Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Review of Economics

Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftswissenschaften

Editor-in-Chief: Berlemann, Michael

Ed. by Haucap, Justus / Thum, Marcel

Online
ISSN
2366-035X
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 69, Issue 1

Issues

Peer-to-Peer Lending – A (Financial Stability) Risk Perspective

Benjamin Käfer
Published Online: 2017-12-19 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/roe-2017-0020

Abstract

The aim of this survey article is to discuss P2P lending, a subcategory of crowdfunding, from a (financial stability) risk perspective. The discussion focuses on a number of dimensions such as the role of soft information, herding, platform default risk, liquidity risk, and the institutionalization of P2P markets. Overall, we conclude that P2P lending is more risky than traditional banking. However, it is important to recognize that a constant conclusion would be misleading. P2P platforms have evolved and changed their appearance markedly over time, which implies that although our final conclusion of increased riskiness through P2P markets remains valid over time, it is based on different arguments at different points in time.

Keyword: Peer-to-peer lending; crowdfunding; financial development; financial stability risk

References

  • Agrawal, A. K., C. Catalini and A. Goldfarb (2014): Some Simple Economics of Crowdfunding, Innovation Policy and the Economy 14, 63–97.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Akerlof, G. A. (1970): The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 84, 488–500.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baker, T. (2015): Marketplace Lenders are a Systemic Risk, American Banker, August 17, http://www.americanbanker.com/bankthink/marketplace-lenders-are-a-systemic-risk-1076047-1.html?zkPrintable=1&nopagination=1 (accessed January 16, 2016).

  • Belleflamme, P., N. Omrani and M. Peitz (2015): The Economics of Crowdfunding Platforms, Information Economics and Policy 33, 11–28.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Borello, G., V. De Crescenzo and F. Pichler (2015): The Funding Gap and the Role of Financial Return Crowdfunding: Some Evidence from European Platforms, Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce 20, 1–20.Google Scholar

  • Cortese, A. (2014): Loans That Avoid Banks? Maybe Not, The New York Times, May 3.Google Scholar

  • Deutsche Bundesbank. (2015): Die Ertragslage Der Deutschen Kreditinstitute Im Jahr 2014. Monatsbericht, September, 43–77.Google Scholar

  • Devasabai, K. (2014): A Loan in the Dark, Risk magazine, October, 18–26.Google Scholar

  • Dorfleitner, G., C. Priberny, S. Schuster, J. Stoiber, M. Weber, I. De Castro and J. Kammler (2016): Description-Text Related Soft Information in Peer-To-Peer Lending – Evidence from Two Leading European Platforms, Journal of Banking and Finance 64, 169–187.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • EBA (2015): Opinion of the European Banking Authority on Lending-Based Crowdfunding, European Banking Authority, EBA-Op-2015-03.Google Scholar

  • The Economist (2015): From the People, for the People – But Will Financial Democracy Work in a Downturn? May 9.Google Scholar

  • Emekter, R., Y. Tu, B. Jirasakuldech and M. Lu (2015): Evaluating Credit Risk and Loan Performance in Online Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Lending, Applied Economics 47, 54–70.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Everett, C. R. (2015): Group Membership, Relationship Banking and Loan Default Risk: The Case of Online Social Lending, Banking and Finance Review 7, 15–54.Google Scholar

  • FCA (2015): A Review of the Regulatory Regime for Crowdfunding and the Promotion of Non-Readily Realisable Securities by Other Media, UK Financial Conduct Authority, February.Google Scholar

  • Freedman, S. and G. Z. Jin (2008): Do Social Networks Solve Information Problems for Peer-to-Peer Lending? Evidence from Prosper.Com, NET Institute Working Paper No. 08-43, November.Google Scholar

  • GAO (2011): Person-To-Person Lending: New Regulatory Challenges Could Emerge as the Industry Grows, United States Government Accountability Office, GAO-11-613, July.Google Scholar

  • Gorton, G. (2010): Slapped by the Invisible Hand: Banking and the Panic of 2007. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Greiner, M. (2013): Determinants and Consequences of Herding in P2P Lending Markets, Proceedings of the 19th Americas Conference on Information Systems, Chicago, August 15–17.Google Scholar

  • Herzenstein, M., U. M. Dholakia and R. L. Andrews (2011): Strategic Herding Behavior in Peer-to-Peer Loan Auctions, Journal of Interactive Marketing 25, 27–36.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Hildebrand, T., M. Puri and J. Rocholl (2010): Skin in the Game in the Originate-to-Distribute Model: Evidence from the Online Social Lending Market, Working Paper. http://www.suomenpankki.fi/en/tutkimus/konferenssit/konferenssit_tyopajat/Documents/CEPR2010/CEPR2010_HildebrandPuriRocholl_paper.pdf (accessed March 21, 2016)

  • IMF (2015): Statistical Appendix. International Monetary Fund Global Financial Stability Report: Navigating Monetary Policy Challenges and Managing Risks, April.Google Scholar

