Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Review of Economics

Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftswissenschaften

Editor-in-Chief: Berlemann, Michael

Ed. by Haucap, Justus / Thum, Marcel

3 Issues per year

Online
ISSN
2366-035X
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Why Do Few Homeowners Insure Against Natural Catastrophe Losses?

Benjamin Addai Antwi-Boasiako
  • Dresden Leibniz Graduate School (DLGS), Leibniz Institute of Ecological and Regional Development (IOER), Faculty of Environmental Studies, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2016-02-11 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/roe-2014-0302

Abstract

Insurance has been suggested as a policy instrument that can help in managing the rising economic cost of natural catastrophes. Evidence, however, shows that many homeowners do not insure their homes against natural catastrophes and tend to depend on (unreliable) disaster aid. This paper surveys the economics, insurance and psychology literature to explain why few homeowners insure against natural catastrophes. The paper covers the relevant theoretical approaches as well as the available empirical evidence and possible policy measures.

Keywords: Insurance; natural catastrophes; government intervention; uncertainty

About the article

Published Online: 2016-02-11

Published in Print: 2014-12-01


Citation Information: Review of Economics, Volume 65, Issue 3, Pages 217–240, ISSN (Online) 2366-035X, ISSN (Print) 0948-5139, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/roe-2014-0302.

Export Citation

© 2014 by Lucius & Lucius, Stuttgart.

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Benjamin A. Antwi-Boasiako
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2017, Volume 22, Page 297

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in