Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Review of Law & Economics

Editor-in-Chief: Parisi, Francesco

Ed. by Cooter, Robert D. / Gómez Pomar, Fernando / Kornhauser, Lewis A. / Parchomovsky, Gideon / Engel, Christoph


SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.196
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.401
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.244

Online
ISSN
1555-5879
See all formats and pricing

 


Select Volume and Issue

Issues

Volume 13 (2017)

30,00 € / $42.00 / £23.00

Get Access to Full Text

Estimating Judicial Ideal Points in Latin America: The Case of Argentina

Juan González Bertomeu1 / Lucia Dalla Pellegrina2 / Nuno Garoupa3

1Department of Law, Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México (ITAM), Mexico

2Department of Economics, Management and Statistics (DEMS), University of Milano-Bicocca, Italy

3Texas A&M University School of Law, 1515 Commerce Street, Fort Worth, TX 76102, USA

Citation Information: Review of Law & Economics. Volume 13, Issue 1, 20150040, ISSN (Online) 1555-5879, ISSN (Print) 2194-6000, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/rle-2015-0040, July 2016

Publication History

Published Online:
2016-07-02

Abstract

This paper presents an estimation of ideal points for the Justices of the Supreme Court of Argentina for 1984–2007. The estimated ideal points allow us to focus on political cycles in the Court as well as possible coalitions based on presidential appointments. We find strong evidence to support the existence of such coalitions in some periods (such as President Carlos Menem’s term) but less so in others (including President Néstor Kirchner’s term, a period of swift turnover in the Court due to impeachment processes and resignations). Implications for comparative judicial politics are discussed.

Keywords: constitutional court; constitutional review; empirical analysis; ideal point; Argentina

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.