drettakis, G., and Robert, P. (2016). A feasibility study with image-based rendered virtual reality in patients with mild cognitive impairment and dementia. PLoS One 11, Article e0151487.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Mazzoli Moraes, T., Ferreira de Andrade, A., and Silva Paiva, W. (2016). Virtual reality for the treatment of posttraumatic disorders. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 12, 785–786.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • McCabe, J.A., Redick, T.S., and Engle, R.W. (2016). Brain-training pessimism, but applied-memory optimism. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 17, 187–191.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • McKinley, R.A., McIntire, L., Nelson, J., Nelson, J., and Goodyear, C. (2017). The Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Training During a Complex Procedural Task. Advances in Neuroergonomics and Cognitive Engineering. K. Hale and K. Stanney, eds. (Switzerland: Springer), pp. 173–183.Google Scholar

  • Medalia, A. and Erlich, M. (2017). Why cognitive health matters (editorial). Am. J. Public Health 107, 45–47.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Miller, D.B. and O’Callaghan, J.P. (2017). New horizons for focused ultrasound (FUS) – therapeutic applications in neurodegenerative diseases. Metab. Clin. Exp. 69, S3–S7.Google Scholar

  • Mishra, V. and Barratt, J. (2016). Final Report on Reablement and Older People. International Federation on Aging (IFA) Copenhagen 2016 Summit. Available at: http://www.ifa-copenhagen-summit.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Copenhagen-Summit-Final-Report.pdf.

  • Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., and Altman, D.G. (2009). The PRISMA group, preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 6, e1000097.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Motter, J.N., Pimontel, M.A., Rindskopf, D., Devanand, D.P., Doraiswamy, P.M., and Sneed, J.R. (2016). Computerized cognitive training and functional recovery in major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis. J. Affect. Disord. 189, 184–191.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Nguyen, J., Suarez, A., Kemoun, G., Meignier, M., Le Saout, E., Damier, P., Nizard, J., and Lefaucheur, J.-P. (2017). Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with cognitive training for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurophysiol. Clin. 47, 47–53.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Ortiz, A., Munilla, J., Górriz, J.M., and Ramírez, J. (2016). Ensembles of deep learning architectures for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Int. J Neural Syst. 26, 1650025.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Palmeri, T.J., Love, B.C., and Turner, B.M. (2017). Model-based cognitive neuroscience. J. Math. Psychol. 76, 59–64.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Plancher, G. and Piolino, P. (2017). Virtual Reality for Assessment of Episodic Memory in Normal and Pathological Aging. The Role of Technology in Clinical Neuropsychology. R.L. Kane and T.D. Parsons, eds. (UK: Oxford University Press), pp. 237–260.Google Scholar

  • Ponce, F.A., Asaad, W.F., Foote, K.D., Anderson, W.S., Cosgrove, G.R., Baltuch, G.H., Beasley, K., Reymers, D.E., Oh, E.S., Targum, S.D., et al. (2015). Bilateral deep brain stimulation of the fornix for Alzheimer’s disease: surgical safety in the advance trial. J. Neurosurg. 125, 75–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Rabipour, S. and Davidson, P.S.R. (2015). Do you believe in brain training? A questionnaire about expectations of computerised cognitive training. Behav. Brain Res. 295, 64–70.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Raggi, A., Tasca, D., and Raffaele Ferri, R. (2017). A brief essay on non-pharmacological treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Rev. Neurosci. 28, 587–597.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Rebok, G.W., Ball, K., Guey, L.T., Jones, R.N., Kim, H.Y., King, J.W., Marsiske, M., Morris, J.N., Tennstedt, S.L., Unverzagt, F.W., et al. for the ACTIVE Study Group (2014). Ten-year effects of the ACTIVE cognitive training trial on cognition and everyday functioning in older adults. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 62, 16–24.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Regan, B., Wells, Y., Farrow, M., O’Halloran, P., and Workman, B. (2016). MAXCOG – maximizing cognition: a randomized controlled trial of the efficacy of goal-oriented cognitive rehabilitation for people with mild cognitive impairment and early Alzheimer disease. Am. J. Geriat. Psychiatry 25, 258–269.Google Scholar