  • Iyer, R., A. I. Khwaja, E. F. P. Luttmer and K. Shue (2010): Inferring Asset Quality: Determining Borrower Creditworthiness in Peer-to-Peer Lending Markets, Working Paper. http://www.hks.harvard.edu/fs/akhwaja/papers/Prosper_20100728_complete.pdf (accessed March 21, 2016)

  • Jackson, P. (2013): Shadow Banking and New Lending Channels – Past and Future, in: M. Balling and E. Gnan (eds) 50 Years of Money and Finance: Lessons and Challenges. Vienna: Larcier, 377–414.Google Scholar

  • Kirby, E. and S. Worner (2014): Crowd-Funding: An Infant Industry Growing Fast, Staff Working Paper of the IOSCO Research Department 3/2014, February.Google Scholar

  • Leland, H. E. and D. H. Pyle (1977): Informational Asymmetries, Financial Structure, and Financial Intermediation, The Journal of Finance 32, 371–387.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lenz, R. (2016): Peer-to-Peer Lending – Opportunities and Risks, European Journal of Risk Regulation 7, 688–700.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Lin, M., N. R. Prabhala and S. Viswanathan (2013): Judging Borrowers by the Company They Keep: Friendship Networks and Information Asymmetry in Online Peer-to-Peer Lending, Management Science 59, 17–35.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Lu, Y., B. Gu, Q. Ye and Z. Sheng (2012): Social Influence and Defaults in Peer-to-Peer Lending Networks, Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Information Systems and Technology, Orlando.Google Scholar

  • Luo, B. and Z. Lin (2013): A Decision Tree Model for Herd Behavior and Empirical Evidence from the Online P2P Lending Market, Information Systems and e-Business Management 11, 141–160.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Magee, J. R. (2011): Peer-to-Peer Lending in the United States: Surviving after Dodd-Frank, North Carolina Banking Institute Journal 15, 139–174.Google Scholar

  • Michels, J. (2012): Do Unverifiable Disclosures Matter? Evidence from Peer-to-Peer Lending, The Accounting Review 87, 1385–1413.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nash, R. M. and E. Beardsley (2015): The Future of Finance: The Rise of the New Shadow Bank, Goldman Sachs Equity Research, March 3.Google Scholar

  • Pope, D. G. and J. R. Sydnor (2011): What’s in a Picture? Evidence of Discrimination from Prosper.Com, The Journal of Human Resources 46, 53–92.Google Scholar

  • Price, S. and J. Abou-Jaoude (2014): Directing the Disruptive: Institutional Investors and the Secondary Market in Peer-to-Peer Loans, Cass-Capco Institute Paper Series on Risk No. 40.Google Scholar

  • Rajan, R. G. (2005): Has Financial Development Made the World Riskier? Proceedings of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Economics Symposium, 313—369.Google Scholar

  • Ravina, E. (2012): Love & Loans – The Effect of Beauty and Personal Characteristics in Credit Markets, Working Paper, Columbia University.Google Scholar

  • Sinn, H.-W. (1988): Gedanken Zur Volkswirtschaftlichen Bedeutung Des Versicherungswesens, Zeitschrift Für Die Gesamte Versicherungswissenschaft 77, 1–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Standard and Poor’s (2014): As Peer-to-Peer Lending Draws Wider Interest, Does Securitization Lie In Its Future? April 30.Google Scholar

  • Stiglitz, J. E. and A. Weiss (1981): Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information, The American Economic Review 71, 393–410.Google Scholar

  • Verstein, A. (2012): The Misregulation of Person-to-Person Lending, University of California Davis Law Review 45, 445–530.Google Scholar

  • Wardrop, R., R. Rosenberg, B. Zhang, T. Ziegler, R. Squire, J. Burton, E. Arenas Hernandez and K. Garvey (2016): Breaking New Ground: The Americas Alternative Finance Benchmarking Report, Cambrige Centre for Alternative Finance https://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/fileadmin/user_upload/research/centres/alternative-finance/downloads/2016-americas-alternative-finance-benchmarking-report.pdf (accessed Fegruary 19, 2017)

  • Wei, S. (2015): Internet Lending in China: Status Quo, Potential Risks and Regulatory Options, Computer Law & Security Review 31, 793–809.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yan, J., W. Yu and J. L. Zhao (2015): How Signaling and Search Costs Affect Information Asymmetry in P2P Lending: The Economics of Big Data, Financial Innovation 1, 1–11.Google Scholar

  • Zhang, B., R. Wardrop, R. Rau and M. Gray (2015): Moving Mainstream: The European Alternative Finance Benchmarking Report, University of Cambridge and EY.Google Scholar

  • Zhang, J. and P. Liu (2012): Rational Herding in Microloan Markets, Management Science 58, 892–912.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-12-19

Published in Print: 2018-03-26


Citation Information: Review of Economics, Volume 69, Issue 1, Pages 1–25, ISSN (Online) 2366-035X, ISSN (Print) 0948-5139, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/roe-2017-0020.

Export Citation

© 2018 Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag GmbH, Published by De Gruyter Oldenbourg, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in