Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Rhizomata

A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science

Ed. by Bodnár, István / Corcilius, Klaus / Gregoric, Pavel / Ierodiakonou, Katerina

Editorial Board: Barnes, Jonathan / Bobzien, Susanne / Burnyeat, Myles / Cooper, John M. / Dimas, Panos / Grgic, Filip / Karasmanis, Vassilis / Laks, André / Lautner, Péter / Lennox, James / Mourelatos, Alexander / Natali, Carlo / Rapp, Christof / Sedley, David / von Staden, Heinrich / Taub, Liba / Vogt, Katja

Online
ISSN
2196-5110
See all formats and pricing
More options …

The Eleatic Challenge in Aristotle’s Physics I.8

Scott O’Connor
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Philosophy & Religion, New Jersey City University, 2039 Kennedy Boulevard, Jersey City New Jersey 07305 New Jersey, USA,
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2017-07-18 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/rhiz-2017-0002

Abstract:

In Physics I.8, Aristotle outlines and responds to an Eleatic argument against the reality of change. I defend a new reading according to which the argument assumes Predicational Monism, the claim that each being can possess only one property. In Phys. I.2, Aristotle responds to Predicational Monism, which he attributes to the Eleatics; I argue that he uses this response to distinguish coincidental from non-coincidental becoming, a distinction he employs in Phys I.8 to resolve the argument against the reality of change. The Eleatics’ acceptance of Predicational Monism, I argue, explains why this distinction is unavailable to them.

Keywords: Aristotle; change; the Eleatics; Physics; predicational monism

Bibliography

  • Ackrill, J.L. (1963): Aristotle: Categories and de Interpretatione. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

  • Anagnostopoulos, Andreas (2013): “Aristotle’s Parmenidean Dilemma”, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 95, pp. 245–74.Google Scholar

  • Brown, Lesley (1994): “The Verb ‘to Be’ in Greek Philosophy.” In: Stephen Everson (ed.): Language (Companions to Ancient Thought 3). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 212–36.Google Scholar

  • Charlton, William (1992): Aristotle’s Physics: Books 1 and 2. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

  • Clarke, Timothy (2012): Aristotle and Eleatic Monism. PhD thesis, Yale University.Google Scholar

  • Clarke, Timothy (2015): “Aristotle and the Ancient Puzzle about Coming to Be”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 49, pp. 129–50.Google Scholar

  • Code, Alan (1976a): “Aristotle’s Response to Quine’s Objections to Modal Logic”, Journal of Philosophical Logic 5, pp. 159–86.Google Scholar

  • Code, Alan (1976b): “The Persistence of Aristotelian Matter”, Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 29, pp. 357–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Curd, Patricia (1998): The Legacy of Parmenides: Eleatic Monism and Later Presocratic Thought. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Ebrey, David (2007): Aristotle’s Motivation for Matter. PhD thesis, UCLA.Google Scholar

  • Gill, Mary Louise (1991): Aristotle on Substance: The Paradox of Unity. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Gill, Mary Louise (1994): “Individuals and Individuation.” In: Theodore Scaltsas, David Charles, and Mary Louise Gill (eds.): Unity, Identity, and Explanation in Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

  • Irwin, Terence (1988): Aristotle’s First Principles. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

  • Irwin, Terence, and Gail Fine (1995): Aristotle: Selections. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar

  • Jones, Barrington (1974): “Aristotle’s Introduction of Matter”, The Philosophical Review 83, pp. 474–500.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kahn, Charles H. (2009): Essays on Being. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Kelsey, Sean (2006): “Aristotle Physics I.8”, Phronesis: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy 51, pp. 330–61.Google Scholar

  • Kelsey, Sean (2010): “Hylomorphism in Aristotle’s Physics”, Ancient Philosophy 30, pp. 107–24.Google Scholar

  • Loux, Michael (1992): “Aristotle and Parmenides: An Interpretation of Physics A8”, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 8, pp. 281–319.Google Scholar

  • Matthews, Gareth (1982): “Accidental Unities.” In: Malcolm Schofield and Martha Nussbaum (eds.): Language and Logos. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 223–40.Google Scholar

  • Matthews, Gareth (1992): “On Knowing How to Take Aristotle’s Kooky Objects Seriously.” Pacific Division meeting of the APA, Portland.Google Scholar

  • Morison, Benjamin (2002): On Location: Aristotle’s Concept of Place. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • O’Connor, Scott (2015): “The Subjects of Natural Generations in Aristotle’s Physics I.7”, Apeiron: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science 48, pp. 45–75.Google Scholar

  • Ross, W. D. (1936): Aristotle’s Physics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

  • Shields, Christopher John (2007): Aristotle. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Waterlow, Sarah (1982): Nature, Change, and Agency in Aristotle’s Physics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-07-18

Published in Print: 2017-07-26


Citation Information: Rhizomata, Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 25–50, ISSN (Online) 2196-5110, ISSN (Print) 2196-5102, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/rhiz-2017-0002.

Export Citation

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in