Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Review of Law & Economics

Editor-in-Chief: Parisi, Francesco

Ed. by Cooter, Robert D. / Gómez Pomar, Fernando / Kornhauser, Lewis A. / Parchomovsky, Gideon / Engel, Christoph

3 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.22

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.197
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.355

Online
ISSN
1555-5879
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 13, Issue 2 (Jan 2017)

Issues

US Interstate Underground Trade Flow: A Gravity Model Approach

Travis Wiseman
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Finance and Economics, Mississippi State University, 210 McCool Hall, Mississippi State, MS, USA
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Paul Walker
  • College of Business and Economics, Department of Economics, West Virginia University, 1601 University Avenue, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2017-01-26 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/rle-2015-0057

Abstract

In this paper we model interstate trade in US shadow economies using a traditional gravity model, updated to control for factors that encourage (discourage) underground exchange among formal sector trading partners. Using data on interstate trade flow from the US Census Bureau, and a unique dataset measuring US state-level shadow economy size, we develop a first-ever estimate of interstate underground trade flow (UTF) for the US. Using a UTF ratio, measured as the portion of state i’s aggregate value of underground exports flowing into state j, we investigate the relationship between UTF and policy governing marijuana consumption in each state. Results suggest a negative (positive) relationship between the UTF ratio and marijuana decriminalization when state i (state j) is the only state among trading partners to relax its regulation. Additionally, when both trading partners decriminalize marijuana consumption, this relationship is positive. This may suggest that states recognize an increased cost to exporting underground goods to states where the good is prohibited; when the rules make it quasi-legal to produce and sell at home. Alternatively, states that decriminalized marijuana appear to increase their consumption of underground imports (or at least the value of those imports) all around.

Keywords: shadow economy; illicit trade; gravity model; regional; US states

JEL Classification: K49; O17; O51; R11

References

  • Alderslade, J., J. Talmage and Y. Freeman. 2006. “Measuring the Informal Economy: One Neighborhood at a Time,” A Discussion Paper Prepared for The Brooking Institution Metropolitan Policy Program.

  • Bhagwati, J. and B. Hansen. 1973. “A theoretical analysis of smuggling,” 87(2) The quarterly journal of economics 172–187.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Buehn, A. and F. Schneider. 2012. “Shadow economies around the world: Novel insights, accepted knowledge, and new estimates,” 19 International tax and public finance 139–171.

  • Buehn, A. 2011. “The shadow economy in german regions: An empirical assessment,” 13(3)German economic review 275–290.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bollen, K. 1989. Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.

  • Chaudhari, K., F. Schneider and S. Chattopadhyay. 2006. “The size and development of the shadow economy: An empirical investigation from states of india,” 80 Journal of development economics 428–443.

  • Dell’Anno, R. and O. Solomon. 2008. “Shadow economy and unemployment rate in USA: Is there a structural relationship? an empirical analysis,” 40 Applied economics 2537–2555.Google Scholar

  • Ferwerda, J., M. Kattenberg, H. Chang, B. Unger, L. Groot and J. Bikker. 2013. “Gravity models of trade-based money laundering,” 45 Applied economics 3170–3182.CrossrefWeb of Science

  • Frey, Burno S. and Hannelore Weck-Hanneman 1984. “The Hidden Economy as an ‘Unobserved Variable’,” 26 European Economic Review 33–53.Crossref

  • Lacko, M. 1998. “The hidden economies of visegrad countries in international comparison: A household electricity approach,” in Hungary: Towards a Market Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Lacko, M. 1999. “Electricity intensity and the unrecorded economy in post-socialist countries,” in Edgar L. Feige and Katarina Ott, eds. Underground Economies in Transition, Aldershot, United Kingdom: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.

  • Lacko, M. 2000a. “Do power consumption data tell the story? electricity intensity and hidden economy in post-socialist countries,” in Eric Maskin and András Simonovits, eds. Planning, shortage, and transformation: Essays in honor of Janos Kornai. MIT Press. 345–366.

  • Lacko, M. 2000b. “Hidden economy: An unknown quantity? comparative analysis of hidden economies in transition countries, 1989–1995,” 8(1) Economies in transition 117–149.Google Scholar

  • Merryman, S.2005. “USSWM: Stata Module to Provide US State and County Spatial Weight (Contiguity) Matrices,” Statistical Components S448405, Boston College Department of Economics.

  • Norton, D. 1988. “On the economic theory of smuggling,” New Series 55(217) Economica 107–118.Google Scholar

  • Pitt, M. 1981. “Smuggling and price disparity,” 11(4) Journal of international economics 447–458.Crossref

  • Schneider, F. and A. Buehn. 2014, “Estimating the Size of the Shadow Economy: Methods, Problems and Open Questions,” SSRN Working Paper.

  • Schneider, F. 2012. The Shadow Economy and Work in the Shadow: What do We (Not) Know?” IZA Discussion Paper No. 6423.

  • Schneider, F. 2010. “The influence of public institutions on the shadow economy,” 6(3) Review of law & economics 441–468.Google Scholar

  • Sheikh, M. 1974. “Smuggling, production and welfare,” 4(4) Journal of international economics 355–364.Crossref

  • Tanzi, V. 1983. “The underground economy in the united states: Annual estimates, 1930–1980,” 30 IMF staff papers 283–305.

  • Tinbergen, J. 1962. Shaping the world economy: Suggestions for an international economic policy. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.

  • Walker, J. 1995, “Estimating the Extent of Money Laundering in and through Australia,” Report for the Australian Financial Intelligence Unit, AUSTRAC.Google Scholar

  • Walker, J. and B. Unger. 2009. “Measuring global money laundering: ‘the walker gravity model’,” 5(2) Review of law & economics 821–853.Google Scholar

  • Wiseman, T. 2017. “US shadow economies, corruption, and entrepreneurship: State-level spatial relations,” Journal of regional analysis and policy (forthcoming).

  • Wiseman, T. 2013. “US shadow economies: A state-level study,” 24(4) Constitutional political economy 310–335.

  • Zdanowicz, J. 2009. “Trade-based money laundering and terrorist financing,” 5 Review of law & economics 855–878.

About the article

Published Online: 2017-01-26


Citation Information: Review of Law & Economics, ISSN (Online) 1555-5879, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/rle-2015-0057.

Export Citation

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Giulia Berlusconi, Alberto Aziani, and Luca Giommoni
Social Networks, 2017

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in