  • Riva, G. (1998). Virtual reality as assessment tool in psychology. Virtual Reality Neuro-Psycho-Physiol. 44, 71–79.Google Scholar

  • Riva, G. (2005). Virtual reality in psychotherapy: review. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 8, 220–240.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rizzo, A., Buckwalter, J.G., van der Zaag, C., Neumann, U., Thiebaux, M., Chua, C., van Rooyen, A., Humphrey, L., and Larson, P. (2000). Virtual environment applications in clinical neuropsychology. Proc. IEEE Virtual Reality 2000 Conf. 63–70.Google Scholar

  • Rodakowski, J. and Skidmore, E.R. (2017). Non-pharmacological interventions for early cognitive decline. Am. J. Geriat. Psychiatry 25, 270–271.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Román, F.J., Iturria-Medina, Y., Martínez, K., Karama, S., Burgaleta, M., Evans, A.C., Jaeggi, S.M., and Colom, R. (2017). Enhanced structural connectivity within a brain sub-network supporting working memory and engagement processes after cognitive training. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 141, 33–43.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Ross, L.A., Freed, S.A., Edwards, J.D., Phillips, C.B., and Ball, K. (2016). The impact of three cognitive training programs on driving cessation across 10 years: a randomized controlled trial. Gerontologist. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnw143.Google Scholar

  • Sasaki, Y. and Watanabe, T. (2017). When perceptual learning occurs. Nat. Hum. Behav. 1, Article 0048.Google Scholar

  • Shah, T.M. and Martins, R.N. (2017). Synergistic Effects of Combined Physical Activity and Brain Training on Neurological Functions. Physical Activity and the Aging Brain: Effects of Exercise on Neurological Function, R. Ross Watson, ed. (Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier), pp. 175–184.Google Scholar

  • Shah, T.M., Weinborn, M., Verdile, G., Sohrabi, H.R., and Martins, R.N. (2017). Enhancing cognitive functioning in healthy older adults: a systematic review of the clinical significance of commercially available computerized cognitive training in preventing cognitive decline. Neuropsychol. Rev. 27, 62–80.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shukla, A.W. and Okun, M.S. (2016). State of the art for deep brain stimulation therapy in movement disorders: a clinical and technological perspective. IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng. 9, 219–233.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Simons, D.J., Boot, W.R., Charness, N., Gathercole, S.E., Chabris, C.F., Hambrick, D.Z., and Stine-Morrow, E.A. (2016). Do ‘brain-training’ programs work? Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 17, 103–186.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sitaram, R., Ros, T., Stoeckel, L., Haller, S., Scharnowski, F., Lewis-Peacock, J., Weiskopf, N., Blefari, M.L., Rana, M., Oblak E., et al. (2017). Closed-loop brain training: the science of neurofeedback. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 18, 86–100.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smart, C.M., Karr, J.E., Areshenkoff, C.N., Rabin, L.A., Hudon, C., Gates, N., Ali, J.I., Arenaza-Urquijo, E.M., Buckley, R.F., Chetelat, G., et al. (2017). Non-pharmacologic interventions for older adults with subjective cognitive decline: systematic review, meta-analysis, and preliminary recommendations. Neuropsychol. Rev. 27, 1–13.Google Scholar

  • Söderqvist, S. and Nutley, S. (2017). Working memory training – claims & evidence. New Business and Innovation, Pearson Clinical Assessment. Online document. Extended Version V.4, 1–40. Available at: http://www.cogmed.com/wp-content/uploads/CogmedClaimsEvidence.pdf. Accessed May 2017.

  • Taya, F., Sun, Y., Babiloni, F., Thakor, N., and Bezerianos, A. (2015). Brain enhancement through cognitive training: a new insight from brain connectome. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 9, Article 44.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Torous, J., Staples, P., Fenstermacher, E., Dean, J., and Keshavan, M. (2016). Barriers, benefits, and beliefs of brain training smartphone apps: an Internet survey of younger US consumers. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 10, Article 180.Google Scholar

  • University of Sydney. (2016). Brain training can help in fight against dementia, meta-analysis shows. University of Sydney Science News, ScienceDaily, 14 Nov 2016. Available at: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/11/161114105531.htm. Accessed May 2017.

