Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Review of Middle East Economics and Finance

Ed. by Dibeh, Ghassan / Assaf, Ata / Cobham, David / Hakimian, Hassan / Henry, Clement M.

Online
ISSN
1475-3693
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Children’s Gender and Men’s Income: Evidence from Iran

Hossein A. Abbasi
  • Corresponding author
  • Economics Department, University of Maryland, 3114 Tydings Hall, 7343 Preinkert Dr., College Park, MD 20742, USA
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Seyed M. Karimi
  • Department of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences, University of Washington Tacoma, GWP 228, Box 358436, 1900 Commerce Street, Tacoma, WA 98402, USA
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2017-05-05 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/rmeef-2016-0028

Abstract

In many societies, men work for more hours and acquire higher wages if they have sons versus daughters. Gender bias, higher returns to male children’s human capital, and higher costs of raising male children are hypothesized to explain this behavior. Among these, gender bias has received stronger support from empirical studies. Using a four-year panel dataset, we show that a different institutional setting may make men respond to their children’s gender differently. We study men’s income in a dotal society, Iran, where families are expected to provide dowry for their marrying daughters. We show that, in contrast to the findings in developed countries, Iranian men earn more income when they have daughters versus sons, and we argue that the institution of marriage is the major reason for this unconventional finding.

Keywords: children’s gender; man’s income; marriage; dotal society

JEL Classification: J12; J13; J16; J22; J24

References

  • Asfaw, A., F. Lamanna, and S. Klasen. 2010. “Gender Gap in Parents’ Financing Strategy for Hospitalization of Their Children: Evidence from India.” Health Economics 19 (3): 265–279.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Azimi, E. 2014;“Intra-Household Resource Allocation and Gender Bias in Iran.” Working Paper, Department of Economics, Simon Fraser University.

  • Barcellos, S.H., L.S. Carvalho, and A. Lleras-Muney. 2014. “Child Gender and Parental Investments in India: Are Boys and Girls Treated Differently?” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 6 (1): 157–189.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Bhalotra, S., and C. Attfield. 1998. “Intrahousehold Resource Allocation in Rural Pakistan: A Semiparametric Analysis.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 13 (5): 463–480.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Burgess, R., and J. Zhuang. 2003;“Modernisation and Son Preference.” STICERD, Development Economics Discussion Paper 29, London School of Economics.

  • Choi, H. -J., J. M. Joesch, and S. Lundberg. 2008. “Sons, Daughters, Wives, and the Labour Market Outcomes of West German Men.” Labour Economics 15 (5): 795–811.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Dahl, G.B., and E. Moretti. 2008. “The Demand for Sons.” Review of Economic Studies 75 (4): 1085–1120.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Deaton, A 1989. “Looking for Boys-Girls Discrimination in Household Expenditure Data.” World Bank Economic Review 3 (1): 1–15.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Deolalikar, A., and E. Rose. 1998. “Gender and Savings in Rural India.” Journal of Population Economics 11 (4): 453–470.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dercon, S., and A. Singh. 2013. “From Nutrition to Aspirations and Self-Efficacy: Gender Bias over Time among Children in Four Countries.” World Development 45: 31–50.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gong, X., A. Van Soest, and P. Zhang. 2005. “The Effects of Gender of Children on Expenditure Patterns in Rural China: A Semi-Parametric Analysis.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 20 (4): 509–527.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Haughton, D., and J. Haughton. 1997. “Explaining Child Nutrition in Vietnam.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 45 (3): 541–556.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Koohi-Kamali, F 2008;“Intra-Household Inequality and Child Gender Bias in Ethiopia.” Policy Research Working Paper 475, World Bank.

  • Koohi-Kamali, F 2011. “The Adult Goods Approach to Child Gender Bias: Evidence from Iran.” Journal of Applied Business Research 27 (4): 22–26.Google Scholar

  • Lundberg, S., and E. Rose. 2002. “The Effect of Sons and Daughters on Men’s Labor Supply and Wages.” Review of Economics and Statistics 84 (2): 251–268.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Maralani, V 2008. “The Changing Relationship between Family Size and Educational Attainment over the Course of Socioeconomic Development: Evidence from Indonesia.” Demography 45 (3): 693–717.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McGarry, K 1998. “Caring for the Elderly: The Role of Adult Children.” In Inquiries in the Economics of Aging., edited by D.A. Wise, 133–163. Chicago: University of Chicago Press .Google Scholar

  • Morgan, S.P., D. Lye, and G. Condron. 1988. “Sons, Daughters and the Risk of Marital Disruption.” American Journal of Sociology 94 (1): 110–129.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mott, F.L 1994. “Sons, Daughters and Father’s Absence: Differentials in Father-Leaving Probabilities and In-Home Environments.” Journal of Family Issues 15 (1): 97–128.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pollani, G 2014;“Childhood Health and the Wantedness of Male and Female Children.” Working Paper, Department of Economics, University of Maryland.

  • Rose, E 2000. “Gender Bias, Credit Constraints and Time Allocation in Rural India.” Economic Journal 110 (465): 738–758.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Salehi-Isfahni, D., and M. Majbouri. 2013. “Mobility and Dynamics of Poverty in Iran: Evidence from 1992-1995 Panel Survey in Iran.” Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 53 (3): 257–267. .Google Scholar

  • Subramaniam, R 1996. “Gender-Bias in India: The Importance of Household Fixed-Effects.” Oxford Economic Papers, New Series 48 (2): 280–299.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Teachman, J.D., and P.T. Schollaert. 1989. “Gender of Children and Birth Timing.” Demography 26 (3): 411–423.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • World Bank. 2012. World Development Report 2012: Gender Equality and Development Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-05-05


Citation Information: Review of Middle East Economics and Finance, Volume 13, Issue 1, 20160028, ISSN (Online) 1475-3693, ISSN (Print) 1475-3685, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/rmeef-2016-0028.

Export Citation

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in