  • van de Ven, R.M., Buitenweg, J.I.V., Schmand, B., Veltman, D.J., Aaronson, J.A., Nijboer, T.C.W., Kruiper-Doesborgh, S.J., van Bennekom, C.A., Rasquin, S.M., Ridderinkhof, K.R., et al. (2017). Brain training improves recovery after stroke but waiting list improves equally: a multicenter randomized controlled trial of a computerbased cognitive flexibility training. PLoS One 12, Article e0172993.Google Scholar

  • van Heugten, C.M., Ponds, R.W.H.M., and Kessels, R.P.C. (2016). Brain training: hype or hope? Neuropsychol. Rehabil. 26, 639–644.Google Scholar

  • Vermeij, A., Claassen, J.A.H.R., Dautzenberg, P.L.J., and Kessels, R.P.C. (2016). Transfer and maintenance effects of online working memory training in normal ageing and mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychol. Rehabil. 26, 783–809.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Vinogradov, S. (2017). The golden age of computational psychiatry is within sight. Nat. Hum. Behav. 1, Article 0047.Google Scholar

  • Wang, J.-Y. (2016). Designing brain training games and evaluating the usability between young and elderly. 3rd Int. Conf. on Info. Science and Control Eng. (ICISCE), 8–10 July 2016, pp. 308–312. Published online Nov 2016.Google Scholar

  • Yong, E. (2016). The weak evidence behind brain-training games. The Atlantic, 2016. Available at: http://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/10/the-weak-evidence-behind-brain-training-games/502559/. Accessed 3 May 2017.

About the article

Rebeca Isabel García-Betances

Rebeca Isabel García-Betances is a telecommunications engineer with an MSc in biomedical engineering and is presently a biomedical engineering PhD candidate at UPM. She is a senior researcher at the LifeSTech Group, where she works on e-Health, e-Inclusion, self-management of chronic diseases, and VR in Ambient Intelligence applications. She currently manages activities for three EU’s Horizon 2020 Programme projects related to dementia self-management, brain-computer interfaces, and smart home technologies. She has authored 12 articles in refereed specialized journals in areas of communications infrastructure for rural telemedicine, automatic patient identification, patient engagement in diabetes self-management, affective and persuasive computer-mediated healthcare, ICT use for aging- and disability-derived functional impairments, and VR environments for cognitive training of the elderly and AD patients.

María Fernanda Cabrera-Umpiérrez

María Fernanda Cabrera-Umpiérrez is a telecommunications engineer with a PhD in biomedical engineering. She is an associate professor at ETSIT, UPM, and the CTO of the LifeSTech Group. She has been responsible for the concept development and coordination of large multidisciplinary national and international projects and has been the project coordinator and technical manager of more than 30 national and EU projects. She has authored more than 100 articles in national and international journals and conferences in the fields of e-Health, adaptive interfaces and decision support, and integrated care.

María T. Arredondo

María T. Arredondo is an Electrical Engineer with a PhD in Telecommunications Engineering. She is a full Professor of Bioengineering at UPM’s ETSIT. She is the CEO of LifeSTech, an international research group at UPM’s ETSIT, which she founded in 1995, dedicated to development of ICT applications to support people’s health care, welfare, quality of life, social inclusion and independent living. She has been a Principal Researcher in more than 50 EU-funded granted scientific and technical projects dealing with a variety of issues in the areas of Ambient Assisted Living and Ambient Intelligence applied to the social and healthcare sectors. She has published more than 200 papers and several books, and has served or serves on numerous committees and editorial boards.


Received: 2017-05-05

Accepted: 2017-06-29

Published Online: 2017-08-19

Published in Print: 2017-12-20


Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no competing interests. The corresponding author had full control of all the parts of the article and has final responsibility in the decision to submit it for publication.


Citation Information: Reviews in the Neurosciences, Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages 55–69, ISSN (Online) 2191-0200, ISSN (Print) 0334-1763, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/revneuro-2017-0031.

Export Citation

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in